SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-14901E + AMD Radeon RX 7400: A 65 W Processor Paired with an Entry-Level GPU

This desktop pairing combines a high-single-thread, 65 W Intel Core i9-14901E with AMD's Radeon RX 7400, an entry-level RDNA 3.0 graphics card. The data in this FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from direct gameplay measurement. The combined system sits at the 52nd percentile against all builds, placing it in the middle of the performance distribution, though the individual components are starkly mismatched—the CPU ranks at the 86th percentile while the GPU ranks at the 17th percentile.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14901E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. This flexibility allows builders to choose between established, widely available DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits, depending on motherboard selection and budget priorities. The platform also supports ECC memory, a feature typically associated with workstation and server environments, which adds a layer of data integrity for compute-heavy tasks. The CPU itself provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast connectivity for modern NVMe storage and expansion cards, though the GPU in this build uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is backward-compatible.

The 65 W TDP of the i9-14901E is notably modest for a Core i9-class processor, which means cooling requirements are relatively mild—a stock or entry-level air cooler should suffice under normal loads. The GPU has a 43 W TDP, and the system's suggested PSU is 200 W, indicating that this build does not demand a high-wattage power supply. The combination of low CPU and GPU power draw leaves substantial headroom for additional peripherals, storage drives, or modest overclocking attempts, though the CPU's multiplier is locked, preventing manual overclocking of the processor.

Given the platform's capabilities, a sensible next upgrade would involve replacing the RX 7400 with a more powerful GPU. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking and strong multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core at 25753) indicate it can drive significantly faster graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU ensure that future GPUs, even those using PCIe 5.0, will have adequate bandwidth. Alternatively, users could add more RAM or faster storage, but the most impactful upgrade path is clearly the GPU, given the current 17th percentile graphics score. The motherboard socket and memory compatibility remain unchanged, so a GPU swap is straightforward.

Gaming Performance

Because the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of each component. The Radeon RX 7400's PassMark G3D score of 11897 places it at the 17th percentile of all GPUs, which signals entry-level rasterization capability. In practical terms, this GPU is suited for 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings in modern titles, and it will struggle with high-refresh-rate or high-resolution gaming. The GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate capacity for 1080p textures but may run into limitations with larger assets at higher resolutions.

The CPU, however, is exceptionally strong for gaming workloads. The i9-14901E's single-thread performance, as measured by Cinebench R23 single-core at 3635, is in the top tier, and its PassMark single-thread score of 4354 reinforces this. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as esports titles at low settings or simulation games with heavy physics, the i9-14901E would not be the limiting factor. The bottleneck will almost always be the RX 7400, which caps frame rates well below what the CPU can theoretically support. For example, in a CPU-light game like Fortnite at competitive settings, the GPU would likely produce 60-90 FPS at 1080p, while the CPU could handle 200+ FPS if paired with a stronger GPU. These numbers are estimates, but the percentile gap between the CPU (86th) and GPU (17th) is so large that the GPU will dominate the FPS ceiling in virtually every title.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-14901E delivers benchmark scores that place it in the upper echelon of CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 and single-core score of 3635 demonstrate balanced strength in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The Cinebench R20 results (10816 multi-core, 1526 single-core) and R15 results (2595 multi-core, 366 single-core) follow the same pattern, showing consistent scaling across generations of the Cinebench test. The PassMark suite further illustrates the CPU's capabilities: a multithread score of 30298, a single-thread score of 4354, and notable results in integer math (112736) and floating-point math (81089). The data compression score of 288777 and encryption score of 18571 indicate strong performance in data-intensive tasks. The CPU's average benchmark score is 37911, which places it at the 86th percentile against all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (avg score 37904, delta 0%) and AMD Ryzen 7 9700X (avg score 37943, delta -0.1%). This places the i9-14901E in a dead heat with these competitors, with performance deltas of less than 1%.

The AMD Radeon RX 7400, in contrast, produces scores that place it firmly in the entry-level segment. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 is modest, and its PassMark G3D score of 11897 sits at the 17th percentile of all GPUs. The GPU's PassMark compute score of 5152 is also low, indicating limited compute throughput. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 8040S (avg score 2440, delta 1.1%) and NVIDIA GeForce 710M (avg score 2433, delta 1.4%), which are both older or lower-tier parts. The GPU's average benchmark score of 2467 is an order of magnitude lower than the CPU's average score, highlighting the severe imbalance. In the combined picture, the CPU contributes the majority of the system's processing power, while the GPU holds the system back in graphics-bound tasks. The combined percentile of 52 reflects this middle-ground position—strong CPU performance is dragged down by weak GPU performance.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks. The i9-14901E's 86th percentile CPU ranking makes it suitable for software developers compiling large codebases, data analysts running complex simulations, or students in engineering or scientific fields who need fast single-threaded and multi-threaded processing. The CPU's ECC memory support further appeals to professionals who require data integrity in their computations. For content creators, the CPU's high Cinebench scores suggest solid performance in video encoding and 3D rendering tasks that are CPU-bound, though the GPU's weak compute score (5152) means GPU-accelerated rendering will be slow.

Gamers at 1080p with low graphical demands could use this build for esports titles, where the CPU's high single-thread score (4354 in PassMark) ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the GPU's 17th percentile ranking limits visual fidelity. This is not a build for 1440p or 4K gaming, nor for high-refresh-rate gaming at any resolution. Small business workstations that run office applications, database queries, or web servers would benefit from the CPU's multithreaded score of 30298 and its low 65 W TDP, which reduces cooling and power costs in dense deployments. The build's 200 W suggested PSU also makes it easy to integrate into power-constrained environments.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the AMD Radeon RX 7400 is the primary bottleneck in this system for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The CPU's 86th percentile versus the GPU's 17th percentile creates a massive imbalance, where the CPU will sit idle waiting for the GPU to finish rendering frames in most graphical tasks. The PassMark G3D score of 11897 is only slightly above the GPU's nearest rivals, which are older integrated graphics-like parts, while the CPU's single-thread score of 4354 is near the top of the stack. In CPU-bound workloads such as compilation or spreadsheet analysis, the GPU is irrelevant, and the CPU performs at its full potential. In GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering with ray tracing or high-resolution gaming, the GPU limits the system to entry-level performance.

The FPS scaling between CPU and GPU is dictated by the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103, which is low enough to cap frame rates at 1080p. The CPU's high single-thread performance does not translate to higher FPS in GPU-bound scenarios because the GPU cannot produce frames fast enough. Conversely, in scenarios with very low graphical load, such as 720p esports gaming or 2D applications, the CPU's strength becomes visible. The bottleneck is not a matter of configuration but of fundamental component class; the GPU is an entry-level part while the CPU is a high-end part.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build is not suitable for high-refresh gaming at 1080p in modern titles. The GPU's 17th percentile ranking and low 3DMark score of 1103 will cap frame rates well below 144 FPS in most games. The CPU could support high refresh rates, but the GPU cannot deliver the frames.

Streaming: The CPU's strong multi-threaded score (Cinebench R23 multi-core at 25753) can handle software encoding for streaming, but the GPU's weak compute performance (5152 in PassMark) limits the quality of hardware encoding. Streamers would need to rely on CPU-based x264 encoding, which the i9-14901E can manage, but gaming performance would still be limited by the GPU.

Video editing: CPU-based video editing and rendering will be smooth, given the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753. However, GPU-accelerated effects and exports will be slow due to the RX 7400's low compute score of 5152, making this a mixed experience.

3D rendering: CPU rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D will benefit from the i9-14901E's high multi-threaded performance, but GPU rendering with the RX 7400 will be disappointing, as the GPU's OpenGL score of 4.6 and DirectX 12 score of 44 indicate limited acceleration.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 112736 and data compression score of 288777 make it excellent for compiling code and running test suites. The GPU is irrelevant here, so developers will see top-tier performance.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4354 handles spreadsheets, word processing, and web browsing with ease. The GPU's low power draw (43 W TDP) and the system's 200 W PSU suggest a quiet, efficient office machine, though the GPU is overkill for these tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's socket and can it use DDR4 or DDR5 memory?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X?

A: The i9-14901E's average benchmark score is 37911, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X's score of 37943, making them essentially equal in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 7400 has 28 ray tracing cores, but its low overall performance (17th percentile) means ray tracing will be limited to low settings at best.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so the i9-14901E cannot be overclocked.

Q: What is the recommended power supply for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 200 W, given the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 43 W TDP.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce 710M?

A: The RX 7400's average benchmark score is 2467, which is 1.4% higher than the GeForce 710M's score of 2433, indicating nearly identical performance levels.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i9-14901E, a Raptor Lake Refresh CPU with 8 cores and 16 threads, with the AMD Radeon RX 7400, an entry-level RDNA 3.0 GPU based on the Navi 33 chip. The CPU is a high-end part, ranking at the 86th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 37911. The GPU is an entry-level part, ranking at the 17th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 2467. The combined system percentile is 52, placing it in the middle of all builds, but this is a misleading average—the CPU is far above average while the GPU is far below. The build is best described as a high-performance CPU with a placeholder GPU, suitable for CPU-bound work but not for graphics-intensive applications.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14901E is a desktop processor from the Core 14th Gen series, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes ECC memory support, which is unusual for a consumer part. It also features integrated UHD Graphics 770, providing basic display output without a discrete GPU.

The benchmark scores confirm the i9-14901E's position as a high-performance part. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 and single-core score of 3635 show strong scaling across workloads. The PassMark single-thread score of 4354 is particularly notable, indicating excellent per-core performance that benefits gaming and lightly threaded applications. The multithread score of 30298 and the integer math score of 112736 further demonstrate its capability in content creation and scientific computing. The 65 W TDP is remarkably low for this level of performance, making it an efficient choice for compact or power-conscious builds. The nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, are all within 0.3% of the i9-14901E's average score, showing that this CPU competes at the top tier of the market.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is an entry-level graphics card based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Navi 33 chip manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The die contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² area, with a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps. The GPU's base clock is 1452 MHz, with a boost clock of 2300 MHz and a game clock of 2200 MHz.

The RX 7400 has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It includes 28 ray tracing cores, which is modest for modern games, and its FP32 performance is 16.49 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 32.97 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 147.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 257.6 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The TDP is 43 W, with a dual-slot design and a single 6-pin power connector.

Benchmark results place this GPU at the bottom of the performance stack. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 is low, and the PassMark G3D score of 11897 is at the 17th percentile. The PassMark compute score of 5152 is equally weak, indicating limited compute performance for tasks like machine learning or GPU rendering. The nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon 8040S and NVIDIA GeForce 710M, are within 1.9% of the RX 7400's average score of 2467, confirming that this is an entry-level product. In practical terms, this GPU is suitable for 1080p gaming at low settings in older or less demanding titles, but it will struggle with modern games at higher settings or any resolution above 1080p.