SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

48,477 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-14901E + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT: A Desktop Workstation and Gaming Analysis

This pairing combines an 8-core, 16-thread Intel Raptor Lake desktop processor with a 16 GB AMD RDNA 2 flagship-class graphics card. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU holds the 85th percentile among all GPUs, placing the combined system at the 86th percentile overall. This is a desktop-class build aimed at users who need strong multi-threaded compute for productivity and high-resolution rendering for gaming, though the data shows some interesting balance characteristics worth examining.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14901E is a desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It uses a 10 nm process node from Intel and has a die size of 257 mm². The chip features 8 physical cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. Its thermal design power is rated at 65 W, which is notably modest for a Core i9-class processor, suggesting a focus on efficiency relative to raw power draw.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool benefits workloads that repeatedly access the same data, such as database operations and certain scientific simulations. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and the chip supports ECC memory, which is a meaningful feature for workstation reliability in data-sensitive environments. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU provides high-bandwidth connectivity for modern storage and accelerators. Integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present, which can serve as a fallback display output or for quick-sync style tasks.

Benchmark results for the CPU are strong across the board. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 25753, while single-core reaches 3635. The single-core figure is particularly high, indicating excellent per-thread performance that benefits lightly-threaded applications like many games and legacy software. The multi-core score, while lower than what higher-core-count rivals might achieve, is still very respectable for 8 cores. In Cinebench R20, scores are 10816 multi-core and 1526 single-core; in R15, they are 2595 multi-core and 366 single-core.

PassMark results add further texture. The CPU scores 30298 in multithread, 4354 in single-thread, 112736 in integer math, 81089 in floating point math, and 288777 in data compression. The data encryption score is 18571, extended instructions hit 17249, and find prime numbers scores 189. Physics processing reaches 3041, and random string sorting is 39138. The average benchmark score is 37911, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs.

The nearest rivals show tight competition. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has an average score of 37904, which is a 0% delta, making them essentially tied. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37943, representing a -0.1% difference, meaning the i9-14901E is just 0.1% behind. The Intel Core 5 211E scores 37829, a 0.2% advantage for the i9-14901E, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37804, a 0.3% lead. These differences are within noise, indicating the i9-14901E sits at a performance parity point with several modern mid-range and embedded processors, despite its Core i9 branding.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 21 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm TSMC process. It contains 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die, with a transistor density of 51.5 million per mm². The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. Memory clock is rated at 2000 MHz, which translates to 16 Gbps effective.

The compute configuration is substantial: 4608 shading units, 288 texture mapping units, 128 raster operation units, and 72 ray tracing cores. The GPU does not have tensor cores, as RDNA 2 relies on shader-based compute for AI workloads. Base clock is 1825 MHz, game clock is 2015 MHz, and boost clock reaches 2250 MHz. Pixel rate is 288.0 GPixel/s, texture rate is 648.0 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 20.74 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 41.47 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The card is dual-slot, 267 mm long, 120 mm tall, and 50 mm wide, requiring 2x 8-pin power connectors and a 700 W suggested PSU.

Benchmark scores for the GPU are strong. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 3689. Geekbench results show 181337 in Metal, 171304 in OpenCL, and 136875 in Vulkan. PassMark results include 24980 in G3D, 13245 in GPU compute, 1030 in G2D, 100 in DirectX 12, 264 in DirectX 11, 265 in DirectX 9, and 155 in DirectX 10. The average benchmark score is 48477, placing it at the 85th percentile among all GPUs.

The nearest rivals present an interesting comparison. The NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile has an average score of 47743, which is 1.5% lower, meaning the RX 6800 XT is 1.5% ahead. The Intel Arc A550M scores 49737, representing a -2.5% delta, so the RX 6800 XT trails by 2.5%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 49957, a -3% delta, and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 50001, also -3%. These deltas indicate the RX 6800 XT, despite being from an older generation, still competes within a few percentage points of newer and mobile-class products.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark data is one of high overall capability with a slight CPU advantage. The CPU's average benchmark score of 37911 places it at the 86th percentile, and the GPU's average score of 48477 places it at the 85th percentile. The combined percentile is 86, indicating that the pairing sits at the 86th mark for all systems in the database. This suggests a well-matched set where neither component dramatically outclasses the other.

In CPU-bound tasks like Cinebench R23 multi-core, the score of 25753 demonstrates strong multi-threaded throughput, though the nearest rivals show that this is not a blowout victory. The single-core score of 3635 is more decisive, putting the i9-14901E in a strong position for latency-sensitive workloads. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3689, combined with its PassMark G3D score of 24980, indicates robust rasterization performance that should handle modern titles at high settings.

The data also shows some workload-specific strengths. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 288777 is exceptionally high, suggesting strong performance in file archiving and compression utilities. Floating point math at 81089 and integer math at 112736 both indicate solid general compute. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 20.74 TFLOPS is significant for compute-heavy rendering tasks, though the lack of tensor cores means AI acceleration relies on shader-based approaches.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance for mixed workloads. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution will find the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth sufficient for high-resolution textures and modern game engines. The CPU's 5.60 GHz boost clock and strong single-core score of 3635 in Cinebench R23 will keep frame pacing stable in CPU-bound scenarios.

Content creators working with video editing software will benefit from the CPU's multi-core score of 25753 in Cinebench R23, which handles timeline scrubbing and export encoding efficiently. The GPU's 20.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects rendering and GPU-accelerated previews. 3D rendering artists using applications that leverage both CPU and GPU will find the combination versatile, as the CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's 4608 shading units can work in tandem.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's integer math score of 112736 and multithread score of 30298, which speed up build times. Students and small business workstations benefit from the ECC memory support, which provides data integrity for financial models or research datasets. The modest 65 W CPU TDP makes system cooling simpler, while the GPU's 300 W TDP requires adequate airflow but is manageable in a standard desktop case.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is relatively even, but the data reveals where each component limits the other. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking is slightly higher than the GPU's 85th percentile, indicating a marginal CPU advantage. In practice, this means the CPU is rarely the primary bottleneck in GPU-bound scenarios like high-resolution gaming with ultra settings.

The GPU's 85th percentile with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3689 suggests it can drive high frame rates at 1440p, but at 4K, its 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth may become limiting in the most demanding titles. The CPU's single-core score of 3635 in Cinebench R23 ensures it can feed the GPU adequately, avoiding the classic low-FPS-due-to-CPU-spike problem.

Where the CPU becomes the limiting factor is in highly parallel workloads that scale beyond 16 threads. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration, while efficient, will lag behind higher-core-count processors in rendering farms or heavy multi-tasking scenarios. The nearest rival data confirms this, as the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X (also 8 cores) is only 0.1% ahead, suggesting the i9-14901E is near the ceiling for this core count. The GPU, conversely, has more headroom in compute tasks, as its FP32 throughput of 20.74 TFLOPS is competitive with newer cards.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The platform features PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for modern NVMe drives and future GPU upgrades. The 65 W TDP of the CPU means most 1700-socket motherboards can handle it without elaborate VRM cooling, though the GPU's 300 W TDP requires a 700 W suggested PSU.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count CPU on the same socket, assuming motherboard compatibility, to improve multi-threaded workloads. Alternatively, users could add more memory or faster DDR5 modules, as the memory bandwidth is not specified but the dual-channel support is standard. The GPU's predecessor is Navi and its successor is Navi III, indicating the RX 6800 XT sits in the middle of the RDNA 2 generation.

The platform's ECC memory support is a notable feature for workstation users, and the PCIe 5.0 lanes future-proof the system for high-bandwidth peripherals. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward-compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 slots, so no bottleneck exists there. The production status of the CPU is Active, while the GPU is End-of-life, meaning the CPU has a longer expected availability window.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking compared to all CPUs?

A: The CPU is at the 86th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 37911. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, scores 37904, a 0% delta.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 72 ray tracing cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance?

A: The GPU delivers 20.74 TFLOPS of FP32 compute performance.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build?

A: This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field.

Build Overview

This pairing of the Intel Core i9-14901E and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is a desktop-class system designed for high-performance computing and gaming. The CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, is a Raptor Lake refresh part that sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU, based on RDNA 2, holds the 85th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 86, placing this build in the upper echelon of systems in the database.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 37911 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, with deltas of 0%, -0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.3% against four competitors. This indicates the i9-14901E is a well-balanced performer that trades blows with modern mid-range and embedded processors. The GPU's average score of 48477 puts it 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile, but 2.5% to 3% behind the Intel Arc A550M, NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti, and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64. This suggests the RX 6800 XT is showing its age slightly but remains competitive.

The overall tier of this build is high, with the 86th combined percentile indicating it can handle most demanding applications. The CPU's strong single-core performance and the GPU's large VRAM pool make it particularly suited for gaming at high resolutions and professional rendering tasks.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1440p, this system is well-suited. The CPU's single-core score of 3635 in Cinebench R23 ensures low latency in game logic, while the GPU's 20.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 16 GB VRAM handle modern textures and effects. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3689 suggests solid DX12 performance.

Streaming benefits from the CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's dedicated video encoding, though the lack of tensor cores means AI-based enhancement features are not available. The CPU's multithread score of 30298 in PassMark helps with simultaneous game and stream encoding.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will see strong performance from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753, which accelerates export times. The GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM handle 4K timelines and color grading efficiently.

3D rendering in Blender or Maya leverages both components. The CPU's floating point math score of 81089 and the GPU's FP32 throughput of 20.74 TFLOPS provide balanced compute, though scenes with heavy ray tracing will rely on the GPU's 72 RT cores.

Software development benefits from the CPU's integer math score of 112736 and data compression score of 288777, which speed up build tools and package management. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long compile sessions.

Students and office workers will find this system overkill for basic tasks, but the CPU's 5.60 GHz boost clock ensures snappy responsiveness in productivity suites. The GPU's G2D score of 1030 in PassMark indicates solid 2D performance for display rendering.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The benchmark database contains no measuredFps rows for this pairing, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

Based on the CPU's 86th percentile ranking and the GPU's 85th percentile, this system should deliver high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in most modern titles. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high-resolution textures, and the CPU's strong single-core score of 3635 in Cinebench R23 minimizes CPU-bound frame drops.

At 4K resolution, the GPU's 20.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance will be the limiting factor in the most demanding games, though the 16 GB VRAM helps maintain texture quality. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3689 suggests DirectX 12 titles will perform well, while older DirectX 11 games should see high frame rates given the PassMark DirectX 11 score of 264.

For competitive esports titles at 1080p with high refresh rates, the CPU's 5.60 GHz boost clock and 4354 single-thread PassMark score will drive very high FPS. The GPU's 128 ROPs and 288.0 GPixel/s pixel rate ensure efficient rasterization. These are estimates, and actual performance may vary by game and driver optimization.