SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900T

51,015 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900T and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation represent a desktop pairing that combines a high-core-count, power-efficient CPU with a professional mobile-class GPU. The data indicates a combined performance percentile of 70 among all builds, placing this configuration above the majority of systems. The CPU alone holds a percentile of 90 against all CPUs, showing that the processor is the dominant component in this pairing. The GPU sits at a 50th percentile, indicating mid-pack performance relative to all GPUs. This disparity in percentiles shapes the entire character of the system, suggesting a build that excels in processor-intensive tasks while providing adequate, but not class-leading, graphics capability.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900T is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates on the Intel Socket 1700 platform and is manufactured on a 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The chip has a base clock of 1.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, a wide frequency range that allows for significant power savings during idle or light loads while still providing high peak performance when needed. Its thermal design power (TDP) is rated at 35 watts, a notably low figure for a Core i9, which underscores its "T" designation for power-optimized desktop processors.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. This substantial L3 cache is critical for holding frequently accessed data across the many cores, reducing latency in multi-threaded workloads. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility in platform cost and performance tuning. It also includes ECC memory support, a feature traditionally important for workstation reliability. The integrated graphics are provided by the UHD Graphics 770 unit, and the CPU connects to the rest of the system via a Gen 5 PCIe interface with 16 lanes available from the CPU.

Benchmark results show a processor that is exceptionally strong in multi-threaded applications. In Cinebench R23, the i9-14900T scores 30803 points in the multi-core test and 4348 points in the single-core test. The multi-core score is indicative of a processor that can handle heavy parallel workloads like video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation with ease. The single-core score of 4348 is also robust, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and good performance in lightly-threaded applications. Older Cinebench versions reinforce this picture: the R20 multi-core score is 12937, and the R15 multi-core score is 3104.

PassMark results further detail the CPU's capabilities. The multi-thread score is 36239, and the integer math score is 138149, which is a strong indicator of general-purpose processing power. Floating-point math scores 92699, which is relevant for scientific and engineering calculations. Data compression scores 436066, and data encryption scores 27062, showing solid performance in archival and security-related tasks. The CPU also achieves a single-thread score of 4016 on PassMark, confirming its strength in single-core performance. The average benchmark score for this CPU is 51015.

When compared to its nearest rivals, the i9-14900T shows a tight competitive grouping. It edges out the Intel Core i7-13850HX by 0.5 percent (51015 vs 50761), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT by 0.6 percent (51015 vs 50718). It trails the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T by 0.6 percent (51015 vs 51310) and leads the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 by 1.1 percent (51015 vs 50448). These narrow margins indicate that the i9-14900T is squarely within the performance envelope of contemporary high-end CPUs, with differences that would be imperceptible in real-world use. The data suggests this processor is a top-tier choice for multi-threaded desktop workloads, offering performance comparable to more power-hungry chips while operating at a significantly lower TDP of 35 watts.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 70, meaning it outperforms 70 percent of all recorded system configurations.

Q: How does the CPU benchmark score compare to its closest competitor, the Intel Core i7-13850HX?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900T has an average benchmark score of 51015, which is 0.5 percent higher than the Intel Core i7-13850HX's score of 50761.

Q: What are the key specifications of the CPU's memory support?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900T supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory types in a dual-channel configuration and includes ECC memory support.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and size?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

Q: Is there measured FPS data available for this specific build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All frame rate discussions must be treated as estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's rendering capability in terms of TFLOPS?

A: The GPU delivers 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 32.69 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (1:1 ratio).

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and how does that affect its classification?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 watts, which is a low-power figure for a Core i9, indicating it is designed for power-constrained desktop systems that still require high multi-core performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this build. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking is far higher than the GPU's 50th percentile ranking. This indicates that in most workloads, the processor will be waiting on the graphics card to finish its tasks. The CPU is the stronger component by a wide margin, meaning it will not be the limiting factor in gaming or graphics-intensive applications. The GPU, while competent, will be the primary constraint on frame rates in games, particularly at higher resolutions where the graphics load increases.

The CPU's massive multi-threaded score of 30803 in Cinebench R23, combined with a 90th percentile standing, suggests it is capable of feeding even very fast GPUs in most scenarios. However, the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, with its 50th percentile ranking, is a mid-range performer. In a game at 1080p or 1440p, the CPU is likely to produce frames faster than the GPU can render them, leading to a GPU-bound scenario where the graphics card operates at or near 100 percent utilization. Conversely, in CPU-heavy tasks like physics calculations or AI-driven game logic, the GPU would be underutilized, but this is less common in typical gaming scenarios.

The bottleneck is clearly the GPU. For productivity tasks like video editing, the CPU will handle encoding and effects processing swiftly, while the GPU accelerates previews and rendering. The data shows a system where the CPU has significant headroom. Upgrading the GPU in the future would yield substantial performance gains without necessitating a CPU change, as the i9-14900T has the throughput to support a more powerful graphics card. The combined percentile of 70 is dragged down by the GPU's lower standing; if the GPU were at the CPU's level, the overall system percentile would be much higher.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU compute power above all else but still require a capable GPU for graphics tasks. The Intel Core i9-14900T, with its 24 cores and 32 threads, is ideal for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30803 demonstrates that this CPU can drastically reduce render times compared to mainstream processors. The high PassMark integer math score of 138149 also makes it suitable for developers building large codebases or running complex simulations.

Gamers who play at 1440p or 4K resolution will find the GPU to be the limiting factor, but the system will still provide a smooth experience in most titles. The CPU's 90th percentile ensures that frame pacing will be stable, with no stutters caused by processor bottlenecks. Users who stream their gameplay will benefit from the CPU's many cores, as encoding video for streaming can be offloaded to the processor without impacting gaming performance significantly. The 35-watt TDP is a bonus for those building compact or power-efficient desktops, where heat and energy consumption are concerns.

Students and small business workstations will find this build overqualified for typical office work, but the headroom means it will remain responsive for years. The single-core score of 4348 in Cinebench R23 ensures that everyday tasks like web browsing and document editing are instantaneous. The ECC memory support adds a layer of data integrity that is valuable for financial analysis or database work. This is not a budget-oriented build; it is a professional tool for users who need the CPU's massive multi-threading capability.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 51015 places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong showing, indicative of a top-tier processor. The nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T, scores 51310, which is 0.6 percent higher. The Intel Core i7-13850HX scores 50761 (0.5 percent lower), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 50718 (0.6 percent lower). These differences are negligible in real-world terms. The CPU's performance in Cinebench R23 is particularly telling, with a multi-core score of 30803 and a single-core score of 4348. This establishes the CPU as a leader in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded tasks.

The GPU has no benchmark scores recorded in the FACT PACK, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. Its percentile ranking is 50, which means it sits exactly in the middle of the performance distribution for all GPUs. This is a moderate result, indicating that the GPU is neither a high-end enthusiast part nor a low-end budget part. The lack of benchmark data makes a precise quantitative comparison impossible, but the 50th percentile position suggests it is a solid mainstream performer.

The combined system percentile is 70, which is lower than the CPU's 90th percentile but higher than the GPU's 50th percentile. This is consistent with a system where the CPU is the dominant component and the GPU is the weaker link. The overall picture is of a computer that excels in processor-bound tasks but is only average in graphics-bound tasks. For a user who spends most of their time in CPU-intensive applications, this is an excellent system. For a user who primarily games, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and the system's overall performance will be closer to the GPU's 50th percentile in those scenarios.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and component percentiles. The CPU's 90th percentile and strong single-thread score of 4348 in Cinebench R23 indicate it will not be a bottleneck in gaming. The GPU's 50th percentile, however, suggests that it will limit frame rates in demanding titles.

At 1080p resolution, the GPU will likely be the limiting factor, but the CPU's power will ensure high minimum frame rates, reducing stutters. At 1440p, the GPU load increases, and the system will deliver playable frame rates in most games, though not at the highest refresh rates. At 4K, the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth will be sufficient for textures, but the 50th percentile performance means that high settings will be required over ultra settings to maintain smooth frame rates. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 32.69 TFLOPS is adequate for modern titles, but it is not in the same class as top-tier gaming GPUs.

For esports titles, the CPU's high single-thread performance will push frame rates high, but the GPU will still cap them. The system is best suited for gaming at 1440p with high settings, where it will provide a balanced experience. Users seeking 240Hz or 360Hz competitive gaming should look elsewhere, as the GPU's mid-range standing will not consistently hit those frame rates in newer titles. The data suggests that this build is more of a workstation GPU, and gaming performance is a secondary consideration.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is based on the AD103 chip and the Ada Lovelace architecture. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 930 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz. Memory is 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, running at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, yielding a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

The GPU features 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. It includes 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores, making it capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute performance is 32.69 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 32.69 TFLOPS (1:1). The GPU's TDP is 120 watts, and it is classified as an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors, drawing power from the system board.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. Its 50th percentile ranking indicates it is a capable but not exceptional performer. The 16 GB VRAM is a significant asset for rendering large scenes or running AI models, but the overall compute power is moderate. The lack of benchmark scores makes it difficult to gauge exact performance, but the specifications suggest it will handle professional workloads like CAD and video editing acceleration well. The 120-watt TDP is low for a GPU with this many cores, indicating it is designed for mobile or power-constrained environments, which is consistent with its "Embedded" designation.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe lanes, but the GPU is connected via PCIe 4.0 x16. This means the GPU is not using the fastest available interface, but the PCIe 4.0 bandwidth is sufficient for the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation. The CPU's TDP is 35 watts, and the GPU's TDP is 120 watts. The suggested PSU is not listed, but the combined power draw is low, making this build suitable for a system with a modest power supply.

The GPU has no suggested PSU on record, and its power connectors are listed as "None," implying it draws power from the motherboard. This is unusual for a discrete GPU of this capability, but it reinforces the embedded nature of the component. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a higher-performing model, as the CPU has significant headroom. The 90th percentile CPU would pair well with a GPU in the 80th or 90th percentile, which would raise the system's combined percentile substantially. The CPU's socket, LGA 1700, is a mature platform, and memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 allows for cost-effective upgrades.

The CPU's boost clock of 5.50 GHz and 24 cores mean it will remain relevant for several years. The platform supports 16 Gen 5 lanes, which can be used for a fast NVMe SSD, while the GPU continues to use Gen 4. The 36 MB of L3 cache is ample for gaming and productivity. The low TDP of the CPU and GPU combined (155 watts total) means that users can opt for a quieter cooling solution. The upgrade path is clear: the CPU is a long-term investment, and the GPU is the component most likely to be swapped out first.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs a 24-core, 32-thread Intel Core i9-14900T with an NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation GPU. The CPU is a power-efficient variant of the Core i9 series, with a 35-watt TDP and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The GPU is a professional-grade part with 16 GB of VRAM and a 50th percentile performance ranking. The combined percentile for this system is 70, placing it above the majority of desktop configurations.

The CPU's 90th percentile shows it is among the top 10 percent of all CPUs, while the GPU's 50th percentile shows it is exactly average. This creates a lopsided system that prioritizes processor performance. It is not a balanced gaming rig, but it is a formidable workstation for CPU-intensive tasks. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is upper-mid-range, held back by the GPU's moderate standing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread performance (4348 in Cinebench R23) will not bottleneck, but the GPU's 50th percentile will limit frame rates. At 1080p, high refresh rates are achievable in less demanding titles, but at 1440p, users should expect high frame rates only in optimized games. This is not a 240Hz gaming machine.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 32 threads of the CPU are excellent for streaming. The CPU can handle game encoding via x264 without impacting gaming performance significantly, as the multi-core score of 30803 in Cinebench R23 provides ample headroom for both tasks simultaneously.

Video editing: The CPU is a powerhouse for video editing. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30803 will accelerate export times and effects rendering. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM will help with timeline scrubbing and real-time previews, but the 50th percentile performance means complex effects will rely more on the CPU.

3D rendering: The CPU's 24 cores will excel in CPU-based rendering engines, with the Cinebench R23 score indicating strong performance in Blender or V-Ray. The GPU can assist with GPU-accelerated rendering, but its 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is moderate, making it a secondary renderer to the CPU.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 138149 and the high multi-thread score make this ideal for compiling large codebases. Developers will benefit from the fast compilation times, and the ECC memory support ensures data integrity for long-running builds.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for standard office tasks. The single-core score of 4348 ensures word processors and web apps run instantly. The 90th percentile CPU provides a level of responsiveness that is imperceptible from faster systems, but the low TDP of 35 watts is a benefit for a quiet workspace.