SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900T

51,015 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-14900T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation: A High-Performance Desktop Workstation Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's power-efficient 24-core Raptor Lake refresh processor with NVIDIA's workstation-class Ada Lovelace GPU, creating a desktop build that targets the 93rd percentile of all systems. The CPU holds a 90th percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 95th percentile, making this a top-tier configuration for compute-heavy workflows. The data shows a system designed for professional rendering, scientific computing, and high-end content creation, with the CPU's low 35W TDP being a notable anomaly given its 24-core configuration.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is built on the AD104 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 35,800 million transistors into a 294 mm² die. Its memory subsystem is substantial: 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus delivers 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This configuration is markedly different from consumer GeForce parts, prioritizing capacity and stability over raw bandwidth. The 20 GB frame buffer is the standout feature here — for GPU-accelerated rendering, it means larger scenes, higher-resolution textures, and longer simulation runs before hitting memory limits.

The GPU's compute resources are extensive: 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output processors. More importantly for modern workloads, it carries 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. The RT cores handle ray-traced rendering acceleration, while the tensor cores enable DLSS and AI-accelerated workflows. The FP32 throughput of 26.73 TFLOPS (with FP16 at 26.73 TFLOPS due to 1:1 ratio) places this card firmly in professional territory. Pixel rate is 139.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 417.6 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate performance for high-resolution output.

Benchmark results place this GPU in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 135,218. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 146,593, while Vulkan scores 123,842. The nearest rival, NVIDIA A10M, scores 135,230 (0% delta), indicating these two cards are effectively tied in compute performance. AMD Radeon PRO W6800 trails by 0.1% (135,396), and Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is 0.4% behind. The data suggests this is not the absolute fastest workstation GPU, but it is within 1% of its closest competitors. For rendering workloads, the combination of 20 GB VRAM, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores makes this a versatile tool for both rasterization and ray-traced workflows.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU delivers strong multi-threaded performance with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,803 and a single-core score of 4,348. In Cinebench R20, it scores 12,937 multi-core and 1,826 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 3,104 multi-core and 438 single-core. These scores indicate a processor that excels in heavily parallel workloads, which is expected given its 24 cores and 32 threads. The average benchmark score for this CPU is 51,015, placing it at the 90th percentile of all CPUs.

PassMark results reinforce this picture: multi-thread score of 36,239, single-thread score of 4,016, integer math at 138,149, floating point math at 92,699, and data compression at 436,066. The data encryption score of 27,062 and extended instructions score of 23,660 show strong performance in security and SIMD-heavy applications. Physics score of 2,245 and find prime numbers at 164 round out the compute profile.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 135,218 places it at the 95th percentile. Combined, this system sits at the 93rd percentile of all desktop builds. The CPU's nearest rivals include Intel Core i7-13850HX (50,761, 0.5% higher), Intel Core Ultra 9 285T (51,310, 0.6% higher), AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT (50,718, 0.6% lower), and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (50,448, 1.1% lower). The GPU's competition is similarly tight, with all rivals within 1% of its score. This indicates a system that is highly competitive but not class-leading — it sits comfortably in the upper echelon of desktop performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i9-14900T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a critical feature for workstation users who need data integrity in scientific or financial computing. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output and can handle basic tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed.

The CPU's TDP is remarkably low at 35W, which is the "T" suffix designation indicating a power-optimized variant. This is a significant departure from other Core i9 parts and makes this processor well-suited for small form factor builds or systems where thermal management is a priority. The GPU's TDP is 130W with a suggested PSU of 300W, meaning the total system power draw is modest. This leaves substantial headroom for additional components, but the 1x 16-pin power connector requirement should be noted. A 300W PSU is the minimum recommendation; a slightly larger unit would provide more headroom for overclocking or additional drives.

For a sensible next upgrade, the platform offers several paths. Users could add more DDR4 or DDR5 memory, though the dual-channel configuration limits total bandwidth. The PCIe Gen 5 x16 slot supports the latest GPU generation, so a future GPU upgrade would be straightforward. The 20 GB VRAM on the current GPU is substantial, so most users would not need to upgrade for several years. The CPU's 35W TDP limits overclocking potential, and since the multiplier is locked, users looking for more CPU performance would need to move to a different platform entirely.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets professionals who need serious compute power without the thermal or power demands of high-end desktop parts. The 90th percentile CPU and 95th percentile GPU indicate a system that can handle demanding workloads, but the 35W CPU TDP and 130W GPU TDP suggest it fits in environments where power efficiency matters. The 20 GB VRAM is particularly valuable for data scientists working with large datasets, 3D artists rendering complex scenes, and video editors working with high-resolution footage.

Content creators will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 30,803) for video encoding and 3D rendering, while the GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates GPU-accelerated effects. Software developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the 24 cores and 32 threads. Students in engineering or computer science programs would find this system capable of handling simulation software and machine learning frameworks. Small business workstations running virtualization, database, or financial analysis workloads will appreciate the ECC memory support and 20 GB GPU memory.

The 93rd combined percentile means this is not an entry-level build. It is suited for professionals who generate income from their computing hardware — 3D artists, video editors, data analysts, and researchers. The power efficiency makes it viable for office environments where noise and heat are concerns. The single-slot GPU design (245 mm length, 112 mm height) allows for compact workstation builds that would not accommodate larger cards.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU and GPU are well-matched in compute performance, but the data reveals interesting bottleneck dynamics. The CPU's 90th percentile and GPU's 95th percentile suggest the CPU is the limiting factor in most scenarios, but the gap is narrow — only 5 percentile points. In GPU-accelerated workloads like rendering or machine learning, the GPU will be the performance driver, and the CPU's 24 cores provide ample feeding capability. The CPU's nearest rival, Intel Core Ultra 9 285T, scores 0.6% higher, indicating the 14900T is not the absolute fastest in its class.

In gaming scenarios, the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 4,348, PassMark single-thread of 4,016) is strong but not exceptional. The GPU's 95th percentile positioning means it can outpace the CPU in frame rate delivery, making the CPU the bottleneck at high frame rates. However, the 35W TDP limits sustained multi-core boost behavior, which could impact performance in CPU-heavy games or streaming scenarios. The data shows no measured FPS figures for this combination, so all gaming performance is estimated from the benchmark scores.

For productivity workloads, the balance is more even. The CPU's multi-thread score of 36,239 in PassMark and 30,803 in Cinebench R23 indicate strong parallel processing capability. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM prevents memory-related bottlenecks in large datasets. In mixed workloads — such as rendering while encoding video — the system should maintain balanced performance. The main bottleneck risk is the CPU's power constraint, which could limit sustained all-core boost clocks during long renders.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The system sits at the 93rd combined percentile of all desktop builds, with the CPU at the 90th percentile and GPU at the 95th percentile.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4000 Ada Generation have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth with memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and how does it compare to its multi-core performance?

A: The CPU has a remarkably low 35W TDP yet achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,803, placing it at the 90th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900T supports ECC memory in its dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 configuration.

Q: What are the GPU's nearest rivals and how do they compare?

A: The GPU's nearest rival is the NVIDIA A10M with a score of 135,230 (0% delta), followed by AMD Radeon PRO W6800 at 135,396 (-0.1%), AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo at 135,774 (-0.4%), and AMD Radeon PRO V620 at 136,472 (-0.9%).

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 300W, and the GPU itself has a 130W TDP.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900T includes UHD Graphics 770 as its integrated GPU.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 95th percentile ranking and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest strong frame rates at high resolutions, though the CPU's single-thread score of 4,348 in Cinebench R23 may limit very high refresh rates. The 20 GB VRAM ensures texture-heavy games run without memory pressure. No measured FPS data exists for this pairing, so these are estimates.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, but the 35W TDP could limit sustained multi-core boost clocks. The GPU's 192 tensor cores could offload encoding tasks, though the data does not specify NVENC capabilities.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,803 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 146,593 indicate strong performance in export and effects rendering. The 20 GB VRAM allows for large timelines and complex effects without memory swapping.

3D rendering: The 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores accelerate ray-traced rendering and AI denoising. The 20 GB VRAM supports large scenes, and the GPU's 95th percentile ranking places it among top workstation cards.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 138,149 and multithread score of 36,239 indicate fast compilation times. The 24 cores handle parallel builds efficiently, and ECC memory support provides data integrity for long-running processes.

Student and office work: The power efficiency (35W CPU, 130W GPU) makes this viable for shared office spaces. The 93rd combined percentile is overkill for basic productivity, but the system handles any academic workload from simulations to data analysis.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-14900T (24 cores, 32 threads, Raptor Lake architecture) with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation workstation GPU. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, supports DDR4/DDR5 memory, and has a 35W TDP. The GPU is based on Ada Lovelace architecture with 20 GB GDDR6 memory and a 130W TDP. The system ranks at the 93rd combined percentile, with the CPU at 90th and GPU at 95th. This is a professional workstation configuration that prioritizes compute performance and power efficiency over raw gaming frame rates. The CPU's launch MSRP was $549.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-14900T is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R codename) on a 10 nm Intel process. The die size is 257 mm², and it features a 36 MB shared L3 cache, 2 MB L2 cache per core, and 80 KB L1 cache per core. Base clock is 1.10 GHz with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The 35W TDP is the defining characteristic — this is a power-constrained processor that sacrifices sustained clock speeds for efficiency. The multiplier is locked, preventing overclocking.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,803 and PassMark multithread score of 36,239 demonstrate strong parallel performance. The single-core score of 4,348 in Cinebench R23 and 4,016 in PassMark single-thread indicate solid, but not class-leading, single-thread performance. The data compression score of 436,066 and floating point math of 92,699 show strong throughput in data-intensive applications.

The nearest rivals highlight the competitive landscape. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T scores 51,310 (0.6% higher), while AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 50,718 (0.6% lower). This places the 14900T in a tightly contested mid-to-high range. For real workloads, these scores translate to fast video encoding, quick software compilation, and efficient scientific computing. The 35W TDP means this CPU can deliver high performance in thermally constrained environments, but sustained all-core workloads may see clock throttling. The 10 nm process and 257 mm² die size indicate a mature, well-understood architecture.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest it can handle modern games at high settings and resolutions. The 20 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for current titles, even at 4K with high-resolution texture packs. The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 score of 4,348) is adequate for gaming, but not exceptional — it may limit frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios.

The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 123,842 and OpenCL score of 146,593 indicate strong compute performance that translates well to game rendering. The 48 RT cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the 192 tensor cores enable DLSS upscaling. The 360.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is modest for a 95th percentile GPU, which could impact performance at very high resolutions with heavy texture streaming. However, the 20 GB capacity compensates for bandwidth limitations in most scenarios. For 1080p and 1440p gaming, this system should deliver high frame rates at ultra settings. At 4K, performance will be strong but may show CPU limitations in poorly optimized titles. Given the workstation-class GPU and power-efficient CPU, this is not the ideal gaming platform, but it is certainly capable.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900T

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

FAQ

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

Build Overview

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds