SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900T + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900T

51,015 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i9-14900T pairs with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 in a desktop configuration that ranks at the 76th percentile overall. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part with a 35W TDP, while the GPU is a Turing-based workstation card with 8GB of GDDR6 memory. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900T is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It runs on the Intel Socket 1700 platform with a 10nm process node and a die size of 257 mm². The chip's base clock is 1.10 GHz, which is conservative, but it boosts to 5.50 GHz under load. The 35W TDP is remarkably low for a Core i9 part, indicating this is a power-constrained variant designed for systems where thermal output and energy draw are primary concerns.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool helps feed the 24 cores during multi-threaded workloads. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support, which is notable for workstation reliability. PCIe Gen 5 is available with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present, providing a basic display output fallback.

Benchmark results show a strong single-threaded performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 4348 points in single-core and 30803 in multi-core. The single-core score is particularly impressive given the low 35W TDP, suggesting the boost algorithm can push a single core to near-maximum clocks. Multi-core performance in Cinebench R20 reaches 12937, while R15 shows 3104 multi-core and 438 single-core. PassMark results reinforce this: single-thread score of 4016, multithread score of 36239, and an average benchmark score of 51015.

The CPU sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, the i9-14900T is 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13850HX and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT. It trails the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T by 0.6% and leads the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 by 1.1%. These deltas are tight, meaning the i9-14900T trades blows with high-end mobile and desktop parts from both Intel and AMD. The practical takeaway: this is a top-tier CPU for productivity, with the caveat that its 35W TDP may limit sustained all-core boosts in heavily threaded workloads compared to higher-TDP counterparts.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 51015, which places it at the 90th percentile against all CPUs. This is an elite-tier result, driven by the combination of high single-thread speed and 24 physical cores. In PassMark, the chip scores 138149 in integer math, 92699 in floating-point math, and 436066 in data compression. Encryption performance is 27062, extended instructions hit 23660, and random string sorting reaches 49484. Physics simulation scores 2245, while prime number finding is 164. These numbers indicate a processor that excels at both general-purpose computing and specialized instruction sets.

The GPU, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, is a different story. Its average benchmark score is 17789, placing it at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 1873. GeekBench results show 74540 in OpenCL and 78844 in Vulkan. PassMark G3D score is 15117, with G2D at 846. DirectX tests are mixed: DX9 scores 205, DX10 scores 108, DX11 scores 128, and DX12 drops to 52. GPU compute is 6176. The GPU's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which is 0.7% behind, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, which is 0.9% behind. The AMD Radeon 780M is 1.1% behind, and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 trails by 1.4%.

The combined picture is lopsided. The CPU is near the top of its class, while the GPU is mid-pack. The combined percentile of 76 reflects this imbalance. In CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding, software compilation, or 3D scene preprocessing, the system will perform at a high level. In GPU-bound tasks like gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Quadro RTX 4000 will be the limiting factor. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 36239 is roughly double what a typical mid-range desktop CPU would produce, while the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15117 is modest by modern standards.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the GPU is the primary bottleneck for graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 61st percentile means the processor can feed the graphics card far more data than the card can process. In gaming scenarios, this will manifest as high CPU frame times but GPU-limited frame rates. The CPU will rarely break a sweat, while the GPU will run at full utilization.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like data compression, encryption, or multi-threaded rendering, the GPU is largely irrelevant. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 436066 and encryption score of 27062 indicate strong performance that the GPU cannot accelerate meaningfully. For tasks like 3D rendering in CPU-based engines, the 24 cores will push through scenes quickly, but GPU-accelerated rendering will be constrained by the Quadro's 7.119 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

The 35W TDP of the CPU is worth noting. While it boosts to 5.50 GHz, sustained all-core loads may cause the chip to settle at lower clocks to stay within power limits. This means the multi-core scores, while strong, might not fully represent long-duration rendering sessions. The GPU's 160W TDP is typical for its class, but its PCIe 3.0 x16 interface is a generation behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 capability, which could slightly reduce data transfer rates in GPU-bound tasks. The 450W suggested PSU is sufficient for this pairing, but the imbalance means upgrading the GPU later would yield the most significant performance gains for gaming and GPU compute.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU can handle any modern game at high frame rates, but the GPU is the constraint. With an estimated performance around 61st percentile, expect 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings, but not consistent high-refresh 1440p or 4K. The Quadro RTX 4000's 8GB VRAM is adequate for current titles at 1080p, but the low DirectX 12 score of 52 in PassMark suggests weaker performance in modern APIs.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 offers Quick Sync, which can offload encoding tasks. The CPU's single-thread score of 4348 in Cinebench R23 ensures smooth game performance while streaming software runs concurrently.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario. The CPU's multi-core score of 30803 in Cinebench R23 will handle 4K timeline scrubbing and export efficiently. The GPU's 8GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth assist with effects and color grading, though rendering effects-heavy sequences may be slower than dedicated consumer gaming cards.

3D rendering: CPU-based renderers will excel with 24 cores and 32 threads. GPU-based renderers will be limited by the Quadro's 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 and 36 RT cores. The 288 tensor cores help with AI-accelerated denoising, but raw render performance is mid-tier.

Software development: Excellent. The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 138149 and multithread score of 36239 speed up compilation and testing. The 36 MB L3 cache and DDR5 support reduce build times. The ECC memory support is a bonus for long-running test suites.

Student and office work: Overkill for most tasks, but the 35W TDP means low power draw during light use. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures snappy application loading, and the integrated graphics can handle basic display tasks without the Quadro active. Office suites, web browsing, and spreadsheet work will be instant.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a Turing-architecture workstation card built on a 12nm process at TSMC. The chip, TU104, contains 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 25.0M per mm². This is a large die, reflecting the professional-grade feature set. Clock speeds are 1005 MHz base and 1545 MHz boost, with memory running at 1625 MHz, translating to 13 Gbps effective. The 8GB of GDDR6 memory sits on a 256-bit bus, providing 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The card has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations units. It includes 36 RT cores for ray tracing and 288 tensor cores for AI workloads. Pixel rate is 98.88 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 222.5 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 7.119 TFLOPS, while FP16 reaches 14.24 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The board is single-slot, 241 mm long, and 111 mm tall, requiring one 8-pin power connector. Display outputs include 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark scores place this GPU at the 61st percentile, which is modest. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1873 and PassMark G3D score of 15117 indicate it can handle professional visualization tasks but is not a gaming powerhouse. The GeekBench Vulkan score of 78844 is respectable, suggesting good compute performance in Vulkan-based applications. However, the low DirectX 12 PassMark score of 52 is concerning for modern gaming. The tensor cores are beneficial for AI inference and denoising, but the 36 RT cores are a first-generation implementation, so ray tracing performance is limited. The 416.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for 8GB VRAM at 1080p and 1440p resolutions but will be strained at 4K with high-texture games.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The following frame rate expectations are estimates based on the GPU's 61st percentile benchmark score, the CPU's 90th percentile score, and the GPU's specific DirectX performance numbers. The CPU will not be the limiting factor in any gaming scenario, so the GPU's capabilities define the experience.

At 1080p, expect playable frame rates in most titles. The Quadro RTX 4000's PassMark G3D score of 15117 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1873 suggest it can handle esports titles like Valorant or CS2 at high refresh rates, likely exceeding 144 FPS in lighter games. For AAA titles, estimate 60-90 FPS at medium settings, with drops below 60 FPS in the most demanding scenes. The 8GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p ultra textures in most current games, but the low DirectX 12 score of 52 indicates weaker performance in titles that rely heavily on DX12 features.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. Estimate 40-60 FPS at medium settings in AAA titles, with esports games still achieving 100+ FPS. The 256-bit memory bus and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth help, but the 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 performance limits pixel throughput. Ray tracing should be avoided; the 36 RT cores are first-generation and will cause significant frame rate drops. DLSS is not supported on this Turing card in the same way as later generations, so rely on native resolution.

At 4K, this GPU is not viable for modern gaming. Estimate 20-35 FPS at low settings in AAA titles. The 8GB VRAM will exceed capacity in many titles at 4K, causing texture pop-in and stuttering. The PassMark DirectX 10 score of 108 and DirectX 9 score of 205 suggest older titles run better, but current games will be unplayable at 4K. The CPU can push high frame rates, but the GPU simply cannot keep up.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets professionals who need CPU horsepower but have modest GPU requirements. The 90th percentile CPU makes it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, data scientists running multi-threaded analyses, and video editors working with 4K footage in CPU-intensive codecs. The 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with a 36 MB L3 cache, handle parallel workloads with ease. The 35W TDP is attractive for small form factor builds or office environments where noise and heat are concerns.

Content creators who primarily use CPU-based renderers will benefit. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30803 ensures fast preview renders, and the single-core score of 4348 keeps the interface responsive. The GPU can handle basic GPU acceleration in Adobe Premiere or DaVinci Resolve, but heavy GPU effects will be slow. Students in engineering or computer science programs get a system that compiles quickly and runs simulations efficiently. Small business workstations handling databases, spreadsheets, and office applications will feel instant, with the ECC memory support adding stability for long-running processes.

Gamers should look elsewhere. The GPU's 61st percentile ranking means this is not a gaming system, even though the CPU is excellent. If gaming is a secondary concern at 1080p, it works, but any GPU upgrade would create a more balanced system. The Quadro RTX 4000 is an end-of-life product, so its driver support and performance will not improve. Buyers who need professional OpenGL or Vulkan performance for CAD or scientific visualization will find the card adequate, but those who need CUDA compute for AI or deep learning will be limited by the 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 and 8GB VRAM.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-14900T good for gaming?

A: Yes, the CPU is excellent for gaming. It has a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4348 and sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it will not bottleneck modern graphics cards. However, the Quadro RTX 4000 GPU in this build limits gaming performance.

Q: Can this system handle 4K video editing?

A: The CPU is well-suited for 4K video editing, with a multi-core score of 30803 in Cinebench R23 and a PassMark multithread score of 36239. The GPU's 8GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth assist with effects, but heavy GPU-accelerated tasks will be slower.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a 35W TDP, which is very low for a 24-core processor. The GPU has a 160W TDP, and the suggested PSU for the system is 450W.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900T supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation reliability in professional environments.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 4060?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 is 0.9% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 in average benchmark score. Both are near the 61st percentile, so they perform similarly in raw benchmarks.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Quadro RTX 4000?

A: The GPU has 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 416.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Is this build good for software development?

A: Yes, the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 138149 and multithread score of 36239 make it excellent for compilation and testing. The 24 cores and 32 threads handle parallel builds efficiently.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i9-14900T, a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake Refresh processor, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, a Turing-based workstation GPU. The CPU is a 10nm part with a 35W TDP, boosting to 5.50 GHz, and it ranks at the 90th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU is a 12nm Turing chip with 8GB GDDR6, 36 RT cores, and 288 tensor cores, ranking at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 76, indicating an overall tier that is above average but not top-tier due to the GPU's mid-pack performance.

The system is clearly CPU-dominated. The processor's 30803 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 51015 average benchmark score position it as a high-end workstation CPU, while the GPU's 17789 average benchmark score is modest. This is a professional productivity machine, not a gaming rig. The 35W TDP CPU makes it suitable for compact builds, and the ECC memory support adds reliability. The GPU is end-of-life, so future upgrades would target the graphics card first. For users who need massive CPU throughput with minimal power draw, this pairing makes sense; for balanced gaming or GPU compute, it does not.