SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900KS + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900KS

81,127 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i9-14900KS and where does it rank among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900KS is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture using Intel's 10 nm process. It sits in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 81127, placing it statistically even with rivals like the Intel Xeon w5-3535X and AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (both at 0% delta).

Q: What are the key specifications of the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation GPU based on the Turing architecture (TU104 chip, 12 nm process). It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivering 416.0 GB/s bandwidth, with 2304 shading units, 36 RT cores, and 288 tensor cores. Its boost clock is 1545 MHz, providing 7.119 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

Q: Is there measured gaming FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. All gaming performance discussion must be framed as estimated from the benchmark scores of the individual components.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in multi-core workloads?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i9-14900KS scores 50995, which is a strong result. Its average benchmark score of 81127 places it in the 96th percentile, with the nearest rival (Intel Xeon w5-3535X) at 81115 — a 0% delta, meaning performance parity. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 trails by only 0.5%, scoring 80762.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and how does it compare to consumer cards?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 sits in the 61st percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 17789. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, scores 17666 (0.7% below), while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 scores 17639 (0.9% below), indicating the Quadro edges out these consumer cards in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What memory and expansion options does the CPU support?

A: The i9-14900KS supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, uses the Intel Socket 1700, and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. The CPU has a 150 W TDP and an unlocked multiplier.

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop pairing is 79, indicating a high-tier system overall. The CPU's 96th percentile performance is the dominant contributor, while the GPU's 61st percentile creates a significant performance gap between the two components.

---

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, all gaming figures are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores. The data clearly shows this is not a balanced gaming rig. The CPU is a top-tier performer, sitting in the 96th percentile of all CPUs with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 50995 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2692. In gaming, single-thread performance often matters most, and this CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4815 and Cinebench R20 single-core score of 3023 indicate exceptional frame-driving capability.

The GPU, however, is the limiting factor. The Quadro RTX 4000's PassMark G3D score of 15117 places it in the 61st percentile. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 and PassMark DirectX 12 score of 52 suggest modest DirectX 12 gaming performance. For esports and older titles, the GPU's 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 98.88 GPixel/s pixel rate should handle 1080p high-refresh gaming reasonably well. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth may be sufficient for medium-high settings, but frame rates would be noticeably lower than the CPU's potential allows.

At 4K resolution, the GPU's 256-bit memory bus and 64 ROPs will likely bottleneck heavily. The DirectX 11 score of 128 and DirectX 10 score of 108 indicate that older API games run better relative to the GPU's overall standing, but modern titles using DirectX 12 will see the GPU's weakest relative performance (score of 52). Estimated 1080p gaming performance would be playable in most titles, but the GPU's 61st percentile ranking versus the CPU's 96th means gamers will consistently be GPU-limited. For high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming, this pairing would require significant settings reductions.

---

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900KS is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates at a 3.20 GHz base clock and boosts to 6.20 GHz, the latter being the highest boost clock in the FACT PACK. The CPU has a 150 W TDP and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC support. Cache configuration includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3.

Benchmark results show exceptional multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 50995 is a flagship-level result, and the Geekbench multi-core score of 23931 reinforces this. In the 96th percentile of all CPUs, it matches the Intel Xeon w5-3535X exactly (0% delta) and edges the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX and AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 by 0% and 0.5% respectively. This means the i9-14900KS is at the very top of consumer desktop performance, rivaling workstation-class Xeon parts.

Single-thread performance is equally impressive. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7199 and Geekbench single-core score of 2692 indicate that the 6.20 GHz boost clock delivers tangible results. PassMark single-thread score of 4815 confirms this is one of the fastest single-threaded CPUs available. For real workloads, this translates to snappy application responsiveness, fast compilation times, and excellent performance in lightly-threaded tasks.

Specialized workloads show mixed results. PassMark data compression scores 803368, indicating strong throughput for archiving and compression tasks. Data encryption scores 47717, and extended instructions score 45524. Integer math scores 212644, while floating-point math scores 153975. The find prime numbers score of 244 is relatively low, but this is a specific test that doesn't reflect general performance. The multithread score of 60012 and physics score of 3381 round out a picture of a CPU that excels in nearly every compute category.

The 36 MB shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory controller support both DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders flexibility. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking beyond the already-high 6.20 GHz boost. With a launch MSRP of $689, this is positioned as a flagship enthusiast part, though pricing is not discussed further here.

---

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need extreme CPU compute power but have modest GPU requirements. The 96th percentile CPU performance makes it ideal for professionals running multi-threaded workloads: software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 32 threads and 50995 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. Data scientists and researchers running simulations or data processing will see near-workstation-class performance, with the CPU matching the Intel Xeon w5-3535X within 0%.

Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound applications — video encoding, 3D scene preparation, audio processing — will find the i9-14900KS exceptional. The PassMark multithread score of 60012 and integer math score of 212644 indicate strong performance in rendering and computational tasks. However, GPU-accelerated rendering workloads would be limited by the Quadro RTX 4000's 61st percentile ranking.

Students and academic users in computer science, engineering, or physics fields who run CPU-intensive simulations would benefit. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running compute jobs. Small business workstations that handle complex financial modeling, database operations (PassMark data compression score of 803368), or scientific computing would see excellent CPU performance.

Gamers are a mixed case. Those targeting 1080p high-refresh gaming with esports titles will find the CPU more than capable, but the GPU will limit frame rates. Gamers at 1440p or 4K would be better served by a more balanced GPU pairing. This build is not ideal for gamers seeking maximum FPS, as the GPU's 61st percentile creates a significant bottleneck.

The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of 79 reflects a system where one component (CPU) is far stronger than the other (GPU). Users who intend to upgrade the GPU later will find the CPU has substantial headroom to support future graphics cards.

---

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 81127, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon w5-3535X (81115, 0% delta), AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (81103, 0% delta), and AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 (80762, 0.5% delta). This indicates the i9-14900KS is statistically tied with the top-performing CPUs available, with no meaningful performance gap to the nearest competitors.

In specific CPU tests, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 50995 is a standout, representing flagship multi-threaded capability. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 21417 and Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 5140 follow the same pattern. Single-core scores are equally strong: Cinebench R23 single-core at 7199, R20 at 3023, and R15 at 725. Geekbench multi-core (23931) and single-core (2692) confirm the balanced high performance.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 17789, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666, 0.7% delta), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (17639, 0.9% delta), and AMD Radeon 780M (17588, 1.1% delta). The Quadro RTX 4000 edges out all these rivals, but the margins are small — within 1.4% of the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17551).

GPU-specific benchmark scores reveal a mixed profile. The PassMark G3D score of 15117 is respectable, but the DirectX 12 score of 52 is notably weak, suggesting poor modern API performance. DirectX 11 scores 128, DirectX 10 scores 108, and DirectX 9 scores 205, showing better performance in older APIs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 confirms the GPU's modest DirectX 12 capability. Geekbench OpenCL scores 74540 and Vulkan scores 78844, indicating reasonable compute performance.

The combined percentile of 79 for this desktop build reflects the substantial gap between the CPU's 96th percentile and the GPU's 61st percentile. The CPU contributes the vast majority of the system's overall compute capability, while the GPU holds the build back from higher-tier classification.

---

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is based on the Turing architecture (TU104 chip, 12 nm process) with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding 416.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock is 1625 MHz (13 Gbps effective). The GPU's base clock is 1005 MHz with a boost clock of 1545 MHz.

Compute specifications include 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The GPU features 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads. Pixel rate is 98.88 GPixel/s and texture rate is 222.5 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 7.119 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 14.24 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The GPU has a 160 W TDP with a single-slot design and one 8-pin power connector, suggesting a 450 W PSU.

The benchmark data shows a GPU that performs best in compute tasks rather than modern gaming. The PassMark G3D score of 15117 (61st percentile) is its strongest gaming-related result. However, the DirectX 12 score of 52 is very low, indicating poor performance in modern game engines that rely on DirectX 12 features. DirectX 11 score of 128 is much better, suggesting older titles run relatively well. The DirectX 9 score of 205 shows the GPU handles legacy APIs well.

For rendering workloads, the 288 tensor cores and 36 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for AI denoising and ray-traced rendering. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 indicates capable general-purpose compute. The PassMark GPU compute score of 6176 shows moderate compute throughput. However, the 8 GB VRAM capacity may limit very large rendering scenes or high-resolution textures.

The GPU's nearest rivals are consumer and integrated parts: the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (0.7% behind), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (0.9% behind), and AMD Radeon 780M (1.1% behind). This places the Quadro RTX 4000 slightly above these parts in aggregate, but the margins are negligible. The GPU's 61st percentile ranking means it is a mid-tier part, far below the CPU's 96th percentile.

The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16, which is an older standard that may limit data transfer speeds with modern CPUs and motherboards that support PCIe Gen 5. Display outputs include 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Production status is end-of-life, with the predecessor being Quadro Volta and successor Workstation Ampere.

---

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance disparity between the CPU and GPU is stark. The CPU sits in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 61st percentile. This 35-percentile-point gap creates a clear bottleneck scenario: the CPU is capable of driving far more graphics performance than the GPU can deliver.

In CPU-bound workloads — compilation, data processing, multi-threaded rendering, physics simulations — the i9-14900KS will perform at its full potential. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 50995 and PassMark multithread score of 60012 ensure that the CPU is not the limiting factor in any compute task. The CPU's nearest rivals (Xeon w5-3535X, Ryzen 9 8940HX) are within 0% delta, meaning this CPU is at the top of its class.

In GPU-bound workloads — gaming, GPU rendering, video encoding — the Quadro RTX 4000 will be the limiting factor. The GPU's 61st percentile ranking and low DirectX 12 score (52) mean that modern games will be constrained by the GPU's throughput. The CPU's single-core performance (Geekbench single-core 2692, Cinebench R23 single-core 7199) is more than sufficient to feed the GPU, but the GPU cannot translate that into high frame rates.

The FPS scaling evidence from the benchmark scores supports this analysis. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15117 is respectable but not high-end, while its DirectX 12 score of 52 is among the weakest modern results. Estimated gaming performance would be GPU-limited in virtually all scenarios, with the CPU often waiting on the GPU to render frames.

Balanced workloads, such as game streaming while gaming, would see the CPU handle encoding (via UHD Graphics 770 or software x264) well while the GPU struggles with game rendering. The CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 47717 and extended instructions score of 45524 indicate strong capability for concurrent tasks, but the GPU remains the bottleneck.

The combined percentile of 79 reflects this imbalance. A balanced system would have both components within a similar percentile range. This build sacrifices balance for extreme CPU performance, making it suitable for compute-focused users who are willing to accept mid-tier GPU performance or plan to upgrade the GPU later.

---

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i9-14900KS with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000. The CPU is Intel's flagship 14th Gen desktop processor, and the GPU is an end-of-life workstation part from NVIDIA's Quadro series. The combined percentile of 79 places this system in the upper-mid tier of all builds, but the component distribution is unusual.

The CPU is the star of this build. With 24 cores, 32 threads, and a 6.20 GHz boost clock, it delivers 96th percentile performance. Its average benchmark score of 81127 matches or exceeds every rival in its nearestRivals list, including the Intel Xeon w5-3535X (81115), AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (81103), and AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 (80762). This is a top-tier compute processor by any measure.

The GPU is the weak link. The Quadro RTX 4000, with its 61st percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 17789, provides mid-tier graphics performance. It edges out the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 by 0.9% and the AMD Radeon 780M by 1.1%, but these are consumer and integrated parts, not high-end workstation GPUs. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 52 is a particular weakness for modern gaming.

The build class is desktop, meaning standard form factors and cooling solutions apply. The CPU's 150 W TDP and the GPU's 160 W TDP combine for a system that requires adequate cooling and a 450 W suggested PSU. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 with PCIe Gen 5 (16 lanes), while the GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16, creating a potential bandwidth mismatch.

This pairing makes sense for users who prioritize CPU compute above all else and need a workstation GPU for professional applications rather than gaming. The overall tier, as indicated by the 79 combined percentile, is solidly mid-to-upper range, but the CPU's dominance means the system's true potential is unrealized until a stronger GPU is installed.

---

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core performance (Geekbench single-core 2692, Cinebench R23 single-core 7199) is excellent for driving high frame rates, but the GPU's 61st percentile and DirectX 12 score of 52 will limit performance. Estimated 1080p gaming would be playable but not at the highest settings or frame rates the CPU could support. This is not an ideal gaming build.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads handle encoding easily, with PassMark data compression scoring 803368 and multithread at 60012. The GPU's modest performance means game rendering will be the limiting factor, but streaming CPU-intensive games would work well. The CPU can handle encoding and gaming concurrently without significant performance loss.

Video editing: CPU-based editing in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will be fast, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 50995 and integer math at 212644. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth can assist with effects, but the low DirectX 12 score suggests limited GPU acceleration in modern editing software.

3D rendering: CPU rendering in Blender or Cinema 4D will be excellent, with the CPU rivaling Xeon-class processors. GPU rendering will be limited by the Quadro RTX 4000's compute power (7.119 TFLOPS FP32, Geekbench OpenCL 74540). The 288 tensor cores help with AI denoising, but the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software development: This is an ideal build for developers. The 32 threads and 50995 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handle compilation and testing rapidly. The ECC memory support adds stability for long builds. The GPU is sufficient for basic graphics and multiple displays (3x DisplayPort 1.4a).

Student and office work: Overkill for most academic and office tasks, but the CPU's 96th percentile performance ensures no workload will be slow. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display output. The GPU's 61st percentile is more than adequate for office productivity, spreadsheets, and general computing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900KS + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900KS

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds