SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900KS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900KS

81,127 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-14900KS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080: Desktop Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's flagship 14th Gen desktop processor with NVIDIA's Ampere-based RTX 3080, creating a system where the CPU's raw multi-threaded power and single-core speed are matched against a GPU that, while still capable, sits in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. The data shows a processor that outperforms nearly every other CPU on the market (96th percentile) paired with a graphics card that is solidly mid-to-upper tier but no longer at the state-of-the-art. This is a build defined by CPU dominance, with the GPU as the clear limiting factor for gaming at high resolutions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the Core i9-14900KS's single-core might drives frame rates. With a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7199 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2692, the CPU can feed the RTX 3080 efficiently. The GPU's 29.77 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth are sufficient for high frame rates, though the 68th percentile GPU ranking means you will not hit the absolute highest FPS numbers seen with newer cards. Expect strong performance at 1440p, but the GPU will cap frames before the CPU does.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 32 threads provide exceptional headroom for encoding while gaming. PassMark multi-thread score of 60012 and data encryption score of 47717 indicate heavy parallel workloads are handled with ease. The RTX 3080's NVENC hardware is not explicitly benchmarked here, but the GPU's 272 tensor cores and 68 RT cores suggest it can handle encoding tasks without offloading too much to the CPU, keeping game FPS stable.

Video editing: This is where the CPU shines. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 50995 and Geekbench multi-core score of 23931 place the i9-14900KS in the top 4% of all CPUs. Timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export tasks that use multiple cores will fly. The GPU's 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 465.1 GTexel/s texture rate help with GPU-accelerated effects, but the CPU is the primary workhorse for most non-4K editing workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU's PassMark floating point math score of 153975 and integer math score of 212644 indicate strong performance for CPU-based rendering engines. For GPU rendering, the RTX 3080's 8704 shading units and 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 compute provide solid performance, but the 68th percentile GPU ranking means it lags behind newer cards in ray-traced workloads. The 68 RT cores are functional but not class-leading.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit directly from the CPU's 24 cores. PassMark find prime numbers score of 244 is low but irrelevant; the random string sorting score of 89789 and data compression score of 803368 are more relevant for build tools and version control operations. The CPU's DDR4 and DDR5 memory support and dual-channel bus provide flexibility for different motherboard configurations.

Student and office work: This system is grossly overpowered for basic tasks. The PassMark single-thread score of 4815 ensures snappy responsiveness in word processors and browsers. However, the 150 W TDP for the CPU and 320 W TDP for the GPU mean this is not an energy-efficient choice for light workloads. It will excel at any task, but it is a power-hungry solution for spreadsheets and email.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 3080 is built on the GA102 chip using Samsung's 8 nm process, containing 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. Its 10 GB of GDDR6X memory runs at 19 Gbps effective across a 320-bit bus, yielding 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a well-balanced memory subsystem for 1440p gaming, though the 10 GB capacity can be a constraint in the most demanding modern titles at 4K.

Clock speeds are modest by current standards: 1440 MHz base and 1710 MHz boost. The GPU's pixel rate of 164.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 465.1 GTexel/s are solid but not exceptional. The FP32 compute of 29.77 TFLOPS (with FP16 at the same 1:1 ratio) is respectable, but the 68% percentile ranking shows it is clearly outclassed by newer GPUs.

The 272 tensor cores and 68 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS support, though the RT performance is a generation behind. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the score of 4407 reflects this mid-tier positioning. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 152423 and Vulkan score of 33620 indicate strong compute performance for general tasks, but the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 100 (normalized) suggests it is not optimized for the latest DX12 features compared to newer cards.

For rendering, the GPU can handle 1440p ray-traced workloads with DLSS enabled, but at 4K, the 10 GB memory capacity and RT core count will cause performance drops in heavy scenes. The PassMark G3D score of 25086 and GPU compute score of 14397 place it firmly in the upper-mid range, capable but not dominant.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data presents a clear picture: the CPU is the system's strength, and the GPU is the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios. The i9-14900KS sits in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 81127. The RTX 3080 sits in the 68th percentile, with an average score of 23172. This imbalance means the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor.

In CPU-bound workloads like video editing, software compilation, or 3D rendering with CPU-based engines, the i9-14900KS provides exceptional performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 50995 is 0% different from the Intel Xeon w5-3535X (score 81115) and the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (score 81103), showing it trades blows with workstation-class chips. The single-core performance of 7199 in Cinebench R23 is unmatched by any of its nearest rivals, which all score within 0.5% of each other.

In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at 1440p or 4K, the RTX 3080 becomes the constraint. The GPU's 68th percentile ranking means it will cap frame rates before the CPU can push higher. The data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's high single-core scores suggest it can feed the GPU adequately, but the GPU's relative weakness will show in high-refresh scenarios.

The combined percentile of 82 reflects this imbalance. The system is more than the sum of its parts for productivity, but for gaming, the GPU holds back the CPU's potential. The 150 W CPU TDP and 320 W GPU TDP suggest a 700 W suggested PSU is appropriate, leaving headroom for overclocking the unlocked multiplier on the CPU.

FAQ

Q: Is the RTX 3080 too weak for the i9-14900KS?

A: For gaming, yes, the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 68th percentile means the RTX 3080 will cap frame rates before the i9-14900KS can stretch its legs. For productivity, the CPU is the main driver, and the GPU is sufficient for acceleration.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: The RTX 3080's 10 GB GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 4K, but the GPU's 68th percentile performance means you will need to lower settings or use DLSS. The CPU will not be a bottleneck at 4K, but the GPU will struggle with the most demanding titles.

Q: What is the CPU's memory support?

A: The i9-14900KS supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus. This gives flexibility in motherboard choice, though DDR5 will provide higher bandwidth for memory-intensive workloads.

Q: Is the CPU good for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, and the 150 W TDP leaves some headroom. The 6.20 GHz boost clock is already high, but the unlocked multiplier allows for manual tuning if you have adequate cooling.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-14900KS has an average benchmark score of 81127, which is 0% different from the Intel Xeon w5-3535X (81115) and AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (81103). It is 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 (80762) and Intel Xeon 638 (80723).

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing performance?

A: The RTX 3080 has 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores, providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4407 indicates it can handle ray-traced workloads, but not at the level of newer GPUs.

Q: Is this system suitable for professional workstation use?

A: Yes, for CPU-intensive tasks. The 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with ECC memory support, make it suitable for scientific computing, software development, and 3D rendering. The GPU's 68th percentile ranking is less impressive but still capable for GPU-accelerated tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i9-14900KS delivers exceptional benchmark results across the board. In Cinebench R23, it scores 50995 multi-core and 7199 single-core. The Geekbench scores are 23931 multi-core and 2692 single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 60012, single-thread score of 4815, integer math of 212644, and floating point math of 153975. The data compression score of 803368 and data encryption score of 47717 round out a comprehensive performance picture.

These scores place the CPU in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 81127. Its nearest rivals — the Intel Xeon w5-3535X (81115), AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (81103), AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 (80762), and Intel Xeon 638 (80723) — are all within 0.5% of its average score. This means the i9-14900KS is effectively tied with workstation-class processors in overall performance.

The RTX 3080 delivers an average benchmark score of 23172, placing it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals — the NVIDIA P106-100 (23249), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 (23250), AMD Radeon RX 6600M (23273), and AMD Radeon R9 M290X (23276) — are all within 0.4% of its score, which is somewhat surprising given the RTX 3080's launch position. This suggests the GPU's benchmark performance has not aged well relative to newer and even lower-tier cards.

The combined system percentile of 82 reflects the CPU's strength and the GPU's mediocrity in the current market. The CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is a solid but not exceptional choice. For productivity workloads, this system is excellent. For gaming, the GPU holds it back.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame rate discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as qualitative expectations rather than precise figures.

At 1080p, the i9-14900KS's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 7199, Geekbench single-core of 2692) will drive extremely high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The RTX 3080's 29.77 TFLOPS compute and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are more than sufficient for 1080p, so the CPU will likely be the limiting factor in esports titles, which is a good problem to have. Expect frame rates well above 144 FPS in most competitive games.

At 1440p, the balance shifts. The GPU becomes the primary constraint, with the 68th percentile ranking suggesting it will not keep up with the CPU's potential. The 10 GB memory capacity and 320-bit bus are adequate for 1440p, but the GPU's overall compute power will cap frame rates at lower levels than the CPU could theoretically support. Expect solid but not spectacular performance, with frame rates varying widely based on game optimization.

At 4K, the RTX 3080 is the clear bottleneck. The 10 GB memory capacity may be insufficient for the most demanding textures, and the GPU's compute power (29.77 TFLOPS) is not enough to drive high refresh rates at this resolution. The CPU will sit idle waiting for the GPU to finish rendering each frame. DLSS and ray tracing features will be necessary for playable frame rates in AAA titles.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p with high-refresh monitors will benefit from the i9-14900KS's single-core speed, but they should be aware that the RTX 3080 will limit their frame rates at higher resolutions. Competitive gamers who play CPU-bound esports titles will find the 24 cores and 6.20 GHz boost clock to be overkill but beneficial for maintaining maximum FPS.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will find the CPU's multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 50995, PassMark multi-thread of 60012) to be exceptional. The ECC memory support and DDR4/DDR5 flexibility make it suitable for workstation builds where data integrity and memory choice matter. The GPU's compute capabilities (OpenCL score of 152423) provide acceleration for GPU-rendered effects.

Students and professionals who need a system for office work, data analysis, or light programming will be vastly overserved by this hardware. The CPU's single-thread speed (PassMark score of 4815) ensures snappy application performance, but the power draw and cost are disproportionate to the needs of these workloads. Small business workstations that run multi-threaded applications, database queries, or virtualization will benefit from the CPU's thread count.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i9-14900KS uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the final generation for this socket. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, giving builders a choice between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is backward compatible with the RTX 3080's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

The CPU's 150 W TDP and the GPU's 320 W TDP suggest a 700 W PSU is the recommended minimum, as stated in the suggestedPsu field. This provides headroom for the CPU's unlocked multiplier overclocking, though the 6.20 GHz boost clock is already near the limits of the Raptor Lake architecture.

A sensible next upgrade would be the GPU. The RTX 3080's 68th percentile ranking is the system's primary weakness. Replacing it with a newer, higher-percentile GPU would better utilize the CPU's 96th percentile performance. The CPU itself is at the top of its platform, so a CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard and socket. The RTX 3080's successor, the GeForce 40 series, would be a logical upgrade path, though the 12-pin power connector may require an adapter for newer power supplies.

The platform's DDR4 and DDR5 support means an upgrade to faster memory is possible without changing the motherboard, but the CPU's dual-channel bus limits memory bandwidth compared to newer platforms with quad-channel support. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure future GPUs and NVMe drives will work at full bandwidth.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900KS is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. The die size is 257 mm², and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The base clock is 3.20 GHz, boosting to 6.20 GHz, which is the highest boost clock in the FACT PACK.

The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, and it includes ECC memory support, making it suitable for workstation environments where data integrity is critical. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output, though most builders will use a discrete GPU. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes from the CPU ensures compatibility with the fastest storage and GPU interfaces.

Benchmark results show exceptional performance: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 50995 and single-core of 7199, Geekbench multi-core of 23931 and single-core of 2692. The PassMark suite reveals strength in integer math (212644) and floating point math (153975), but the find prime numbers score of 244 is notably low, suggesting this workload is not optimized for the architecture. The data compression score of 803368 and random string sorting score of 89789 indicate strong memory subsystem performance.

The 96th percentile ranking places it among the best CPUs available, with an average benchmark score of 81127. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of its average score, showing that the i9-14900KS is at the top of its class but not significantly ahead of the competition. The unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, and the 150 W TDP provides some thermal headroom for enthusiasts with capable cooling solutions.

For real workloads, this CPU excels at multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-core performance ensures fast response in everyday applications and gaming. The architecture's trade-off is power consumption — 150 W TDP is high, and the 10 nm process is not as efficient as newer nodes. However, for users who need maximum CPU performance on the Socket 1700 platform, this is the definitive choice.