SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900KF + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900KF

79,371 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900KF paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is a desktop build that combines a top-tier 24-core Raptor Lake processor with a professional-grade mobile-derived GPU. This combination sits at the 73rd percentile for all desktop builds, and while it presents an unusual pairing of a flagship CPU with an embedded workstation GPU, the benchmark data reveals distinct strengths and clear limitations. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900KF is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. The chip operates with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 6.00 GHz, making it one of the highest-clocking desktop processors available. The CPU is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It features a three-tier cache hierarchy: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel memory bus, and it includes ECC memory support. The processor connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, and it has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

The benchmark results for this CPU are exceptionally strong across the board. In Cinebench R23, the i9-14900KF scores 49,370 in multi-core and 6,969 in single-core tests. The multi-core score reflects the massive parallel throughput available from 24 cores and 32 threads, making it suitable for heavily threaded workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing. The single-core score of 6,969 indicates excellent per-thread performance, which matters for lightly threaded applications like legacy games or certain database operations. In Geekbench, the processor achieves 23,789 multi-core and 2,727 single-core, confirming the same pattern of dominant multi-threaded capability with strong single-thread responsiveness.

The PassMark suite provides additional granularity. The multithread score of 58,405 reinforces the CPU’s position as a high-end workstation processor. Integer math scores 209,125, while floating-point math scores 151,918, showing balanced arithmetic performance. Data compression scores 785,831, and data encryption scores 46,416, indicating robust throughput for archival tasks and security-related workloads. Extended instruction set performance reaches 44,839, which benefits modern AVX-512 or similar workloads. The processor also scores 231 in find prime numbers, 3,159 in physics, and 86,564 in random string sorting, with a single-thread score of 4,685.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 79,371, placing it at the 95th percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rivals show tight competition: the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus scores 79,574, just 0.3% higher, while the Intel Core i9-14900K scores 79,097, 0.3% lower. The AMD EPYC 7413 scores 80,041, 0.8% higher, and the Intel Xeon w5-2565X scores 80,671, 1.6% higher. These deltas are all within 1.6%, meaning the i9-14900KF sits in a performance cluster where small differences do not translate into meaningful real-world advantages. The processor is effectively at parity with its immediate rivals, and the 95th percentile ranking confirms it belongs in the top tier of desktop CPUs.

For real workloads, the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20,735 and R15 multi-core score of 4,976 indicate that the CPU can handle sustained all-core loads without significant degradation. The single-core R20 score of 2,926 and R15 score of 702 show that even a single thread can reach near-peak performance, which is crucial for responsiveness in interactive applications. The PassMark data compression and encryption scores suggest that the CPU excels at both compression tasks and cryptographic operations, making it suitable for file servers, backup systems, and secure communication workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The GPU in this build, the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, has an empty benchmark array, meaning no direct GPU benchmark scores exist in the data. Its percentile rank is 50, placing it at the median of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score is reported as 0. The CPU, by contrast, has extensive benchmark data. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 79,371 and its 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs establishes it as a top-tier processor. The combined build percentile is 73, which indicates that the overall system performance is above average but not elite, largely due to the GPU’s middling percentile position.

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,370 is a standout figure, placing it near the top of the charts for desktop processors. The Geekbench multi-core score of 23,789 further confirms this. In the PassMark suite, the multithread score of 58,405 and the integer math score of 209,125 demonstrate that the CPU is particularly adept at integer-heavy workloads, which are common in code compilation, spreadsheet calculations, and database operations. The floating-point score of 151,918 is slightly lower but still strong, supporting tasks like 3D modeling and physics simulations.

The combined picture from these benchmarks shows a system where the CPU is the dominant component. The CPU’s 95th percentile rank against all CPUs contrasts sharply with the GPU’s 50th percentile rank. This disparity suggests that in most workloads, the CPU will not be the limiting factor, but the GPU may hold back overall system performance in graphics-intensive tasks. The build’s 73rd percentile combined rank reflects this imbalance, positioning it as a system that excels in CPU-bound scenarios but is merely average in GPU-bound scenarios.

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate estimates must be inferred from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s high single-thread and multi-thread scores suggest that it can feed a GPU with data quickly, but the GPU’s median performance implies that frame rates in modern games will be moderate rather than exceptional. The estimated performance picture is one of a CPU that is far ahead of the GPU in relative terms, which will manifest in games where the GPU becomes the bottleneck at high resolutions or with demanding graphics settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900KF scores 79,371 on average, which is 0.3% below the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (79,574), 0.3% above the Intel Core i9-14900K (79,097), 0.8% below the AMD EPYC 7413 (80,041), and 1.6% below the Intel Xeon w5-2565X (80,671). These differences are all within 1.6%, indicating near-parity.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it performs at the median level. Its average benchmark score is 0 in the provided data, with no benchmark entries.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900KF supports ECC memory, though the memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU achieves a single-core score of 6,969 in Cinebench R23, which indicates strong per-thread performance for lightly threaded applications.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the build’s overall percentile ranking?

A: The combined build percentile is 73, placing it above average among all desktop builds.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900KF has a boost clock of 6.00 GHz and a base clock of 3.20 GHz.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14900KF uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for 12th, 13th, and 14th generation desktop processors. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in memory selection. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is suitable for modern high-bandwidth add-in cards such as graphics cards and NVMe storage. The processor has a TDP of 125 W, which is moderate for a 24-core part, and it requires a capable cooling solution to maintain boost clocks under load.

The GPU, the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, has a TDP of 120 W and uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. The GPU has no power connectors listed, meaning it draws power directly from the motherboard slot, and its slot width is listed as IGP, indicating it is designed for embedded or portable applications. The suggested PSU is null in the data, so no specific power supply recommendation is provided. The CPU’s TDP of 125 W and the GPU’s TDP of 120 W together suggest a system that can be powered by a standard desktop power supply, but the lack of a suggested PSU means the builder must calculate total system power draw based on other components.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to improve the GPU, as the CPU’s 95th percentile ranking is far higher than the GPU’s 50th percentile. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support means future GPUs that use PCIe Gen 5 can be fully utilized, though the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 allows for an upgrade path from older DDR4 systems to newer DDR5 platforms without changing the CPU. The socket 1700 platform is mature, with a wide range of motherboards available that support the i9-14900KF’s features, including overclocking via its unlocked multiplier.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU is at the 95th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 79,371, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0. In CPU-bound workloads, such as data compression, encryption, and integer math, the i9-14900KF will perform exceptionally, with PassMark scores of 785,831 for compression and 209,125 for integer math. These workloads will not be limited by the GPU, so the system will deliver top-tier performance.

In GPU-bound workloads, such as gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering with ray tracing, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The GPU’s 50th percentile rank means it performs at the median level for graphics, so frame rates will be moderate. The CPU’s high single-thread score of 6,969 in Cinebench R23 ensures that the CPU can process game logic and physics quickly, but the GPU’s rendering throughput will cap the final frame rate. This is particularly true at higher resolutions where the GPU’s 16 GB GDDR6 memory and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth become more critical.

The combined build percentile of 73 reflects this bottleneck, with the CPU pulling the overall score up while the GPU brings it down. For users who run mixed workloads, such as gaming and video editing, the system will feel fast for CPU-intensive tasks but average for graphics-heavy tasks. The data suggests that the CPU is the system’s strength, and the GPU is the component that would benefit most from an upgrade.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is built on the AD103 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The GPU contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². It has 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. The GPU includes 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores, making it capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based workloads such as DLSS. The base clock is 930 MHz with a boost clock of 1680 MHz.

The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective. The pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s. The GPU delivers 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the same 32.69 TFLOPS for FP16 in a 1:1 ratio, indicating that it is designed for professional compute tasks as well as graphics. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering the latest graphics APIs.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are empty, and its percentile rank is 50, meaning it sits at the median of all GPUs. This suggests that while the GPU is capable, it is not a top-tier performer compared to the best consumer or workstation GPUs. The 16 GB VRAM is generous for many professional workloads, such as 3D rendering or video editing, but the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is moderate. The FP32 performance of 32.69 TFLOPS is respectable for compute tasks, but the absence of benchmark data means the GPU’s real-world performance must be inferred from its specifications and percentile position.

The GPU’s TDP of 120 W is low relative to its memory capacity and compute capabilities, which is typical for embedded parts designed for mobile or compact systems. The lack of power connectors and the IGP slot width suggest it is intended for soldered or low-profile installations. For rendering tasks, the 76 RT cores will handle ray tracing, but the GPU’s median performance means it will not match high-end desktop GPUs in frame rates. The 304 tensor cores provide AI acceleration, which is useful for applications that leverage DLSS or similar technologies.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-core score of 6,969 in Cinebench R23 and multithread score of 58,405 in PassMark provide ample processing power for game logic and physics. However, the GPU’s 50th percentile rank means frame rates will be moderate, making high-refresh gaming at 1080p possible but not guaranteed at maximum settings. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will likely cap frame rates below what the CPU can deliver.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with a PassMark multithread score of 58,405, allow for simultaneous game encoding and streaming without significant performance drops. The GPU’s tensor cores could accelerate encoding, but the lack of benchmark data makes its contribution uncertain. The system can handle streaming workloads with headroom on the CPU side.

Video editing: The CPU excels in video encoding and decoding tasks, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,370 and a PassMark data compression score of 785,831. These scores indicate fast export times and smooth timeline scrubbing. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K video editing, but its median performance may slow GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s multi-core performance, with a Cinebench R20 score of 20,735 and R15 score of 4,976, is well-suited for CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 76 RT cores support GPU rendering, but its 50th percentile rank means it will be slower than high-end desktop GPUs in render tests.

Software development: The CPU’s integer math score of 209,125 and multithread score of 58,405 make it excellent for code compilation and parallel build tasks. The GPU’s compute capabilities can accelerate certain workloads, but the CPU will be the primary driver in development environments, delivering fast compile times.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,685 in PassMark and Geekbench single-core score of 2,727 provide responsive performance for everyday tasks such as word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU’s performance is irrelevant for these tasks, so the system would be more than adequate for office use, though the power draw of the CPU may be excessive for light workloads.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-14900KF, a 24-core desktop processor, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, a professional GPU designed for embedded systems. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile is 73, placing it above average among all desktop builds. The CPU is the standout component, ranking at the 95th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 79,371. The GPU ranks at the 50th percentile, indicating median performance. The combination is unusual, as the embedded GPU is typically found in laptops or workstations, but it is being used in a desktop context here.

The CPU’s specs include 24 cores, 32 threads, a base clock of 3.20 GHz, and a boost clock of 6.00 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, 9,728 shading units, and a TDP of 120 W. The overall system tier, based on the 73rd percentile, is solid but not top-tier, reflecting the GPU’s limiting role. The build is a desktop class system that leans heavily on CPU performance, making it suitable for workloads that prioritize processing power over graphics.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need maximum CPU performance but do not require top-tier GPU power. Gamers at 1080p resolution will benefit from the CPU’s high single-thread and multi-thread scores, which prevent CPU bottlenecks in most titles, though the GPU’s median performance will cap frame rates. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,370 and PassMark multithread score of 58,405 invaluable for reducing render times and export durations.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s integer math score of 209,125 and data encryption score of 46,416, which speed up code compilation and secure communications. Students and office workers will find the system more powerful than necessary, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 4,685 ensures snappy application launches and multitasking. Small business workstations that rely on CPU-intensive tasks, such as financial modeling or data analysis, will benefit from the processor’s 95th percentile ranking. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 32.69 TFLOPS make it suitable for light GPU compute tasks, but the CPU is the primary reason to choose this build.