SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900KF + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900KF

79,371 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900KF paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a desktop configuration that delivers exceptional processing power but is anchored by a graphics card that is now several generations old. The data shows a stark contrast between the CPU, which sits at the 95th percentile among all processors, and the GPU, which only reaches the 67th percentile. This pairing is best understood as a high-end workstation CPU joined with a professional-grade GPU that has been superseded, resulting in a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks but lags in modern graphics-intensive workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900KF is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 6.00 GHz, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The chip includes a substantial cache hierarchy: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus and includes ECC memory support, making it suitable for workstation environments where data integrity is critical.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 79371. This puts it in a dead heat with the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, which scores 79574, a delta of -0.3%. It is also 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900K, demonstrating that the "KF" variant (without integrated graphics) performs essentially identically to the base model. The data shows a 0.8% lead over the AMD EPYC 7413 and a 1.6% lead over the Intel Xeon w5-2565X.

In multi-threaded workloads, the processor is a powerhouse. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49370 and the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20735 indicate exceptional performance for rendering and compilation tasks. The Geekbench multi-core score of 23789 reinforces this, showing strong scaling across its 32 threads. The PassMark multithread score of 58405 and the integer math score of 209125 further confirm its dominance in parallel processing. The floating-point math score of 151918 suggests it handles scientific and engineering simulations with ease.

Single-threaded performance is equally impressive. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6969 and the Geekbench single-core score of 2727 show that the high 6.00 GHz boost clock translates into top-tier responsiveness for lightly-threaded applications. The PassMark single-thread score of 4685 places it among the fastest processors for tasks that rely on a single core, such as legacy software or certain gaming engines. The PassMark physics score of 3159 indicates strong performance in physics simulations, which can benefit gaming and scientific applications.

The architecture also shows strength in specialized tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 785831 is notably high, making this CPU an excellent choice for file archiving and data storage workloads. The data encryption score of 46416 and extended instructions score of 44839 demonstrate robust handling of cryptographic operations and modern SIMD instructions. The find prime numbers score of 231 is comparatively modest, suggesting that this specific workload does not scale as well with the core configuration.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i9-14900KF compare to its direct rival, the Core i9-14900K?

A: The two processors are statistically identical in performance. The Core i9-14900KF averages a benchmark score of 79371, which is 0.3% higher than the Core i9-14900K's score of 79097.

Q: What is the primary memory specification for this CPU?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel memory bus. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature often required for professional and server workloads.

Q: Is this CPU suitable for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, which allows for overclocking. The base clock is 3.20 GHz, and the maximum boost clock is 6.00 GHz, providing significant headroom for enthusiasts to push performance further.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile, and how does it compare to its nearest rival?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 sits in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. It is 1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and 1.2% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile in average benchmark scores.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the "KF" designation indicates that the integrated graphics have been disabled. This system requires a discrete GPU for any video output.

Q: What is the process node and foundry for the GPU?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 is built on a 12 nm process node at TSMC. It uses the TU104 chip and is based on the Turing architecture.

Benchmark Performance

This system presents a unique benchmark profile due to the absence of measured FPS data for the combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this exact CPU+GPU pairing, so all gaming performance analysis is estimated from the individual benchmark scores.

The CPU's performance is stellar. With a 95th percentile ranking and an average score of 79371, it is a top-tier processor. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, scores 79574, a difference of only -0.3%. This places the i9-14900KF at the apex of consumer and professional desktop processors.

The GPU, however, tells a different story. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 has an average benchmark score of 21629, placing it in the 67th percentile. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which scores 21856, meaning the Quadro is 1% slower. It is 1.2% faster than the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile and 1.8% faster than the AMD Radeon HD 8970M. The PassMark G3D score of 15616 and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 indicate that while the GPU is capable, it is not competitive with modern high-end gaming cards.

The combined percentile for this build is 81, reflecting the strong CPU contribution dragging up the overall score. The data suggests a severe imbalance: the CPU is a top-5% part, while the GPU is merely above average. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, 3D rendering, and data analysis, this system will perform exceptionally well. In GPU-bound scenarios such as high-resolution gaming or real-time ray tracing, the system will be limited by the Quadro RTX 5000. The estimated FPS in modern games at 1080p or 1440p would likely be moderate, but at 4K, the GPU would become a significant bottleneck, potentially delivering frame rates comparable to older mid-range gaming GPUs.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize raw computational throughput over graphical horsepower. The primary audience is professionals in fields like software development, scientific research, and financial modeling, where the 24-core, 32-thread CPU can dramatically reduce compile times and simulation durations. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49370 and the PassMark integer math score of 209125 are indicative of a machine that crunches numbers and processes data with minimal delay.

Content creators who work with video encoding or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded might, but they should be aware that the GPU will be the limiting factor in GPU-accelerated renderers. The Quadro RTX 5000's 16 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth are substantial, but its compute performance, as measured by the PassMark GPU compute score of 6525, is not in the same league as its CPU counterpart.

Students and small business workstations that run heavy multi-threaded applications, such as MATLAB, Ansys, or large Excel models, would see strong performance. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking ensures that any CPU-bound task will be handled swiftly. However, gamers looking for high-refresh-rate experiences at 1440p or 4K should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 67th percentile ranking will not deliver the frame rates expected from a modern high-end gaming PC.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data indicates a clear and significant bottleneck in this system: the GPU. The CPU's 95th percentile performance is bottlenecked by the GPU's 67th percentile performance in graphics-intensive scenarios. For every task that relies on the GPU, the system will perform as if it had a mid-range graphics card. The PassMark G3D score of 15616 confirms that the Quadro RTX 5000 is a capable but dated GPU.

In CPU-bound workloads, the system is exceptionally balanced. The processor's 49370 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core suggests that it can feed even the fastest GPUs in non-graphics tasks. However, in gaming, the imbalance is stark. The estimated FPS at 1080p would be constrained by the GPU, and at 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the definitive limiting factor. The CPU's 6.00 GHz boost clock and 4685 PassMark single-thread score are more than sufficient for any modern game engine, but the GPU's 11.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will hold back frame rates.

The data shows that this is a system where the CPU is underutilized in gaming scenarios. Upgrading the GPU to a modern part would unlock the CPU's full potential in graphics workloads. Conversely, in productivity tasks that use the CPU, there is no bottleneck; the system operates at its peak capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not the ideal platform. The GPU's 67th percentile ranking and 1% deficit against the GTX 1060 6 GB suggest that frame rates will be moderate, even at 1080p. The CPU is overkill for this task, and the system will likely feel GPU-limited in most titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide exceptional headroom for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark data compression score of 785831 suggests that x264 encoding will be swift, allowing for high-quality streams. However, the game itself will be limited by the GPU's performance.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for the CPU. Multi-core rendering in software like Premiere Pro will benefit from the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49370. The GPU can assist with effects and playback, but the 16 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for most editing timelines.

3D Rendering: The CPU excels in CPU-based renderers like V-Ray or Blender's Cycles. The 20735 Cinebench R20 multi-core score indicates fast render times. However, GPU-accelerated renderers like Octane will be limited by the Quadro RTX 5000's compute score of 6525.

Software Development: This is a flagship scenario. Compiling large codebases will be exceptionally quick, thanks to the 32 threads and high multi-core scores. The Geekbench multi-core score of 23789 and PassMark multithread score of 58405 suggest that build times will be minimal.

Student and Office Work: This system is massively overpowered for typical office tasks. The CPU's speed ensures that spreadsheets and documents are handled instantly, but the cost and power requirements are not justified for this use case. The GPU is irrelevant for these workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory that fits their budget and performance needs. The system provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is future-proof for the fastest NVMe SSDs and modern expansion cards.

The GPU uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, which is an older standard. While it will function in a PCIe 5.0 slot, the bandwidth is limited to PCIe 3.0 speeds. The GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 125 W. This leaves significant headroom for a power supply upgrade if a more powerful GPU is installed later.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The Quadro RTX 5000 is the bottleneck, and replacing it with a modern GPU would dramatically improve graphics performance without requiring a new CPU or motherboard. The CPU has enough headroom to support any current high-end GPU, as its 95th percentile ranking ensures it will not be the limiting factor in most scenarios.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a top-tier 24-core Intel processor with a professional Turing-generation GPU. The CPU is a flagship part, sitting in the 95th percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range workstation card in the 67th percentile. The combined percentile for the build is 81, suggesting an overall above-average system that is heavily skewed toward processing power.

The pairing is unusual: a modern 14th Gen CPU with a GPU that was released in 2018. This suggests the builder prioritized CPU performance for specific professional applications. The system is a capable workstation for CPU-intensive tasks but is not suited for modern high-end gaming due to the GPU's age and performance level.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is based on the Turing architecture, built on a 12 nm process at TSMC with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It includes 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI acceleration, respectively.

The GPU clocks at a base of 1620 MHz and boosts to 1815 MHz. The memory runs at 1750 MHz, or 14 Gbps effective. The pixel rate is 116.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 348.5 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 11.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1).

Benchmark results show the GPU in the 67th percentile with an average score of 21629. The PassMark G3D score is 15616, and the Geekbench OpenCL score is 78999. These numbers indicate that it performs comparably to a mainstream gaming GPU from its era. The nearest rival, the GTX 1060 6 GB, is 1% faster, which puts the Quadro's gaming performance in perspective: it is roughly equivalent to a mid-range gaming card from 2016.

For rendering, the 16 GB of VRAM is a significant asset, allowing for large textures and complex scenes. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution textures without stuttering. The RT cores and tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and DLSS, although the performance is limited compared to newer architectures. The PassMark GPU compute score of 6525 suggests that while the GPU is capable of compute tasks, it is not a compute powerhouse. The DirectX 12 score of 59 and the Vulkan score of 92309 in Geekbench indicate that it can handle modern APIs, but the raw performance is not competitive with modern GPUs. The GPU is end-of-life, with its successor being Workstation Ampere, and its predecessor being Quadro Volta.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900KF + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900KF

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds