SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900KF

79,371 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

54,209 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-14900KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER: Flagship Desktop Pairing

This desktop build pairs Intel's 24-core Core i9-14900KF with NVIDIA's RTX 4080 SUPER, landing at the 91st percentile among all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU alone sits at the 95th percentile across all processors, while the GPU holds the 86th percentile among all graphics cards. This is a top-tier combination for demanding workloads, though the data shows the CPU is the stronger component relative to its competition. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900KF is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates on a 10 nm Intel process node with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock runs at 3.20 GHz, with a maximum boost clock of 6.00 GHz. This is an unlocked multiplier part (part number SRN49), meaning users can adjust clock speeds beyond stock settings if their cooling and motherboard allow it.

The core configuration breaks down as 24 cores with a shared 36 MB L3 cache. Each core carries 80 KB of L1 cache and 2 MB of L2 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support. PCIe connectivity comes via Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU. There is no integrated graphics on this KF variant, so a discrete GPU is mandatory for any display output. The launch MSRP is $564.

Benchmark results place this CPU in elite territory. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 49,370, while the single-core score is 6,969. These numbers indicate exceptional sustained multi-threaded throughput and top-tier single-thread responsiveness. The R20 results show 20,735 multi-core and 2,926 single-core, while the older R15 test yields 4,976 multi-core and 702 single-core. Geekbench scores come in at 23,789 multi-core and 2,727 single-core.

The PassMark suite provides additional workload-specific insights. The multi-thread score is 58,405, with a single-thread score of 4,685. Integer math reaches 209,125, floating-point math hits 151,918, and extended instructions score 44,839. Data compression scores 785,831, while data encryption hits 46,416. Random string sorting scores 86,564, and physics simulation scores 3,159. Prime number finding scores 231, which is a low absolute number but consistent with how that specific test scales across processors.

The average benchmark score across all tests is 79,371. Against nearest rivals, the Core i9-14900KF is effectively tied with the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, which scores 79,574 (a 0.3% difference). The i9-14900K scores 79,097, putting the KF variant 0.3% ahead. The AMD EPYC 7413 scores 80,041, which is 0.8% higher, and the Intel Xeon w5-2565X scores 80,671, 1.6% higher. These deltas are small, meaning the 14900KF sits right at the top of its peer group for general processing.

For real-world workloads, the multi-core Cinebench and PassMark results translate to strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks. The single-core scores matter for lightly threaded applications, where the 6.00 GHz boost clock helps maintain fast response times. The data compression and encryption scores suggest solid performance in file archiving and disk encryption scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of the 95th-percentile CPU and 86th-percentile GPU is well-suited for high-refresh gaming. The CPU's single-core score of 6,969 in Cinebench R23 and 4,685 in PassMark single-thread indicate strong per-core performance that can feed frames quickly, while the GPU's compute capabilities handle the rendering load. This pairing should maintain high frame rates in most titles.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 32 threads provide substantial headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. PassMark's data encryption score of 46,416 and integer math score of 209,125 suggest the CPU can handle the overhead of software encoding while keeping game performance stable. The 16 GB of GDDR6X VRAM on the GPU also helps by keeping more assets resident.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,370 indicates strong render performance for video exports. The GPU's 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 compute accelerates effects and timeline rendering. The 736.3 GB/s memory bandwidth on the GPU supports working with high-resolution footage and multiple streams.

3D rendering: Multi-core performance is the primary driver, and the CPU delivers. The R20 multi-core score of 20,735 and the R15 score of 4,976 show scaling across all 24 cores. The GPU's 10,240 shading units and 80 RT cores accelerate both rasterization and ray-traced rendering workloads. The 16 GB VRAM allows for larger scenes without spilling to system memory.

Software development: Compilation benefits heavily from multi-core throughput, and the PassMark integer math score of 209,125 reflects strong integer performance. The 36 MB L3 cache helps keep working sets resident, and the dual-channel memory support (both DDR4 and DDR5) provides flexibility in platform choice. The high single-thread scores also help with build steps that are not fully parallelized.

Student and office work: This configuration is far beyond the requirements for typical student or office workloads. The single-core scores and 6.00 GHz boost clock ensure snappy application launches, but the cost and power characteristics make this overkill for document editing or spreadsheet work. The data shows the capability is there, but it is not an efficient choice for these tasks.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i9-14900KF compare to the Core i9-14900K?

A: The KF variant scores an average of 79,371, which is 0.3% higher than the 14900K's 79,097. The KF has no integrated graphics, while the K model typically includes Intel UHD graphics. The benchmark delta is negligible.

Q: Is the RTX 4080 SUPER meaningfully faster than the RTX 4080?

A: The average benchmark score for the RTX 4080 SUPER is 54,209, compared to 54,247 for the RTX 4080. That is a 0.1% difference, making the two effectively identical in performance based on the data.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The Core i9-14900KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory. The choice of memory type depends on the motherboard selected.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 320 W. The suggested PSU for this GPU is 700 W. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No. The KF designation means the integrated graphics are disabled. A discrete GPU is required for display output. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for the GPU and other devices.

Q: How does this CPU compare to the AMD EPYC 7413?

A: The EPYC 7413 has an average score of 80,041, which is 0.8% higher than the Core i9-14900KF's 79,371. Both are close in aggregate benchmarks, but they target different platforms and markets.

Q: When was the RTX 4080 SUPER released?

A: The release date is January 30, 2024. It is part of the GeForce 40-series, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm TSMC process. Its production status is listed as end-of-life, with the GeForce 50-series as its successor.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile data shows the CPU at the 95th percentile and the GPU at the 86th percentile. This asymmetry indicates the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU within their respective product universes. In CPU-bound workloads, the processor can push beyond what the GPU can render, making the GPU the limiting factor. In GPU-bound scenarios, the CPU has ample headroom.

The CPU's multi-core scores are exceptional, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,370. This means tasks like 3D rendering, video encoding, and code compilation will be limited by how fast the GPU can accelerate specific parts of the pipeline, not by the CPU. For example, GPU compute tasks like the PassMark GPU compute score of 19,822 will be the ceiling for those workloads.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 54,209 places it just 0.1% ahead of the RTX 4080 and 1.1% behind the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X. That places it firmly in high-end territory, but the CPU is even further ahead of its rivals. The 0.3% lead over the Core i9-14900K and the 0.8% gap to the EPYC 7413 show the CPU is near the top of its class.

For gaming at lower resolutions, the CPU becomes relatively more important, and the 6.00 GHz boost clock helps maintain high frame rates. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the primary constraint. The 16 GB VRAM and 736.3 GB/s memory bandwidth on the GPU support high-resolution textures and detailed scenes without hitting memory limits.

The combined percentile of 91 reflects that both components are strong, but the CPU is the more dominant part. For workloads that scale across many cores, the CPU will not bottleneck. For graphics-heavy tasks, the GPU sets the performance ceiling.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 79,371, ranking it in the 95th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, scores 79,574, a difference of 0.3%. The Core i9-14900K scores 79,097, putting the KF 0.3% ahead. The AMD EPYC 7413 scores 80,041, which is 0.8% higher, and the Intel Xeon w5-2565X scores 80,671, 1.6% higher. The 14900KF is thus competitive with workstation and server-class chips despite being a consumer desktop part.

Specific CPU benchmarks: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 49,370 and single-core scores 6,969. Cinebench R20 multi-core scores 20,735 and single-core scores 2,926. Cinebench R15 multi-core scores 4,976 and single-core scores 702. Geekbench multi-core scores 23,789 and single-core scores 2,727. PassMark multi-thread scores 58,405 and single-thread scores 4,685. PassMark integer math scores 209,125 and floating-point math scores 151,918.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 54,209, placing it in the 86th percentile among all GPUs. The RTX 4080 scores 54,247, a 0.1% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54,828, 1.1% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55,698, 2.7% higher, and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55,757, 2.8% higher. Note that the GPU's nearest rivals are a mix of workstation and consumer cards, with some scoring higher on aggregate benchmarks.

GPU-specific benchmarks: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 6,600. Geekbench OpenCL scores 219,065 and Vulkan scores 260,075. PassMark G3D scores 34,245, with G2D at 1,270. PassMark GPU compute scores 19,822. DirectX 12 scores 134, DirectX 11 scores 301, DirectX 10 scores 193, and DirectX 9 scores 381.

The combined picture is a desktop build at the 91st percentile overall. The CPU is the standout component, while the GPU is strong but not as dominant within its own category. The aggregate scores show both components performing at high levels, with no obvious weak link.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots.

The GPU has a TDP of 320 W and requires a 1x 16-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is 700 W. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W. When combined, the system's power requirements are well within the suggested 700 W PSU headroom, assuming the rest of the system components do not draw excessive power.

The GPU is listed as end-of-life, with the GeForce 50-series as its successor. The CPU is listed as active production. For a sensible next upgrade, the GPU would be the first target, as it is the weaker component relative to its peers and is already end-of-life. A newer GPU would better match the CPU's 95th-percentile standing.

The CPU's socket, Intel Socket 1700, limits CPU upgrades to other LGA1700 parts. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means the motherboard choice determines which memory type is available. The GPU's triple-slot width and 310 mm length require a case with sufficient clearance. The 1x 16-pin power connector means the PSU must have the appropriate cable.

The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide headroom for future GPUs or NVMe storage that can use the additional bandwidth. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is not a bottleneck for current workloads, given the benchmark scores.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all gaming frame-rate figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as expectations rather than measured results.

The CPU's single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 6,969 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,685, indicates strong per-core capability that supports high frame rates in games that rely on a few fast threads. The 6.00 GHz boost clock is among the highest available, which helps in CPU-bound scenarios.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,600 and PassMark G3D score of 34,245 indicate high-end rasterization performance. The 10,240 shading units and 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 compute suggest strong raw throughput for modern game engines. The 80 RT cores support ray-traced effects, and the 320 tensor cores accelerate DLSS and other AI-based features.

The 16 GB of GDDR6X memory with 736.3 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for high-resolution textures and detailed environments. At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU's strong single-thread scores should allow the GPU to reach high frame rates in most titles. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary limiter, and frame rates will depend on the specific game's optimization.

The combined 91st-percentile ranking suggests this system will perform well above average in most games. The CPU's 24 cores provide headroom for background tasks like streaming or recording while gaming. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM avoids capacity limits in current titles, though future games with higher memory demands may approach that limit.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. It pairs Intel's Core i9-14900KF, a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake refresh processor, with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, an Ada Lovelace GPU with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory. The combined percentile is 91, placing this system in the top tier of all recorded CPU+GPU combinations.

The CPU is the stronger component, sitting at the 95th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 86th percentile among all GPUs. This means the processor is closer to the top of its category than the graphics card is to the top of its category. The CPU's average benchmark score of 79,371 is within 1.6% of its nearest rivals, including server-class chips like the AMD EPYC 7413 and Intel Xeon w5-2565X. The GPU's average score of 54,209 is within 2.8% of its nearest rivals, which include both workstation and consumer cards.

The GPU is listed as end-of-life, while the CPU is active production. The GPU's launch MSRP is 999 USD. The CPU's launch MSRP is $564. The build targets high-end desktop performance for workloads that benefit from both strong multi-core CPU throughput and high-end GPU compute.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need maximum multi-core CPU performance and high-end GPU capability. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,370, make it suitable for content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerate rendering and compute workloads.

Gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions will benefit from the GPU's high-end rasterization and ray-tracing performance, with the CPU's strong single-thread scores ensuring the GPU is fed adequately. The 16 GB VRAM supports high-resolution textures without memory pressure. The CPU's 95th-percentile ranking and the GPU's 86th-percentile ranking mean this system will not be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios.

Software developers will find the CPU's integer math score of 209,125 and multi-thread score of 58,405 valuable for build times and parallel compilation. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with repeated compilation steps. The support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory allows flexibility in platform choice.

Students and small business users who require occasional high-performance tasks, such as video editing or 3D modeling, will find this system capable, though it exceeds the requirements for standard office work. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures responsive daily use, but the cost and power characteristics make it a niche choice for these users.

Professionals working with GPU-accelerated applications, such as machine learning or simulation, will benefit from the GPU's 320 tensor cores and 80 RT cores. The 45,900 million transistors on the AD103 chip provide substantial compute density. The system's 91st-percentile combined ranking indicates it is among the top configurations for demanding workloads.