SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900KF + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900KF

79,371 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900KF is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates on a 10 nm process node from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The chip features a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 6.00 GHz, placing it among the highest-clocked mainstream desktop CPUs in the database. The KF designation indicates an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, as confirmed by the multiplierUnlocked field, and the absence of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache pool helps feed the 24 cores during multi-threaded workloads, reducing memory latency bottlenecks. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel memory bus, with ECC memory support enabled—a feature more commonly seen in workstation or server platforms, making this chip viable for error-sensitive compute tasks.

Benchmark data shows a dominant multi-threaded performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 49,370 points in multi-core and 6,969 points in single-core. The R20 results show 20,735 multi-core and 2,926 single-core, while R15 yields 4,976 multi-core and 702 single-core. Geekbench scores are 23,789 multi-core and 2,727 single-core. The PassMark suite reinforces this: multi-thread score of 58,405, single-thread of 4,685, integer math at 209,125, floating-point math at 151,918, and extended instructions at 44,839. Data compression in PassMark reaches 785,831, while encryption hits 46,416, indicating strong throughput for archival and security workloads.

The CPU sits in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 79,371. Its nearest rivals show tight competition: the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus scores 79,574 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core i9-14900K scores 79,097 (0.3% lower), the AMD EPYC 7413 scores 80,041 (0.8% higher), and the Intel Xeon w5-2565X scores 80,671 (1.6% higher). The deltas are all within 1.6%, meaning the i9-14900KF is effectively performance-equivalent to these alternatives, though the EPYC and Xeon are server-class chips with different platform trade-offs. For desktop workloads, this CPU is at the top tier.

For real workloads, the multi-core scores translate to fast video rendering, 3D scene compilation, and software builds. The single-core scores matter for older games, lightly threaded applications, and general responsiveness. The PassMark physics score of 3,159 suggests strong simulation performance, while random string sorting at 86,564 indicates efficient memory-bound operations. This is a CPU that does not throttle on paper—the 125 W TDP is modest for the core count, and the boost clock of 6.00 GHz is exceptional, though sustained all-core boosting will depend on cooling and motherboard power delivery.

# FAQ

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core i9-14900KF?

A: The launch MSRP is $564.

Q: How does the i9-14900KF compare to the Intel Core i9-14900K in average benchmark score?

A: The i9-14900KF has an average score of 79,371, while the i9-14900K scores 79,097, making the KF 0.3% higher.

Q: What memory types does the i9-14900KF support?

A: It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon RX 7700 support DirectX 12?

A: Yes, it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RX 7700?

A: The RX 7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of the i9-14900KF and RX 7700 pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 77, indicating the pairing outperforms 77% of all recorded CPU+GPU combinations.

Q: Is the RX 7700's performance closer to the RX 9060 or the RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The RX 7700 scores 15,852 on average, while the RX 9060 scores 16,014 (1% higher) and the RTX 3060 Ti scores 16,129 (1.7% higher). It is closer to the RX 9060 in delta terms.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i9-14900KF and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 skews heavily toward the CPU. The i9-14900KF sits in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, while the RX 7700 sits in the 58th percentile among all GPUs. This 37-point gap indicates the GPU is the limiting factor in most graphics-bound scenarios. In CPU-heavy workloads—such as data compression, encryption, or software compilation—the CPU will not be constrained by the GPU, but in gaming at high resolutions, the RX 7700 will cap frame rates well before the i9-14900KF reaches its limits.

The PassMark GPU compute score for the RX 7700 is 10,963, while the CPU's PassMark multi-thread score is 58,405. For workloads that offload compute to the GPU, the RX 7700's compute throughput is roughly one-fifth of the CPU's multi-thread throughput on these specific tests, though the comparison is not apples-to-apples due to different instruction paths. The GPU's G3D score of 20,974 and G2D score of 1,206 show strong 3D rendering but modest 2D acceleration, which is typical for a discrete GPU.

The bottleneck analysis depends on the workload. For gaming at 1080p or 1440p, the GPU will almost always be the limiting factor because the i9-14900KF's single-core performance ranks in the 95th percentile, and its 6.00 GHz boost clock ensures the CPU can feed frames quickly. The absence of measured FPS data for this pair means the exact scaling is unknown, but the percentile gap suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield larger gaming gains than upgrading the CPU. Conversely, for multi-threaded productivity tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU is the engine, and the GPU matters only if the renderer uses GPU acceleration.

The RX 7700's 200 W TDP and the CPU's 125 W TDP mean the power draw is manageable, but the suggested PSU is 550 W, which provides headroom for both components under load. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface on the GPU and the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes mean there is no bandwidth bottleneck for modern graphics cards. The CPU's dual-channel memory support, whether DDR4 or DDR5, will not starve the GPU, but DDR5 is recommended for peak CPU performance in memory-sensitive tasks.

# Who Should Build It

The target user is a desktop enthusiast who prioritizes CPU compute power for productivity while maintaining a capable mid-range GPU for gaming and light creative work. The i9-14900KF's 95th percentile CPU ranking makes it suitable for content creators who render video, compile code, or run simulations. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,370 indicates a system that can handle 4K video exports and complex 3D scene rendering without stalling. The PassMark data compression score of 785,831 suits archival and backup tasks, while the encryption score of 46,416 supports secure file operations.

For gamers, the RX 7700's 58th percentile GPU ranking means it is a mid-tier card. At 1080p, the GPU will drive high frame rates in most titles, but at 1440p or 4K, the GPU will become the bottleneck. The CPU's single-core strength—Cinebench R23 single-core of 6,969 and Geekbench single-core of 2,727—ensures that frame pacing is consistent, avoiding CPU-induced stutters in games that favor high clock speeds. This pairing is less suited for competitive esports at 360 Hz refresh rates where the GPU might not keep up with the CPU's capability.

Software developers benefit from the 24 cores and 32 threads, which allow parallel builds and rapid iteration. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running compile jobs or server-like workloads. Students and small business workstations would find the CPU overkill for basic tasks, but the combination handles multitasking with ease—spreadsheets, browsers, and virtual machines run without contention. The RX 7700's 16 GB VRAM is notable for its class, allowing larger textures and datasets in GPU-accelerated applications without running out of memory.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 79,371, placing it in the 95th percentile. The nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, scores 79,574, a 0.3% difference, making these effectively identical in aggregate. The Intel Core i9-14900K is 0.3% lower, the AMD EPYC 7413 is 0.8% higher, and the Intel Xeon w5-2565X is 1.6% higher. The single-core and multi-core Cinebench scores confirm the CPU's strength: R23 multi-core at 49,370 is a top-tier result, while the single-core at 6,969 is among the best in the database.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 15,852, placing it in the 58th percentile. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon R9 370X, scores 15,862 (0.1% higher), which is surprising given the generational gap. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 scores 16,014 (1% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 scores 15,679 (1.1% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 16,129 (1.7% higher). The RX 7700's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,865, and its Geekbench OpenCL score is 106,028. In PassMark, the G3D score is 20,974, while the GPU compute score is 10,963.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 77, meaning it outperforms 77% of all recorded combinations. The CPU's 95th percentile drags the average up, while the GPU's 58th percentile pulls it down. The combined picture is a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks but is average-to-good in GPU-bound tasks. For users who prioritize compute over graphics, this is a strong pairing; for those who want max gaming FPS, the GPU is the weak link. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Navi 32 chip with a codename of Wheat Nas. It is manufactured on a 5 nm TSMC process with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 81.2 million per mm². The GPU has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, along with 40 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 1900 MHz, with a boost clock of 2459 MHz and a game clock of 2041 MHz. The memory runs at 2438 MHz, effective 19.5 Gbps.

The memory subsystem is a highlight: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth. This is generous for the GPU's performance class, allowing high-resolution textures and large datasets to reside in VRAM. The pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 393.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 25.18 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 25.18 TFLOPS (1:1), indicating that the GPU does not double FP16 throughput—a design choice that limits some compute workloads but is irrelevant for gaming.

The GPU's benchmark scores are modest relative to its memory capacity. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,865 suggests it handles modern DX12 titles at mid-range settings. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 106,028 shows compute capability for general-purpose tasks, but the PassMark GPU compute score of 10,963 is lower than expected given the FP32 figure. The DirectX tests show 92 for DX10, 186 for DX11, 96 for DX12, and 261 for DX9, indicating that the GPU performs better on older APIs relative to its DX12 score—a possible driver or architectural quirk.

The RX 7700's 58th percentile ranking means it is below average among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the Radeon R9 370X, is a much older card with a nearly identical average score, which is an anomaly. The RX 9060 is 1% faster, and the RTX 3060 Ti is 1.7% faster, placing the RX 7700 in a tight performance band. For rendering, the 16 GB VRAM allows larger scenes and more textures than the 8 GB cards in its performance class, but the raw compute is not exceptional. The 40 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but the scores do not indicate strong RT performance—users should expect RT to be a feature, not a strength.

The GPU has a 200 W TDP, a dual-slot cooler, and requires 2x 8-pin power connectors. The suggested PSU is 550 W, and the card is 267 mm long, 135 mm tall, and 50 mm wide. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C, providing modern connectivity. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slot.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14900KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus. The CPU has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, providing high bandwidth for a single GPU or NVMe storage. The socket is a mature platform, and the i9-14900KF is near the top of the stack for Socket 1700, so the upgrade path is limited for the CPU itself—users would need a new motherboard for a newer generation. The memory support is flexible, allowing users to choose DDR4 for cost savings or DDR5 for higher bandwidth, though the dual-channel limitation means memory bandwidth is not a differentiator.

The GPU's upgrade path is straightforward: the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is backward and forward compatible, so a newer GPU can slot into the same motherboard. The RX 7700's 200 W TDP and the suggested 550 W PSU leave headroom for a more power-hungry GPU, provided the PSU has the right connectors. The CPU's 125 W TDP is low for a 24-core chip, so power delivery is not a constraint. The 2x 8-pin power connectors on the GPU are standard, and newer GPUs with 12VHPWR connectors would require an adapter.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a stronger GPU. The CPU's 95th percentile and the GPU's 58th percentile mean that the CPU has significant headroom to drive a faster graphics card. Upgrading to a GPU in the 75th percentile or higher would balance the system. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes and dual-channel memory are sufficient for any current GPU. Alternatively, adding more RAM or faster DDR5 would help CPU-bound tasks, but the 36 MB L3 cache already mitigates memory latency.

The platform's ECC memory support is unusual for a consumer chip and suggests a use case in small servers or workstations. If the user's workload is compute-heavy, the CPU is the keeper; if gaming is the priority, the GPU should be replaced first. The motherboard is the limiting factor for future CPU upgrades—Socket 1700 is not forward-compatible with newer Intel sockets, so a CPU upgrade would require a full platform change.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-14900KF, a 24-core, 32-thread desktop CPU, with the AMD Radeon RX 7700, a 16 GB desktop GPU. The build class is desktop. The combined percentile is 77, indicating that this pairing outperforms 77% of all recorded CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU is in the 95th percentile, and the GPU is in the 58th percentile, creating a lopsided system where the CPU is the star and the GPU is a mid-range companion.

The i9-14900KF is a top-tier processor for multi-threaded workloads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,370 and a boost clock of 6.00 GHz. The RX 7700 is a capable mid-range GPU with 16 GB of VRAM and a 58th percentile ranking, trading blows with the RTX 3060 Ti (1.7% faster). The system is best described as a productivity-first desktop that can also game at reasonable settings. The CPU's launch MSRP is $564, and the GPU has no recorded launch MSRP.

The tier of this build is upper-mid-range overall, dragged down by the GPU. In CPU-bound tasks, it performs like a top-5% system; in GPU-bound tasks, it performs like a slightly-above-average system. The 77th combined percentile is a fair summary: this is not a balanced high-end gaming rig, but it is a powerful workstation that can handle moderate gaming. The lack of measured FPS data means the gaming experience is estimated, but the CPU's strength ensures that any bottleneck comes from the GPU, not the processor.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the RX 7700's 58th percentile ranking and 16 GB VRAM can drive high frame rates in esports and older titles, but the CPU's 6.00 GHz boost clock ensures no CPU-side frame drops. At 1440p or higher, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and users should expect mid-range performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,865 indicates modern DX12 games will run at medium-to-high settings, not ultra at high refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads handle encoding and gaming simultaneously without contention. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,370 suggests that software x264 encoding at high presets is feasible, while the GPU's 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 can assist with hardware encoding if the software supports it. The PassMark encryption score of 46,416 ensures secure stream keys are processed quickly.

Video editing: The CPU dominates this workload. The PassMark integer math score of 209,125 and floating-point math of 151,918 accelerate timeline rendering and effects processing. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM allows large preview buffers and GPU-accelerated effects, but the CPU will do most of the heavy lifting in codecs like H.264 or HEVC. The 95th percentile CPU ranking means this is a top-tier editing machine.

3D rendering: In CPU-based renderers, the i9-14900KF is exceptional—the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,370 is a direct indicator of Blender or V-Ray CPU performance. In GPU-based renderers, the RX 7700's 58th percentile and 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 make it usable but not fast. The 16 GB VRAM is an advantage for scenes that exceed 8 GB, but the render time will be longer than with a higher-tier GPU.

Software development: The 24 cores and 32 threads compile code in parallel, and the PassMark data compression score of 785,831 speeds up build artifact packing. The ECC memory support reduces crash risk in long-running builds. The single-core score of 4,685 in PassMark ensures responsive IDE interaction, while the multi-thread score of 58,405 handles test suites quickly.

Student and office work: This is massively over-provisioned for documents and spreadsheets, but the system does not struggle with anything. The CPU's single-core performance makes UI rendering snappy, and the GPU's 2D score of 1,206 in PassMark is sufficient for multiple monitors. The 16 GB VRAM is wasted on office tasks, but the system will run any productivity software without lag.

# Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and the measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU individually.

The CPU's 95th percentile ranking and 6.00 GHz boost clock suggest that it will not bottleneck any game at any resolution. The GPU's 58th percentile ranking, with an average score of 15,852, is the limiting factor. Based on the GPU's nearest rival—the RTX 3060 Ti at 1.7% higher—the RX 7700 should perform similarly to that card in most titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,865 indicates that modern DX12 games will run at playable frame rates, but not at high refresh rates on ultra settings.

At 1080p ultra, games like esports titles (CS2, Valorant) should exceed 144 FPS, given the GPU's 58th percentile and the CPU's top-tier single-core performance. At 1440p ultra, the GPU will likely deliver 60–90 FPS in AAA titles, with the 16 GB VRAM allowing high texture settings without memory overflow. At 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in demanding titles, and users should lower settings to medium or high. The absence of measured data means these numbers are estimates; the actual performance could vary by 10–20% depending on the game's optimization.

The combined picture is a system that can game competently at 1080p and 1440p, but the GPU is the ceiling. Users who want to play at 4K or at 144 Hz with ultra settings should pair the i9-14900KF with a higher-tier GPU. The CPU will not hold back any GPU upgrade, making this a good foundation for future gaming improvements.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900KF + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900KF

AMD Radeon RX 7700

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds