SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900K + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

97%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900K

79,097 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is an unusual combination: a flagship-tier desktop processor sitting alongside a professional embedded GPU. The data shows a clear asymmetry. The i9-14900K sits in the 95th percentile against all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 79097, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada lands at the 50th percentile against all GPUs, and the pairing produces a combined percentile of 73. That gap defines this build's character: it is CPU-dominant, well suited to compute-bound and lightly-threaded-sensitive work, and merely mid-pack for graphics-heavy rendering loads. Notably, this exact combination has no measured FPS data in the database, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores rather than measured gameplay.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-14900K is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-R processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 257 mm² die. Its base clock sits at 3.20 GHz and it boosts to 6.00 GHz — the latter figure is central to why this chip posts such strong single-core numbers. The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, plus 36 MB of shared L3. The hybrid design behind those 24 cores is reflected in the benchmark spread, where lightly-threaded scores are elite and heavily-threaded scores are excellent but not untouchable.

The single-core results tell the most decisive story. A Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2262.5, a Cinebench R20 single-core score of 2935, a Cinebench R15 single-core score of 324.5, a Geekbench single-core score of 2655, and a PassMark single-thread result of 4697 place this chip among the fastest consumer CPUs available for tasks that run on one or a few threads. For software development — compiling, scripting, IDE responsiveness — that matters more than raw multi-core throughput. It also matters for games, which remain largely latency- and single-thread-bound at the CPU side.

Multi-core numbers are equally telling. Cinebench R23 multi-core lands at 39399.5, R20 multi-core at 20793, and R15 multi-core at 6103. Geekbench multi-core reaches 21697, and PassMark multithread hits 58674. The PassMark subtests break down where that throughput comes from: 210622 on integer math, 152975 on floating point math, 792694 on data compression, 46813 on encryption, 86971 on string sorting, 45154 on extended instructions, and 3140 on physics. Find-prime-numbers posts 231. Together these indicate a chip that handles parallel compilation, media encoding, compression workloads, and simulation with headroom to spare.

Against its nearest rivals, the margins are razor thin at the top. The i9-14900KF averages 79371 — just 0.3 percent ahead of this chip — and the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus averages 79574, a 0.6 percent advantage. The AMD EPYC 7413 averages 80041, 1.2 percent ahead, which is notable because the EPYC is a server part. In the other direction, the i9-14900K beats the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (77740 average) by 1.7 percent. The verdict from the data: this CPU operates in a statistical dead heat with the fastest chips in the database, and its 95th percentile position against all CPUs confirms it.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform story starts with Intel Socket 1700. That socket support gives the build a defined ecosystem, and the chip's DDR4 and DDR5 memory support over a dual-channel bus means builders can carry forward older DDR4 kits or move to DDR5. ECC memory is supported, which is unusual for a desktop part and relevant for workstation stability in professional contexts.

PCIe is where the pairing gets interesting. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada connects over PCIe 4.0 x16. The GPU therefore cannot exploit Gen 5 bandwidth, though for a card of this performance class the interface is not the limiting factor. Gen 5 lanes remain available for a future storage or GPU upgrade.

Power considerations come directly from the pack: the CPU carries a TDP of 125 W and the GPU a TDP of 120 W. Neither figure suggests exotic cooling requirements; the multiplier is unlocked on the CPU, so an overclocking-capable board and a capable cooler are the sensible pairing. The GPU has no external power connectors and is classified as an integrated graphics package form factor (IGP slot width), with display outputs listed as portable-device dependent — a reminder that this is an embedded professional part, not a retail desktop card.

A sensible next upgrade follows the data. The CPU is already at the 95th percentile and within a fraction of a percent of the fastest chips measured, so replacing it yields almost nothing. The GPU, at the 50th percentile against all GPUs, is the component with room to climb, and a stronger discrete GPU would directly raise the combined percentile of 73. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 on the CPU also provides a fallback display path if the embedded GPU is repurposed or removed.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is built on the AD103 chip, Ada Lovelace architecture, TSMC's 5 nm process, with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die — a density of 121.1 million transistors per square millimetre. It is a professional embedded part: successor to Ampere-MW and predecessor to Blackwell-MW, per the data, and part of the GeForce 50-series listing with the Ada-MW generation designation.

The silicon is substantial. There are 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, 112 render output units, 76 RT cores, and 304 tensor cores. Peak rates work out to 188.2 GPixel/s pixel fill, 510.7 GTexel/s texture fill, and 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 — with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, also 32.69 TFLOPS. Clocks run from a 930 MHz base to a 1680 MHz boost, with memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Memory is the strongest attribute: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That capacity and bandwidth are the hallmarks of a rendering and compute card rather than a pure gaming card. The 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores mean real-time ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads (denoising, DLSS-class upscaling, tensor inference) are hardware-supported.

What the benchmarks mean for rendering is harder to state precisely, because the GPU's benchmark list is empty — average benchmark score is 0 and no nearest-rival entries exist. The database's percentile rating of 50 against all GPUs is the only positioning figure available. Interpreted conservatively: the hardware specifications describe a mid-pack performer with workstation-class memory, and rendering throughput should be understood through that percentile rather than through measured scores. It will not be the fastest renderer in any pipeline, but the 16 GB frame buffer and 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth give it endurance in scenes and models that exhaust smaller-memory cards.

Balance and Bottleneck

The build's balance is quantified by the percentiles: CPU at 95, GPU at 50, combined at 73. That combination sits well above the GPU alone and well below the CPU alone — arithmetic that identifies the GPU as the limiter in any graphics-bound workload. In practice, this means games and 3D rendering will be constrained by the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada, while compilation, compression, physics simulation, and general application work run at the i9's ceiling.

For gaming specifically, the 6.00 GHz boost clock and elite single-core PassMark score of 4697 mean the CPU will essentially never be the bottleneck at any resolution; the card's 50th percentile GPU position will set the frame ceiling. In production workloads the picture inverts favourably: the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 58674 and Geekbench multi-core of 21697 dominate streaming, encoding, and multi-tasking scenarios, while GPU-accelerated effects and exports draw on the 304 tensor cores and 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

The API support — DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 — means no modern renderer or engine will be excluded by software limits. The bottleneck is purely throughput, not compatibility. Given the empty GPU benchmark list, the honest framing is that the combined percentile of 73 is itself an estimate-weighted figure, and any upgrade decision should target the GPU first.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's full measured slate, from the database:

Cinebench R15 multi-core: 6103
Cinebench R15 single-core: 324.5
Cinebench R20 multi-core: 20793
Cinebench R20 single-core: 2935
Cinebench R23 multi-core: 39399.5
Cinebench R23 single-core: 2262.5
Geekbench multi-core: 21697
Geekbench single-core: 2655
PassMark multithread: 58674
PassMark single-thread: 4697
PassMark integer math: 210622
PassMark floating point: 152975
PassMark data compression: 792694
PassMark encryption: 46813
PassMark extended instructions: 45154
PassMark string sorting: 86971
PassMark physics: 3140
PassMark find prime numbers: 231

The average benchmark score is 79097, placing the chip in the 95th percentile versus all CPUs. Rival context: the i9-14900KF at 79371 (0.3 percent ahead), the Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus at 79574 (0.6 percent ahead), the EPYC 7413 at 80041 (1.2 percent ahead), and the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 at 77740 (1.7 percent behind). Every gap is under two percent in either direction — this is top-tier silicon with no meaningful peer distance.

The GPU side has no recorded benchmark scores; its percentile of 50 against all GPUs is the sole positional datum. The combined system percentile of 73 reflects a strong CPU carrying a mid-pack GPU. The overall verdict from the data: an elite compute platform with a professional, middle-of-the-distribution graphics engine attached.

Who Should Build It

The measured profile maps cleanly onto several user groups. Competitive and high-refresh gamers benefit from the CPU's 6.00 GHz boost and 4697 PassMark single-thread score, though they should note the GPU's 50th percentile position caps peak frame rates — this is not a maximum-settings 4K gaming rig by the numbers. Content creators are the best fit: video editors get 16 GB of GPU memory and 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth plus a 39399.5 Cinebench R23 multi-core score for timeline scrubbing and exports. 3D artists working in ray-traced viewports get 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores for denoising and AI acceleration. Developers get elite single-core responsiveness (2655 Geekbench single-core) and 58674 PassMark multithread for parallel builds. Students and office users will find the chip wildly overqualified for document and web work, but the ECC memory support and UHD Graphics 770 fallback make it defensible as a small-business workstation where stability and longevity matter. Scientific and engineering users can lean on the floating point score of 152975 and encryption score of 46813.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. No measured FPS rows exist for this combination in the database — all frame figures are estimates from benchmark scores. On those estimates, the 95th-percentile CPU with a 6.00 GHz boost will feed frames faster than the 50th-percentile GPU can render them, so high-refresh play at 1080p and 1440p is realistic with settings tuned down from ultra; 4K ultra play is where the GPU percentile will bite hardest.

Streaming. The CPU's 58674 PassMark multithread score and 21697 Geekbench multi-core leave ample headroom to encode a stream while gaming, and the 76 RT cores plus NVENC-class hardware implied by the Ada architecture support hardware encoding. The GPU, not the CPU, will cap the game's visual settings during a simultaneous stream.

Video editing. This is a strength. A Cinebench R23 multi-core of 39399.5 handles timeline rendering, the 792694 data compression score accelerates archive and proxy workflows, and the GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 with 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth handles high-resolution footage and effects without memory pressure.

3D rendering. The 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 and the 76 RT cores deliver GPU rendering throughput in the middle of the distribution, while the 24-core CPU provides strong fallback CPU rendering (20793 in Cinebench R20 multi-core). Expect production-grade reliability rather than leaderboard speed.

Software development. Elite fit. The 4697 PassMark single-thread score and 2655 Geekbench single-core make IDEs and interpreters snappy, and 24 cores across 32 threads crush parallel compilation, container builds, and test suites.

Student and office work. Overqualified but stable: ECC memory support, dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 flexibility, and integrated UHD Graphics 770 as a display fallback. The 3.20 GHz base clock keeps idle and light-load behaviour conservative at a 125 W TDP.

FAQ

Q: Does this build have measured frame rates in the database? A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination (dataIsMeasured is false), so every frame-rate statement here is an estimate derived from benchmark scores.

Q: How does the i9-14900K compare to its closest rivals? A: It is statistically tied with the best. The i9-14900KF is 0.3 percent ahead, the Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus 0.6 percent ahead, and the EPYC 7413 1.2 percent ahead, while it leads the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 by 1.7 percent. Its average score is 79097.

Q: Is the GPU good for gaming? A: By the numbers, it is mid-pack: the 50th percentile against all GPUs. Its strengths — 16 GB of GDDR6, 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, 76 RT cores, 304 tensor cores — favour professional rendering and compute over maximum-frame-rate gaming.

Q: What memory does the platform support? A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with ECC support. The GPU carries its own 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the bottleneck in this pairing? A: The GPU. The CPU sits at the 95th percentile and the GPU at the 50th, producing a combined percentile of 73. Graphics-bound workloads will be GPU-limited; everything else runs at the CPU's ceiling.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked? A: Yes — the multiplier is unlocked. Base TDP is 125 W.

Q: What was the launch MSRP of the CPU? A: The launch MSRP was $589.

Gaming Performance

The database holds no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core i9-14900K plus RTX 5000 Embedded Ada combination, so the following is framed entirely as estimates from the benchmark scores. The CPU side of the equation is not in question: a 6.00 GHz boost, 4697 PassMark single-thread score, and 95th percentile standing mean frame delivery and game logic will never be the constraint. Estimated frame ceilings come from the GPU's 50th percentile position, its 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, 188.2 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 510.7 GTexel/s texture rate.

At 1080p with ultra settings, estimates point to high-refresh play in most titles, since the pixel fill rate is generous at that resolution and the CPU can drive very high frame rates. At 1440p ultra, expect solid but not exceptional frame rates consistent with a mid-distribution GPU; the 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth and 16 GB frame buffer will hold texture quality and asset streaming steady. At 4K ultra, the 50th percentile position becomes the defining limit — turn down ray tracing or use the 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores for AI-accelerated upscaling, which the hardware explicitly supports through DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4.

The overall estimated verdict: this is a CPU-forward build where gaming is competent rather than class-leading. Players whose priority is competitive frame rates at lower resolutions will find the i9-14900K delivers everything the GPU can consume, while players chasing maximum-settings 4K should recognise from the percentile data that the embedded Ada card — a professional part with portable-device-dependent display outputs and no external power connectors — was never positioned as a flagship gaming solution.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900K + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900K

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds