SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900K + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900K

79,097 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a desktop combination that presents a stark contrast in generational performance. The CPU is a current-generation flagship with immense processing power, while the GPU is an end-of-life workstation card based on older architecture. The benchmark data shows a processor that dominates its competition and a graphics card that sits in a mid-range tier, making this pairing suitable for specific professional workloads rather than a balanced gaming system.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900K is built on the Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process, featuring 24 cores and 32 threads. This configuration is a hybrid design, though the fact pack does not specify the P-core/E-core split. The base clock is 3.20 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 6.00 GHz, which is a significant single-thread capability. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and it includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. It is an unlocked multiplier part (indicated by the "K" suffix) designed for the Intel Socket 1700 platform, with a TDP of 125 W. The L3 cache is a shared 36 MB, with 2 MB of L2 per core and 80 KB of L1 per core.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 95th percentile of all processors, indicating top-tier performance. In Cinebench R23, it scores 39399.5 in multi-core and 2262.5 in single-core. The Geekbench scores are 21697 multi-core and 2655 single-core. These numbers show a processor that is exceptionally strong in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The Passmark multithread score of 58674 and single-thread score of 4697 reinforce this pattern. Specific compute tasks from the Passmark suite reveal strengths: floating-point math scores 152975, integer math scores 210622, and data compression scores 792694. The extended instructions score is 45154, which is relevant for AVX-512 or similar workloads, while the random string sorting score of 86971 indicates strong memory subsystem performance.

The nearest rivals provide context. The Intel Core i9-14900KF is 0.3% behind with an average score of 79371, which is essentially identical since the "F" variant lacks integrated graphics. The Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus is 0.6% behind with 79574. The AMD EPYC 7413 server chip is 1.2% behind with 80041. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is 1.7% ahead with 77740. This places the i9-14900K in a tight cluster, meaning it is not a clear winner but is competitive with the fastest chips available. For real workloads, the multi-core scores translate to fast video rendering and code compilation, while the single-core score of 2262.5 in Cinebench R23 supports high responsiveness in applications that rely on one or two threads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU is more than capable of feeding a high-refresh display, given its 6.00 GHz boost clock and strong single-core performance. The GPU, however, is a limiting factor, as its benchmark scores are comparable to a GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which is not a high-refresh 1080p card. The data suggests the CPU will not bottleneck, but the GPU will cap frame rates well below what the CPU can support.

Streaming: The CPU offers 24 cores and 32 threads, which can handle encoding workloads. The Passmark data encryption score of 46813 and extended instructions score of 45154 indicate strong processing for encryption and compression, both relevant to streaming. The lack of modern AV1 encoding on the GPU means the CPU would be relied upon for x264 encoding, which it can handle given its multi-core might.

Video editing: The Geekbench multicore score of 21697 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39399.5 are strong indicators of performance in timeline scrubbing and export tasks. The CPU should handle 4K video editing with ease. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and compute performance (Passmark GPU compute score of 6525) can assist with effects and rendering, though its overall score is mid-range.

3D rendering: The CPU’s multi-core performance is excellent for CPU-based rendering, with the Passmark floating-point math score of 152975 showing strong arithmetic throughput. For GPU rendering, the Quadro RTX 5000 has 3072 shading units and 48 RT cores, but its Passmark DirectX 12 score of 59 is low. This suggests the GPU is not a top performer for modern render engines, making the CPU the primary workhorse.

Software development: The CPU is well-suited for compiling code, given the high integer math score of 210622 and multithread score of 58674. The 32 threads allow for parallel builds. The single-thread score of 4697 in Passmark ensures responsive IDE interactions and fast code indexing. The GPU is less relevant here, except for any CUDA-accelerated development tasks.

Student and office work: This is overkill for typical office tasks. The CPU’s single-core performance is excellent for spreadsheet and document work, but the 125 W TDP and desktop-class requirements make it impractical for a simple student build. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 would suffice for office workloads, making the discrete GPU unnecessary for this scenario.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14900K compare to its closest rival, the i9-14900KF?

A: The i9-14900K has an average benchmark score of 79097, while the i9-14900KF scores 79371, a difference of -0.3%. They are effectively identical in performance, with the only difference being the presence of integrated graphics on the non-F variant.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance tier relative to other graphics cards?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 is in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 21629, which is 1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, a popular mid-range card from a previous generation.

Q: Does the CPU support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900K supports ECC memory, according to the fact pack. This feature is typically important for workstation stability and data integrity.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 has a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, using 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and platform generation?

A: The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 and is part of the Core 14th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture. It supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded tasks versus multi-threaded tasks?

A: The single-core score in Cinebench R23 is 2262.5, while the multi-core score is 39399.5. This shows a ratio of about 17.4:1, indicating that the processor scales exceptionally well with thread count, but also retains strong single-thread performance.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is marked as "End-of-life" in the fact pack. It was released on 2018-08-12, and its successor is Workstation Ampere.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU is in the 95th percentile of all processors, while the GPU is in the 67th percentile. This means the CPU is a top-tier part, while the GPU is a mid-range performer. In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the bottleneck. The CPU’s high single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2262.5) means it can process game logic and physics quickly, but the GPU’s average benchmark score of 21629, which is 1% behind a GTX 1060 6 GB, will limit frame output.

For CPU-bound tasks like software compilation or CPU rendering, the GPU is not a limiting factor. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 58674 in Passmark will dominate these workloads. However, for GPU-accelerated tasks like 3D rendering in modern engines or machine learning inference, the GPU’s compute score of 6525 in Passmark GPU compute is low relative to the CPU’s capabilities. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM is generous for large datasets, but the raw compute throughput (11.15 TFLOPS FP32) is not high by current standards.

The combined percentile is 81, which reflects the middling GPU pulling down the exceptional CPU. In a balanced system, you would expect both components to be in a similar percentile range. Here, the CPU is a flagship, and the GPU is a workstation card that competes with the GTX 1060, meaning any workload that depends on the GPU will not benefit from the CPU’s full power. The PCIe 3.0 x16 interface on the GPU also limits bandwidth compared to the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support, potentially affecting data transfer for large datasets.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation GPU based on the Turing architecture, using the TU104 chip manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It has 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, with a transistor density of 25.0M per mm². The GPU has 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output processors. It features 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, which are designed for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The base clock is 1620 MHz, and the boost clock is 1815 MHz.

Memory is a strong point: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a large capacity for handling complex scenes or large models. The pixel rate is 116.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 348.5 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 11.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1). The TDP is 230 W, requiring a 550 W suggested PSU and a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector setup. It is a dual-slot card, 267 mm long.

Benchmark results are less flattering. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 78999, and in Vulkan, it scores 92309. The Passmark G3D score is 15616, but the DirectX 12 score is a low 59, suggesting poor performance in modern graphics APIs. The Passmark GPU compute score is 6525. The overall average benchmark score is 21629, placing it in the 67th percentile. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which is 1% ahead, and the AMD Radeon HD 8970M, which is 1.8% behind. This indicates the GPU is not a high-performance part by modern standards, despite its workstation branding and 16 GB VRAM.

For rendering, the 16 GB memory capacity is useful for holding large textures and models, and the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth supports data-heavy workflows. The RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, but the low DirectX 12 score suggests that real-time rendering performance will be limited. The tensor cores can accelerate AI denoising and other neural network tasks, but the compute score of 6525 is modest. This GPU is best suited for tasks that require large VRAM and CUDA compatibility rather than raw frame-rendering speed.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets professionals who need the CPU’s immense multi-threading power but have a GPU workload that is memory-capacity-bound rather than compute-bound. The Intel Core i9-14900K with 24 cores and 32 threads is ideal for software developers who compile large codebases, as the Passmark integer math score of 210622 and multithread score of 58674 show strong parallel processing. Video editors working with high-resolution footage will benefit from the CPU’s Geekbench multicore score of 21697 for export tasks, and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM can hold large preview buffers.

Students in engineering or data science fields may find the CPU useful for simulation and analysis, but the GPU is not a strong accelerator. Small business workstations that run heavy CPU-based calculations, such as financial modeling or scientific computing, would benefit from the CPU’s performance. The GPU’s ECC memory support is not listed, but the CPU does support ECC, which is critical for data integrity in professional workflows.

The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM makes it suitable for machine learning inference with large models, though the compute performance is not top-tier. For 3D artists using software that relies on CUDA, the Quadro RTX 5000 offers compatibility, but the performance is closer to a GTX 1060, which is not a professional-grade renderer. This build is not for gamers, as the GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 59 is a clear indicator of poor gaming performance. It is for users who prioritize CPU throughput above all else and have specific needs for large GPU memory.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 79097, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900KF, scores 79371, which is 0.3% higher. The AMD EPYC 7413 scores 80041, which is 1.2% higher, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 scores 77740, which is 1.7% lower. These deltas are small, showing the i9-14900K is at the top of the performance stack.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 21629, placing it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, scoring 21856, which is 1% higher. The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile scores 21379, which is 1.2% lower, and the AMD Radeon HD 8970M scores 21237, which is 1.8% lower. The GPU is clearly a mid-range part.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 81. This indicates that the system as a whole is better than 81% of possible combinations, but this is skewed by the CPU’s high score. The GPU’s low percentile drags the combination down. In a balanced build, you would expect the combined percentile to be closer to the average of the two components. Here, the CPU’s 95th percentile and GPU’s 67th percentile average to 81, which is exactly the combined score. The data shows a CPU that is a performance leader and a GPU that is a performance laggard in this context.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: "desktop") that pairs a current-generation flagship CPU with an end-of-life workstation GPU. The Intel Core i9-14900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor with a 6.00 GHz boost clock, representing the top of the Core 14th Gen lineup. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a Turing-architecture card with 16 GB of VRAM, designed for professional workloads but now several generations old.

The overall tier, based on the combined 81st percentile, is upper-mid-range. This is not a top-tier gaming system, nor is it a top-tier workstation for GPU-accelerated tasks. It is a system where the CPU is the star, and the GPU is a supporting player with a specific niche. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking places it among the best available, while the GPU’s 67th percentile puts it in the middle of the pack. This build is a study in contrast: a flagship processor constrained by a mid-range graphics card.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The fact pack contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The dataIsMeasured field is false, so this analysis is qualitative and grounded in the relative performance of the components.

The GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 59 is exceptionally low, indicating poor performance in modern games that rely on DX12. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 140 is higher but still low. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 92309 is the strongest graphics API result, suggesting some headroom in Vulkan titles. However, the GPU’s average benchmark score of 21629, which is 1% behind a GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, sets expectations. A GTX 1060 is capable of 1080p gaming at medium settings in modern titles, but not high-refresh or high-ultra settings.

The CPU would not be a bottleneck, given its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2262.5. In games that are CPU-bound, such as esports titles, the i9-14900K would allow very high frame rates, but the GPU would limit output to what a GTX 1060-class card can produce. For 1080p ultra settings, the user should expect playable frame rates in older or less demanding games, but modern AAA titles would require lowering settings. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU would be severely strained, and the 16 GB VRAM would not compensate for the low compute throughput. The 67th percentile GPU ranking confirms that this is not a gaming-focused build, and the estimated FPS would be low for high-refresh monitors.