SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900K

79,097 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is a desktop build that presents a stark contrast in performance tiers. The CPU is a top-tier enthusiast part, sitting at the 95th percentile of all processors, while the GPU, despite its modern architecture, ranks at only the 18th percentile among all graphics cards based on the available benchmark data. This pairing results in a combined percentile of 57, indicating a system where the processor vastly outperforms the graphics component in relative terms. The benchmark data shows a significant imbalance, with the CPU delivering exceptional multi-threaded and single-threaded performance while the GPU’s measured score places it in a much lower competitive bracket.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates on a 10 nm process node from Intel and features a base clock of 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 6.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel setup and offers ECC memory support, making it versatile for various workstation tasks. The processor connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770.

Benchmark results position this CPU as a powerhouse. In Cinebench R23, it scores 39399.5 points in multi-core and 2262.5 points in single-core tests. The Geekbench results show 21697 points multi-core and 2655 points single-core. These figures place the i9-14900K at the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 79097. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-14900KF, which scores 79371 (a 0.3% difference), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus at 79574 (0.6% difference). The data indicates that this CPU is within 1.2% of the AMD EPYC 7413’s score of 80041, yet it leads the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 by 1.7%. For real workloads, the multi-core scores translate to exceptional performance in video rendering, software compilation, and data processing tasks. The single-core score of 2262.5 in Cinebench R23 suggests strong responsiveness in everyday applications and lightly-threaded workloads. The Passmark data further illustrates the CPU’s capabilities, with a multithread score of 58674 and a single-thread score of 4697. Data encryption performance is also notable at 46813, and floating-point math operations score 152975, indicating robust number-crunching ability for scientific and financial applications.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores. The data for the RTX 5070 SUPER is limited to a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690, which places it at the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This is a low standing, with the GPU’s nearest rivals including the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2664 points), GeForce GT 1030 (2662 points), and Intel Arc Pro B50 (2660 points). These comparisons suggest that the GPU’s raw graphical performance, as measured by this specific test, is not competitive with modern high-end cards. Consequently, gaming performance at high resolutions and ultra settings is expected to be constrained by the GPU.

Based on the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 2262.5 in Cinebench R23, the processor can handle game logic and physics calculations with ease. However, the GPU’s 18th percentile ranking indicates that filling frames at high detail settings will be the primary challenge. For 1080p and 1440p gaming, the CPU may be able to push high frame rates in less demanding titles, but the GPU will likely bottleneck in graphically intensive scenarios. At 4K, the GPU’s limitations become more pronounced, and frame rates are expected to be modest even with upscaling technologies. The estimates suggest that this pairing is not ideal for high-refresh-rate gaming at high settings, as the GPU’s performance tier is far below what is typically required for such tasks. The lack of measured FPS data reinforces the need to treat these expectations as qualitative projections based on the available scores.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture is one of extreme CPU strength and relative GPU weakness. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 79097, placing it at the 95th percentile, which is exceptional. The GPU’s average score is 2690, placing it at the 18th percentile, which is below average. The combined percentile for the system is 57, reflecting the dominant influence of the CPU’s high score over the GPU’s lower one. In Cinebench R20, the CPU scores 20793 multi-core and 2935 single-core, further confirming its high-end status. The Passmark tests show a data compression score of 792694, which is particularly high, indicating strong performance in file archiving and compression tasks. Extended instructions score 45154, and integer math operations score 210622, showcasing the CPU’s arithmetic capability. The GPU’s single 3DMark score of 2690 is the only data point for the RTX 5070 SUPER, and it is 1% above the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and 1.7% above the GeForce GT 440. This places the GPU in a performance class that is significantly lower than contemporary gaming cards. The overall picture is that this system excels in CPU-bound tasks such as rendering, encoding, and computation, but it will struggle in GPU-bound scenarios like high-fidelity gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in most workloads. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 18th percentile creates a massive gap in relative capability. In gaming, the CPU can process frames quickly, but the GPU cannot keep up with the rendering demands, leading to a GPU bottleneck. This is especially true in graphically demanding titles where the GPU’s low score relative to rivals will cap frame rates. The FPS scaling from the estimated performance suggests that reducing resolution or graphical settings will be necessary to achieve higher frame rates, as the GPU’s throughput is the primary constraint. For non-gaming workloads, the balance shifts. In tasks like video editing or 3D rendering that rely heavily on the CPU, the i9-14900K will dominate, and the GPU’s role is diminished. However, if the software uses GPU acceleration, the RTX 5070 SUPER’s low percentile will slow down the process. The CPU’s high multi-core scores (39399.5 in Cinebench R23) mean that it can handle massive parallel workloads, but the GPU’s low 3DMark score suggests that any task offloaded to the GPU will see reduced performance. The system is therefore unbalanced, with the CPU being the clear performance driver and the GPU holding back the overall experience in graphics-intensive applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14900K uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is a platform that supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the CPU supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for stability in workstation environments. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, allowing for high-bandwidth connections to compatible devices. The GPU, which uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, can take full advantage of this bandwidth, though the GPU’s performance is not limited by the interface in this case. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 275 W, with a power connector requirement of 1x 16-pin. The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, but the combined TDP of 400 W indicates that a capable power supply is necessary. The system’s upgrade path is primarily focused on the GPU, as the CPU is already at the top of its platform. Replacing the RTX 5070 SUPER with a higher-performing GPU would address the current bottleneck and better utilize the i9-14900K’s capabilities. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, so future GPUs using this interface will work without issue. Memory can also be upgraded, but the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support means that the current configuration is flexible. A sensible next upgrade is to replace the GPU with a model that ranks higher in the benchmark percentile to balance the system, as the CPU has ample headroom to support more powerful graphics cards.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s single-core performance is excellent, but the GPU’s low percentile makes high-refresh-rate gaming at high settings unlikely. Estimated frame rates would be modest, and achieving 144 Hz or higher would require lowering graphical quality or resolution. The system is not well-suited for competitive gaming at high refresh rates, as the GPU will be the primary limiter.

Streaming: The i9-14900K’s strong multi-core score of 39399.5 in Cinebench R23 can handle encoding and streaming workloads efficiently. The GPU’s dedicated encoders may assist, but its low performance tier means that gaming while streaming will be challenging. The CPU can compensate for the GPU’s weakness in encoding tasks, making this a viable but not ideal streaming setup.

Video Editing: Video editing software often uses both CPU and GPU. The CPU’s high multithread score of 58674 in Passmark will excel in timeline processing and export tasks. The GPU’s low score may slow down effects rendering or playback with heavy GPU acceleration. Overall, the CPU will carry the workload, making this system capable for video editing, but GPU-accelerated tasks will be slower than on a system with a better-balanced GPU.

3D Rendering: This workload heavily favors the CPU. The i9-14900K’s multi-core performance in Cinebench R20 (20793) and R23 (39399.5) is outstanding for CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s 3DMark score of 2690 indicates weak GPU rendering performance, so using a GPU renderer would be slow. For CPU rendering, this system is excellent.

Software Development: Compilation and code building are CPU-intensive tasks. The CPU’s high integer math score of 210622 and multithread score of 58674 will significantly reduce build times. The GPU is less relevant for development, so the system’s imbalance is not a major issue here. The CPU’s 95th percentile makes it a strong choice for developers.

Student and Office Work: For everyday tasks like web browsing, word processing, and spreadsheets, the CPU’s single-core score of 4697 in Passmark ensures snappy responsiveness. The GPU is largely irrelevant for these tasks. The system is overkill for basic office work, but it will handle any productivity task without issue, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for data-sensitive work.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over GPU performance. The i9-14900K’s 95th percentile ranking makes it ideal for professionals in software development, where compilation speed is critical, or for video editors who rely on CPU-based encoding. Content creators working with 3D rendering using CPU renderers will benefit from the high multi-core scores. The system is less suitable for gamers, especially those targeting 1440p or 4K resolutions, as the GPU’s 18th percentile will limit frame rates. Small business workstations that run complex calculations or data analysis will find the CPU’s performance (e.g., Passmark data compression of 792694) valuable, but they should avoid GPU-accelerated tasks. Students and office workers will find the system more than capable, but the high CPU performance is wasted on basic tasks. The target user is someone who needs maximum CPU compute power and is willing to accept or work around the GPU’s limitations, possibly by upgrading the GPU later.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that combines the Intel Core i9-14900K, a flagship 24-core processor from the Raptor Lake refresh, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, a GPU from the GeForce 50-series based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The CPU is a top-tier component at the 95th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 18th percentile. The combined percentile of 57 reflects the system’s overall standing, which is dragged down by the GPU. The CPU’s architecture supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and the GPU features 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus with a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. The system is classified as a desktop build, and its overall tier is mid-range due to the GPU’s low ranking, despite the CPU’s high-end status. The pairing is unconventional, offering exceptional CPU performance for compute-heavy tasks but limited graphics capability for gaming and GPU-accelerated applications.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14900K compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900KF?

A: The i9-14900K has an average benchmark score of 79097, while the i9-14900KF scores 79371. This is a difference of -0.3%, meaning the two processors perform virtually identically.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile, and what does it mean?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER is at the 18th percentile of all GPUs, based on its average benchmark score of 2690. This indicates that it performs worse than the majority of graphics cards in the database.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900K has ECC memory support, which is listed as true in the data. This can be important for workstation stability and data integrity.

Q: What memory types are supported by this CPU?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: Is there any measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination. All gaming performance discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900K has a boost clock of 6.00 GHz, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 24 cores and 32 threads, which contributes to its high multi-core benchmark scores like 39399.5 in Cinebench R23.