SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900K

79,097 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is a study in extremes—a top-tier, high-core-count CPU built for heavy compute workloads, matched with a mainstream, power-efficient GPU that excels at 1080p gaming. This is not a balanced pairing in the traditional sense; the data shows the CPU is the dominant component in absolute terms, while the GPU defines the gaming experience. The combined percentile of this build sits at 78, indicating it outperforms the majority of tested configurations, yet the component-level scores tell a more nuanced story.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The foundation of this build is the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. The motherboard must support DDR4 or DDR5 memory, with the CPU utilizing a dual-channel memory bus. This flexibility allows builders to choose between using existing DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 for potentially the memory bandwidth, though the exact bandwidth figures are not specified here. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe, 16 Lanes (CPU only), which is a modern standard for high-speed storage and graphics.

The power supply requirement for the graphics card is an absolute figure: the RTX 4060 has a 115 W TDP and the suggested PSU is 300 W. This leaves the system with some PSU headroom for the CPU, which has a 125 W TDP. The two components together have a combined TDP of 240 W, which is a relatively modest figure for a system with this CPU. The the CPU's TDP is 125 W, but the data shows that the GPU's TDP is 115 W, so a 300 W PSU is a low spec. However, for a more comfortable and stable system, especially with a high-end CPU like the i9-14900K, a larger PSU is often recommended, but the data only specifies that the suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 W.

The upgrade path from this platform is interesting. The Intel Core i9-14900K is already near the top of its generation, so a sensible next upgrade within the same platform would be to keep the CPU and upgrade the GPU, since the RTX 4060 is the "weakest" point in terms of gaming performance. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU would allow for a future GPU upgrade without bottlenecking, as the RTX 4060 itself is a PCIe 4.0 x8 card. The motherboard's memory support for either DDR4 or DDR5 means that the user can keep their existing RAM or upgrade to a faster type as part of a future upgrade.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data presents a clear picture: the CPU is a powerhouse, while the GPU is above average but not exceptional. The Intel Core i9-14900K sits at the 95th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 79097. This score is nearly identical to its closest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900KF, which has an average score of 79371, a difference of only -0.3%. The gap is similarly small compared to the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (79574, -0.6%) and the AMD EPYC 7413 (80041, -1.2%). However, it is notably the i9-14900K is 1.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (77740). The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39399.5 is exceptionally high, and its single-core score of 2262.5 is also very impressive.

The GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, sits at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17639. Its closest rivals are the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666, -0.2%), the AMD Radeon 780M (17588, +0.3%), the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17551, +0.5%), and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 (17509, +0.7%). The RTX 4060 is within a range of 0.7% of these GPUs, indicating that it is a mid-range performer. The combined percentile of this build is 78, which is the 78th percentile for the total database.

When looking at the benchmark results, the CPU's Passmark multithread score is 58674, which is a huge number, while the GPU's PassMark G3D score is 19545. The CPU's scores in these tests are much higher than the GPU's, which is expected since they are different units, but the CPU's average benchmark score of 79097 is more than four times the GPU's average of 17639. This indicates a serious imbalance in compute capability between the two.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 6.00 GHz. The CPU has a total of 36 MB of shared L3 cache, with 2 MB per core of L2 cache and 80 KB per core of L1 cache. Its TDP is 125 W, and it is a desktop segment chip with an unlocked multiplier, meaning it can be overclocked. The CPU is built on Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm².

In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 39399.5 and single-core score of 2262.5 indicate strong all-around performance. The Geekbench scores for multicore (21697) and single-core (2655) also confirm this. In PassMark, the multithread score is 58674, and the single-thread score is 4697. The CPU's performance in the "integer math" test is 210622, and its "floating point" score is 152975, and its "data encryption" score is 46813. The data compression score is 792694, which is a very high number. The CPU scores 231 in the "find prime numbers" test, 3140 in physics, and 45154 in extended instructions. The random string sorting score is 86971.

These scores show a CPU that is built for heavy multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39399.5 is 17.4 times the single-core score, which is what you'd expect from a 24-core processor. The CPU is going to excel in video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where it can use all its threads. The single-core performance is also strong, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2655, which means it can handle games and general office work with ease.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS (frames per second) data for this build is based on actual benchmarks, with the dataIsMeasured field being true. The data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor in most games, but the CPU's power ensures high frame rates in less demanding titles.

At 1080p, the system can run esports and older titles at very high frame rates. For example, in CS2, the frame rate is 184 FPS, while in CS:GO, it's 407 FPS. The Valorant scores 422 FPS at 1080p, which is extremely high. In more demanding games, like Cyberpunk 2077, the system only manages 54 FPS at 1080p, which is playable but not high-refresh. At 1440p, the frame rates drop. In CS2, it's 122 FPS, and in Cyberpunk 2077, it's 41 FPS. At 4K, the system struggles with demanding titles: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 27 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 24 FPS. The average FPS across all tested games is 121.2.

The pair rank by FPS is 1942 out of 3732 pairs, which puts this build in the top half of all tested pairs. The frame rates show that the GPU is the bottleneck in games, because the CPU is so powerful. For example, the difference between 1080p and 1440p in Cyberpunk 2077 is a 13 FPS drop, which is a 24% decrease, while in CS:GO, the drop is 127 FPS (31%). The system is best suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming, with 1440p being playable for less demanding titles, and 4K only for undemanding games or with lower settings.

3. Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows an imbalance in this build: the CPU is far more powerful than the GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score of 79097 is 4.5 times the GPU's average of 17639. This means that in gaming, the GPU will be the bottleneck in most scenarios. The CPU has a 95th percentile rating, while the GPU is at the 61st percentile. The combined percentile is 78, which is lower than the CPU's percentile but higher than the GPU's.

In games, the CPU's high single-core performance (Geekbench single-core 2655) and high frame rates in esports titles like Valorant (422 FPS at 1080p) show that the CPU is not the limiting factor in those games. However, in more demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate is 54 FPS at 1080p, which is a GPU limit, not a CPU limit. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 128-bit bus are also a limiting factor at higher resolutions, as seen in the 4K scores.

The balance is what you'd expect: the CPU is overkill for gaming alone, but it's a great fit for workloads that can use all its threads. The GPU can handle most games at 1080p, but the CPU is ready for a GPU upgrade. The data shows that the CPU is not a bottleneck in gaming, but the GPU is.

4. Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The system can deliver very high frame rates in esports titles at 1080p. In Valorant, it can reach 422 FPS at 1080p, and in CS:GO, it's 407 FPS. Even at 1440p, it can run these games at 360 FPS and 280 FPS, respectively, which is excellent for high-refresh monitors. For more demanding titles, the frame rate drops, but it can still handle most games at 1080p with high settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads can handle encoding and streaming while gaming. The CPU's performance in multithreaded workloads, like a PassMark multithread score of 58674, means it can handle video encoding. The GPU also has NVENC, but the data doesn't specify its capabilities. The CPU can handle streaming and gaming without a issue, but the GPU may limit the in-game frame rate.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39399.5 and Geekbench multicore score of 21697 make it a beast for video editing. It can handle timelines and rendering tasks, while the GPU can assist with effects and export. The system will be able to handle 4K video editing, but the 8 GB of VRAM might be a limit for very large projects.

3D Rendering: The CPU's 24 cores and high Cinebench scores make it a great choice for 3D rendering. The GPU also provides compute performance, with a PassMark compute score of 9213, but the CPU is the primary workhorse. The system can handle CPU-based and GPU-based rendering, though the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM may limit the size of the scenes.

Software Development: The CPU's high single-core and multi-core performance makes it excellent for compiling code and running virtual machines. The PassMark multithread score of 58674 is great for build times, and the CPU's 32 threads allow for parallel compilation. It's a solid choice for a development workstation.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for student or office work. The CPU and GPU are more powerful than needed for word processing, spreadsheets, or web browsing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is more than enough for basic tasks, but the system is a powerful workstation, and the cost would be wasted on simple tasks.

5. Who Should Build It

This build is for users who need a high-end CPU for productivity but are more budget in the GPU. The target audience is a content creator who needs the CPU's heavy multi-threaded performance for rendering and video editing, but doesn't need the top-tier GPU for gaming. It's also for a gamer who wants to play at 1080p with high frame rates and is planning to upgrade the GPU later. The CPU's performance puts it at the 95th percentile, while the GPU's 61st percentile is a mid-range.

For gamers: The system is best suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming. It can run esports at 1440p and some 4K. The GPU is the limit, so if you want 4K gaming, you'd need to upgrade the GPU.

For content creators: The CPU is a powerhouse for video editing and 3D rendering. The GPU is sufficient for 1080p and some 1440p tasks, but the CPU is the main draw.

For developers: The CPU's 24 cores and high single-core performance make it a great for software development, but it's a high-end choice.

For students and small business: This is a powerful and expensive system for these uses, but it would be a fast and reliable workstation. The CPU's power is overkill for office tasks, but it will handle anything thrown at it.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900K has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM and memory type?

A: The RTX 4060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 17639, putting it at the 61st percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The CPU scores 39399.5 in Cinebench R23 multicore.

Q: What is the average FPS across all games for this pair?

A: The pair ranks 1942 out of 3732 pairs in FPS across games, with an average of 121.2 FPS.

Q: What is the GPU's suggested power supply size?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 4060 is 300 W.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD107 chip made on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, with a transistor density of 118.9 million per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 1830 MHz and a boost clock of 2460 MHz. The memory runs at 2125 MHz, and the effective speed is 17 Gbps, which gives a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s over a 128-bit interface.

The GPU has 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. It has 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, which support real-time ray tracing and AI features like DLSS. The pixel rate is 118.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 236.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 15.11 TFLOPS, and FP16 is also 15.11 TFLOPS (1:1). The TDP is 115 W, and it has a dual-slot design.

In terms of APIs, it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has outputs for 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Benchmark scores show the GPU is a mid-tier performer. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2302, and the Geekbench OpenCL score is 95057, with a Vulkan score of 48643. The PassMark G3D score is 19545, and the PassMark GPU compute score is 9213. The PassMark DirectX 12 score is 76, DirectX 11 is 175, DirectX 10 is 103, DirectX 9 is 236, and G2D is 1037. The GPU at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 17639.

In gaming, the GPU is the bottleneck in most scenarios. The 8 GB of VRAM is a limitation at 4K, and the 128-bit bandwidth is a limitation for high-res textures. However, the GPU's performance in esports is good enough for high-refresh 1080p gaming, as seen in the frame rates for CS:GO and Valorant. In demanding titles, the GPU is the limiting factor, and the CPU's power is not fully utilized. The data shows that the GPU is a capable 1080p performer, but it's not a 4K card.

The power draw is low (115 W), and the suggested PSU is 300 W, which is a modest requirement. The GPU is a 240 mm dual-slot card, with 3 DisplayPort 1.4a and 1 HDMI 2.1 outputs. It has a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is a bit lower than the PCIe Gen 5 lanes of the CPU, but it's compatible.

The GPU's predecessor is the GeForce 30 series, and its successor is the GeForce 50 series, but it's end-of-life. The RTX 4060 is a good GPU for 1080p gaming, but the CPU is overkill. The data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor in gaming, and a GPU upgrade would be the next logical step in the future.