SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

97%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900K

79,097 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM creates a unique desktop configuration that pits a top-tier 24-core processor against a mid-range Ampere graphics card. The CPU sits in the 95th percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 50th percentile, making this a lopsided pairing where compute potential vastly outstrips graphical throughput. Benchmark data reveals a system that excels at productivity and CPU-bound tasks but leaves significant performance on the table in GPU-limited scenarios.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA104 chip fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process, containing 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The card operates at a base clock of 915 MHz with a boost clock of 1410 MHz, which are conservative figures compared to typical desktop variants. Memory configuration includes 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU houses 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, with 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI acceleration.

The compute capabilities are substantial for a card at the 50th percentile: FP32 performance reaches 16.60 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 16.60 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate is 135.4 GPixel/s and texture fill rate is 259.4 GTexel/s. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern rendering APIs. However, the 8 GB VRAM capacity is a limiting factor for high-resolution texture-heavy workloads, particularly when ray tracing is enabled, as the 46 RT cores will demand additional memory for acceleration structures.

The RTX 3070 TiM lacks any benchmark scores in the data, and the GPU's percentile rank of 50 places it exactly at the median of all GPUs. This suggests balanced performance for 1080p and 1440p gaming but insufficient headroom for 4K ultra settings in demanding titles. The 220 W TDP with a suggested 550 W power supply indicates the card is relatively power-hungry for its performance class, though the triple-slot cooler with a single 8-pin connector suggests thermal management is prioritized over compactness. For rendering workloads, the 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is capable for DCC applications, but the 8 GB frame buffer will constrain complex scenes with high-resolution textures or heavy geometry.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i9-14900K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the primary graphics card, while the RTX 3070 TiM itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16, ensuring backward compatibility without bottlenecking the older bus standard. The platform supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop CPU and adds flexibility for workstation use cases.

The power delivery situation is straightforward: the CPU has a 125 W TDP, while the GPU requires 220 W, and the suggested PSU rating is 550 W. This leaves ample headroom for overclocking, especially since the CPU has an unlocked multiplier and the boost clock reaches 6.00 GHz. The 550 W suggestion is conservative for a system with a 24-core processor, so users have room to add peripherals or upgrade components without immediately needing a new power supply. However, the RTX 3070 TiM is marked as end-of-life, so future GPU upgrades will likely require a new power supply if moving to a higher-tier card with greater power demands.

A sensible next upgrade path would involve replacing the GPU first, as the CPU is already at the 95th percentile and will not bottleneck any current graphics card. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes on the CPU ensure that even the fastest next-generation GPUs will have full bandwidth available. Memory upgrades are also viable given the dual-channel support for both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing users to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5 depending on their workload priorities. The platform's ECC support further extends its lifespan for reliability-focused builds.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores, and these figures should be treated as approximations rather than verified measurements. The CPU's exceptional single-core performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2655 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2262.5, indicates that frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios will be excellent. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests average performance in GPU-bound scenarios.

At 1080p resolution, the RTX 3070 TiM's 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth should deliver high frame rates in esports titles, with the CPU ensuring minimal frame time variance. The 184 tensor cores can accelerate DLSS, which would extend playable frame rates in supported titles. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM becomes a more significant constraint, and memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s may limit performance in texture-heavy games. The 96 ROPs provide adequate pixel throughput for 1440p, but 4K gaming will likely require reduced settings or upscaling technologies to maintain playable frame rates.

The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4697 and multithread score of 58674 indicate that the processor will not be the limiting factor in any gaming scenario. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it will be the primary determinant of frame rates, and users should expect performance comparable to other mid-range GPUs of its generation. Ray tracing performance, while supported by 46 RT cores, will be modest given the GPU's overall tier, and DLSS will be necessary for acceptable ray-traced frame rates in modern titles.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The combination of a CPU with a Geekbench single-core score of 2655 and a GPU at the 50th percentile supports 144Hz gaming at 1080p in most titles, with the CPU's 6.00 GHz boost clock ensuring high frame rates in CPU-bound games. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provide sufficient headroom for competitive shooters, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit texture quality at higher resolutions.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads with a PassMark multithread score of 58674 provide ample encoding headroom, allowing simultaneous game capture and streaming without impacting gaming performance. The 184 tensor cores on the GPU can assist with AI-based encoding enhancements, while the 125 W TDP CPU and 220 W GPU leave thermal and power room for sustained streaming sessions.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39399.5 and PassMark integer math score of 210622 indicate excellent processing power for video encoding and rendering, while the GPU's 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 and 259.4 GTexel/s texture rate accelerate effects and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM may limit working with 4K timelines or multiple high-resolution layers, but the 36 MB shared L3 cache on the CPU helps with timeline scrubbing.

3D rendering: The CPU's PassMark floating point math score of 152975 and the GPU's 46 RT cores provide a balanced rendering platform, though the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it will be the slower of the two in most render engines. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports texture streaming, but the 8 GB VRAM will require texture atlasing for complex scenes.

Software development: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads with PassMark data compression score of 792694 accelerate compilation and build processes, while the 4697 single-thread score ensures responsive IDE performance. The GPU's 50th percentile is sufficient for basic UI acceleration, and ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds.

Student and office work: The CPU's PassMark find prime numbers score of 231 and single-thread score of 4697 handle office productivity with ease, while the GPU's 135.4 GPixel/s pixel rate supports multiple high-resolution displays. This configuration is overpowered for typical student workloads, but the 125 W TDP CPU and 220 W GPU make it a viable, if not optimal, choice for demanding academic projects.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-14900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It features a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 6.00 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the CPU.

Benchmark results show exceptional multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39399.5, Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20793, and Geekbench multicore score of 21697. The PassMark multithread score of 58674 and integer math score of 210622 further confirm the CPU's prowess in parallel workloads. Single-thread performance is equally strong, with Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2262.5, Geekbench single-core score of 2655, and PassMark single-thread score of 4697.

The CPU ranks in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 79097. It sits just 0.3% behind the Intel Core i9-14900KF (avgScore 79371), 0.6% behind the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (avgScore 79574), and 1.2% behind the AMD EPYC 7413 (avgScore 80041), while leading the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 by 1.7% (avgScore 77740). These margins are minimal, indicating that the i9-14900K is at the performance frontier for consumer CPUs. The unlocked multiplier allows further overclocking beyond the 6.00 GHz boost clock, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output. The CPU was released on 2023-10-16 with a launch MSRP of $589.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over GPU performance. Gamers at 1080p with high-refresh monitors will benefit from the CPU's 4697 single-thread score and 6.00 GHz boost clock, ensuring maximum frame rates in CPU-bound titles, though the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means 1440p and 4K gaming will be less impressive. Content creators working with video editing will appreciate the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39399.5 for fast rendering, but should note the GPU's 8 GB VRAM limitation for complex effects.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant acceleration from the PassMark data compression score of 792694 and multithread score of 58674, making this an excellent choice for build servers or CI machines. Students in engineering or data science fields can leverage the CPU's 24 cores for simulation and analysis workloads, with ECC memory support adding data integrity. Small business workstations requiring virtualization or heavy spreadsheet processing will benefit from the PassMark integer math score of 210622, though the GPU is overkill for most office tasks.

The 95th percentile CPU ranking combined with the 50th percentile GPU creates a system that is ideal for users who expect to upgrade the GPU in the future. The PCIe Gen 5 support and 550 W suggested PSU provide headroom for a future graphics card upgrade without changing the platform. This build is less suitable for users seeking balanced gaming performance at high resolutions, where the GPU would be the limiting factor.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The 45-percentage-point gap between the CPU's 95th percentile and the GPU's 50th percentile defines the bottleneck landscape. In gaming workloads, the RTX 3070 TiM will be the limiting factor at resolutions above 1080p, as the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth constrain texture detail and frame rates. The CPU's superior single-thread performance ensures that even at lower resolutions, frame times will be consistent, but the GPU will cap maximum FPS.

In productivity workloads, the GPU's 50th percentile becomes less relevant, and the CPU's 24 cores dominate. Video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation scale with the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39399.5, making the GPU a secondary consideration. However, GPU-accelerated tasks like ray tracing or AI inference will be limited by the 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, respectively, which are mid-range by the 50th percentile standard.

The combined percentile of 73 reflects a system where the CPU boosts the overall performance tier, but the GPU drags it down from what would otherwise be a top-tier build. Memory bandwidth is balanced between the CPU's dual-channel support and the GPU's 256-bit bus, with no obvious bottleneck in data transfer. The 550 W suggested PSU provides adequate power for both components under load, with the CPU's 125 W TDP and GPU's 220 W TDP leaving 205 W of headroom for other components. For users who plan to upgrade the GPU, the CPU's 95th percentile ensures it will not bottleneck even the fastest next-generation graphics cards.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 73, reflecting the CPU's 95th percentile ranking and the GPU's 50th percentile ranking.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900K supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop CPU and adds data integrity for workstation use.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RTX 3070 TiM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-14900K is 0.3% behind the i9-14900KF (avgScore 79371), 0.6% behind the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (avgScore 79574), and 1.2% behind the AMD EPYC 7413 (avgScore 80041), while leading the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 by 1.7% (avgScore 77740).

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, which provides headroom for the CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 220 W TDP.

Q: Does the CPU have an integrated GPU?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900K includes UHD Graphics 770, which can serve as a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is unavailable.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and how many cores does it have?

A: The CPU has 24 cores and 32 threads with a boost clock of 6.00 GHz, and it has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i9-14900K delivers a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 6103 and single-core score of 324.5, Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20793 and single-core score of 2935, and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39399.5 and single-core score of 2262.5. Geekbench results show a multicore score of 21697 and single-core score of 2655. PassMark tests reveal data compression score of 792694, data encryption score of 46813, extended instructions score of 45154, find prime numbers score of 231, floating point math score of 152975, integer math score of 210622, multithread score of 58674, physics score of 3140, random string sorting score of 86971, and single-thread score of 4697. The CPU's average benchmark score is 79097, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM has no benchmark scores in the data, and its average benchmark score is 0, placing it in the 50th percentile of all GPUs. The GPU's specifications include 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. Its FP32 performance is 16.60 TFLOPS with a pixel rate of 135.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 259.4 GTexel/s.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer at the 95th percentile, while the GPU is exactly average at the 50th percentile. The combined percentile of 73 indicates an above-average overall system, but one that is heavily skewed toward CPU-bound workloads. The RTX 3070 TiM's lack of benchmark data makes direct performance comparisons impossible, but its percentile rank suggests it performs as expected for a mid-range Ampere card.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-14900K, a 24-core Raptor Lake processor from the Core 14th Gen series, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM, an Ampere-architecture GPU from the GeForce 30-series. The CPU is an active production part released on 2023-10-16 with a launch MSRP of $589, while the GPU is marked as end-of-life. The pairing represents a workstation-class CPU with a gaming-class GPU, creating a system that is optimized for productivity over gaming.

The CPU's 95th percentile ranking and the GPU's 50th percentile ranking result in a combined percentile of 73, placing this build in the upper-mid range of all systems. The CPU is competitive with the fastest consumer processors, sitting within 1.2% of the AMD EPYC 7413 and leading the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 by 1.7% in average benchmark scores. The GPU, while not top-tier, provides solid 1080p and 1440p gaming performance with ray tracing and DLSS support via its 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores.

The build class is desktop, and the platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 5, and ECC memory, making it a versatile foundation for various workloads. The 550 W suggested PSU and the CPU's 125 W TDP with the GPU's 220 W TDP indicate a system that is power-efficient relative to its performance ceiling. Overall, this is a CPU-first build where the processor dominates the performance profile, and the GPU serves as a capable but not exceptional companion. Users seeking balanced gaming performance may find the GPU underwhelming, but those prioritizing CPU-intensive tasks will find this pairing delivers exceptional value in compute workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900K

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

FAQ

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds