SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900K

79,097 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is a high-performance desktop combination that delivers exceptional CPU throughput but shows its age on the GPU side. The data indicates a system where the processor is the dominant performer, ranking in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card sits in the 61st percentile among all GPUs. This results in a combined performance percentile of 78, placing this build firmly in the upper echelon of desktop systems, but with a clear imbalance that favors the processor in most workloads.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is built on the Ampere architecture using an 8 nm process at Samsung, featuring a GA104 chip with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The card operates with a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 1725 MHz, paired with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory runs at 1750 MHz with a 14 Gbps effective data rate.

In terms of compute resources, the RTX 3070 houses 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. For accelerated workloads, it includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, providing the hardware foundation for real-time ray tracing and AI-enhanced features. The card's theoretical performance is rated at 20.31 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1) operations, with a pixel rate of 165.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 317.4 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results show the GPU achieves a Passmark G3D score of 22214 and a Passmark GPU Compute score of 11195. In DirectX 12 testing, the card scores 85, while it reaches 182 in DirectX 11 and 150 in DirectX 10. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 112821, and the Vulkan score is 21022. In the newer 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the GPU scores 3162. These scores place the RTX 3070 in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17208.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 3070 sits closely with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, which has an average score of 17083, putting the NVIDIA card 0.7% ahead. It also edges out the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17037) by 1% and the AMD Radeon HD 7970M (17019) by 1.1%, while trailing the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (17468) by 1.5%. These deltas indicate the RTX 3070 remains competitive with these specific peers, but its end-of-life production status and 8 GB VRAM capacity suggest it is not a forward-looking choice for high-resolution texture-heavy rendering.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i9-14900K delivers dominant multi-core performance across several benchmarking suites. In Cinebench R15, it scores 6103 in multi-core and 324.5 in single-core. Cinebench R20 results show 20793 multi-core and 2935 single-core, while Cinebench R23 reaches 39399.5 multi-core and 2262.5 single-core. Geekbench scores are 21697 multi-core and 2655 single-core. Passmark tests show a multithread score of 58674, a single-thread score of 4697, and specialized workloads including data compression at 792694, data encryption at 46813, extended instructions at 45154, floating point math at 152975, integer math at 210622, and prime number finding at 231.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 79097, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-14900KF with an average score of 79371, which is 0.3% higher, and the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus at 79574, which is 0.6% higher. The AMD EPYC 7413 scores 80041, placing it 1.2% ahead, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 scores 77740, putting the i9-14900K 1.7% ahead of that chip.

On the GPU side, the RTX 3070 sits at the 61st percentile with an average score of 17208, as detailed in the GPU Analysis section. The combined picture shows a system with a 78th percentile combined rank, indicating that while the CPU is near the top of the performance curve, the GPU holds the system back from the very highest tiers. The measured average FPS across games for this pair is 139.1, with a rank of 1450 out of 3861 pairs, meaning this combination outperforms roughly 62% of all CPU-GPU pairings tested in the database.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The data for this build is measured, not estimated, providing direct FPS figures at Ultra settings across three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system delivers high frame rates in esports and lighter titles: Valorant reaches 476.9 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 464.3 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 achieves 206.5 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege X runs at 250 FPS, with Tom Clancy S Rainbow Six Siege at 248 FPS. Roblox achieves 272.2 FPS, Minecraft: Java Edition runs at 207 FPS, and Minecraft hits 206 FPS.

For AAA titles at 1080p, performance remains playable but not extreme. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 183.1 FPS, Doom at 159.1 FPS, Ready Or Not at 167.5 FPS, and Assetto Corsa at 121.9 FPS. More demanding games show lower numbers: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 65 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 57.9 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at just 30.2 FPS. The Medium is particularly demanding, dropping to 46.9 FPS at 1080p.

At 2560x1440, the system shows its limits in heavier titles. Valorant still delivers 407.4 FPS, while Counter-Strike: Global Offensive runs at 318.2 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone reaches 164 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 hits 140.4 FPS. For AAA games, Assetto Corsa runs at 90 FPS, Control at 66.8 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 43.3 FPS. Red Dead Redemption 2 manages 44.2 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 20.2 FPS. The Medium runs at 40.1 FPS at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, 4K gaming becomes challenging for the RTX 3070. Valorant remains high at 327.4 FPS, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 185.8 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 137.3 FPS, but most AAA titles fall below 60 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 32.7 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 26.8 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended drops to 9.4 FPS. The Medium runs at 30.6 FPS, and Control at 41.9 FPS. The data shows that 4K gaming is only viable for lighter esports or older titles.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The performance data clearly indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in gaming workloads, particularly at higher resolutions. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 61st percentile shows a substantial gap in relative capability. This is evident in the FPS scaling: at 1080p, many games exceed 200 FPS (Valorant at 476.9, CS:GO at 464.3), showing the CPU can push frames far beyond what the GPU can render at 4K. At 2160p, the same games see dramatic drops (Valorant to 327.4, CS:GO to 185.8), indicating the GPU's rendering limits are the constraining factor.

The bottleneck shifts in lighter workloads. In CPU-bound scenarios like physics or simulation, the i9-14900K's Passmark physics score of 3140 and multithread score of 58674 suggest ample headroom. For professional tasks like data compression (792694) and integer math (210622), the CPU dominates, meaning the RTX 3070 is not the limiting factor in compute-heavy, non-graphics workloads.

The average FPS of 139.1 across games, with a pair rank of 1450 out of 3861, suggests that while the CPU could handle more, the GPU's performance caps the system's overall frame output. For users targeting high-refresh monitors at 1080p, the balance is acceptable, but for 1440p or 4K gaming, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor, as evidenced by the steep FPS declines in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (65 to 43.3 to 32.7 FPS across resolutions).

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-14900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 6.00 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The chip features a die size of 257 mm² and includes a cache hierarchy of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770.

The benchmark scores indicate exceptional multi-threaded capability. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39399.5 demonstrates strong rendering throughput, while the single-core score of 2262.5 shows high per-thread performance. Passmark multithread score of 58674 and single-thread score of 4697 confirm this dual strength. The Geekbench scores of 21697 multi-core and 2655 single-core further validate the CPU's position in the 95th percentile.

For real workloads, these numbers translate to fast video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The data compression score of 792694 and integer math score of 210622 indicate strong performance in database operations and scientific computing. The floating point math score of 152975 supports heavy numerical simulations. The processor's 6.00 GHz boost clock and unlocked multiplier make it suitable for overclocking, though the data does not include overclocked results.

The nearest rivals show the i9-14900K is tightly grouped with the i9-14900KF (0.3% behind) and the Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (0.6% behind), while being 1.7% ahead of the Ryzen AI Max+ 395. This places it among the top consumer desktop processors, though not the absolute leader in this comparison set.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is a strong scenario for this build. The measured FPS shows Valorant at 476.9 FPS and CS:GO at 464.3 FPS, easily exceeding 240 Hz monitors. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4697 in Passmark ensures minimal frame drops in CPU-bound scenes.

Streaming is feasible given the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39399.5 provides ample headroom for simultaneous encoding and gaming, though the GPU's 61st percentile ranking means game settings may need adjustment to maintain high frame rates while streaming.

Video editing benefits from the CPU's multi-threaded power. The Passmark multithread score of 58674 and data compression score of 792694 accelerate timeline rendering and export tasks. The 8 GB VRAM on the GPU may limit effects-heavy 4K editing, but the CPU handles the heavy lifting.

3D rendering is a clear strength. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20793 and R23 score of 39399.5 indicate rapid render times in CPU-based engines. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 3070's 20.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides moderate acceleration, though the 8 GB VRAM may restrict scene sizes.

Software development workloads are well-served. The integer math score of 210622 and extended instructions score of 45154 support fast compilation and code analysis. The 32 threads handle parallel build processes efficiently, reducing wait times for large projects.

Student and office work is overkill but effective. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking ensures snappy response in productivity suites, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle basic display output without the discrete GPU. The system's high FPS in lighter games like Roblox (272.2 FPS at 1080p) makes it suitable for multitasking between work and entertainment.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh monitors are the primary audience. Measured FPS above 200 in esports titles like Valorant (476.9 FPS) and CS:GO (464.3 FPS) make this ideal for competitive play. The 1440p performance is acceptable for many titles, but the 4K data shows significant drops, so 4K gamers should look elsewhere.

Content creators focused on CPU-heavy workloads will benefit most. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39399.5 and Passmark multithread score of 58674 make video editing and 3D rendering efficient. However, creators requiring large GPU memory for texture-heavy work will find the 8 GB VRAM limiting.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 24-core, 32-thread configuration. The integer math score of 210622 and data compression score of 792694 accelerate build processes. The 6.00 GHz boost clock ensures fast single-threaded tasks like code analysis.

Students in engineering or computer science programs benefit from the CPU's power for simulations and development, while the GPU handles moderate gaming needs. The system's performance in lighter titles like Minecraft (206 FPS at 1080p) provides a capable all-around machine.

Small business workstations requiring heavy data processing will find the CPU's 95th percentile ranking valuable. The data encryption score of 46813 supports secure transactions, while the floating point math score of 152975 aids financial modeling. The GPU is sufficient for basic visualization tasks.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this Intel Core i9-14900K and RTX 3070 build?

A: The combined performance percentile is 78, placing it above the majority of desktop systems but below the top tier due to the GPU's lower ranking.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14900K compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900KF?

A: The i9-14900KF has an average benchmark score of 79371, which is 0.3% higher than the i9-14900K's score of 79097, making them nearly identical in performance.

Q: What is the RTX 3070's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 3070 ranks in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17208.

Q: What are the measured FPS figures for Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p and 4K?

A: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 65 FPS at 1920x1080, 43.3 FPS at 2560x1440, and 32.7 FPS at 3840x2160, showing significant performance drops at higher resolutions.

Q: What memory configurations does the Intel Core i9-14900K support?

A: The i9-14900K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 3070 is 550 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 125 W.

Q: What is the RTX 3070's memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3070 has a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, using 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i9-14900K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the CPU only, while the RTX 3070 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This means the motherboard must support PCIe 5.0 for the CPU's full potential, though the GPU operates on PCIe 4.0.

The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W, indicating the system requires a power supply with at least 550 W capacity. The RTX 3070 uses a 1x 12-pin power connector, which may require an adapter for older power supplies. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, but this would increase power draw beyond the 125 W TDP.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU, as the CPU's 95th percentile ranking leaves significant headroom. The RTX 3070's 8 GB VRAM and 61st percentile ranking are the clear limiting factors. Upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would improve 1440p and 4K performance, as the CPU can support faster graphics cards without becoming the bottleneck. The motherboard socket and memory support do not need changing, as the i9-14900K remains a top-tier processor. For users on DDR4, moving to DDR5 would provide higher memory bandwidth, though the data does not specify the exact performance impact.