SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900K + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900K

79,097 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 is a desktop combination that places the CPU in the 95th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits in the 59th percentile among all graphics cards. This pairing creates a significant performance disparity, with the CPU’s average benchmark score of 79097 vastly outpacing the GPU’s average of 16014. The combined percentile for this build is 77, and the measured data across games shows an average FPS of 111.2 at 1920x1080, which drops to 52.6 at 2560x1440 and 28.8 at 3840x2160 across all tested titles. This is a system where the processor is clearly the dominant component, and every workload from gaming to rendering will be shaped by that imbalance.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1920x1080, this build is exceptionally strong in esports and lighter titles. The data shows Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaching 377 FPS, Valorant hitting 391 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone managing 183 FPS at 1080p. These figures indicate that the CPU’s massive single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2262.5, is more than sufficient to drive high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege also runs at 203 FPS, which means competitive players will have no trouble hitting the refresh rate limits of most high-end monitors.

Streaming while gaming is a realistic workload for this CPU, given its 24 cores and 32 threads. The Passmark multi-thread score of 58674 provides substantial headroom for encoding, overlays, and background tasks. A game like Call of Duty: Warzone at 183 FPS leaves plenty of CPU capacity for a software encoder, and the GPU’s 132 W TDP means there is thermal and power headroom for simultaneous workloads. The Geekbench multicore score of 21697 further reinforces that this processor can handle the parallel demands of game rendering and streaming software without significant frame drops.

Video editing benefits greatly from the CPU’s multi-core strength. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39399.5 places this processor in the top 5% of all CPUs, which translates to fast export times and smooth timeline scrubbing in applications that use multi-threaded rendering. The Passmark data compression score of 792694 and floating point math score of 152975 indicate strong performance in codec processing and effects rendering. For a video editor working with 4K footage, the CPU will rarely be the bottleneck, though the GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM might limit certain effects or color grading operations that rely on GPU acceleration.

3D rendering is where the i9-14900K truly shines. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 6103 and R20 multicore score of 20793 demonstrate that CPU-based rendering engines like those in Blender or Cinema 4D will complete tasks quickly. The Passmark integer math score of 210622 and extended instructions score of 45154 also support heavy computational workloads. However, the RX 9060’s 21.43 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will be the limiting factor for GPU-accelerated rendering, meaning hybrid renderers that use both CPU and GPU will see the CPU waiting on the GPU.

Software development workloads, including compilation and code analysis, are well served by this processor. The Passmark random string sorting score of 86971 and data encryption score of 46813 indicate strong performance in parsing, hashing, and data manipulation tasks. The 32 threads allow for parallel builds, and the single-thread score of 4697 ensures that interactive tasks like code completion and linting remain responsive. The ECC memory support is a notable feature for developers who require data integrity in long-running builds or databases.

Student and office work is almost overkill for this hardware, but it handles these tasks effortlessly. The Passmark single-thread score of 4697 and Geekbench single-core score of 2655 ensure that spreadsheet calculations, document formatting, and web browsing are instantaneous. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though the discrete RX 9060 will handle any graphics-accelerated tasks. The CPU’s 125 W TDP means that even a modest cooler can keep it quiet during light workloads, making this a fast but not power-hungry office machine.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows that the RX 9060 is the primary bottleneck for gaming. The GPU’s 59th percentile ranking among all GPUs is far below the CPU’s 95th percentile, and the measured FPS scaling across resolutions confirms this. At 1920x1080, the average FPS across games is 111.2, but this drops to 52.6 at 2560x1440 and 28.8 at 3840x2160. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are clearly limiting factors at higher resolutions, as seen in Cyberpunk 2077 falling to 38 FPS at 1440p and 25 FPS at 4K.

In CPU-bound scenarios, the i9-14900K performs exceptionally well. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2262.5 places it among the fastest processors for gaming, and the measured FPS in esports titles reflects this. Valorant reaches 391 FPS at 1080p, which is far beyond what most monitors can display, indicating that the CPU is not the limiting factor. Counter-Strike 2 hits 171 FPS at 1080p, again demonstrating that the GPU is what caps performance in these titles.

For multi-threaded workloads like rendering and video editing, the CPU is so far ahead of the GPU that the balance tips the other way. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39399.5 is roughly 19 times its single-core score, showing excellent scaling. The GPU’s Passmark compute score of 9919 is modest, meaning that any workload using GPU compute will see the RX 9060 lagging behind the CPU’s capabilities. This is a system where the CPU is the star, and the GPU is a competent but not exceptional partner.

The FPS scaling between 1080p and 1440p shows a 52.7% drop in average FPS, from 111.2 to 52.6. This steep decline is characteristic of a GPU-limited system, where the CPU has ample headroom but the GPU cannot keep up with increased pixel counts. At 4K, the average FPS of 28.8 is below playable levels for most titles, confirming that this build is not suited for 4K gaming without significant settings reductions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14900K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility means builders can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the memory bandwidth figures are not provided in the data. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is more than sufficient for the RX 9060’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or office tasks without the discrete GPU.

The RX 9060 has a TDP of 132 W and requires a suggested PSU of 300 W, which is modest for a modern graphics card. The CPU’s TDP of 125 W means that the total system draw is well within the range of a typical 650 W power supply, though the exact combined wattage is not specified in the data. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector, which is compatible with most power supplies. The dual-slot design and 1x HDMI 2.1b plus 2x DisplayPort 2.1a outputs provide ample connectivity.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RX 9060 with a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU has substantial headroom. The i9-14900K’s 95th percentile ranking means it can support much faster graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that future GPUs using this interface will be fully compatible. The platform’s 125 W TDP also leaves room for more powerful GPUs, which typically have higher power requirements but are supported by the 300 W PSU suggestion only for the current card.

Memory upgrades are straightforward, with support for both DDR4 and DDR5. The dual-channel memory bus means that adding more RAM or faster modules could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads. The ECC memory support is a unique feature for a consumer CPU, which may appeal to workstation users. The socket 1700 platform is mature, with a wide range of motherboards available, though future CPU upgrades would require a new motherboard as this is the final generation for this socket.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1920x1080 who prioritize high frame rates in competitive titles will find this build well suited. The measured FPS in Valorant (391), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (377), and Rainbow Six Siege (203) shows that the CPU can push extremely high refresh rates, and the GPU is fast enough to support these in most esports games. However, gamers at 2560x1440 will see significantly lower FPS, with the average dropping to 52.6, meaning this is not ideal for high-refresh 1440p gaming in demanding titles.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation will benefit most from this build. The i9-14900K’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39399.5 and Passmark multi-thread score of 58674 make it a powerhouse for these workloads. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM and 21.43 TFLOPS are adequate for light GPU acceleration but will not be the primary driver of performance.

Software developers and data analysts will appreciate the CPU’s single-thread performance and ECC memory support. The Passmark data encryption score of 46813 and random string sorting score of 86971 indicate strong performance in data-intensive tasks. Students and office workers will find this system overkill but responsive, with the integrated graphics providing a backup display option.

Small business workstations that require fast compilation, data processing, or multitasking will benefit from the CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads. The Passmark integer math score of 210622 and floating point math score of 152975 support heavy computational workloads. However, the RX 9060’s 59th percentile ranking means it is not suited for GPU-accelerated tasks like machine learning or complex 3D modeling, where a more powerful GPU would be necessary.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark performance is outstanding, with an average benchmark score of 79097 and a 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39399.5 is matched by a single-core score of 2262.5, showing balanced performance across both multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks. The Geekbench scores of 21697 (multicore) and 2655 (single-core) further confirm this processor’s dominance. The nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-14900KF with an average score of 79371 (a delta of -0.3%), the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus at 79574 (-0.6%), and the AMD EPYC 7413 at 80041 (-1.2%). The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 trails at 77740, which is 1.7% behind.

The GPU’s benchmark performance is more modest, with an average score of 16014 and a 59th percentile ranking. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322 and Passmark G3D score of 17631 place it in the mid-range of graphics cards. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 16129 (-0.7%), the AMD Radeon R9 370X at 15862 (1%), and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 at 15852 (1%). The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 is 2.1% behind at 15679. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 88183 and Vulkan score of 39476 provide additional context for compute workloads.

The combined percentile for this build is 77, reflecting the strong CPU and mid-range GPU. The pair rank by FPS is 2196 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS across games of 111.2. This places the build in the upper half of all CPU-GPU combinations for gaming, but the CPU’s performance is clearly the standout feature. The data shows that this is a CPU-centric build where the GPU is adequate but not exceptional.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data for this build is extensive, covering 51 games at three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the build excels in esports titles: Valorant hits 391 FPS, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 377 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 manages 171 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 183 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 203 FPS. These numbers indicate that the CPU’s single-thread performance is fully utilized in competitive shooters, and the GPU is capable of keeping up at 1080p.

For AAA titles at 1080p, the performance is more varied. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 50 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 46 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 62 FPS. These are playable but not high-refresh experiences. Ark: Survival Ascended is particularly demanding at 25 FPS, and The Medium drops to 36 FPS. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are limiting factors in these titles.

At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops to 52.6, with most AAA titles falling below 60 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 38 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 34 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 162 FPS (still playable). Esports titles remain strong, with Valorant at 334 FPS and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 260 FPS. However, demanding titles like Ark: Survival Ascended drop to 16 FPS, making 1440p gaming inconsistent.

At 3840x2160, the average FPS is 28.8, which is below playable levels for most titles. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 25 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 23 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 138 FPS (playable but not smooth). Valorant remains playable at 267 FPS, but the GPU is clearly the bottleneck at 4K. This build is not suited for 4K gaming without significant resolution scaling or settings reductions.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-14900K faster than the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395?

A: Yes, the i9-14900K has an average benchmark score of 79097, which is 1.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395’s score of 77740.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 ranks in the 59th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16014.

Q: How much FPS can this build achieve in Valorant at 1080p?

A: The measured FPS in Valorant at 1920x1080 is 391 FPS, which is very high and suitable for high-refresh monitors.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900K supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation processors.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 has a suggested PSU of 300 W, and it uses a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014, which is 0.7% lower than the RTX 3060 Ti’s score of 16129.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900K has a boost clock of 6.00 GHz, which is among the highest for consumer processors.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i9-14900K with the AMD Radeon RX 9060. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on a 10 nm process. The GPU is a Radeon RX 9000 series card with a Navi 44 chip, built on TSMC’s 4 nm process with RDNA 4.0 architecture. The combined percentile for this build is 77, placing it in the upper tier of desktop systems.

The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 79097 make it one of the fastest processors available, while the GPU’s 59th percentile ranking and average score of 16014 place it in the mid-range. This is a build where the CPU is the clear star, and the GPU is a competent but not exceptional partner. The pair rank by FPS of 2196 out of 3732 pairs indicates that this combination performs well in gaming, though it is not optimized for maximum frame rates in demanding titles.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900K features 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 6.00 GHz. This is a Raptor Lake architecture chip, codenamed Raptor Lake-R, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support as a notable feature.

The benchmark scores for this CPU are exceptional. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39399.5 is roughly 17 times the single-core score of 2262.5, demonstrating excellent multi-threading scaling. The Geekbench multicore score of 21697 and single-core score of 2655 further confirm its dominance. The Passmark multi-thread score of 58674 and single-thread score of 4697 show strength in both parallel and sequential workloads.

The Passmark data compression score of 792694 and data encryption score of 46813 indicate strong performance in data-intensive tasks, while the floating point math score of 152975 and integer math score of 210622 support scientific and financial computing. The extended instructions score of 45154 and find prime numbers score of 231 round out the computational picture. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 79097 places it in the 95th percentile, with nearest rivals being the i9-14900KF (-0.3%), Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (-0.6%), and AMD EPYC 7413 (-1.2%). The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is 1.7% behind.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display output, and the CPU’s 125 W TDP is modest for its performance level. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, and the PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes ensures compatibility with modern GPUs and storage. This is a flagship consumer CPU that excels in every multi-threaded workload, from rendering to compilation, while maintaining top-tier single-thread performance for gaming.