SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900K + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900K

79,097 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 is a desktop configuration that combines a high-end 24-core processor with a mid-range 16 GB graphics card. The benchmark data is measured, with actual FPS figures recorded across a wide range of titles at three resolutions. The pair ranks at the 77th percentile overall, with the CPU sitting at the 95th percentile and the GPU at the 58th percentile, indicating a significant performance disparity that shapes the system’s behavior in both gaming and productivity tasks. This analysis walks through the measured FPS, component balance, raw benchmark scores, platform characteristics, and the specific workloads where this pairing excels or falls short.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data at ultra settings reveals a configuration that is strongly resolution-dependent. At 1920x1080, the system frequently delivers high-refresh-rate performance. Esports titles show exceptional results: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 431 FPS, Valorant hits 447 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege achieves 232 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 195 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone is playable at 183 FPS. These numbers indicate that the CPU’s strong single-thread performance is not a bottleneck at 1080p for competitive shooters. Minecraft also performs well at 192 FPS, and Roblox reaches 252 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain respectable but show the expected scaling drop. Valorant still leads with 381 FPS, while CS:GO drops to 297 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone remains smooth at 162 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege is at 152 FPS. Heavier titles like Cyberpunk 2077 fall to 43 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 39 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to a marginal 18 FPS. The 1440p results suggest that the GPU is starting to become the limiting factor for demanding AAA games, though lighter titles still benefit from the CPU’s power.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s mid-range class becomes evident. Valorant still manages 305 FPS, and CS:GO runs at 175 FPS, but most games see significant drops. Call of Duty: Warzone is the standout at 138 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 28 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 26 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to just 9 FPS. The Medium runs at 27 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator is at 42 FPS. Only a few titles remain comfortably playable at 4K ultra, with most requiring settings reductions or upscaling. The average FPS across all games is 126.4, and the pair ranks 1747 out of 3732 pairs, confirming that this is not a top-tier 4K gaming machine but excels at lower resolutions.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates an unbalanced pairing where the CPU vastly outpaces the GPU. The processor’s 95th percentile ranking against all CPUs contrasts sharply with the GPU’s 58th percentile, creating a scenario where the graphics card is almost always the limiting factor in gaming. This is evident in the FPS scaling: at 1080p, many games show high frame rates that could be much higher with a stronger GPU, while at 4K, the frame rates drop dramatically, a classic sign of GPU saturation.

For example, in Valorant, the difference between 1080p (447 FPS) and 4K (305 FPS) is relatively modest, suggesting the CPU is still capable of driving high frame rates but the GPU’s pixel throughput limits the absolute ceiling. Conversely, in Ark: Survival Ascended, the 1080p result of 28 FPS and the 4K result of 9 FPS show a GPU-bound workload where the CPU’s power cannot compensate for the graphics card’s inability to handle heavy rendering. Similarly, Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 58 FPS at 1080p to 28 FPS at 4K, reinforcing that the RX 7700’s 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the primary constraint in modern, demanding titles.

In productivity and compute workloads, the bottleneck reverses. The CPU’s multi-threaded scores dominate, and the GPU’s compute performance, while decent, is not in the same league. This means that for tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering that rely heavily on CPU cores, the system will perform exceptionally; for GPU-accelerated rendering, the RX 7700 will hold the system back relative to the CPU’s potential.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are outstanding. In Cinebench R23, it scores 39399.5 points in multi-core and 2262.5 points in single-core. Geekbench results show 21697 multi-core and 2655 single-core. PassMark’s multithread test yields 58674, with integer math at 210622 and floating-point math at 152975. The average benchmark score is 79097, placing it at the 95th percentile. Compared to its nearest rivals, it trails the Intel Core i9-14900KF by 0.3%, the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus by 0.6%, and the AMD EPYC 7413 by 1.2%, while leading the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 by 1.7%. This is a top-tier desktop CPU.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are more modest. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2865. Geekbench OpenCL reaches 106028, and PassMark G3D is 20974, with G2D at 1206. The average benchmark score is 15852, placing it at the 58th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 370X (0.1% behind), the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (1% ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (1.1% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (1.7% ahead). This places it firmly in the mid-range segment.

The combined picture shows a system that is extremely powerful for CPU-bound tasks but only average for GPU-bound ones. The combined percentile of 77 reflects this gap, with the CPU’s excellence pulling the overall score up despite the GPU’s mediocrity.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, a feature that appeals to workstation users. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, ensuring high-bandwidth connectivity for the latest storage and graphics cards. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or basic tasks without the discrete GPU.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe 5.0 slots, though it will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 200 W, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W. This leaves ample headroom for a system with this CPU and GPU, as the combined TDP is 325 W, suggesting that a quality 550 W power supply would be adequate, though a higher-wattage unit would allow for future upgrades.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system is the GPU. The CPU is already at the top of its platform, and its 95th percentile ranking means it will not be the bottleneck in most scenarios. Upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would better utilize the CPU’s capabilities, especially at 1440p and 4K resolutions where the RX 7700 is clearly the limiting factor. The platform itself is mature, and there is little room for CPU improvement without changing the motherboard and socket.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 6.00 GHz, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm².

The benchmark scores translate to exceptional real-world performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39399.5 places it among the fastest desktop CPUs available, making it ideal for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-core score of 2262.5 is equally impressive, ensuring snappy response in everyday tasks and strong performance in lightly-threaded applications. PassMark data compression (792694) and encryption (46813) scores indicate excellent performance in archival and security tasks. The find prime numbers score of 231 is lower relative to other tests, but the overall picture is one of a processor that excels in every metric.

This CPU is a workstation-class part, and its 95th percentile ranking confirms that it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs on the market. For users who need maximum multi-threaded throughput, this processor delivers, and its high single-core performance ensures that it does not sacrifice responsiveness for raw core count.

FAQ

Q: How does the CPU perform in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The CPU scores 39399.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 58674 in PassMark multithread, placing it at the 95th percentile against all CPUs. This makes it excellent for rendering and compilation.

Q: Is the GPU capable of 4K gaming?

A: At 3840x2160 ultra settings, the GPU delivers playable frame rates only in lighter titles. Valorant runs at 305 FPS, but Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 28 FPS and Ark: Survival Ascended to 9 FPS.

Q: What is the main bottleneck in this system?

A: The GPU is the main bottleneck in gaming. The GPU’s 58th percentile ranking is much lower than the CPU’s 95th percentile, and FPS drops significantly at higher resolutions.

Q: Can this system handle high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p?

A: Yes, at 1920x1080 many titles exceed 144 FPS, including CS:GO at 431 FPS, Valorant at 447 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 232 FPS.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the CPU has an unlocked multiplier, and its boost clock reaches 6.00 GHz, indicating headroom for manual overclocking.

Q: What memory types are supported?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU has an average benchmark score of 15852, which is 0.1% behind the Radeon R9 370X, 1% behind the Radeon RX 9060, 1.1% ahead of the Radeon Pro W5500, and 1.7% behind the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is based on the Navi 32 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Wheat Nas. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. The memory clock is 2438 MHz, effective at 19.5 Gbps. The core clocks are 1900 MHz base, 2041 MHz game, and 2459 MHz boost.

The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. It includes 40 ray tracing cores, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores. The pixel rate is 236.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 393.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 25.18 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 25.18 TFLOPS (1:1). The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In benchmark terms, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20974 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2865 indicate solid 1080p and 1440p gaming performance. The PassMark GPU compute score of 10963 is moderate, suggesting that compute-heavy tasks like some rendering or machine learning workloads will not be a strength. The 58th percentile ranking places it in the middle of the pack, and its performance in the measured games confirms that it is best suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming and 1440p at medium-to-high settings, with 4K being reserved for less demanding titles.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that combines a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU. The Intel Core i9-14900K is a flagship processor, ranked at the 95th percentile, while the AMD Radeon RX 7700 is a mid-range graphics card, ranked at the 58th percentile. The combined percentile is 77, reflecting the imbalance. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 79097 is nearly five times higher than the GPU’s average score of 15852, which shows that the processor is the dominant component in this pairing.

The build is best described as a CPU-centric workstation that can also handle gaming. The data indicates it is not a balanced gaming machine, as the GPU is the clear weak point. The pair ranks 1747 out of 3732 pairs by FPS, with an average FPS of 126.4 across games. For users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity and are willing to compromise on gaming frame rates, this is a viable combination, but for pure gaming, a more balanced pairing would be preferable.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need extreme CPU processing power and are willing to accept a mid-range GPU. Gamers at 1920x1080 will find this system excellent, as the CPU ensures high frame rates in esports titles like Valorant (447 FPS) and CS:GO (431 FPS), and even demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 run at a playable 58 FPS. At 2560x1440, the system is still capable, but the GPU’s limitations become apparent in AAA titles.

Content creators and video editors will benefit greatly from the CPU’s 39399.5 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, which accelerates rendering and encoding. Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant speedups. Students and small business users with compute-heavy workloads, such as data analysis or scientific simulations, will also find the CPU’s performance valuable. However, those who focus on 3D rendering with GPU acceleration or high-end gaming at 4K should look elsewhere, as the GPU will bottleneck these tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this system delivers exceptional frame rates in competitive titles, with CS:GO at 431 FPS and Valorant at 447 FPS, making it ideal for high-refresh monitors. At 1440p, the experience is still smooth for most games, though the GPU limits the absolute maximum.

Streaming: The CPU’s 32 threads and high multi-core score (39399.5 in Cinebench R23) provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, ensuring minimal performance impact on the game itself.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 58674 and floating-point math score of 152975 accelerate timeline scrubbing and export times, making this a strong choice for 4K video editing.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be very fast, but GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the GPU’s 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 58th percentile ranking, which is below average for modern renderers.

Software development: The CPU’s high integer math score of 210622 and data compression score of 792694 speed up compilation and code analysis, making this a productive development workstation.

Student and office work: For general productivity, the CPU’s single-core score of 2262.5 in Cinebench R23 and 2655 in Geekbench ensure snappy application responsiveness, while the 16 GB GPU memory is more than sufficient for multi-monitor office setups.