SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900K + AMD Radeon RX 6800

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900K

79,097 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800

30,095 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-14900K + AMD Radeon RX 6800: A Desktop Powerhouse with a Balanced Profile

This pairing combines Intel's flagship 14th-generation desktop processor with AMD's Radeon RX 6800, a RDNA 2.0 graphics card. The CPU sits at the 95th percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 75th percentile among all graphics cards, resulting in a combined system percentile of 85. This is a desktop-class build aimed at high-end productivity and high-refresh gaming, though with a notable asymmetry: the processor is a top-tier compute monster, while the graphics card is a solid mid-to-high-range performer. The data for this analysis contains no measured frame-rate rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance projections are estimated from the individual benchmark scores and percentile positions.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900K is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, using a 10 nm process node from Intel. It features 24 cores and 32 threads, a configuration that pairs performance and efficiency cores. The base clock is 3.20 GHz, with a boost clock of 6.00 GHz, and the processor has a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. This is a desktop-class chip with an unlocked multiplier, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, and includes ECC memory support.

Benchmark data shows this CPU is a multi-threaded beast. In Cinebench R23, it scores 39399.5 points in multi-core and 2262.5 in single-core. The multi-core score places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 95% of processors on the market. The single-core score of 2262.5 is also strong, indicating excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded tasks. The Geekbench results corroborate this: a multi-core score of 21697 and a single-core score of 2655. PassMark tests further break down the performance: integer math hits 210622, floating point math reaches 152975, and extended instructions score 45154. The multi-thread score of 58674 and single-thread score of 4697 confirm the processor's dual nature—capable of both massive parallel workloads and snappy single-threaded response.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i9-14900K is extremely competitive. The Intel Core i9-14900KF scores 79371 on average, which is only 0.3% higher, indicating the K variant's integrated graphics come at a negligible performance cost. The Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus is 0.6% faster, and the AMD EPYC 7413 is 1.2% faster, but these are marginal differences. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is 1.7% slower, making the i9-14900K the value leader in this immediate comparison group. For real workloads, this means the CPU handles video rendering, software compilation, and scientific computing with near-top-tier speed, while maintaining excellent single-thread performance for gaming and general desktop use.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 79097, which is the aggregate across all listed tests. This score places it at the 95th percentile, just behind the i9-14900KF (-0.3%) and the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (-0.6%), but ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (1.7% faster than that rival). The GPU, with an average benchmark score of 30095, sits at the 75th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, which scores 29945 and is 0.5% faster; the RX 6800 is 0.6% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, 1% faster than the RTX 2080 Ti, and 1.1% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 6700.

The combined picture shows a system with a dominant CPU and a capable GPU. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking means it can feed any modern GPU without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios. The GPU's 75th percentile ranking indicates it is above average but not in the top tier. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 3188, which is a modern DirectX 12 test. PassMark GPU tests show a G3D score of 22067 and a compute score of 10864. The DirectX 12 score of 89 is lower than DirectX 11 (214) and DirectX 9 (257), which is typical for older API tests that do not scale with modern hardware. Geekbench scores for the GPU are 24508 in OpenCL, 115107 in Vulkan, and 153635 in Metal, showing strong compute capability across different APIs.

This combined data suggests a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks like rendering, compilation, and simulation, while the GPU handles 1440p gaming comfortably and 4K gaming with adjusted settings. The 85th combined percentile for the entire build indicates a well-above-average system, though the GPU is the weaker link relative to the CPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 6800's 75th percentile and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3188 suggest it can drive high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p in most titles. The CPU's single-core score of 2262.5 in Cinebench R23 ensures frame pacing remains consistent, but the GPU will likely cap maximum FPS in graphically demanding games.

Streaming: The i9-14900K's 24 cores and 32 threads handle encoding workloads exceptionally well, evidenced by a PassMark multi-thread score of 58674. The GPU's fixed-function hardware and 16 GB VRAM provide ample headroom for game capture and encoding, making this a viable single-PC streaming setup.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39399.5 and PassMark integer math score of 210622 indicate rapid timeline rendering and effect processing. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth allow for smooth scrubbing and preview of high-resolution footage, with the OpenCL score of 24508 supporting GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The CPU's 95th percentile ranking and PassMark floating point math score of 152975 mean CPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles, V-Ray) is exceptionally fast. The GPU's 16.17 TFLOPS FP32 performance also accelerates GPU-based renderers, though it trails top-end cards by a noticeable margin.

Software development: The CPU's multi-thread score of 58674 and data compression score of 792694 accelerate compilation and packaging tasks. The 36 MB L3 cache and 32 threads allow for parallel builds with minimal contention, while the GPU's compute capability (10864 in PassMark GPU compute) speeds up testing and machine learning workloads.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for document processing and web browsing, but the CPU's single-thread score of 4697 in PassMark ensures zero lag in office suites. The GPU's 75th percentile is unnecessary for 2D workloads, but the system's overall speed makes it future-proof for any academic software.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need extreme CPU performance but are willing to save on the GPU. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates will benefit from the CPU's single-thread speed, though at 4K the GPU becomes the limiting factor. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's 95th percentile indispensable, especially for render times. Software developers compiling large codebases will see dramatic speedups from the 24-core configuration. Students in engineering or scientific fields can run simulations and data analysis without waiting, and small business workstations requiring heavy spreadsheet or database workloads will appreciate the data compression score of 792694. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM also supports AI inference and large dataset visualization, making this a flexible choice for researchers. However, buyers primarily focused on gaming at 4K ultra settings should consider a stronger GPU, as the RX 6800's 75th percentile will hold back the CPU's potential in that scenario.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame-rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The RX 6800's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3188 and 75th percentile ranking suggest it delivers playable performance at 1440p in most modern titles. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (2262.5 in Cinebench R23) will likely push frame rates high enough to saturate a 144Hz or 165Hz monitor in esports titles. The GPU's 16.17 TFLOPS FP32 and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth indicate it can handle ultra settings at 1440p with some titles requiring reduced shadows or reflections. For 4K gaming, the RX 6800 will manage 30-60 FPS depending on the title and settings, with less demanding games hitting 60 FPS and AAA titles requiring upscaling or medium settings. DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with ray tracing and mesh shaders, though the 60 RT cores are modest compared to higher-tier cards. The 16 GB VRAM is a strong advantage for texture-heavy mods and future titles, but the GPU's raw compute (16.17 TFLOPS) is the primary limiter for extreme settings.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-14900K faster than the Intel Core i9-14900KF?

A: No, the i9-14900KF is 0.3% faster in average benchmark score (79371 vs 79097), but the difference is negligible for real-world use.

Q: How does the RX 6800 compare to the RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti scores 29945 on average, which is 0.5% higher than the RX 6800's 30095, meaning the two are statistically tied in performance.

Q: Does this system support DDR4 or DDR5 memory?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through its dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in platform choice.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The RX 6800 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: Is the CPU's integrated graphics sufficient for display output?

A: Yes, the i9-14900K includes UHD Graphics 770, which can drive displays and handle basic tasks, though the discrete GPU is required for gaming and compute.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this build?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 600 W, while the CPU has a 125 W TDP, so a quality 650 W or higher PSU is recommended for headroom.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows an unbalanced pairing. The CPU sits at the 95th percentile, while the GPU is at the 75th percentile. In CPU-bound workloads like rendering, compilation, and physics simulations, the i9-14900K will not be the limiting factor—its PassMark physics score of 3140 and multi-thread score of 58674 ensure maximum throughput. However, in gaming, the GPU becomes the bottleneck as resolution increases. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance can push frame rates, but at 1440p and 4K, the RX 6800's 16.17 TFLOPS and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap FPS. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3188 indicates the GPU can handle modern DX12 titles, but it is not in the same tier as the CPU. For mixed workloads like video editing, the balance is better: the CPU handles encoding and timeline rendering, while the GPU accelerates effects and previews. The PassMark GPU compute score of 10864 shows the GPU is capable, but the CPU's 95th percentile means it will finish its tasks faster, creating a queue in some workflows. Overall, this build favors CPU-intensive tasks, and gamers should expect the GPU to be the primary constraint in high-resolution scenarios.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-14900K, a flagship 14th-gen processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 6800, a mid-to-high-range GPU from the Radeon RX 6000 series. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake part with a 6.00 GHz boost clock and a 95th percentile ranking, making it one of the fastest consumer processors available. The GPU is a RDNA 2.0 chip with 16 GB GDDR6 memory, 3840 shading units, and a 75th percentile ranking, placing it above average but not in the top tier. The combined percentile of 85 indicates a system that outperforms the vast majority of desktop builds, with the CPU as the dominant component. This pairing is best suited for users who prioritize compute and productivity over pure gaming frame rates, as the GPU is sufficient for high-refresh 1440p gaming but will not maximize the CPU's potential at 4K ultra settings. The build targets enthusiasts and professionals who need extreme multi-threaded performance without the cost of a flagship GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which is compatible with 14th-gen Core processors and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes from the CPU provides high-bandwidth connectivity for next-gen storage and GPUs, though the RX 6800's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is fully backward-compatible. The 125 W TDP CPU and 250 W GPU, with a suggested PSU of 600 W, leave modest headroom for upgrades; a higher-wattage PSU would be needed for a more powerful GPU. The GPU is end-of-life, so a sensible next upgrade would be a newer-generation card with higher performance, provided the PSU can handle the increased load. The CPU's unlocked multiplier and active production status mean it remains a viable platform for overclocking, and the 36 MB L3 cache and dual-channel memory support are adequate for most workloads. For users seeking more GPU performance, upgrading to a card in the 90th percentile or higher would better match the CPU's 95th percentile, while the CPU itself is already near the top of its platform.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, using a 7 nm process from TSMC with 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die. The GPU has 3840 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, with 60 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 1700 MHz, with a game clock of 1815 MHz and a boost clock of 2105 MHz. Memory consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) for a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 202.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 505.2 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 16.17 TFLOPS and FP16 of 32.33 TFLOPS (2:1). It uses a dual-slot design with 2x 8-pin power connectors and a suggested PSU of 600 W.

Benchmark results place this GPU at the 75th percentile, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3188. The PassMark G3D score of 22067 and compute score of 10864 show balanced raster and compute performance. Geekbench scores of 24508 (OpenCL), 115107 (Vulkan), and 153635 (Metal) indicate strong cross-API compute capability. The 60 RT cores are sufficient for light ray tracing, but the 16.17 TFLOPS FP32 is the primary performance limiter in heavy rasterization. The 16 GB VRAM is a standout feature, allowing high-resolution textures and large datasets without running out of memory. For rendering workloads, the GPU can accelerate OpenCL and Vulkan-based applications, but it is not in the same class as higher-end cards in the 90th percentile. The GPU's 75th percentile means it is a solid choice for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K requiring settings adjustments. Compared to its nearest rivals, it trades blows with the RTX 3070 Ti (0.5% slower) and RTX 2080 Ti (1% slower), while leading the RTX 5070 Mobile (0.6% faster) and trailing the RX 6700 (1.1% slower). This places it in a well-rounded performance tier, adequate for most modern titles but not future-proof for 4K ultra gaming at high refresh rates.