SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900HX

56,004 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900HX paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is a laptop configuration that presents a stark contrast in generation and purpose. The CPU is a modern, high-core-count mobile flagship built for heavy parallel workloads, while the GPU is an older, professional-grade Turing architecture part aimed at stability and certified performance rather than raw gaming speed. Because no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, all gaming performance estimates below are derived strictly from the benchmark scores and percentile data in the fact pack.

Gaming Performance

The fact pack contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU pairing. All frame rate expectations are therefore estimates based on the CPU's strong single-threaded benchmark scores and the GPU's mid-range percentile ranking. The Core i9-14900HX posts a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2181.5 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4175, which indicates excellent per-core performance that should prevent CPU bottlenecks in most gaming scenarios. However, the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, which places it squarely in the mid-range tier for rasterization performance.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this pairing should deliver playable frame rates in most titles, but it will not push high-refresh monitors to their limits in demanding games. The GPU's FP32 performance of 9.400 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 97.92 GPixel/s suggest it can handle modern games at medium-to-high settings, but the Turing architecture lacks the advanced ray tracing acceleration found in newer generations. The RTX 5000 Mobile has 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, but these are first-generation implementations, so ray-traced effects will come with a significant performance cost.

For competitive esports titles, the CPU's strength becomes evident. The 5.80 GHz boost clock and 2.20 GHz base clock provide the responsiveness needed for high frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the GPU will cap the maximum achievable FPS. Expect roughly 60-90 FPS at 1440p ultra in AAA titles, with lower settings required for 144Hz displays. At 4K, the 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will help with texture-heavy scenes, but the 50th percentile GPU performance will limit resolution scaling.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers outstanding multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30055 and an average benchmark score of 56004. This places the i9-14900HX in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, which is a top-tier result for a mobile processor. The GPU, however, sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0 due to the lack of benchmark entries in the fact pack. The combined percentile for this build is 71, reflecting the imbalance between the high-end CPU and mid-range GPU.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i9-14900HX is essentially tied with the Intel Core 7 253PQE, which scores 55919 on average, a delta of just 0.2 percent. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 both score slightly higher, at 56273 and 56306 respectively, putting them 0.5 percent ahead of the i9-14900HX. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX leads this group with a 56555 average score, 1 percent higher. These tight margins indicate that the i9-14900HX is competitive with the best current mobile and workstation CPUs, but not the absolute fastest in synthetic averages.

The combined picture is clear: this is a workstation-class CPU paired with a professional GPU that has a lower raw performance ceiling. The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 15616 and Geekbench multi-core score of 17511 confirm its ability to handle heavy parallel workloads, while the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it will not be the bottleneck in compute tasks but will limit gaming performance relative to the CPU's capabilities.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900HX is a 24-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, which is a substantial boost headroom for a mobile chip. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. This large cache pool helps with data-heavy workloads and contributes to the strong benchmark results.

The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. This makes it suitable for workstation tasks where memory reliability is critical. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 CPU lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for modern SSDs and GPUs, although the GPU in this build uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which may limit data transfer speeds in some scenarios.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2181.5 is excellent for a mobile chip, while the multi-core score of 30055 demonstrates strong scaling across the 24 cores. The Passmark multithread score of 43778 and integer math score of 157375 indicate robust throughput for computational workloads. The floating-point math score of 112273 shows solid performance for scientific and engineering applications, while the data encryption score of 32619 and compression score of 539965 highlight its capability in security and file-handling tasks.

The 55 W TDP is modest for a chip with this many cores, suggesting that the laptop manufacturer has implemented power limits that may affect sustained performance under heavy loads. The die size of 257 mm² is large for a mobile processor, indicating a densely packed design that generates significant heat. Real-world workloads will see performance that depends heavily on the laptop's cooling solution and power delivery.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This pairing will struggle to maintain high frame rates at high refresh rates in modern AAA titles. The GPU's 50th percentile performance limits FPS to roughly 60-90 at 1440p ultra, which is insufficient for 144Hz displays in demanding games. The CPU's fast single-core performance of 2181.5 in Cinebench R23 will help in esports titles, but the GPU remains the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU's 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The Passmark multithread score of 43778 indicates strong multi-tasking capability, allowing simultaneous game rendering, video encoding, and chat applications without significant frame drops. The GPU's 384 tensor cores can assist with AI-based encoding features, though the older Turing architecture may lack the latest encoding algorithms.

Video editing: The i9-14900HX excels in this scenario. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30055 and Geekbench multi-core score of 17511 indicate fast rendering times for video exports. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM helps with timeline scrubbing and effect previews, but the 50th percentile performance means GPU-accelerated effects will not be as fast as newer workstation cards. The combination is suitable for 4K video editing with proxy workflows.

3D rendering: The CPU is the primary workhorse here, with its 24 cores and 32 threads delivering strong performance in CPU-based renderers. The Passmark floating-point math score of 112273 supports this, indicating solid computational throughput. GPU-accelerated rendering will be slower due to the GPU's mid-range standing, but the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance can still handle moderate scenes.

Software development: The CPU's high single-threaded score of 4175 in Passmark and 2181.5 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy compilation of single-threaded code, while the multi-core score of 30055 accelerates parallel builds. The 36 MB L3 cache and DDR5 memory support improve compile times for large projects. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a strong choice for developers.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for typical student workloads. The CPU's single-threaded performance will make document editing and web browsing feel instant, but the 55 W TDP and 110 W GPU TDP mean this laptop will require frequent charging. The ECC memory support and professional GPU drivers may appeal to engineering students running specialized software, but the cost and power draw are excessive for basic productivity.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 71, which places it above the average laptop configuration but below top-tier gaming or workstation builds.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The i9-14900HX is 0.2 percent ahead of the Intel Core 7 253PQE, 0.5 percent behind both the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, and 1 percent behind the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, indicating mid-range performance.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900HX supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation stability.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The i9-14900HX has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, which is high for a mobile processor.

Q: Is the GPU production status active?

A: No, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is listed as end-of-life, with a release date of 2020-06-07.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU cannot be upgraded independently. The motherboard and cooling solution are fixed, so any CPU upgrade would require a full laptop replacement. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory available for workstation use. The fact pack indicates support for up to 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, which allows for fast NVMe SSDs, but the GPU in this build uses PCIe 3.0 x16, creating a potential bandwidth bottleneck for GPU-intensive tasks.

Memory upgrades are the most practical path, as the laptop likely has SODIMM slots for DDR4 or DDR5 modules. The GPU has a TDP of 110 W and uses no external power connectors, suggesting it is a soldered mobile part that cannot be replaced. The CPU TDP is 55 W, and the fact pack lists no suggested PSU, which is consistent with a laptop where power delivery is handled by the motherboard and AC adapter. The lack of upgradeable components means the primary future upgrade would be external: a Thunderbolt or USB4 eGPU enclosure, though the GPU's PCIe 3.0 interface may limit external connectivity options.

The platform's ECC memory support and 36 MB L3 cache make it suitable for workstation tasks, but the end-of-life GPU status means driver support and performance optimizations will not improve. The sensible next upgrade is a new laptop with a newer GPU architecture, as the CPU's performance is already in the 91st percentile and will remain competitive for several years.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance imbalance is evident in the percentile data: the CPU at 91st percentile versus the GPU at 50th percentile. In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor, capping frame rates at a level far below what the CPU can support. The CPU's single-threaded score of 2181.5 in Cinebench R23 ensures it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU's 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 50th percentile standing will prevent high-refresh gaming. The fact pack shows no measured FPS data, but the GPU's mid-range ranking suggests that at 1080p ultra, the GPU will bottleneck in most titles, especially those with heavy graphical effects.

In compute workloads, the CPU becomes the primary performer, with the GPU serving as a secondary accelerator. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30055 and Passmark multithread score of 43778 indicate that CPU-bound tasks will scale well across all 24 cores. The GPU's 3072 shading units and 192 TMUs provide moderate parallel compute, but the 50th percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier compute device. For tasks like rendering or simulation that use both CPU and GPU, the CPU will complete its portion faster, leaving the GPU as the bottleneck.

The combined percentile of 71 reflects this imbalance: the build is better than average overall, but the GPU drags down what would otherwise be a top-tier workstation CPU. In mixed workloads like video editing, the CPU handles encoding and project management while the GPU accelerates effects and previews, but the GPU's Turing architecture and 12 nm process node are dated compared to the CPU's 10 nm Raptor Lake design.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build (buildClass: laptop) that pairs a top-tier mobile CPU with a mid-range, end-of-life professional GPU. The Intel Core i9-14900HX is a 24-core Raptor Lake processor with a 91st percentile ranking, making it one of the fastest mobile CPUs available. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is a Turing architecture GPU with a 50th percentile ranking, indicating mid-pack performance among all GPUs. The overall combined percentile is 71, which places this configuration above average but below the top echelon of gaming or workstation laptops.

The CPU's release date of 2024-01-07 and active production status contrast sharply with the GPU's release date of 2020-06-07 and end-of-life status. This is a refresh-generation pairing, where the CPU is current while the GPU is several generations old. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are respectable, but the underlying Turing architecture lacks the features and efficiency of newer designs. The build is best described as a workstation-oriented laptop that prioritizes CPU compute power over gaming performance.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need extreme CPU performance in a laptop form factor and do not require top-tier gaming graphics. The 91st percentile CPU ranking makes it suitable for software developers who compile large codebases, with the Passmark multithread score of 43778 indicating fast parallel builds. Video editors working with 4K or 8K footage will benefit from the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30055, though they should be prepared for slower GPU-accelerated effects due to the 50th percentile GPU.

3D artists and engineers using CPU-based renderers will find the 24 cores and 32 threads valuable, with the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 15616 confirming strong performance. The ECC memory support makes it suitable for financial modeling or scientific computing where data accuracy is critical. Students in engineering or computer science programs will appreciate the CPU's speed for simulations and coding, but the 55 W CPU TDP and 110 W GPU TDP mean battery life will be short, making this impractical for all-day campus use.

Small business workstations that run multi-threaded applications like data analysis or virtualization will see strong performance from the CPU, with the Geekbench multi-core score of 17511 supporting heavy multitasking. However, the GPU's end-of-life status means it is not suitable for future-proofing in graphics-intensive applications. Gamers should avoid this build, as the 50th percentile GPU will not deliver the high frame rates that the CPU's single-threaded performance of 4175 in Passmark suggests. The ideal buyer is a professional who needs maximum CPU throughput in a portable package and can accept mid-range GPU performance for occasional graphics work.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds