SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900HX

56,004 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900HX paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation combination that prioritizes extreme multi-threaded compute over gaming agility. The CPU, a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-HX Refresh part, is the undisputed anchor of this system, while the GPU, based on the older Turing architecture, serves as a capable but secondary component. Benchmark data indicates a machine built for sustained, heavy workloads, not for chasing high frame rates in the latest titles.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900HX is a high-end mobile processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads, a configuration designed to handle massively parallel tasks with ease. The core complex is bolstered by a substantial 36 MB of shared L3 cache, alongside 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 80 KB of L1 cache per core. This cache hierarchy is critical for feeding the processor's high throughput in data-heavy applications. The CPU’s base clock is 2.20 GHz, which can scale up to a 5.80 GHz boost clock, ensuring that single-threaded tasks receive a significant speed advantage when needed. This processor is built on Intel's 10 nm process node and features a die size of 257 mm². It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes ECC memory support, a feature often critical for professional workstations requiring data integrity.

Benchmark results show a processor that is exceptionally strong in multi-core scenarios. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30055 points places it in a high performance tier, and the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 15616 reinforces this. These scores indicate that the CPU can handle demanding multi-threaded workloads like video rendering, 3D scene compilation, and scientific simulations without significant slowdown. The PassMark multithread score of 43778 further confirms this, while the specific PassMark data compression score of 539965 and data encryption score of 32619 highlight its proficiency in these specialized tasks. Single-threaded performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2181.5 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2330, suggesting that the CPU is not a bottleneck in everyday applications and lightly-threaded software. The processor holds an average benchmark score of 56004, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, proof of its top-tier standing. It sits less than 1% ahead of the Intel Core 7 253PQE and less than 1% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390, indicating a tightly contested performance bracket at the very top of the mobile processor market.

Gaming Performance

Important Note: The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All frames-per-second (FPS) figures discussed in this section are estimates derived from the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from direct game testing. The data for this build is explicitly marked as not measured, so these are analytical projections.

Given the GPU’s profile, gaming performance is expected to be moderate. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a professional workstation GPU, and its benchmark percentile of 50 places it in the mid-range for graphics cards. In modern titles, this combination would likely target 1080p gaming with medium to high settings. The CPU’s raw power, particularly its high single-threaded score of 4175 in PassMark, ensures that frame pacing and physics calculations will be handled efficiently. However, the GPU will be the primary determinant of frame rate. In less demanding esports titles, the system might achieve high refresh rates, but in AAA single-player games, a 60 FPS target at 1080p is a more realistic expectation. At 1440p, the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth would provide sufficient capacity, but the underlying compute performance of 9.400 TFLOPS would likely struggle to maintain high frame rates with ultra settings. The lack of measured data makes these estimates, but the significant performance gap between the 91st-percentile CPU and the 50th-percentile GPU suggests a system where gaming is not the primary design intent.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance in this system is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The Intel Core i9-14900HX, with its 91st percentile ranking and average score of 56004, vastly outpaces the GPU, which sits at the 50th percentile. This creates a scenario where the CPU is the dominant component in the majority of workloads, except for those that are exclusively graphics-bound. In gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor; the CPU will easily feed frames to the Quadro RTX 5000, leaving the graphics card as the bottleneck. This is a typical configuration for a professional laptop where tasks like compiling code, running simulations, or rendering video are more common than gaming.

For content creation work, the balance is more harmonious. The CPU’s massive multi-core throughput (Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30055) will accelerate tasks like video encoding and 3D rendering, while the GPU can assist with hardware-accelerated effects and viewport rendering. However, if a workload relies heavily on GPU compute, such as in certain AI training or rendering engines, the system would be held back by the older Turing architecture and its 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The data suggests a clear hierarchy: the CPU is the engine, and the GPU is a supporting component. This is not a balanced pairing for raw graphics performance, but a highly specialized one for compute-centric tasks. The combined percentile for this pair is 71, which is respectable, but the delta between the two components' individual percentiles is a clear indicator of where the system's strengths lie.

Who Should Build It

This specific combination is not aimed at the general consumer or the high-refresh-rate gamer. Instead, it targets professionals and power users who need substantial CPU compute power in a mobile form factor. The data shows a clear profile for the ideal user:

  • Software Developers and Engineers: The high multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multicore at 30055, PassMark multithread at 43778) are ideal for compiling large codebases, running virtual machines, and executing complex build processes. The ECC memory support further cements its place in this field.
  • Content Creators and 3D Artists: The CPU will excel in video editing timelines, 3D rendering engines, and after-effects. The 24-core/32-thread configuration can handle complex scene rendering and encoding. The Quadro GPU, while not top-tier for gaming, is a professional card with 16 GB of VRAM, which is beneficial for large textures and viewport workloads.
  • Data Scientists and Analysts: Tasks involving data manipulation are handled well, as shown by the PassMark data compression score of 539965 and data encryption score of 32619. The 32 threads can process large datasets efficiently.
  • Students in STEM Fields: For those studying engineering, computer science, or data science, this laptop provides the necessary compute headroom for demanding academic projects without the need for a desktop workstation.
  • Small Business Workstations: For tasks like financial modeling, large spreadsheet manipulation, or running moderate-sized server workloads, the CPU's power provides a significant advantage.

This is a machine for those who prioritize processing power and reliability over graphical flair. The 91st percentile CPU ranking is the primary selling point; the GPU is a secondary feature for professional visualization rather than gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data paints a clear picture of a compute-heavy system. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 56004, placing it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. This is a top-tier score, indicating that the processor is one of the fastest available. It is nearly identical in performance to its closest rivals: it is 0.2% faster than the Intel Core 7 253PQE and 0.5% slower than the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470. This places it in a cluster of top-performing mobile processors.

Specific CPU scores show strength across the board. The Geekbench multicore score of 17511 and single-core score of 2330 suggest excellent performance in both multi-threaded and single-threaded applications. The PassMark suite confirms this, with high scores in integer math (157375) and floating-point math (112273). The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4574 and single-core score of 310.5 are also strong indicators of a capable processor.

The GPU, however, presents a stark contrast. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits in the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This score of 0 suggests that no standardized benchmark data is available for this part in the database, but its percentile ranking indicates it is a mid-range performer. The combination of a 91st-percentile CPU with a 50th-percentile GPU results in a combined percentile of 71 for the system. The data suggests that the system's overall performance is heavily weighted by the CPU and that the GPU will not be able to keep pace in graphics-intensive applications.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a professional graphics solution built on NVIDIA’s older Turing architecture. It is manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC and features a substantial 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. The GPU is configured with 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It includes 48 RT cores for ray tracing and 384 Tensor cores for AI-accelerated workloads, though these are from the first generation of such hardware and are not as performant as later iterations.

Memory capacity is a strong point for this GPU. It comes with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a significant amount of VRAM for a mobile workstation GPU, allowing for large datasets and complex 3D scenes to be loaded entirely into memory. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU’s compute capabilities are rated at 9.400 TFLOPS for FP32 operations and 18.80 TFLOPS for FP16, and it has a pixel rate of 97.92 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 293.8 GTexel/s.

Given its 50th-percentile ranking, the benchmark scores indicate that this GPU is a mid-range performer. In rendering and compute tasks, its 16 GB of VRAM and 448 GB/s bandwidth will be its most valuable assets, allowing for larger scenes than a comparable gaming GPU. However, its raw compute power (9.400 TFLOPS) is modest by modern standards, meaning that complex GPU-based renders will be slower than on a more modern or higher-end card. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad software compatibility. The GPU is now end-of-life, with its successor being the Ampere-MW architecture.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Core i9-14900HX, which uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket. This is a mobile, soldered processor, meaning the CPU itself is not upgradeable. The system supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility in memory selection, although the exact type is dependent on the motherboard design. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is a high-bandwidth interface for the fastest available NVMe SSDs and potentially external GPUs, though the GPU itself is connected via PCIe 3.0 x16.

The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 110 W. The FACT PACK does not list a suggested PSU, but the combined thermal envelope of the CPU and GPU is significant for a laptop, requiring a robust cooling solution. The power connectors for the GPU are listed as "None," indicating it draws power directly from the motherboard, which is typical for a mobile IGP-class component.

A sensible next upgrade for this system is not the CPU, as it is soldered, but rather the memory and storage. Upgrading to the maximum supported DDR5 memory would improve system responsiveness. Adding a PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drive would maximize storage bandwidth. The GPU is also soldered and cannot be upgraded. The platform’s longevity is tied to its memory and storage, which are the only meaningful upgrade paths. This is a closed platform, designed for a specific performance profile at the time of purchase.

FAQ

Q: What is the most distinctive feature of this CPU?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture. Its high core count and 5.80 GHz boost clock allow it to achieve a 91st-percentile ranking among all CPUs, making it a top-tier mobile processor for heavy multi-threaded workloads.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 56004 is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core 7 253PQE, and it is 0.5% lower than the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470. This places it in a very tight performance group near the top of the mobile CPU market.

Q: What is the GPU's performance class?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mid-range professional GPU, sitting in the 50th percentile of all GPUs. While it has a substantial 16 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, its compute power is rated at 9.400 TFLOPS, which is modest by modern standards.

Q: Is this system good for gaming?

A: The data suggests it is not a primary gaming machine. No measured FPS data exists for this combination. Based on the GPU's 50th-percentile ranking, gaming performance is estimated to be moderate, likely targeting 1080p at medium to high settings rather than high refresh rates at high resolutions.

Q: What workloads are this system best suited for?

A: This system is best suited for CPU-intensive professional tasks such as software development, complex data analysis, and 3D rendering. The CPU’s high multi-threaded scores (e.g., Cinebench R23 multicore at 30055) make it ideal for compiling code and rendering video, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM can support professional visualization workloads.

Q: What is the upgrade path for this laptop?

A: The CPU is a soldered BGA 1964 part and is not upgradeable. The GPU is also soldered. The only practical upgrades are to the system's memory (supporting DDR4 or DDR5) and storage, which can be upgraded to take advantage of the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

Q: What is the performance difference between the CPU and GPU?

A: There is a significant performance gap. The CPU is in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This indicates that the CPU is a top-tier component, while the GPU is only average, creating a system where the CPU is the dominant performance factor.

Usage Scenarios

  • High-Refresh Gaming: Not recommended. The GPU’s 50th-percentile ranking and 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance would struggle to push high frame rates in modern titles, even at 1080p. The CPU is more than capable, but the GPU will be the limiting factor.
  • Streaming: A mixed bag. The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads (Cinebench R23 multicore of 30055) can handle game capture and encoding via software, but the GPU’s older Turing architecture with 384 tensor cores may not provide the most efficient encoding performance, though it is capable.
  • Video Editing: Excellent for the CPU. The high multi-threaded PassMark score of 43778 will significantly accelerate timeline rendering and video exports. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 4K and even 8K timelines, but its compute power may slow down complex GPU-accelerated effects.
  • 3D Rendering: Strong for CPU-based rendering engines. The 32 threads will process complex scenes efficiently. For GPU-based renderers, the Quadro RTX 5000’s 9.400 TFLOPS will be slower than modern cards, but the 16 GB VRAM is a distinct advantage for scene complexity.
  • Software Development: An ideal machine. The CPU’s performance in data compression (539965) and encryption (32619) scores, along with its 32 threads, makes compiling large codebases and running multiple VMs a smooth process. The ECC memory support is a plus for code integrity.
  • Student and Office Work: Overkill for basic tasks, but excellent for demanding ones. Students in engineering or data science will find the compute power invaluable for simulations and analysis. For general office work, the CPU’s single-threaded score of 4175 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness, though the system's power is wasted on spreadsheets and word processing.