SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900HX

56,004 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900HX is a 24-core, 32-thread mobile processor from Intel’s Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture and manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The chip includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, includes ECC memory support, and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770. The CPU is unlocked, meaning the multiplier can be adjusted for overclocking in supported systems. Its release date is 2024-01-07, and it remains in active production. Benchmark data shows a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30055, a single-core score of 2181.5, and a Geekbench multi-core score of 17511 with a single-core score of 2330. The average benchmark score across all tests is 56004, placing it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, it is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core 7 253PQE, 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390, 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, and 1% behind the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX. These deltas are small, indicating that the i9-14900HX sits in a tightly contested performance tier where tiny percentage differences separate top mobile processors.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900HX is a high-core-count mobile processor designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads. With 24 cores and 32 threads, it leverages the hybrid architecture of Raptor Lake, combining performance and efficiency cores to balance throughput and power. The boost clock of 5.80 GHz is exceptionally high for a laptop chip, giving it strong single-threaded performance that is evident in its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2181.5 and Geekbench single-core score of 2330. These scores indicate that the CPU can handle lightly-threaded tasks such as web browsing, office applications, and legacy software with responsiveness comparable to desktop-class parts.

For multi-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30055 demonstrates substantial parallel processing capability. This is reinforced by the PassMark multi-thread score of 43778 and the floating-point math score of 112273, which suggest that the CPU excels in scientific computing, financial modeling, and other floating-point-heavy applications. The integer math score of 157375 further indicates strong performance in general-purpose computing tasks like compilation, data processing, and encryption workloads. The PassMark data encryption score of 32619 and data compression score of 539965 highlight specific strengths in security-related and file-handling tasks.

The 10 nm process node and 257 mm² die size are worth noting. While the process is not the most advanced available, the architecture compensates with high clock speeds and a large cache hierarchy. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache is substantial for a mobile processor, helping to reduce memory latency in cache-sensitive workloads. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 provides flexibility for system integrators, though the actual memory bandwidth will depend on the platform implementation. The TDP of 55 W is moderate for a processor of this capability, but the unlocked multiplier suggests that enthusiasts can push it further if the laptop's cooling solution allows.

The percentile ranking of 91st among all CPUs places this processor in the top tier for mobile computing. The near-zero deltaPct values against its nearest rivals—ranging from +0.2% to -1%—show that the i9-14900HX is effectively at parity with other high-end mobile chips. In real-world terms, this means the CPU will not be the limiting factor in most workloads, whether that involves compiling large codebases, rendering 3D scenes, or running multiple virtual machines. The data indicates that this is a flagship part designed for users who prioritize raw CPU performance over portability or battery life.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The dataIsMeasured field is false, meaning the following figures are qualitative projections based on the CPU's and GPU's capabilities.

The GPU in this pairing is a NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, which is based on the Turing architecture with a TU106 chip. It has 1920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with a base clock of 945 MHz and a boost clock of 1380 MHz. The 6 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. This GPU is in the 50th percentile among all GPUs, which indicates mid-range performance in the broader GPU landscape. For gaming, this suggests it can handle 1080p titles at medium to high settings, but may struggle with 4K or ultra settings in demanding games.

Given the CPU's 91st percentile ranking, the processor will rarely bottleneck the GPU in gaming scenarios. The single-core performance, as measured by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2181.5, is strong enough to feed the GPU in most titles. The multi-core score of 30055 ensures that modern games using multiple threads will also run smoothly. However, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means that frame rates will be constrained by the GPU in graphically intensive situations. For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, the i9-14900HX could deliver high frame rates, possibly exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p. For AAA games, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh would likely produce playable frame rates at 1080p with settings adjusted to medium or high, but not consistently at ultra.

Since the GPU is a workstation-class Quadro product, its driver optimizations are typically geared toward professional applications rather than gaming. This could result in slightly lower gaming performance compared to a GeForce counterpart with similar hardware. The 6 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p gaming but may be insufficient for 1440p with high-resolution textures, especially in newer titles that require more memory. The 336.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest by modern standards, limiting performance in bandwidth-heavy scenes. Overall, the estimated gaming experience is that of a capable but not exceptional laptop GPU, suitable for casual or competitive gaming at 1080p, but not for high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 91st percentile ranking and strong single-core score of 2181.5 in Cinebench R23 make it well-suited for high-refresh gaming at 1080p, where CPU performance is critical. The GPU, however, is in the 50th percentile, so frame rates in graphically demanding titles will be limited. Esports games could run at high frame rates, but AAA games may not consistently hit 144 FPS at 1080p unless settings are reduced.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 43778 suggests that the CPU can handle software encoding without significant performance degradation. The GPU also includes 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, which can accelerate encoding tasks in supported applications. Streaming at 1080p should be smooth, though the GPU's mid-range standing may require lower game settings to maintain stable frame rates during broadcast.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30055 and PassMark floating-point math score of 112273 indicate strong performance in video editing workflows. Timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks will benefit from the high core count and cache. The 6 GB VRAM on the GPU is sufficient for editing 1080p or light 4K footage, but 4K timelines with heavy color grading may exceed its capacity. The 336.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with texture loading and GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-threaded performance is excellent for CPU-based rendering, as evidenced by the 30055 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. GPU-based rendering in Blender or Octane will be limited by the Quadro's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 6 GB VRAM, which is on the lower end for modern scenes. Smaller scenes or those optimized for memory will render acceptably, but large production files may require a more powerful GPU.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 157375 and data encryption score of 32619 suggest strong performance in code compilation and cryptographic operations. The 24-core configuration allows for parallel builds, significantly reducing compile times for large projects. The single-core score of 2330 in Geekbench ensures snappy UI responses in IDEs. Virtual machine hosting is also viable given the high thread count.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core performance and the GPU's 50th percentile ranking are more than adequate for document editing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing. The PassMark random string sorting score of 60861 indicates efficient handling of data manipulation tasks. For students, the laptop class form factor and 55 W CPU TDP mean it can handle all coursework, though the Quadro GPU is overkill for most academic tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a mobile workstation with strong CPU performance and professional GPU capabilities. The i9-14900HX's 91st percentile ranking makes it ideal for engineers running simulations, data scientists processing large datasets, and video editors working with multi-camera projects. The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, despite being in the 50th percentile, is certified for professional applications, making it suitable for CAD, 3D modeling, and scientific visualization where driver stability is paramount.

Content creators who work in 1080p or light 4K will find the 6 GB VRAM sufficient for most projects, while developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 24 cores and 32 threads. Students in engineering or computer science programs will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded power for coursework like finite element analysis or machine learning training, though the GPU's mid-range performance may limit deep learning experimentation. Small business workstations that require reliable performance for financial modeling, database management, or video conferencing will be well-served, though the Quadro GPU is more than needed for such tasks.

The combined percentile of 71 places this pairing in a solid mid-to-high tier, but the CPU is clearly the star component. Users who prioritize CPU-bound workloads—compilation, rendering, data analysis—will be satisfied. Those who expect top-tier gaming or GPU rendering performance should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 50th percentile ranking indicates it is average among all GPUs. The laptop class build means portability is inherent, but the 55 W CPU TDP and 80 W GPU TDP suggest that battery life will be modest under load.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows an imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU's 50th percentile creates a scenario where the GPU is the primary bottleneck in most workloads that involve graphics or GPU compute. The FPS scaling in gaming would be governed by the GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth, not the CPU's multi-core might. For CPU-bound tasks like compilation or data compression, the CPU will not bottleneck, but the GPU's limited VRAM and compute performance may cap performance in hybrid workloads.

In gaming, the CPU's single-core score of 2181.5 in Cinebench R23 ensures it can feed the GPU with draw calls, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means frame rates will drop as resolution and settings increase. At 1080p, the CPU might be slightly ahead of the GPU, but at 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The 6 GB VRAM is a specific constraint for texture-heavy games, as modern titles often exceed this capacity at high settings.

For productivity tasks, the bottleneck depends on the software. Rendering in CPU-based engines like V-Ray will utilize the full 24 cores, making the CPU the workhorse. GPU-based rendering in Octane or Redshift will be limited by the GPU's 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, which are present but not abundant. The 80 W TDP of the GPU is low, further constraining its sustained performance in a laptop chassis. The PCIe 3.0 x16 interface is another potential bottleneck, as the GPU cannot take advantage of newer PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 bandwidth, though this is unlikely to impact most workloads significantly.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is a Turing-architecture GPU built on TSMC's 12 nm process, with a die size of 445 mm² and 10,800 million transistors. It features 1920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with base and boost clocks of 945 MHz and 1380 MHz respectively. The memory subsystem consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) to deliver 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This configuration yields a pixel rate of 88.32 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 165.6 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 5.299 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 10.60 TFLOPS (2:1).

The GPU includes 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, which provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads. In rendering applications, the RT cores enable real-time ray tracing in supported software, while the tensor cores accelerate denoising and DLSS-like features. The FP16 performance of 10.60 TFLOPS is useful for mixed-precision computing in AI inference, though the 6 GB VRAM limits model sizes. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs.

The 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates this is a mid-range part. For professional workloads, the Quadro certification ensures stability and accuracy in CAD and scientific visualization. The 336.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p rendering but may throttle performance in high-resolution textures or large scenes. The 80 W TDP is low for a GPU of this class, meaning sustained performance will be limited by thermal and power constraints in a laptop. The MXM module form factor suggests it is replaceable in some laptops, but the end-of-life production status means it is no longer being manufactured, with the successor being Ampere-MW.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900HX has 24 cores and 32 threads, based on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU scores 30055 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core 7 253PQE, 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390, and 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s and an effective memory clock of 14 Gbps.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, which provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI tasks.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 71, meaning it outperforms 71% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the benchmark database.

Q: Are there measured FPS values for this build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is end-of-life, with a release date of 2019-05-26, and its successor is Ampere-MW.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-14900HX with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread mobile processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake-HX with a boost clock of 5.80 GHz and a TDP of 55 W. The GPU is a Turing-architecture workstation card with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, 1920 shading units, and 30 RT cores, running at 1380 MHz boost with an 80 W TDP. The combined percentile ranking is 71, placing this build in the upper tier of laptop configurations, though the CPU's 91st percentile versus the GPU's 50th percentile creates a notable performance asymmetry. This pairing is designed for users who need maximum CPU throughput for professional workloads, with the GPU providing certified professional graphics acceleration.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 56004, placing it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Key scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 30055, single-core at 2181.5, Geekbench multi-core at 17511, and single-core at 2330. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 43778, floating-point math at 112273, integer math at 157375, and data compression at 539965. The GPU has no benchmark scores listed in the FACT PACK, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The combined picture is a build where the CPU dominates the performance profile, while the GPU provides mid-range graphics capability. The CPU's nearest rivals—Intel Core 7 253PQE, AMD Ryzen AI Max 390, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX—all sit within a 1% delta of the i9-14900HX's average score, indicating that the CPU is at the top of its class. The lack of GPU benchmark data makes it impossible to provide exact performance comparisons, but the 50th percentile ranking suggests it is a competent, if not outstanding, mobile GPU.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds