SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900HX

56,004 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines an Intel Core i9-14900HX mobile processor with an AMD Radeon 860M integrated GPU in a laptop-class platform. The benchmark data positions this as a strongly CPU-centric system: the CPU sits at the 91st percentile against all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 56004, while the GPU sits at the 72nd percentile against all GPUs with an average score of 26401, giving a combined percentile of 82. The result is a platform that excels at processor-heavy workloads while delivering integrated-level graphics.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming is supported on the CPU side but capped by the GPU. The i9-14900HX posts a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2181.5, a Geekbench single-core score of 2330, and a PassMark single-thread score of 4175. Those numbers indicate enough single-thread headroom for high frame-rate game logic, but the Radeon 860M’s average score of 26401 and 72nd GPU percentile are integrated-class results. The GPU will be the limiting factor in demanding rendered scenes.

Streaming workloads benefit from the processor’s dense core layout. The CPU has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a PassMark multithread score of 43778 and a PassMark data-encryption score of 32619. These scores suggest strong headroom for running a game or application alongside encoding and distribution tasks on the same machine.

Video editing relies heavily on the CPU in this configuration. Cinebench R23 multi-core performance is 30055 and PassMark integer math is 157375, which indicates strong CPU-driven timeline and export performance. The GPU’s system-shared memory and mid-tier benchmark position mean hardware-accelerated effects will be less capable than a discrete GPU, but encode- and render-heavy CPU workloads remain strong.

3D rendering is primarily a CPU story here. The processor scores 15616 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, 30055 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 112273 in PassMark floating-point math. The Radeon 860M contributes only 3.072 TFLOPS FP32, so it is best treated as a real-time display adapter rather than a primary render engine.

Software development is a natural fit. PassMark data compression is 539965, PassMark extended instructions is 31247, and the CPU has 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Those resources help with compilation, code analysis, and parallel build pipelines across 24 physical cores.

Student and office work is handled comfortably by the CPU’s single-thread strength. Geekbench single-core 2330 and PassMark single-thread 4175 make everyday responsiveness smooth, while the GPU’s 15 W TDP keeps the graphics part of the platform low-power. Heavy graphics tasks are not the focus, but productivity and document workflows are well served.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-14900HX has an average benchmark score of 56004 and sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its multi-threaded results include 4574 in Cinebench R15, 15616 in Cinebench R20, 30055 in Cinebench R23, 17511 in Geekbench multi-core, and 43778 in PassMark multithread. Single-thread scores are 310.5 in Cinebench R15, 2204 in Cinebench R20, 2181.5 in Cinebench R23, 2330 in Geekbench, and 4175 in PassMark.

The CPU’s nearest rivals are tightly clustered around it. The Intel Core 7 253PQE scores 55919, meaning the i9-14900HX is 0.2% ahead. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 scores 56273, putting it 0.5% ahead of the i9. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 scores 56306, also 0.5% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX scores 56555, putting it 1.0% ahead. The i9-14900HX is therefore within a narrow band of high-end rivals despite being a mobile part.

The AMD Radeon 860M has an average benchmark score of 26401 and sits at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. It scores 22759 in Geekbench OpenCL and 30043 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 at 26421, where the Radeon is 0.1% behind; the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 at 26331, where the Radeon is 0.3% ahead; the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary at 26553, where the Radeon is 0.6% behind; and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 at 26683, where the Radeon is 1.1% behind. The combined percentile of 82 reflects a platform whose processing power is substantially stronger than its graphics power.

CPU Analysis

The i9-14900HX is a Raptor Lake-HX refresh part from Intel’s Core 14th Gen series. It has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. It is built on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². Cache is arranged as 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, includes ECC support, and exposes PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. It also includes Intel UHD Graphics 770, although the active GPU in this configuration is the AMD Radeon 860M.

The benchmark results show a mobile CPU that behaves like a desktop-class workhorse. Cinebench R23 multi-core 30055 and PassMark multithread 43778 place it near rivals such as the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX, which is only 1.0% ahead in aggregate score. Single-thread performance is strong enough that the CPU does not trade responsiveness for core count. PassMark data compression 539965, data-encryption 32619, and integer math 157375 all indicate specialized throughput for compression, encryption, and parallel integer workloads. The 91st percentile rank confirms this is a top-tier mobile processor by aggregate benchmark data.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 91st percentile versus the GPU’s 72nd percentile is a clear indicator of where the platform’s limits lie. Workloads that depend on CPU throughput will access near-top-tier performance. Workloads that depend on GPU throughput will be confined to a much lower ceiling.

In gaming, the processor can handle game logic, physics, and simulation with a PassMark single-thread score of 4175, but the Radeon 860M must handle the actual frame rendering. The GPU’s 512 shading units, 16 ROPs, and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 define that graphical ceiling. In CPU-bound productivity tasks, the 24-core, 32-thread processor can run near full utilization, and the GPU is not the limiting factor. Because no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, precise per-game bottleneck scaling cannot be quantified, but the percentile split strongly suggests that graphics rendering is the platform’s constraint.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. The measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty, pairRankByFps is null, and dataIsMeasured is false, so all FPS discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores and percentiles.

The Radeon 860M’s aggregate score of 26401 and 72nd percentile put it in entry-level graphics territory, statistically close to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 at 26421. The CPU side, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4175 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2330, is strong enough to push high frame rates in CPU-bound scenes, but the GPU will cap output in most rendered scenes. At ultra settings in visually demanding games, performance should be expected to be modest. Lowering graphical settings is likely to yield smoother gameplay, while less demanding titles can take better advantage of the CPU’s single-thread strength.

Who Should Build It

This configuration suits a buyer who needs maximum CPU power in a laptop and treats the GPU as a convenience rather than the main feature. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from 24 cores, 32 threads, and PassMark integer math of 157375, while the 36 MB L3 cache helps working sets and repeated builds. Content creators doing CPU-based video editing and rendering will find Cinebench R23 multi-core 30055 and PassMark floating-point 112273 well matched to their workloads.

Students and office users get a responsive machine for everyday tasks from Geekbench single-core 2330 and PassMark single-thread 4175, without needing a discrete GPU or the added power draw. Small business workstations that favor CPU throughput, dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory with ECC, and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity fit this platform well. It is not the right platform for a laptop built around high-end gaming, because the GPU’s 72nd percentile and system-shared memory cap graphics performance. Buyers who prioritize gaming should look for a discrete GPU configuration instead.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated GPU using the Krackan Point chip, RDNA 3.5 architecture, and TSMC’s 4 nm process. Its generation is listed as Navi III IGP with Strix Point Mobile branding. It has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 ROPs, and 8 ray-tracing cores. No tensor-core data is listed. The base clock is 600 MHz and the boost clock is 3000 MHz. Memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as System Shared, with bandwidth listed as System Dependent, meaning the GPU draws on main system memory. It is rated at 15 W TDP, carries an IGP slot width, uses no power connectors, and relies on portable-device-dependent display outputs. Its bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8.

The GPU’s pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, and FP32 and FP16 performance are both listed at 3.072 TFLOPS. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. In benchmark terms, OpenCL 22759 and Vulkan 30043 produce an average of 26401 at the 72nd percentile. That puts it within 1.1% of several discrete-style rivals in aggregate score. For rendering, the lack of dedicated VRAM and system-dependent bandwidth make it more suitable for light real-time work than for serious GPU rendering. The 8 RT cores provide ray-tracing capability, but with only 3.072 TFLOPS FP32, ray-traced workloads are likely modest.

Upgrade Path and Platform

This platform uses Intel BGA 1964, a socketless mobile package, so replacing the CPU with a different processor is not a practical upgrade path. Memory support covers DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC enabled, which suits workstation-style reliability. The CPU exposes PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, CPU only, giving strong bandwidth for storage and expansion devices.

No suggested PSU is listed in the data, but the CPU TDP is 55 W and the GPU TDP is 15 W, indicating a modest combined power envelope for a laptop platform. Because the Radeon 860M has no dedicated memory and its bandwidth is system dependent, the most sensible upgrade lever is system memory configuration. Higher-bandwidth dual-channel memory would feed the integrated GPU more effectively, while the CPU’s DDR4/DDR5 support provides some flexibility in memory choice. Additional storage remains a straightforward upgrade.

FAQ

Q: What are the key specifications of the Intel Core i9-14900HX?

A: It has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. It uses the Raptor Lake-HX architecture from Intel’s Core 14th Gen series and is built on Intel’s 10 nm process.

Q: How does the CPU compare with its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score is 56004. It is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core 7 253PQE, 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390, 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, and 1.0% behind the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.

Q: How fast is the AMD Radeon 860M compared with other GPUs?

A: Its average benchmark score is 26401, at the 72nd percentile. It is 0.1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, and 1.1% behind the NVIDIA RTX A4000.

Q: Can this platform handle 3D rendering?

A: Yes, primarily through the CPU. Cinebench R23 multi-core is 30055, Cinebench R20 multi-core is 15616, and PassMark floating-point math is 112273. The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 is less capable, so CPU-based rendering is the stronger path.

Q: Does the Radeon 860M have dedicated VRAM?

A: No. Its memory size, memory type, and bus width are all listed as System Shared, and bandwidth is listed as System Dependent. It shares system memory rather than using dedicated graphics memory.

Q: What memory types does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is supported. This makes the platform suitable for reliability-focused tasks.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 82. The CPU sits at the 91st percentile and the GPU at the 72nd percentile, showing a CPU-dominated performance profile.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900HX

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds