SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900HX + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900HX

56,004 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-14900HX + AMD Radeon 8050S — Component Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's top-tier 14th Gen mobile processor with AMD's newest RDNA 3.5 integrated graphics solution, creating a high-performance laptop platform that sits in the 90th combined percentile across all CPU+GPU pairings. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread monster from the Raptor Lake-HX family, while the GPU is a Strix Halo-based integrated part with 2048 shading units. Benchmark data indicates both components perform at the upper echelon of their respective categories, with the CPU ranking in the 91st percentile and the GPU in the 89th percentile. This is not a typical laptop configuration — the integrated GPU is designed to deliver desktop-class graphics performance without a discrete graphics card.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes UHD Graphics 770 as integrated graphics alongside the discrete AMD Radeon 8050S.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the CPU scores 30055 points, while the single-core score is 2181.5 points. The Geekbench scores follow a similar pattern: 17511 multi-core and 2330 single-core. PassMark multi-thread performance reaches 43778, with single-thread at 4175. These scores place the CPU at the 91st percentile of all CPUs tracked, with an average benchmark score of 56004.

The nearest rivals tell an interesting story about the competitive landscape. The Intel Core 7 253PQE scores 55919, a mere 0.2% behind the i9-14900HX. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 scores 56273, putting it 0.5% ahead, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 also sits 0.5% ahead at 56306. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX, a desktop workstation chip, leads by 1% with a score of 56555. This clustering within a 1% band shows that the i9-14900HX is extremely competitive with both mobile and desktop alternatives.

For real workloads, the PassMark sub-tests provide granular insight. Integer math scores 157375, floating-point math scores 112273, and extended instructions score 31247. Data compression reaches 539965, while encryption hits 32619. The find prime numbers test scores 193, and random string sorting scores 60861. Physics processing scores 2638. These numbers indicate strong performance across diverse computational patterns, from integer-heavy code to floating-point scientific workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core performance of 2181.5 in Cinebench R23 and 2330 in Geekbench provides the frame-pacing headroom needed for high-refresh displays. The GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 throughput supports 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, though exact frame rates require measurement.

Streaming: The 24-core, 32-thread configuration allows simultaneous game rendering and video encoding without contention. The PassMark data compression score of 539965 indicates robust handling of encoding workloads. Multi-threaded Cinebench R20 score of 15616 suggests ample encoding capacity.

Video editing: Multi-core scores of 30055 in Cinebench R23 and 17511 in Geekbench translate to fast export times and smooth timeline scrubbing. The floating-point math score of 112273 supports complex effects and color grading operations.

3D rendering: The 32-thread CPU combined with the GPU's 2048 shading units and 32 ray-tracing cores creates a dual-rendering capability. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 4574 indicates strong CPU-based rendering performance for both viewport manipulation and final frame output.

Software development: The 36 MB L3 cache and high single-thread performance of 4175 in PassMark single-thread favor compilation speed. The encryption score of 32619 and extended instructions score of 31247 support cryptographic operations and SIMD-heavy code paths.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core efficiency handles everyday productivity tasks with minimal power draw from the 55 W TDP. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides display output for office applications, while the Radeon 8050S handles more demanding visual tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are remarkably well-matched in this configuration, both sitting in the high-80s to low-90s percentile range. The CPU at 91st percentile and GPU at 89th percentile means neither component dramatically outclasses the other, reducing the likelihood of severe bottlenecking in most workloads.

In CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation, the PassMark physics score of 2638 indicates strong processing capability. The data encryption score of 32619 suggests the CPU can handle cryptographic workloads without stalling GPU tasks. The floating-point math score of 112273 supports scientific computing that might otherwise stress the GPU.

For GPU-bound workloads, the Radeon 8050S delivers 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 and 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate. The 179.2 GPixel/s pixel rate supports high-resolution rendering. The system-shared memory architecture means the GPU depends on the CPU's memory controller, making the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support critical for bandwidth. The "System Dependent" memory bandwidth figure highlights this coupling.

The 55 W TDP for both CPU and GPU suggests a balanced power envelope. Neither component is starved nor wasteful relative to the other, which is unusual in laptop configurations where one component typically dominates power allocation. The PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface for the GPU provides ample bandwidth for data transfer, though the shared memory architecture means most data travels through the system memory bus rather than PCIe.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile platform package. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard, making processor upgrades impossible without replacing the entire motherboard or laptop. The GPU is an integrated part (IGP slot width, no power connectors), so GPU upgrades are similarly impossible. This platform is designed as a complete, sealed system.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with ECC support available. The dual-channel memory bus is essential for the shared-memory GPU, as the Radeon 8050S has no dedicated VRAM — it uses system memory exclusively. Users should prioritize the fastest supported memory to maximize GPU performance, given the "System Dependent" bandwidth specification.

PCIe support is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. This provides high-bandwidth connectivity for NVMe storage and other peripherals. The GPU itself uses PCIe 5.0 x16, ensuring no bottleneck from the bus interface when accessing system memory.

The suggested PSU is not specified, but the combined 55 W TDP for both components suggests a modest power supply requirement. The GPU's 55 W TDP and lack of power connectors indicate it draws power through the motherboard, typical of integrated graphics solutions. This limits the upgrade path for the GPU — users cannot add a discrete graphics card to this platform without external enclosure solutions.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be maximizing system memory capacity and speed, since the GPU's performance scales with memory bandwidth. Adding high-speed NVMe storage via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes would also benefit load times and data-intensive workloads. Beyond that, the platform is essentially maxed out as delivered.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 56004, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. The nearest competitor, Intel Core 7 253PQE, scores 55919 — just 0.2% behind. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 leads by 0.5% with 56273, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 also leads by 0.5% with 56306. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX, a desktop part, leads by 1% with 56555. This tight clustering around the 56000-point mark shows the i9-14900HX is competitive with both mobile and desktop CPUs.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 62108, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61896, just 0.3% behind the 8050S. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63693, leading by 2.5%. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63775, leading by 2.6%, and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP scores 63830, leading by 2.7%. The 8050S is competitive with these discrete mobile GPUs, though it trails the higher-end parts by a small margin.

In specific GPU benchmarks, the Geekbench OpenCL score is 65818, and the Vulkan score is 58398. The OpenCL score is notably higher than Vulkan, suggesting compute-heavy workloads perform better than graphics-heavy workloads. This aligns with the GPU's positioning as an integrated solution optimized for general-purpose computing rather than pure gaming framerates.

The combined percentile of 90 places this pairing in the top 10% of all CPU+GPU configurations tracked. This is a strong overall result, though the lack of measured FPS data means real-world gaming performance must be estimated from these benchmark scores rather than derived from direct testing.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900HX has 24 cores and 32 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU scores 56004 on average, just 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core 7 253PQE, and 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S uses RDNA 3.5 architecture on a 4 nm process from TSMC.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has no dedicated VRAM — it uses system shared memory, with bandwidth marked as "System Dependent."

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900HX supports ECC memory, along with both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance?

A: The Radeon 8050S delivers 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 compute performance.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The GPU scores 62108 on average, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, but 2.5% behind the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is an integrated GPU based on the Strix Halo chip, built on RDNA 3.5 architecture. It uses a 4 nm process from TSMC with a die size of 308 mm². The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It includes 32 ray-tracing cores, though tensor cores are not specified. The base clock is 1295 MHz with a boost clock of 2800 MHz.

Memory is entirely system-shared, with no dedicated VRAM. The memory type, bus width, and bandwidth are all marked as "System Dependent," meaning performance scales with the system's memory configuration. This is a critical consideration for gaming and compute workloads, as memory bandwidth becomes the limiting factor.

The GPU's compute capabilities are substantial for an integrated part. FP32 performance is 11.47 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 11.47 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

In benchmark performance, the Geekbench OpenCL score of 65818 and Vulkan score of 58398 indicate strong compute capability. The OpenCL score being higher than Vulkan suggests the GPU is better optimized for general-purpose compute than pure graphics rendering. The average benchmark score of 62108 places the GPU in the 89th percentile, with the nearest rival being the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M at 61896 (0.3% behind) and the Radeon Pro Vega 56 at 63693 (2.5% ahead).

The GPU's 55 W TDP matches the CPU's TDP, creating a balanced power envelope. The PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface provides high bandwidth for system memory access, though the shared memory architecture means the GPU competes with the CPU for memory bandwidth. The lack of power connectors and IGP slot width confirm this is an integrated solution, not a discrete graphics card.

Build Overview

This is a laptop configuration (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the Intel Core i9-14900HX with the AMD Radeon 8050S. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread mobile processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process. The GPU is an integrated RDNA 3.5 part from AMD's Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation, built on a 4 nm process.

The combined percentile of 90 places this pairing in the top 10% of all tracked CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU's 91st percentile and GPU's 89th percentile are closely aligned, indicating a well-balanced system where neither component significantly outclasses the other. This is unusual for laptop configurations, which often pair a high-end CPU with a mid-range GPU or vice versa.

The platform uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket with PCIe Gen 5 support (16 CPU lanes). Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration with ECC capability. The GPU uses system shared memory, meaning the system's RAM configuration directly impacts graphics performance. Both components have a 55 W TDP, suggesting a power-efficient design that can sustain high performance without excessive heat generation.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need high-end CPU performance with capable graphics in a laptop form factor. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking makes it suitable for professionals running compute-intensive workloads like 3D rendering, video editing, and software development. The PassMark multi-thread score of 43778 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30055 indicate strong performance in multi-threaded applications.

Content creators working with video editing software will benefit from the CPU's 17511 Geekbench multi-core score and the GPU's 65818 OpenCL score for accelerated effects and exports. The floating-point math score of 112273 supports complex visual effects and color correction. The 32-thread configuration handles simultaneous tasks like rendering while previewing edits.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions will find the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate sufficient for high settings in most titles. The 32 ray-tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the shared memory bandwidth may limit performance in VRAM-heavy scenarios. The CPU's 2330 Geekbench single-core score ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound games.

Software developers will appreciate the 36 MB L3 cache and high single-thread performance of 4175 in PassMark, which speeds up compilation and code analysis. The encryption score of 32619 and extended instructions score of 31247 support security-focused development and SIMD-optimized code.

Students and small business users in STEM fields benefit from the dual capability: the CPU handles simulation and data analysis, while the GPU accelerates visualization and machine learning tasks. The 55 W TDP for both components suggests reasonable battery life for a high-performance laptop, making it viable for mobile work.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

Based on the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 89th percentile ranking, this system should handle most modern games at 1080p with high settings. The 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate supports high-resolution textures, while the 179.2 GPixel/s pixel rate allows for high display resolutions. The 32 ray-tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though performance will vary depending on the game's implementation.

The CPU's 2330 Geekbench single-core score and 4175 PassMark single-thread score ensure that CPU-bound games will not be the limiting factor at standard frame rates. The 24-core, 32-thread configuration also provides headroom for background tasks like streaming or recording while gaming.

The shared memory architecture is the primary concern for gaming performance. The GPU has no dedicated VRAM, so it relies on system memory bandwidth. In dual-channel DDR5 configurations, this can be sufficient for 1080p gaming, but 1440p or 4K gaming with high textures may strain the memory bandwidth. Users should configure the system with the fastest supported memory to maximize gaming performance.

The Geekbench Vulkan score of 58398 indicates solid DirectX 12 and Vulkan API performance, which covers the majority of modern game engines. The OpenCL score of 65818 suggests compute-heavy effects like physics simulations and post-processing will perform well. Overall, this system should deliver a capable gaming experience at 1080p, with playable performance at 1440p in less demanding titles, though these figures remain estimates until measured FPS data becomes available.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900HX + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900HX

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds