SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900F and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation form a desktop pairing that sits in the 71st percentile overall, a figure that suggests a high-performing system, though the components occupy very different echelons of their respective markets. The CPU is a top-tier enthusiast part, while the GPU, despite its powerful specifications, is an embedded mobile component that lands exactly at the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This creates a fascinating imbalance where the processor has significantly more compute headroom than the graphics card can utilize in many scenarios. The data indicates a system built for heavy multi-threaded productivity tasks, with gaming performance as a secondary, though still capable, consideration.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is a study in mobile workstation power wrapped in an unusual package. It is built on the AD103 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 45,900 million transistors into a 379 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 930 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz, which are relatively modest figures, but the memory subsystem is where this card distinguishes itself. It utilizes 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. This substantial memory allocation and bandwidth are critical for professional workloads like large 3D scene rendering or high-resolution video editing, where the data set exceeds the capacity of typical consumer cards.

The compute configuration is robust, featuring 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation processors. The RT and tensor core counts are particularly relevant for modern workloads: 76 RT cores handle ray tracing acceleration, while 304 tensor cores provide the horsepower for AI-driven tasks such as DLSS and machine learning inference. The raw throughput figures are impressive, with the card capable of 32.69 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio), a pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 510.7 GTexel/s. These numbers suggest that in pure compute terms, the GPU is a formidable rendering engine.

However, the benchmark data for this GPU is empty, and its percentile ranking sits at exactly 50, indicating it is an average performer relative to all other GPUs in the database. This is a critical interpretation point: the specifications suggest high-end capability, but the percentile placement implies that in real-world, aggregated benchmark results, this embedded part does not outperform the median GPU by a significant margin. The lack of nearest rivals in the data pack further complicates the analysis, leaving no direct comparison points. The GPU's power envelope is listed at 120 W TDP, which is low for its compute capacity, a characteristic of embedded parts designed for thermal and power constraints rather than raw performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is anchored by the Intel Core i9-14900F, which uses the Intel Socket 1700 interface. This socket is the foundation of the 14th Gen Core series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering flexibility for builders to choose between older, more affordable memory or newer, higher-bandwidth modules. With ECC memory support enabled, the platform is suited for workstation environments where data integrity is paramount. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes from the CPU, ensuring that the fastest available storage and expansion cards can be accommodated.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is a generation behind the CPU's native PCIe Gen 5 support. While this does not bottleneck the GPU's current performance significantly, it is a point to consider for future upgrades. The combined power draw of this system is modest: the CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 120 W. The data pack does not list a suggested PSU for the GPU, but the low TDP figures indicate that a standard, high-quality power supply would have ample headroom. The GPU uses no power connectors, drawing power solely from the slot, which simplifies installation but also limits its peak power delivery.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points toward the GPU as the primary bottleneck. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking and high multi-core scores suggest it has years of relevant performance left, while the GPU's 50th percentile placement is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive tasks. Upgrading to a more powerful desktop GPU would better balance the system, allowing the CPU's full potential to be utilized in gaming and rendering scenarios. The platform's support for DDR5 memory also offers a clear upgrade path for users currently on DDR4, as moving to DDR5 could improve memory bandwidth-sensitive workloads.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core i9-14900F?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F has 24 cores and 32 threads, a configuration designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s, achieved through 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process, while the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is built on TSMC's 5 nm process.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 71, indicating it outperforms 71% of all recorded system configurations.

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-14900F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the CPU has no integrated graphics (N/A), meaning a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, which is high for single-threaded performance.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for the CPU?

A: The CPU has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which is significant for holding frequently accessed data across all cores.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination, and the dataIsMeasured field is set to false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than definitive results. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and single-core score of 5583 indicate exceptional processing power that will not bottleneck most gaming scenarios. The PassMark single-thread score of 4506 further supports this, as gaming is often heavily dependent on single-core performance.

The GPU, however, presents a more complex picture. Its 50th percentile ranking suggests it performs at the median level of all GPUs, which implies it is capable of running modern games at 1440p with high settings, but may struggle with 4K ultra settings in demanding titles. The 16 GB of VRAM is a boon for texture-heavy games, and the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that data can be fed to the GPU cores efficiently. The RT and tensor cores enable ray tracing and DLSS, which can significantly boost frame rates when enabled, but the raw compute power of 32.69 TFLOPS may limit the effectiveness of these features at higher resolutions.

In practical terms, this system is likely to deliver smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p with high or ultra settings in most titles, achieving frame rates well above 60 FPS. At 4K, the GPU's performance will be the limiting factor, and users may need to adjust settings to medium or high to maintain playable frame rates. The CPU's performance headroom means that even if the GPU is fully utilized, the system will not suffer from stuttering or frame drops due to processor limitations. These are estimates based on the benchmark data, and actual performance will vary by game and driver optimization.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance of this system is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The Intel Core i9-14900F ranks in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60008. This places it in the top tier of processors, with nearest rivals being the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and Ryzen 7 8745HX, which are within 0.2% of its score. The GPU, in contrast, sits at the 50th percentile, with no benchmark scores or rivals listed. This stark difference in relative performance creates a clear bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads.

In gaming, the CPU's high single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5583) means it can easily feed frames to the GPU. The bottleneck will manifest at the GPU level, where the 50th percentile ranking indicates it is an average performer. The data suggests that at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU may still have headroom while the GPU is fully saturated, but at higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU will be the sole limiting factor, and the CPU's performance becomes less relevant.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's multi-core dominance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and PassMark multithread score of 46532, makes it the primary driver for tasks like video rendering, 3D modeling, and code compilation. The GPU's compute capabilities are still useful for GPU-accelerated tasks, but the CPU will often be the limiting factor in these scenarios. The 71st combined percentile indicates that the system is well above average overall, but the individual component percentiles suggest that upgrading the GPU would yield the most significant performance gains for gaming, while the CPU is already sufficient for most professional workloads.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build is designed for users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads above all else. The Intel Core i9-14900F's 92nd percentile ranking and high multi-core scores make it an ideal choice for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software development. The PassMark data compression score of 564207 and data encryption score of 34644 indicate strong performance in data-heavy tasks, which is beneficial for developers and analysts working with large datasets. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample parallel processing capability for compiling code or rendering complex scenes.

For gamers, this system is best suited for those playing at 1080p or 1440p resolutions, where the GPU's 50th percentile performance is sufficient for high settings. The 16 GB of VRAM on the GPU ensures that modern games with high-resolution textures will not run out of memory, and the RT and tensor cores offer ray tracing and DLSS support. However, enthusiasts seeking 4K ultra settings may find the GPU lacking. The system is also a strong candidate for small business workstations, where the CPU's ECC memory support and reliability are valuable for data integrity, and the GPU's compute capabilities can accelerate professional applications like CAD or scientific simulations.

Students and office workers will benefit from the system's responsiveness and multi-tasking ability, though the high CPU performance may be overkill for basic tasks. The lack of integrated graphics on the CPU means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which this build includes, making it a complete system. The overall 71st percentile ranking confirms that this is a well-above-average build, suitable for users who demand high performance in professional applications and are willing to accept average GPU performance for gaming.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-14900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, which is a high frequency that benefits single-threaded applications. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache capacity is crucial for holding working sets in memory, reducing the need to access slower system memory.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 is exceptionally high, reflecting the CPU's ability to handle demanding rendering tasks that utilize all cores. The single-core score of 5583 is equally impressive, indicating strong performance in applications that rely on a single thread, such as many games and legacy software. The Geekbench scores of 20008 (multi-core) and 2570 (single-core) corroborate these results, showing a balanced performance profile.

In real workloads, this CPU is a powerhouse. The PassMark scores are particularly telling: integer math at 177066 and floating point math at 119550 show strong computational throughput, while the extended instructions score of 31084 indicates good performance in SIMD-heavy tasks. The physics score of 2899 is lower, which may reflect the test's sensitivity to specific architectural features, but it is still respectable. The 92nd percentile ranking places it above nearly all other CPUs, with nearest rivals like the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and Ryzen 7 8745HX being within 0.2% of its performance, making it a top-tier choice for any CPU-intensive application.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This build is classified as a desktop system, combining the Intel Core i9-14900F with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation. The pairing is unusual because it mates a top-tier desktop CPU with an embedded mobile GPU, which is typically found in laptops or compact workstations. The combined percentile of 71 indicates that this system outperforms 71% of all recorded configurations, placing it in the upper-middle tier of overall performance. This ranking is driven almost entirely by the CPU's 92nd percentile score, while the GPU's 50th percentile score pulls the combined figure down.

The system is best described as a productivity-first workstation with gaming capabilities. The CPU provides exceptional multi-threaded performance for rendering, compilation, and data analysis, while the GPU offers sufficient compute power for professional graphics work and moderate gaming. The 16 GB of VRAM is a highlight, making the GPU suitable for large datasets and high-resolution textures. The build's desktop classification means it is intended for stationary use, and the low TDPs of both components (65 W for CPU, 120 W for GPU) suggest it can be cooled effectively with standard air coolers and does not require an excessive power supply.

The tier placement is a balancing act. In terms of CPU performance, this system competes with the best available, matching the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX within 0.2%. However, the GPU is an average performer, and the system's overall tier is limited by this component. For users who primarily need CPU power, this is an excellent build; for those who need balanced gaming and productivity, the GPU may need to be upgraded to achieve a higher combined percentile.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's benchmark performance is exceptional across all tests. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3986 multi-core and 562 single-core. In Cinebench R20, it achieves 16611 multi-core and 2344 single-core. The Cinebench R23 scores are 39551 multi-core and 5583 single-core. Geekbench results show 20008 multi-core and 2570 single-core. PassMark tests reveal a multithread score of 46532, a single-thread score of 4506, and specialized scores such as data compression at 564207, data encryption at 34644, extended instructions at 31084, find prime numbers at 209, floating point math at 119550, integer math at 177066, physics at 2899, and random string sorting at 63728. These scores place the CPU in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60008.

The GPU, in contrast, has no benchmark scores listed in the FACT PACK, and its average benchmark score is 0. Its percentile ranking is 50, meaning it performs at the median level of all GPUs. There are no nearest rivals listed for the GPU, leaving a gap in comparative data. The combined picture is one of stark contrast: the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is an average one. The combined percentile of 71 reflects this imbalance, showing that the CPU's strength boosts the system above the median, but the GPU's mediocrity prevents it from reaching the upper echelons of performance.

The benchmark data indicates that this system will excel in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the CPU's high multi-core scores provide a significant advantage. In GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the system will perform at an average level, matching what a typical mid-range desktop GPU would offer. The combination is not inherently flawed, but it is optimized for a specific use case: professional work that leverages the CPU's immense processing power, with gaming as a secondary activity.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p or 1440p resolution, this system can drive high-refresh-rate monitors in many titles. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 5583 ensures that frame times are low, preventing CPU bottlenecks, while the GPU's 50th percentile performance is adequate for high settings at these resolutions. However, the GPU may not consistently hit 144 FPS in the most demanding games, making this a solid but not elite gaming system.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 46532 indicates that the CPU can handle both game logic and streaming software without significant performance degradation. The GPU's NVENC encoder, while not explicitly benchmarked, is standard in NVIDIA GPUs and would offload encoding tasks, further improving streaming performance.

Video Editing: This is a strong use case for this system. The CPU's high multi-core performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551, accelerates timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export times. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth allow for smooth playback of high-resolution footage and GPU-accelerated effects, making this a capable editing workstation.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the primary driver for CPU-based rendering, with its PassMark floating point math score of 119550 and integer math score of 177066 indicating strong computational throughput. The GPU can also contribute via CUDA-accelerated renderers, with its 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 performance providing a decent boost. The combination is well-suited for both CPU and GPU rendering workflows, though the GPU is not top-tier.

Software Development: The CPU's high core count and strong multi-threaded performance are ideal for compiling large codebases. The PassMark data compression score of 564207 and data encryption score of 34644 also support tasks like data serialization and secure communications. The GPU is less relevant here, but its presence is necessary for display output since the CPU lacks integrated graphics.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for basic tasks like word processing and web browsing, but its performance ensures a responsive and future-proof experience. The CPU's single-thread score of 4506 in PassMark ensures snappy application launches, and the 16 GB of GPU memory is more than sufficient for any office application. The low TDPs of both components mean the system runs efficiently, though the lack of integrated graphics requires the discrete GPU to be always active.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900F

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds