SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-14900F + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000: A Desktop Workstation Analysis

This pairing combines a 24-core Intel Raptor Lake desktop processor with a 16 GB Turing-architecture workstation GPU, targeting a desktop build class with an 80th combined percentile position. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 67th percentile among all graphics cards, indicating a substantial processing advantage on the CPU side. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the data set, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct gaming measurements.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU core and thread configuration of the Intel Core i9-14900F?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F features 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, built on Intel's 10 nm Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 60008, which is 0.2% below the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (60099) and the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (60104), while sitting 0.6% above the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (59641) and 0.9% below the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T (60572).

Q: What are the key memory specifications of the Quadro RTX 5000 GPU?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, with a base clock of 1620 MHz and boost clock of 1815 MHz.

Q: What is the GPU's performance position relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 21629, which is 1% below the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (21856), 1.2% above the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (21379), 1.8% above the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21237), and 2.3% above the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory and what memory types are compatible?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory and is compatible with both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the power draw and PSU recommendation for the GPU?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 has a TDP of 230 W, and the suggested PSU rating is 550 W, with power delivered through one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector.

Q: What API support does the GPU offer?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, along with 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance distribution between the CPU and GPU creates a strongly CPU-forward system. The processor's 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs, combined with an average benchmark score of 60008, places it in the upper echelon of desktop processors. The GPU's 67th percentile and average score of 21629 position it much lower in the graphics hierarchy. This imbalance suggests that in most CPU-bound workloads, the i9-14900F will be waiting on the GPU; conversely, compute-heavy CPU tasks will run at full speed without GPU interference.

In gaming scenarios, the CPU's multi-threaded capabilities — evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 46532 — far exceed what even demanding game engines can utilize. The bottleneck will almost always be the GPU, particularly at higher resolutions where pixel throughput becomes the limiting factor. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 15616 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 indicate mid-tier graphics performance that will cap frame rates well before the CPU reaches its limits.

For content creation and rendering workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 16611 and Passmark integer math score of 177066 demonstrate exceptional parallel processing, while the GPU's compute score of 6525 on Passmark shows comparatively modest compute throughput. In 3D rendering tasks that rely on CUDA cores, the GPU becomes the limiting factor; in CPU-based rendering, the processor dominates. The 0.2% delta to the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and 0.6% advantage over the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D in average score show the CPU operates at parity with top competitors, meaning the GPU's relative weakness defines overall system limits.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this specific combination, all gaming frame rates are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's Passmark DirectX 12 score of 59 and DirectX 11 score of 140, alongside its G3D score of 15616, suggest modest gaming performance that would suit 1080p and 1440p gaming with adjusted settings. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample capacity for modern game assets, but the raw compute power — 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 — limits high-refresh gaming.

At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5583, Passmark single-thread score of 4506) ensures that the processor is never the limiting factor. The GPU's pixel rate of 116.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 348.5 GTexel/s would produce playable frame rates in most titles, but the DirectX 12 score of 59 indicates that modern API-heavy games will stress the GPU significantly. The GPU's nearest rival, the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, scores only 1% higher on average, situating the Quadro RTX 5000 in the same performance tier as that older gaming card.

At 1440p, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM capacity becomes advantageous for texture-heavy games, but the 256-bit memory bus and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain performance in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios. The Passmark G2D score of 709 reflects adequate 2D acceleration for desktop and interface rendering, but this is not indicative of gaming capability. For 4K gaming, the GPU would struggle to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles, given its 67th percentile standing and the fact that its nearest rivals include the GTX 1060 6 GB — a card widely considered entry-level for modern gaming.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need substantial CPU compute power alongside professional-grade GPU features, rather than pure gaming performance. The 92nd percentile CPU ranking makes this system ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, data scientists running multi-threaded analyses, and researchers executing simulation workloads. The CPU's Passmark data compression score of 564207 and data encryption score of 34644 indicate strong throughput for database operations and secure data handling.

Content creators working with video encoding, 3D modeling, and architectural visualization will benefit from the CPU's multi-core dominance — the Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3986 and Geekbench multi-core score of 20008 demonstrate rapid rendering times. The GPU's professional Quadro lineage, with 16 GB of VRAM and 384 tensor cores, supports CUDA-accelerated workflows in applications like CAD, scientific visualization, and AI inference, even though the raw gaming performance is modest.

Students in engineering, computer science, or digital media programs would find this system capable of handling coursework ranging from parallel programming assignments to GPU-accelerated projects. Small business workstations for financial modeling, video editing, or 3D product visualization would also match this hardware profile — the CPU handles heavy spreadsheet calculations and compilation tasks, while the GPU accelerates viewport rendering and video effects. The desktop form factor and ECC memory support make this suitable for professional environments where data integrity matters.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's benchmark scores — Passmark G3D of 15616 and DirectX 11 of 140 — suggest this system would achieve moderate frame rates at 1080p in competitive titles, but the 67th GPU percentile means high-refresh (144 Hz+) gaming at maximum settings is beyond its capabilities. The CPU's single-thread performance would not bottleneck, but the GPU would cap frame rates well below what the processor could deliver.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming software, with a Passmark multi-thread score of 46532 ensuring smooth background workloads. The GPU's tensor cores could assist with AI-based encoding features, but the modest gaming performance would limit the quality of the game feed itself.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core scores — Cinebench R23 multi-core of 39551 and Passmark floating point math of 119550 — enable fast export and rendering timelines, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM handles large video buffers and effects. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 indicates adequate acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects, though the 1% delta to the GTX 1060 6 GB shows this is not a top-tier editing GPU.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering engines will perform exceptionally well, given the 92nd percentile processing power. GPU-based rendering via CUDA will be slower — the 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 and Passmark compute score of 6525 place it below contemporary workstation cards, though the 16 GB memory capacity allows large scenes.

Software development: The CPU's compilation throughput is outstanding, with Passmark integer math of 177066 and data compression of 564207 enabling rapid builds. Developers running virtual machines, containers, and multiple IDE instances will find the 32 threads highly effective for parallel workloads.

Student and office work: Office productivity, web browsing, and document creation are trivially handled by this hardware. The CPU's single-thread Passmark score of 4506 ensures responsive application performance, while the GPU's 709 G2D score provides smooth desktop rendering. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power draw reasonable for a desktop workstation.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is built on the Turing architecture with the TU104 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 12 nm process with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1620 MHz and boost clock of 1815 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for professional applications but below modern gaming cards.

The GPU includes 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It features 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI processing. The FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) indicate the compute capability for professional workloads. The pixel rate of 116.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 348.5 GTexel/s define the rasterization throughput.

Benchmark results show a GPU that performs well in compute tasks but lags in gaming-specific tests. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 92309 is the highest benchmark result, indicating strong general-purpose compute. The Passmark G3D score of 15616 places it in the 67th percentile, with the nearest rival being the GTX 1060 6 GB at only 1% higher average score. This comparison reveals that the Quadro RTX 5000's gaming performance is comparable to a mid-range gaming GPU from several generations ago, despite its professional feature set.

The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage for rendering large scenes, machine learning models, and multi-display professional setups. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C outputs support multi-monitor configurations. The 230 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU indicate moderate power requirements, with a dual-slot design and 267 mm length fitting most desktop cases. Being end-of-life, with successor Workstation Ampere, this GPU offers professional features at a performance level that benchmarks show is now considered mid-range.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 60008 places it at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, scores 60099, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the Intel processor is essentially at parity. The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX also scores 60104, again -0.2% relative. Against the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (59641), the i9-14900F holds a 0.6% advantage, while the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T (60572) leads by 0.9%. This clustering shows the CPU is competitively positioned among high-end processors.

In specific CPU benchmarks, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and single-core score of 5583 demonstrate strong performance in both parallel and single-threaded tasks. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20008 and single-core score of 2570 reinforce this picture. Passmark results show specialized strengths: data compression at 564207, floating point math at 119550, and integer math at 177066 all indicate robust processing capabilities across varied workloads.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 21629 places it at the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the GTX 1060 6 GB, scores 21856 with a -1% delta, meaning the Quadro is slightly behind. The RTX A4000 Mobile (21379) trails by 1.2%, the Radeon HD 8970M (21237) by 1.8%, and the Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153) by 2.3%. This tight cluster around the 21,000-22,000 score range indicates the GPU competes with mid-range hardware.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU's 92nd percentile vastly outperforms the GPU's 67th percentile. The combined percentile of 80 reflects this imbalance, placing the overall build above average but well below the CPU's individual standing. In CPU-bound tasks, this system competes with the best; in GPU-bound tasks, it performs at mid-range levels. The delta between CPU and GPU percentiles (25 points) is significant, indicating that the GPU will be the limiting factor in most graphics-intensive applications.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i9-14900F with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000, creating a workstation-oriented system with strong CPU performance and professional GPU features. The CPU, from the Core 14th Gen series on the Raptor Lake architecture, represents Intel's high-end desktop offering with 24 cores and 32 threads. The GPU, from NVIDIA's Quadro Turing generation, targets professional workloads with 16 GB of VRAM and RT/tensor core support.

The combined percentile of 80 places this build in the upper fifth of all systems, though the significant gap between CPU (92nd percentile) and GPU (67th percentile) percentile positions defines its character. This is a CPU-first build where the processor provides exceptional compute power for multi-threaded workloads, while the GPU offers professional-grade features at mid-range performance levels. The CPU's launch MSRP is $524, while the GPU's launch MSRP is 2,299 USD.

The desktop class designation means this system is intended for stationary use rather than portable applications. The CPU's Intel Socket 1700 and the GPU's PCIe 3.0 x16 interface are standard desktop components. The CPU's TDP of 65 W is notably low for a 24-core processor, while the GPU's 230 W TDP is moderate for a workstation card. This system is best suited for users who prioritize processor performance for compilation, rendering, simulation, and data processing, while needing professional GPU features like ECC memory support and certified drivers for workstation applications.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, including ECC, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The CPU's benchmark performance is exceptional across the board. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3986 and single-core score of 562 establish a strong baseline. Moving to newer tests, the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 16611 and single-core score of 2344, and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and single-core score of 5583, all demonstrate top-tier performance. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20008 and single-core score of 2570 confirm this standing.

In specialized Passmark tests, the CPU shows particular strength in data compression (564207) and integer math (177066), indicating excellent performance for database operations and general computation. The floating point math score of 119550 and extended instructions score of 31084 highlight its capability in scientific and media workloads. The multi-thread score of 46532 and single-thread score of 4506 round out a comprehensive picture of a processor that excels in both parallel and sequential tasks.

The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and Ryzen 7 8745HX, both with average scores within 0.2%, and the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D at 0.6% behind. The Intel Xeon Gold 6338T leads by 0.9%. This tight competition means the i9-14900F is at the top of its class, with the 92nd percentile ranking confirming its position among the best processors available. The 65 W TDP is remarkably efficient for this level of performance, making it suitable for systems where power consumption is a consideration.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with ECC capability. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 CPU lanes provides modern connectivity for storage and expansion. The CPU's 65 W TDP leaves substantial thermal headroom, and the platform can accommodate higher-TDP processors if a future upgrade is desired.

The GPU connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, which is an older interface standard. This means the Quadro RTX 5000 does not take advantage of the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, but the GPU's 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is not constrained by the PCIe 3.0 interface in most workloads. A future GPU upgrade would benefit from the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support, provided the motherboard and other components support it.

The GPU has a TDP of 230 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W. This leaves headroom for additional components, and the CPU's 65 W TDP means the total system power draw is moderate for the performance level. The power connectors (1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin) are standard for this GPU class. A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the GPU with a more modern workstation card, as the CPU's 92nd percentile performance is not the limiting factor in most scenarios. The CPU itself could be upgraded within the Socket 1700 platform, though the 14900F is already near the top of its generation.

Memory upgrades offer another path: the CPU's support for DDR5 with ECC means users can increase capacity or bandwidth to match workloads. The dual-channel configuration supports up to the maximum capacity allowed by the platform. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide future-proofing for high-speed NVMe storage or other Gen 5 peripherals, even though the current GPU uses PCIe 3.0. This combination of a high-end CPU with a mid-range professional GPU creates a system where the CPU upgrade path is limited (already near the top), but the GPU can be substantially improved to unlock the full potential of the processor.