SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

77,712 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i9-14900F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D form a desktop pairing that targets the very top of the performance stack, with the CPU holding a 92nd percentile rank among all processors and the GPU matching that 92nd percentile among all graphics cards. The data for this exact combination contains no measured FPS rows, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay captures. This pairing combines a 24-core, 32-thread processor with a 32 GB GDDR7 graphics card built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, creating a system that appears positioned for maximum throughput in both compute and rendering workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is a substantial piece of silicon, built on a 5 nm TSMC process with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. The memory subsystem is the standout feature at first glance: 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus delivers 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth, which is the kind of headroom that matters for high-resolution textures and large dataset processing. The clock speeds are a base of 2017 MHz and a boost of 2407 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz for 28 Gbps effective throughput. This is not a subtle card; the 575 W TDP and 950 W suggested PSU make the power requirements clear.

The compute configuration is dense: 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. The RT cores number 170, and the tensor cores are 680, which tells you the card is built to accelerate ray tracing and AI workloads concurrently. Pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s, both of which are enormous figures that translate to raw fill-rate capacity. The FP32 performance is 104.8 TFLOPS, and the FP16 figure matches at 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1), meaning the card does not artificially halve FP16 throughput — that is useful for mixed-precision workloads where you want consistent performance across data types.

Benchmark results confirm the hardware design intent. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14,326 is a strong indicator of modern rasterized gaming performance. In Geekbench compute tests, the OpenCL score of 310,674 and Vulkan score of 376,915 show the card scales well across different API environments. The PassMark G3D score of 44,065 and GPU compute score of 28,396 place it in the upper echelon of graphics hardware. However, the nearestRivals data provides a reality check: the RTX 5090 D is only 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT in average score, and 1.6% behind the Radeon RX 6850M XT. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB is 2.1% ahead, and the 16 GB version is 2.4% ahead. This suggests that while the RTX 5090 D has massive memory and bandwidth advantages, the raw compute score does not dominate the field as much as the spec sheet might imply — the deltaPct values here are tight, within a few percent of each other.

For rendering workloads, the 1.79 TB/s bandwidth and 32 GB VRAM mean you can load scenes that would spill over on smaller cards. The 170 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, and the 680 tensor cores handle denoising and AI upscaling tasks. The FP32 and FP16 being 1:1 is a notable detail for compute-heavy rendering pipelines that use half-precision for intermediate calculations. The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 371 versus DirectX 12 score of 219 is curious — it suggests the card performs better in legacy DX11 APIs than in DX12, which is opposite to what you might expect from a Blackwell architecture card, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad score is a more modern and reliable indicator for current games.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1440p or 4K is the primary target for this build. The RTX 5090 D has the raw compute and memory bandwidth to push high frame rates, and the Core i9-14900F's single-core score of 5,583 in Cinebench R23 ensures the CPU can feed frames without becoming the bottleneck. The 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance is the kind of headroom that supports high settings and high refresh simultaneously, though the lack of measured FPS data means exact numbers are estimates.

Streaming is a dual-workload scenario where the CPU's 24 cores and the GPU's tensor cores both come into play. The i9-14900F has a PassMark multithread score of 46,532, which provides ample capacity for encoding and background tasks, while the RTX 5090 D's tensor cores can handle AI-based encoding and enhancement filters without stealing rendering performance. The 32 GB VRAM means you can also offload encoding to the GPU without worrying about texture memory pressure.

Video editing benefits from both components. The CPU's 39,551 Cinebench R23 multicore score accelerates timeline operations and export encoding, while the GPU's 1.79 TB/s bandwidth and 32 GB memory allow for smooth scrubbing through high-resolution footage and applying GPU-accelerated effects. The FP16 performance at 104.8 TFLOPS is relevant here, as many video effects pipelines use half-precision for speed.

3D rendering is where this combination shines. The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 177,066 and floating point math score of 119,550 handle CPU-based simulation and physics, while the GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth accelerate viewport rendering and final frame renders. The 680 tensor cores also enable AI denoising, which can cut render times by reducing the samples needed.

Software development is a practical fit for the i9-14900F's 24 cores and 32 threads. Compilation tasks benefit from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39,551, and the PassMark data compression score of 564,207 suggests fast builds and package management. The GPU is overkill for development, but the 32 GB VRAM is useful for local AI model testing or GPU compute debugging.

Student and office work is the least demanding scenario, but the system handles it with ease. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,583 ensures snappy application launch and browser responsiveness, and the 65 W CPU TDP means low idle power draw. The GPU's power draw is irrelevant in office tasks, but the system is far more capable than needed for spreadsheets and document editing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node from Intel. The base clock is 2.00 GHz and the boost clock reaches 5.80 GHz, which is a significant frequency range that allows the chip to scale from power-efficient operation to maximum single-thread performance. The cache layout is 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3, which is a generous amount of fast memory for frequently accessed data. The die size is 257 mm², and the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 and has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for the CPU.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a high-end desktop processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39,551 and single-core score of 5,583 show strong performance in both domains. Geekbench multicore is 20,008 and single-core is 2,570, which aligns with the Cinebench results. The PassMark tests reveal specific strengths: integer math at 177,066, floating point math at 119,550, and multithread at 46,532. The data compression score of 564,207 is particularly high, suggesting the chip handles compression-heavy workloads well. The data encryption score of 34,644 and extended instructions score of 31,084 indicate solid performance in cryptography and SIMD-heavy code.

The nearestRivals data shows the i9-14900F sits in a competitive position. It is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and Ryzen 7 8745HX, and 0.6% ahead of the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. The Intel Xeon Gold 6338T is 0.9% ahead. These are all close margins, meaning the i9-14900F is not a clear winner but rather a peer among top-tier CPUs. The 92nd percentile rank among all CPUs confirms it is in the upper tier, but the deltaPct values show that the competition is tight.

For real workloads, the 24 cores and 32 threads handle content creation tasks with ease. The 36 MB of L3 cache is beneficial for workloads that repeatedly access the same data, such as database queries or scientific simulations. The 5.80 GHz boost clock ensures that single-threaded tasks like gaming or legacy applications get maximum frequency. The 65 W TDP is notable because it is lower than many competing high-core-count CPUs, which means the cooling requirements are more manageable while still delivering high performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i9-14900F and RTX 5090 D is asymmetric. The GPU has a 575 W TDP and the CPU has a 65 W TDP, which means the power delivery and cooling focus is heavily on the graphics card. The suggested PSU is 950 W, which accommodates the GPU's draw with headroom for the CPU and other components. The CPU's 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide ample bandwidth for the GPU's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, so there is no data transfer bottleneck at the bus level.

In gaming workloads, the CPU is likely not the limiting factor at high resolutions. The single-core score of 5,583 in Cinebench R23 and the PassMark single-thread score of 4,506 suggest the CPU can maintain high frame rates, but the GPU's compute performance will determine the maximum FPS. The RTX 5090 D has 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is the dominant figure for rendering. The lack of measured FPS data means we cannot quantify the exact balance, but the deltaPct values from the rivals suggest the GPU is not as far ahead of the competition as the spec sheet implies.

In compute workloads, the CPU and GPU are complementary. The CPU's 24 cores handle tasks that are not easily parallelized on the GPU, such as data compression at 564,207 PassMark score or encryption at 34,644. The GPU handles massively parallel tasks, as shown by the Geekbench OpenCL score of 310,674. The PassMark GPU compute score of 28,396 is lower than the CPU's multithread score of 46,532, which is interesting — it suggests that for certain compute tasks, the CPU may actually be faster than the GPU, depending on the workload characteristics.

The bottleneck analysis depends on the task. For gaming, the GPU is the primary determinant of FPS, and the CPU is sufficient to feed it. For productivity, the CPU is the workhorse, but the GPU can accelerate specific tasks like rendering or video encoding. The 32 GB VRAM on the GPU means memory capacity is rarely a bottleneck, but the GPUs compute score relative to rivals suggests that the card may not scale as well as the memory and bandwidth figures imply.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so the gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The RTX 5090 D's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14,326 indicates strong 4K gaming capability, while the CPU's single-core score of 5,583 in Cinebench R23 ensures the processor can keep up with game logic and draw calls.

At 4K resolution, the GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth are the key assets. The 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests that modern AAA titles at high settings should run at high frame rates, though the exact numbers depend on the game engine and optimization. The 170 RT cores mean ray-traced effects are feasible, but they will reduce overall FPS compared to rasterized rendering.

At 1440p, the CPU becomes more relevant. The single-core performance is sufficient for high refresh rates, but the GPU is still the limiting factor in most scenarios. The PassMark G3D score of 44,065 suggests this card is in the upper tier of gaming GPUs, but the nearestRivals data shows it is only 1.1% ahead of the Radeon RX 6650M XT, which is a mobile GPU — this is a surprising comparison and suggests the benchmark scores may not fully capture the RTX 5090 D's strengths in gaming-specific workloads.

At 1080p, the CPU's single-core performance is the primary driver of FPS, and the GPU is underutilized. The i9-14900F's 5.80 GHz boost clock and 4,506 PassMark single-thread score mean it can handle high refresh rates, but the GPU's massive compute resources are wasted at this resolution. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score is more representative of 1440p or 4K performance than 1080p.

For esports titles, the system is overkill. The CPU's single-core performance and the GPU's raw throughput mean frame rates are likely limited by the game engine or monitor refresh rate rather than hardware. For simulator games that are CPU-bound, the 24 cores and 36 MB L3 cache provide solid performance, but the single-thread performance is the more critical factor.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who play at 4K resolution with maximum settings and want ray tracing enabled. The RTX 5090 D's 32 GB VRAM ensures future games with high texture requirements will not run out of memory, and the 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides the compute headroom for demanding scenes. The CPU's 5,583 single-core score ensures the processor does not hinder frame rates.

Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering are the other primary audience. The CPU's 39,551 Cinebench R23 multicore score accelerates rendering and encoding, while the GPU's 1.79 TB/s bandwidth and 32 GB VRAM handle large projects. The FP16 performance at 104.8 TFLOPS is useful for AI-based effects and denoising.

Software developers who build large codebases or run local AI models will find the CPU's 24 cores and the GPU's tensor cores valuable. The PassMark data compression score of 564,207 speeds up build artifacts, and the 680 tensor cores enable local model inference. The 32 GB VRAM is sufficient for many AI models.

Students and small business workstations are not the target for this build — the hardware is far more capable than office tasks require. However, if a student or business user needs a system that handles compute-intensive workloads alongside everyday tasks, this combination would not be a bottleneck. The 65 W CPU TDP and 575 W GPU TDP mean the system generates significant heat, so a well-ventilated case is necessary.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 60,008, with a percentile rank of 92 among all CPUs. The nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX at 60,099 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX at 60,104 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D at 59,641 (0.6% behind), and the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T at 60,572 (0.9% ahead). These are tight margins, showing the i9-14900F is a peer among top CPUs but not a leader.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 77,712, with a percentile rank of 92 among all GPUs. The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT at 76,904 (1.1% behind the RTX 5090 D), the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT at 78,940 (1.6% ahead), the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB at 79,396 (2.1% ahead), and the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB at 79,605 (2.4% ahead). The GPU is not the dominant force its specs suggest, as the deltaPct values show it is within a few percent of several rivals.

The combined percentile for this build is 92, which places it in the top tier of all desktop configurations. The CPU's Cinebench R23 scores of 39,551 multicore and 5,583 single-core are strong, and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 14,326 is high. The combined picture is a system that excels in multi-threaded productivity and high-end gaming, but the GPU's benchmark scores relative to rivals suggest that the 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth may be more valuable than the raw compute score indicates.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5090 D have, and what type is it?

A: The RTX 5090 D has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The memory bandwidth is 1.79 TB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 5.80 GHz, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 950 W, and the GPU TDP is 575 W.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 39,551.

Q: What is the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score?

A: The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 14,326.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The memory support includes ECC, which is useful for workstation tasks. The CPU has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, so the bandwidth is sufficient for current and near-future graphics cards.

The GPU has a 575 W TDP and requires a 950 W PSU, which is a significant power budget. The power connector is a single 16-pin, and the card is dual-slot with dimensions of 304 mm length, 137 mm height, and 48 mm width. This means the case must accommodate a large card and provide adequate airflow. The display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, supporting multiple high-resolution monitors.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase the memory capacity or speed, as the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5. However, the motherboard choice determines which memory type is available. The CPU's 36 MB L3 cache and 24 cores are sufficient for most workloads, so a CPU upgrade would require a platform change to a different socket. The GPU is already at the top of its generation, so an upgrade would mean waiting for the next generation, which is listed as GeForce 60 series in the FACT PACK. The 1x 16-pin power connector and 950 W PSU requirement mean that any future GPU upgrade would need to be compatible with this power delivery configuration.