SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

56,083 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It uses a 10 nm process node from Intel and features a die size of 257 mm². The base clock sits at 2.00 GHz, while the boost clock reaches 5.80 GHz. This is a locked multiplier part (SRN3W), meaning overclocking is not supported through the multiplier, but the high boost clock already provides substantial single-thread performance out of the box.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache pool helps feed the 24 physical cores, particularly in workloads that benefit from frequent data reuse. Memory support is dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5, with ECC memory support included, which is notable for a desktop Core i9 part. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, ensuring compatibility with the fastest available storage and graphics cards.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39551 is the headline figure, indicating exceptional multi-threaded capability. The single-core score of 5583 in Cinebench R23 is strong but not class-leading, which aligns with the locked multiplier and the architecture's design goals. The Geekbench scores of 20008 multicore and 2570 single-core corroborate this split, with the multicore result being the clear standout.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i9-14900F is essentially neck-and-neck with the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, trailing by only 0.2% in average benchmark score. It is also 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX, but leads the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D by 0.6% and the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T by 0.9%. These tiny margins indicate that the i9-14900F is precisely positioned in the upper tier of desktop processors, without a clear winner among its closest competitors.

The PassMark suite provides insight into specialized workloads. The floating-point math score of 119550 and integer math score of 177066 indicate robust general-purpose compute. The data compression score of 564207 is exceptionally high, which matters for file archiving and database operations. Data encryption at 34644 and extended instructions at 31084 show strong cryptographic and SIMD performance. The multithread score of 46532 reinforces the multicore strength, while the single-thread score of 4506 is respectable. The physics score of 2899 and prime number finding score of 209 are more modest, suggesting that certain integer-heavy, latency-sensitive tasks are not this chip's primary strength.

The average benchmark score of 60008, combined with the 92nd percentile ranking, means this CPU outperforms the vast majority of installed processors. It is a high-end desktop part that excels in parallel workloads while maintaining competitive single-thread performance, making it a versatile choice for demanding applications.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The strong single-core performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5583 and PassMark single-thread score of 4506, provides the foundation for high frame rates in esports and competitive titles. The 36 MB L3 cache helps reduce memory latency, which is beneficial for game engines that rely on frequent data access. This CPU will not be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, though the locked multiplier means users cannot push clock speeds beyond the 5.80 GHz boost.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 32 threads are more than sufficient for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The PassMark data compression score of 564207 indicates that the CPU can handle the data throughput required for video encoding tasks. The high multithread score of 46532 ensures that background encoding processes will not create noticeable frame drops in games. Streamers who prefer CPU-based encoding over GPU-based encoding will find ample headroom here.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39551 and Geekbench multicore score of 20008 directly translate to faster rendering times in video editing software. The PassMark floating-point math score of 119550 supports this, as video effects and color grading rely heavily on floating-point calculations. The 32 threads will accelerate timeline scrubbing, preview rendering, and final exports. This is a top-tier CPU for non-linear editing workflows.

3D Rendering: The multicore performance is exceptional, with Cinebench R20 multicore at 16611 and Cinebench R15 multicore at 3986. These scores indicate that CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray will complete significantly faster than on lower-core-count processors. The 24 physical cores provide a direct scaling advantage in ray tracing workloads that are not GPU-accelerated. The 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms this is one of the fastest rendering chips available.

Software Development: The PassMark integer math score of 177066 and the data encryption score of 34644 are relevant for compilation tasks and secure coding workflows. The 32 threads allow parallel builds to utilize all available resources, reducing build times for large codebases. The ECC memory support is a bonus for developers who require data integrity during long-running test suites. The single-thread performance of 4506 in PassMark ensures that interactive development tools remain responsive.

Student and Office Work: The single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5583, handles everyday productivity applications with ease. Spreadsheets, word processors, and web browsers will run smoothly. The 24 cores may be overkill for basic tasks, but the headroom ensures longevity as software becomes more parallelized. The 65 W TDP means this CPU can be cooled effectively in a standard desktop chassis, making it suitable for a dorm room or small office build.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using the GB203 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The die contains 45,600 million transistors across a 378 mm² area, resulting in a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². This is a high-end GPU with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1875 MHz, which translates to 30 Gbps effective.

The GPU has 10752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. The RT cores number 84, and there are 336 tensor cores. This hardware configuration supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 56.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

The base clock is 2295 MHz, with a boost clock of 2617 MHz. The card has a TDP of 360 W and requires a 750 W power supply. It uses a single 16-pin power connector and is a dual-slot design measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b connectors.

Benchmark results place this GPU in the 87th percentile among all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8637 is a strong indicator of modern gaming performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 235901 and Vulkan score of 255450 show excellent compute capability across different APIs. The PassMark G3D score of 36565 is substantial, while the GPU compute score of 21789 indicates strong general-purpose processing power.

The nearest rival comparison shows the RTX 5080 is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon 8060S, 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, and 2.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by 2.2%. These margins are small, indicating that the RTX 5080 sits in a competitive tier where performance differences are minimal. The average benchmark score is 56083.

The 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores are dedicated to ray tracing and AI acceleration. The FP16 performance at 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1) suggests that the tensor cores are capable of handling AI workloads efficiently. The 16 GB of GDDR7 memory is sufficient for high-resolution textures and complex scenes, while the 960.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures data can be fed to the GPU without bottlenecks.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this pairing, the CPU and GPU are both high-end components that complement each other well. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking and the GPU's 87th percentile ranking mean neither component is significantly stronger than the other in the broader hardware landscape. This balance suggests that in most workloads, the system will not have a severe bottleneck in either direction.

For gaming at lower resolutions, the CPU's single-thread performance will be the primary driver of frame rates. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5583 is strong, but the locked multiplier means it cannot be pushed further. At higher resolutions, the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8637 and its 87th percentile ranking will become the limiting factor, as the rendering load shifts to the graphics card.

In CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the i9-14900F's multicore scores (Cinebench R23 multicore of 39551) will be the determining factor. The GPU's compute capabilities (PassMark GPU compute of 21789) may assist in GPU-accelerated rendering, but the CPU will handle the bulk of physics and geometry calculations. The balanced nature of this pairing means neither component will idle while the other works at full capacity.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU is notably low for a 24-core part, which means it produces less heat and requires less cooling than expected. The GPU's 360 W TDP is substantial, making the graphics card the primary source of heat and power draw in the system. This asymmetry in power consumption means the CPU is unlikely to thermal throttle, while the GPU's cooling solution will be the critical factor for sustained performance.

The memory bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s on the GPU far exceeds what the CPU's dual-channel memory controller can provide. This is normal for a discrete GPU setup, but it means that system memory bandwidth is not a bottleneck for the GPU's operations. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes ensures that data transfer between CPU and GPU is not a limiting factor.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This provides flexibility for builders who want to reuse existing DDR4 modules or invest in newer DDR5 for higher bandwidth. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for this platform, and ECC memory support is included for those who need it.

The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, which is sufficient for a single high-end graphics card. The RTX 5080 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, so it will run at full bandwidth without any lane-sharing concerns. Storage devices can also use PCIe Gen 5 lanes if the motherboard provides additional slots, though the CPU's 16 lanes are dedicated to the primary graphics slot.

The suggested power supply for the GPU is 750 W, which provides headroom for the CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 360 W TDP. A quality 750 W PSU can handle this system with room for additional drives and peripherals. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector, so the PSU must have the appropriate cable or adapter.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-core-count CPU, though the Socket 1700 is nearing the end of its lifecycle with the 14th generation. The 24-core i9-14900F is already near the top of this socket's range, so the upgrade path is limited. However, the DDR5 memory support means users can upgrade to faster memory kits without changing the platform. The GPU can be upgraded to a future GeForce 60-series card, as the PCIe 5.0 interface will remain compatible.

The launch MSRP for the CPU is $524, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 999 USD. These are the only pricing facts available, and they indicate a premium tier for both components.

Who Should Build It

This system is aimed at enthusiasts and professionals who need maximum performance in parallel workloads. The 24-core CPU and 16 GB GPU combination is ideal for content creators who edit high-resolution video or render 3D scenes. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39551 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8637 provide the horsepower for these tasks.

Gamers targeting high refresh rates at 1440p or 4K resolution will benefit from this pairing. The GPU's 87th percentile ranking ensures high frame rates in modern titles, while the CPU's single-thread performance prevents bottlenecks in CPU-bound games. The 16 GB of GDDR7 memory is sufficient for high-resolution textures and future game releases.

Software developers who work on large codebases will appreciate the 32 threads for parallel compilation. The PassMark integer math score of 177066 and data encryption score of 34644 indicate strong performance in build tools and security-related tasks. The ECC memory support is an added benefit for data integrity.

Students in engineering or computer science programs can use this system for simulations, data analysis, and development work. The CPU's multicore performance handles heavy computational tasks, while the GPU accelerates CUDA-based workloads. The 65 W CPU TDP means the system can run in a dorm room without excessive heat or noise.

Small business workstations that require reliable performance for data processing, financial modeling, or database management will find this system capable. The data compression score of 564207 and the multithread score of 46532 indicate strong throughput for these applications. The production status of both components is "Active," ensuring ongoing support and availability.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-14900F achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39551 and a single-core score of 5583. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score is 16611, and the single-core score is 2344. The Cinebench R15 scores are 3986 for multicore and 562 for single-core. Geekbench results show a multicore score of 20008 and a single-core score of 2570.

The PassMark suite yields a multithread score of 46532 and a single-thread score of 4506. Integer math scores 177066, floating-point math scores 119550, and extended instructions score 31084. Data compression scores 564207, data encryption scores 34644, and random string sorting scores 63728. Physics scores 2899, and find prime numbers scores 209. The average benchmark score is 60008, placing the CPU in the 92nd percentile.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8637. Geekbench OpenCL scores 235901, and Vulkan scores 255450. PassMark G3D scores 36565, and GPU compute scores 21789. DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores are 208, 324, and 151 respectively, while DirectX 9 scores 389. The G2D score is 1415. The average benchmark score is 56083, placing the GPU in the 87th percentile.

The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 90, indicating that this system outperforms 90% of all desktop configurations. The CPU trails its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, by only 0.2%, while the GPU leads the AMD Radeon 8060S by 0.6%. This combined picture shows a well-matched system where both components perform near the top of their respective tiers.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-14900F support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, as indicated by the "multiplierUnlocked" field being false. The boost clock of 5.80 GHz is the maximum achievable without external clock generator adjustments.

Q: What type of memory does this CPU support?

A: The i9-14900F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is also supported, which is unusual for a desktop Core processor.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 5080 is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon 8060S and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by 2.2%.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 750 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 360 W. It uses a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the stronger component?

A: The CPU ranks in the 92nd percentile, while the GPU ranks in the 87th percentile. The CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers, but both are high-end components.

Q: Does the GPU support the latest APIs?

A: Yes, the RTX 5080 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the release date of this CPU?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F was released on 2024-01-07, and the RTX 5080 was released on 2025-01-29.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, meaning these are expectations rather than verified results.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8637 indicates strong DirectX 12 gaming performance. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 5583) will be the primary driver of frame rates, and the GPU will not be the bottleneck. Expect very high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU capable of pushing well over 144 FPS in competitive games.

At 1440p, the GPU's rendering power becomes more significant. The PassMark G3D score of 36565 suggests that the RTX 5080 can handle high refresh rates at this resolution in most games. The 16 GB of GDDR7 memory with 960.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that high-resolution textures will not cause stuttering. Frame rates should remain above 100 FPS in demanding titles.

At 4K resolution, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The 87th percentile ranking means this is a high-end GPU, but 4K rendering is extremely demanding. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8637 indicates that the GPU can handle 4K at playable frame rates, but users may need to adjust settings from "Ultra" to "High" in the most demanding games to maintain smooth performance. The FP32 throughput of 56.28 TFLOPS supports this level of rendering load.

Ray tracing performance is supported by the 84 RT cores. Titles with heavy ray tracing effects will see a performance impact, but the dedicated hardware ensures this is less severe than on non-RT GPUs. The tensor cores (336) provide DLSS acceleration, which can boost frame rates in supported games. The Vulkan score of 255450 suggests strong performance in Vulkan-based titles.

Overall, this system is estimated to deliver excellent gaming performance across all resolutions, with the CPU capable of high frame rates in esports and the GPU handling demanding AAA titles at high settings. These estimates are derived from benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations until measured FPS data becomes available.