SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing of the Intel Core i9-14900F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 presents one of the most extreme performance asymmetries in the database. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop flagship built on the Raptor Lake architecture, capable of a 5.80 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a 4 GB entry-level accelerator built on the older Ampere architecture. Benchmark results confirm this divergence: the processor sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card ranks at the 18th percentile among all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 55, indicating that the overall performance profile is dragged down significantly by the graphics subsystem, making this configuration suitable only for specific CPU-bound workloads rather than balanced gaming or content creation.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. The die size is 257 mm², and the chip features a hybrid design with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a maximum boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support, which is a notable feature for workstation reliability. The CPU has a 65 W TDP and uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, with PCIe Gen 5 connectivity providing 16 lanes from the CPU. There is no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory.

In multi-threaded benchmarks, the Core i9-14900F delivers exceptional results. It scores 39,551 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 16,611 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 3,986 in Cinebench R15 multi-core. The PassMark multi-thread score is 46,532, and the Geekbench multi-core score is 20,008. These numbers place the CPU in the top 8% of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 60,008. When compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows a near-tie with the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, which scores 60,099 (a delta of -0.2%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX, which scores 60,104 (a delta of -0.2%). The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D scores 59,641 (a delta of +0.6% in favor of the Intel chip), and the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T scores 60,572 (a delta of -0.9%). This means the Core i9-14900F is statistically indistinguishable from the top competing desktop and mobile HX-series parts in aggregate CPU performance.

Single-thread performance is equally strong. The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 5,583, the Cinebench R20 single-core score is 2,344, and the PassMark single-thread score is 4,506. The Geekbench single-core score is 2,570. These results indicate that the 5.80 GHz boost clock is effective for lightly threaded workloads such as office applications, web browsing, and legacy software. For integer math, the PassMark score is 177,066, while floating-point math reaches 119,550. Data compression performance is particularly high at 564,207 in PassMark, and data encryption scores 34,644. Extended instruction set performance is 31,084, and the find prime numbers test yields 209. The physics test in PassMark scores 2,899, and random string sorting scores 63,728. These numbers point to a processor that excels at heavy computational tasks, including software compilation, scientific simulations, and batch data processing, while maintaining excellent responsiveness in single-threaded scenarios.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the database. The FACT PACK confirms that no measuredFps data exists, so all frame rate discussion here must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components, not from direct testing of the pair. The dataIsMeasured field is false, which means the following figures are qualitative and should be used for understanding the performance ceiling rather than as exact expectations.

The Core i9-14900F provides more than enough CPU headroom for any gaming workload, as its 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs ensures that it will not be the limiting factor in frame generation. The bottleneck will almost certainly be the RTX 4010 GPU. With a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,893, the GPU sits at the 18th percentile among all graphics cards, which is a very low position. In modern titles at high or ultra settings, the RTX 4010's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth will constrain performance severely, likely resulting in playable frame rates only at 1080p with reduced settings or in older, less demanding games. The GPU's 2.706 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 16 ROPs will limit pixel throughput, and the 64-bit memory bus will cause stuttering in texture-heavy scenes. Estimated frame rates in AAA titles at 1080p ultra would likely fall below 30 FPS in many cases, while esports titles like CS2 or Valorant could run at higher frame rates but will still be limited by the GPU's low fill rate and memory bandwidth. At 1440p or 4K, the RTX 4010 would struggle to maintain playable frame rates in anything beyond the lightest titles, and the CPU's power would be wasted. The data suggests that for high-refresh gaming, this GPU is the wrong pairing, and users should expect to lower settings significantly to achieve smooth gameplay.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Core i9-14900F is fully capable of driving frame rates above 144 FPS in CPU-bound scenarios, as its single-thread score of 4,506 in PassMark and 5,583 in Cinebench R23 indicate. However, the RTX 4010's low percentile ranking (18th) and 2.706 TFLOPS of compute will cap frame rates well below what the CPU can deliver. Users targeting 144 Hz or higher should not consider this GPU for modern titles, as the estimated performance would fall far short of that target at any resolution above 720p.

Streaming: The CPU's 32 threads and high multi-core scores, including a 39,551 Cinebench R23 multi-core result, make it excellent for software encoding while gaming. The PassMark data compression score of 564,207 and encryption score of 34,644 further support efficient encoding workloads. However, the GPU's lack of performance will limit the gaming side of the stream, making this pairing impractical for live streaming of demanding titles unless the game is set to very low settings and low resolution.

Video editing: The Core i9-14900F excels in video editing workloads, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 46,532 and floating-point math score of 119,550 that indicate strong rendering performance in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with timeline scrubbing and effect processing. The RTX 4010's 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth will, however, limit GPU-accelerated effects and 4K preview rendering, making this a CPU-only editing machine with minimal GPU acceleration for export.

3D rendering: In CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or V-Ray, the Core i9-14900F will perform admirably, with its 24 cores and 32 threads providing near-workstation-level throughput. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20,008 and Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3,986 support this. GPU rendering with the RTX 4010, by contrast, will be very slow due to the 2.706 TFLOPS compute and 24 tensor cores, which are minimal for this workload. The CPU should be the primary render device here.

Software development: The Core i9-14900F is a top-tier choice for compilation and code analysis, as the PassMark integer math score of 177,066 and random string sorting score of 63,728 indicate rapid handling of large codebases and binary data. The 32 threads will keep build times low in parallel compilation, and the single-thread performance ensures fast IDE responsiveness. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, so this pairing works well for developers, provided they do not need GPU acceleration for machine learning or graphics programming.

Student and office work: For typical office tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, the Core i9-14900F is massively overqualified, but it will provide instant responsiveness. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,506 ensures smooth operation. The RTX 4010 is sufficient for 2D desktop acceleration and video playback, and its single-slot, low-profile design (163 mm length, 69 mm height) makes it easy to fit in small cases. The low 50 W TDP of the GPU and 65 W TDP of the CPU also mean low power consumption for everyday use, though the system's potential is wasted in this scenario.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the Core i9-14900F and the RTX 4010 is stark, and the data clearly identifies the GPU as the limiting factor in any graphics-related workload. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 18th percentile creates a situation where the CPU will be idle waiting for the GPU to complete frame rendering. In gaming, the GPU's low fill rate (28.19 GPixel/s) and texture rate (42.29 GTexel/s) will cap frame rates, while the CPU's 5.80 GHz boost clock will have no effect on improving FPS once the GPU is saturated. The FPS scaling evidence is indirect but consistent: the GPU's 3DMark score of 2,893 is only 3.5% lower than the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB's score of 2,907, yet the RTX 4010 has only 4 GB of VRAM versus 16 GB, meaning that any game exceeding 4 GB of VRAM will cause severe drops, stuttering, or outright crashes. For compute workloads like 3D rendering, the CPU will dominate, and the GPU's 2.706 TFLOPS will be a minor contributor. For video encoding, the CPU's high multi-thread scores will handle the load, while the GPU's 24 tensor cores are too few to accelerate AI-based encoding features effectively. In short, the CPU is the bottleneck for CPU-bound tasks, but the GPU is the bottleneck for virtually all graphics and GPU-compute tasks, making the system poorly balanced for any unified workload.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is based on the Ampere architecture, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process node, with a chip designated GA107. The die contains 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² area, giving a transistor density of 43.5 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 16 raster operation units (ROPs). It features 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, which provide hardware support for ray tracing and DLSS, respectively, though the low core counts limit their effectiveness. The base clock is 1417 MHz, and the boost clock is 1762 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, running at 1500 MHz with a 12 Gbps effective data rate, yielding a bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s. This is a very narrow memory interface, which will severely constrain performance in modern games that require high bandwidth.

The pixel rate is 28.19 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is rated at 2.706 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 2.706 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating that the GPU does not have specialized FP16 acceleration. The TDP is 50 W, and the card is single-slot with no external power connectors, drawing all power from the PCIe slot. The suggested PSU is 250 W, which is very low. The card uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 4010's benchmark score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 is 2,893, placing it at the 18th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (score 2,907, delta -0.5%), RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (score 2,910, delta -0.6%), RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (score 2,913, delta -0.7%), and Quadro P600 (score 2,923, delta -1%). This means the RTX 4010 performs slightly below the RTX 4060 Ti in this specific benchmark, but with only 4 GB of VRAM, it is not comparable in real-world scenarios where memory capacity matters. The GPU's performance is adequate for basic 2D tasks, light photo editing, and older games, but it is not suitable for modern AAA gaming or professional rendering workloads.

Who Should Build It

This system is not a typical gaming build. The data suggests it is intended for users who need massive CPU compute power but have minimal graphics requirements. Target users include software developers who compile large codebases and run virtual machines, benefiting from the 32 threads and 36 MB L3 cache. Students in computer science or engineering fields who run simulations or data analysis in MATLAB, Python, or R will see excellent performance from the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 177,066 and floating-point score of 119,550. Small business workstations that handle database queries, spreadsheets, and document processing will be more than served by the CPU's single-thread score of 4,506, while the low-power GPU keeps the system quiet and cool. For content creators, the system is viable only for CPU-based rendering and video encoding, as the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth will choke GPU-accelerated tasks. Gamers should avoid this pairing unless they exclusively play light esports titles at 1080p with low settings, where the RTX 4010's 2.706 TFLOPS might suffice. The system is also suitable for headless servers or compute nodes where the GPU is merely for display output, given the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are uniformly strong. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3,986 multi-core and 562 single-core. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 16,611 multi-core and 2,344 single-core. Cinebench R23 yields 39,551 multi-core and 5,583 single-core. Geekbench results are 20,008 multi-core and 2,570 single-core. PassMark scores include 564,207 for data compression, 34,644 for data encryption, 31,084 for extended instructions, 209 for find prime numbers, 119,550 for floating-point math, 177,066 for integer math, 46,532 for multi-thread, 2,899 for physics, 63,728 for random string sorting, and 4,506 for single-thread. The CPU's average benchmark score is 60,008, and its percentile is 92. The GPU's only benchmark score is 2,893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with an average score of 2,893 and a percentile of 18. The combined percentile of the system is 55. This combined picture shows a processor that is among the best available, but a GPU that is among the weakest in the database. The system's overall performance is therefore entirely dependent on the workload: CPU-heavy tasks will perform at near-flagship levels, while GPU-heavy tasks will perform at entry-level levels.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i9-14900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, but the motherboard must be capable of delivering enough power for the 24-core chip under load. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for future high-end GPUs. The RTX 4010 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is fine for its bandwidth needs but means the PCIe Gen 5 lanes are unused. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives builders flexibility, but for maximum performance, DDR5 is recommended given the CPU's high core count. The GPU's suggested PSU is 250 W, and its TDP is 50 W, so the power supply in a system with this CPU will need to account for the CPU's boost behavior, which can draw significantly more than the 65 W TDP. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RTX 4010 with a more capable GPU, as the CPU can easily support any modern graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking means it will remain relevant for several years, so the upgrade path is clear: keep the CPU and motherboard, upgrade the GPU to a model with more VRAM and higher compute throughput. The socket 1700 platform is mature, and the CPU's 36 MB L3 cache and 32 threads will not limit future software. The lack of an unlocked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked is false) means overclocking is not possible, but the 5.80 GHz boost clock already provides high single-thread performance. The integrated graphics are absent, so the RTX 4010 must remain in the system for display output, even if it is not used for compute. The platform's support for ECC memory is a plus for workstation use, though it requires compatible motherboards and memory modules.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-14900F faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX?

A: In aggregate benchmark scores, the two are nearly identical. The Core i9-14900F has an average benchmark score of 60,008, while the Ryzen 9 7945HX scores 60,099, a delta of -0.2% in favor of the AMD chip. This difference is within statistical noise.

Q: Can the RTX 4010 handle modern games at 1080p?

A: Based on its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,893 and 18th percentile ranking, the RTX 4010 can only handle modern games at 1080p with low or medium settings. The 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth will cause severe limitations in texture-heavy titles.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this system?

A: The combined percentile is 55, which reflects the high CPU percentile (92) being dragged down by the low GPU percentile (18). This system is better suited for CPU-bound tasks than for gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads.

Q: Does the Core i9-14900F support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the FACT PACK lists eccMemory as true. This makes the CPU suitable for workstation builds that require error-correcting memory for data integrity.

Q: What power supply is recommended for the RTX 4010?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 4010 is 250 W. The GPU itself has a 50 W TDP and does not require external power connectors.

Q: How does the RTX 4010 compare to the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB in 3DMark Steel Nomad?

A: The RTX 4010 scores 2,893, while the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB scores 2,907, a delta of -0.5%. Despite the similar score, the RTX 4060 Ti has 16 GB of VRAM versus 4 GB, making it far more capable in real-world scenarios.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4010?

A: The RTX 4010 has a memory bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s, provided by 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus running at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective).

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds