SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP represents a striking asymmetry in a desktop build. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread powerhouse based on the Raptor Lake Refresh architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, placing it firmly in the high-end desktop segment. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, includes ECC memory support, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Its thermal design power is rated at 65 W, which is notably modest for a Core i9, suggesting careful power management despite the high core count.

In terms of cache hierarchy, the i9-14900F offers 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a substantial 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration is designed to feed the 24 cores and 32 threads efficiently, particularly in workloads that exhibit high data locality. The processor’s benchmark scores reflect its positioning. In Cinebench R23, it achieves a multicore score of 39551 and a singlecore score of 5583. The Geekbench results show a multicore score of 20008 and a singlecore score of 2570. These figures place the CPU in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market.

The nearest rivals provide context for these scores. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX both show an average benchmark score of approximately 60099 and 60104, respectively, with a deltaPct of -0.2 relative to the i9-14900F. This means the Intel chip is essentially tied with these mobile-class AMD parts, trailing by a negligible 0.2%. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, with a score of 59641, is 0.6% ahead of the i9-14900F, while the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T, at 60572, is 0.9% ahead. These small deltas indicate that the i9-14900F sits in a competitive performance cluster, where differences of less than one percent are within the margin of benchmark variance.

The PassMark suite provides additional insight into specialized workloads. The processor scores 564207 in data compression, 34644 in data encryption, and 31084 in extended instructions. Floating point math yields a score of 119550, while integer math reaches 177066. The multithread score is 46532, and the single-thread score is 4506. Physics processing is measured at 2899, and random string sorting at 63728. The average benchmark score across all tests is 60008, which aligns with the percentile ranking. For real workloads, these numbers translate to exceptional multi-threaded performance for video rendering, software compilation, and scientific computing. The single-thread performance, while not class-leading, is more than sufficient for everyday tasks and many gaming scenarios.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for this build is entirely CPU-centric, as the GPU’s benchmark array is empty and its average benchmark score is zero. The i9-14900F’s performance is well-documented across multiple suites. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 3986 and singlecore score of 562 are the oldest tests in the set, but they still show strong scaling from single to multi-core. The R20 results, with a multicore score of 16611 and singlecore score of 2344, continue this trend. The R23 scores, which are the most current of the Cinebench series, demonstrate a 7.06x improvement from singlecore to multicore, which is typical for a high-core-count processor.

The Geekbench scores of 20008 multicore and 2570 singlecore provide a cross-platform comparison. The PassMark suite paints a broader picture, with the multithread score of 46532 being particularly notable. This score is a composite of various integer, floating point, and encryption tasks, and it confirms that the CPU excels in parallel workloads. The data compression score of 564207 is exceptionally high, indicating strong performance in archiving, file transfers, and database operations. The encryption score of 34644 shows that the CPU can handle cryptographic tasks efficiently, which is relevant for VPNs and secure communications.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 71, while the CPU alone sits in the 92nd percentile. The GPU, by contrast, is in the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This discrepancy is critical. The CPU is a top-tier part, while the GPU is a mid-range part. The average benchmark score of 60008 for the CPU places it alongside the aforementioned rivals, with deltas ranging from -0.9% to +0.6%. This means that in CPU-bound tasks, the i9-14900F will perform nearly identically to the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and Ryzen 7 8745HX, and it will be virtually indistinguishable from the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D in most workloads. The Xeon Gold 6338T is slightly ahead, but again by less than one percent.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that is vastly overqualified for the GPU it is paired with. In synthetic CPU benchmarks, this build will rank near the top. In synthetic GPU benchmarks, it will rank in the middle of the pack. This imbalance means that the overall build performance will be heavily influenced by the GPU’s capabilities in graphics-intensive tasks, while the CPU’s potential will be underutilized in such scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates a significant bottleneck in this configuration. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking creates a situation where the processor is capable of far more than the graphics card can deliver. In CPU-bound workloads, such as video transcoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the i9-14900F will operate at its full potential, and the GPU will have minimal impact. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39551 and the PassMark multithread score of 46532 demonstrate that the CPU can handle these tasks with ease.

In GPU-bound workloads, such as gaming at high resolutions, the RTX 3060 will be the limiting factor. The CPU’s high frame rate potential, driven by its 5.80 GHz boost clock and 36 MB of L3 cache, will be constrained by the GPU’s rendering capacity. The data shows that the CPU’s single-thread performance, with a Geekbench singlecore score of 2570, is more than sufficient to drive high frame rates, but the GPU’s 14.22 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will not be able to keep pace in graphically intensive scenes.

The FPS scaling in this build will be poor in GPU-bound scenarios. As resolution increases, the CPU’s advantage will become less relevant, and the GPU’s performance will dominate. Conversely, at lower resolutions, the CPU may be able to push higher frame rates, but only up to the point where the GPU becomes saturated. The 65 W TDP of the CPU, combined with the 185 W TDP of the GPU, suggests a system that is not power-hungry by high-end standards, but the performance imbalance remains stark. The 71st combined percentile reflects this compromise, indicating that the build is better than average overall, but not exceptional due to the GPU’s mid-range status.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is suited for users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks but also need a functional GPU for moderate gaming. The i9-14900F’s 24 cores and 32 threads make it an excellent choice for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and large-scale data processing. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39551 indicates that video export and render jobs will complete quickly. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the PassMark integer math score of 177066 and the multithread score of 46532.

For gamers, this build is a mixed proposition. At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 5583, will allow for high frame rates in less demanding titles, but the RTX 3060 will limit performance in graphically intense games. At 1440p, the GPU will become the primary bottleneck, and the CPU’s advantages will be largely irrelevant. This build is not ideal for high-refresh gaming at 1440p or 4K, but it can handle 1080p gaming with reasonable settings.

Students and small business workstations will find the CPU’s performance useful for multitasking, running virtual machines, and data analysis. The PassMark data compression score of 564207 and encryption score of 34644 indicate strong performance in database operations and secure communications. However, the 6 GB GPU memory may be a limitation for some professional applications that require large model loading or high-resolution textures. This build is best suited for those who need a high-performance workstation CPU and are willing to accept a mid-range GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i9-14900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This provides flexibility in memory selection, though the dual-channel memory bus means that memory bandwidth will be shared across all cores. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is a forward-looking feature, though the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The motherboard must be chosen carefully to ensure that the CPU’s power delivery and memory compatibility are adequate, given the 65 W TDP.

The suggested PSU for the RTX 3060 is 450 W, which is quite modest. The CPU’s 65 W TDP, combined with the GPU’s 185 W TDP, suggests that a 450 W power supply is the minimum requirement, and a higher wattage unit would provide more headroom for overclocking or future upgrades. The CPU’s multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not possible, but the boost clock of 5.80 GHz is already high.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU. The CPU has the headroom to support a GPU that is several tiers above the RTX 3060. Given the CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking, it will not bottleneck a high-end graphics card in most scenarios. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU ensures that future GPUs using the newer interface will be compatible, though current GPUs are PCIe 4.0. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that users can upgrade memory without changing the motherboard, provided the board supports the chosen type. The platform is mature, and the CPU’s production status is active, so replacement parts should be readily available.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F has 24 cores and 32 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 60008, which is 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX, 0.6% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, and 0.9% higher than the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the CPU and GPU pairing is 71, with the CPU in the 92nd percentile and the GPU in the 50th percentile.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900F has ECC memory support, which is beneficial for workstation stability.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 is 450 W.

Q: What is the release date of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F was released on 2024-01-07.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of the Intel Core i9-14900F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 5583 and a Geekbench singlecore score of 2570, indicates that it can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU’s 14.22 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 88.90 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest that it can handle modern games at 1080p with medium to high settings.

At 1080p, the CPU will rarely be the bottleneck, and the GPU will be the limiting factor in most titles. The RTX 3060’s 6 GB of VRAM may be insufficient for games with high-resolution textures, leading to potential stuttering or reduced texture quality. At 1440p, the GPU’s performance will drop further, and the CPU’s advantage will be largely irrelevant. The 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores provide hardware support for ray tracing and DLSS, but the GPU’s mid-range position means that ray tracing at high settings will be demanding. Estimated frame rates are likely to be in the playable range for esports titles at 1080p, but more demanding AAA games will require reduced settings to achieve smooth gameplay.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that combines a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU. The Intel Core i9-14900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor that ranks in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, making it one of the most powerful processors available. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP is a 30-series GPU that ranks in the 50th percentile, positioning it as an average performer. The combined percentile of 71 reflects the fact that this build is better than most, but not exceptional, due to the GPU’s limitations.

The build class is desktop, and it is intended for users who need massive CPU performance for productivity tasks. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is remarkably low for its core count, which suggests efficient power usage. The GPU’s 185 W TDP is typical for its class. The overall tier of this build is high-end CPU with mid-range graphics, which creates an imbalance that favors CPU-bound workloads. This is not a balanced gaming rig, but it is a potent workstation for content creation and development.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build is not ideal for high-refresh gaming at 1440p or 4K, as the RTX 3060 will be the limiting factor. At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance can push high frame rates in less demanding titles, but the GPU will cap performance in AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads are excellent for streaming, as they can handle both the game and the encoding workload. The PassMark multithread score of 46532 indicates that the CPU can handle x264 encoding at high presets without significant frame drops.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39551 and Geekbench multicore score of 20008 indicate that video editing software will run smoothly, with fast export times and responsive timeline scrubbing.

3D rendering: The CPU’s high core count and 36 MB of L3 cache make it well-suited for 3D rendering. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 16611 confirms that CPU-based renderers will perform strongly.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 177066 and data compression score of 564207 indicate that code compilation and version control operations will be fast. The 32 threads will handle parallel builds efficiently.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for basic office tasks, but the CPU’s performance ensures that multitasking and large spreadsheet calculations are handled with ease. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running computations.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP is based on the Ampere architecture, manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process. The GA106 chip contains 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die, with a transistor density of 43.5 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 3840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 render output units. It also includes 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores, which provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS.

The memory subsystem consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. The core clocks are 1627 MHz base and 1852 MHz boost. The pixel rate is 88.90 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 222.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 14.22 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 14.22 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio.

For rendering, the GPU’s benchmark scores are empty, but its specifications indicate it is a capable 1080p card. The 6 GB VRAM is a limitation for modern games with high-resolution textures, and the 192-bit bus restricts bandwidth. The RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the GPU’s mid-range position means that ray tracing performance will be moderate. The tensor cores enable DLSS, which can improve frame rates by rendering at a lower resolution and upscaling. The GPU is end-of-life, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, and it requires a 450 W PSU. The GPU is a dual-slot card with a 1x 12-pin power connector.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds