SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

22,549 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-14900F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT: A High-Core Desktop Pairing with a Balanced Profile

This desktop build combines Intel's 24-core Core i9-14900F processor with AMD's Radeon RX 7700 XT graphics card, creating a system that targets the 80th percentile overall among all benchmarked configurations. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 67th percentile among all graphics cards, indicating a configuration where the processor substantially outpaces the graphics subsystem in raw compute capability. No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate discussion in this analysis is estimated from the individual benchmark scores rather than derived from direct testing.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 28,100 million transistors across a 346 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1435 MHz, a boost clock of 2544 MHz, and a game clock of 2171 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz for 18 Gbps effective throughput. The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory sits on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a configuration that supports high-resolution textures and complex scenes without immediate capacity constraints.

The shading array includes 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs, with 54 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU does not list tensor cores, meaning AI-accelerated workloads rely on the standard compute pipeline rather than dedicated tensor hardware. Pixel throughput reaches 244.2 GPixel/s, while texture fill hits 549.5 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute peaks at 35.17 TFLOPS with FP16 running at the same 1:1 rate. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility for modern titles and rendering applications.

Benchmark results place the RX 7700 XT at the 67th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 22549. Its nearest rivals show a tightly clustered field: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile scores 22435 (0.5% lower), the RTX 4060 Mobile scores 22729 (0.8% higher), the RTX 2080 scores 22895 (1.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 scores 22170 (1.7% lower). This indicates the RX 7700 XT performs essentially at parity with these competitors — the largest delta among the four nearest rivals is only 1.7%, making the performance envelope very narrow. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 3316, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores reach 138383 and 46443 respectively. PassMark results show a G3D score of 22547, with DirectX 11 scoring 232 and DirectX 12 scoring 79 — the latter suggesting that DX12-optimized workloads may not scale as well as DX11 in some scenarios, despite the hardware supporting the latest API features.

For rendering workloads, the 12 GB VRAM capacity and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate headroom for 1440p texture sets and moderate 4K usage, while the 54 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the 67th percentile ranking suggests it will not lead the field in RT-heavy scenes. The 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput supports compute-intensive rendering tasks like real-time previews and GPU-accelerated effects, though the 1:1 FP16 ratio means there is no half-precision advantage for AI inference workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i9-14900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor itself, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for the latest storage and expansion cards. The platform supports ECC memory, which is relevant for workstation and server-adjacent use cases where data integrity is critical.

The CPU's thermal design power is rated at 65 W, while the GPU's TDP is 245 W, and the suggested power supply for the graphics card is 550 W. The combined thermal envelope of approximately 310 W for the two primary components leaves substantial headroom within a 550 W PSU budget, allowing for additional drives, fans, and moderate overclocking of other components. The GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors and occupies a dual-slot form factor, measuring 267 mm in length, 135 mm in height, and 50 mm in width.

A sensible next upgrade path depends on workload priorities. For users who find the GPU limiting in gaming scenarios, the RX 7700 XT's 67th percentile ranking is the weaker link in this pairing, so a GPU upgrade would yield the most noticeable performance gains. The PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface on the GPU is fully compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 lanes, though the GPU will operate at Gen 4 speeds, which does not bottleneck current graphics cards. For memory, the platform's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means users can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, depending on motherboard selection. The CPU's 65 W TDP and unlocked multiplier status (multiplierUnlocked: false) indicate this is a locked processor, so overclocking headroom is limited, but the generous PSU headroom means future component additions are unlikely to require a power supply upgrade.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-14900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename. It runs on a 10 nm process node from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, includes ECC support, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes. It has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory, and it was released on January 7, 2024, with an active production status.

Benchmark results place the i9-14900F at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60008. The nearest rivals show remarkably tight competition: the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX scores 60099 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX scores 60104 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D scores 59641 (0.6% lower), and the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T scores 60572 (0.9% higher). The maximum delta among these four competitors is just 0.9%, indicating the i9-14900F sits in an extremely competitive performance tier where no single processor holds a meaningful advantage.

Cinebench results show strong multicore scaling: Cinebench R15 multicore scores 3986 with single-core at 562, R20 multicore reaches 16611 with single-core at 2344, and R23 multicore hits 39551 with single-core at 5583. Geekbench scores are 20008 for multicore and 2570 for single-core. PassMark results are extensive: multithread scores 46532, single-thread scores 4506, integer math scores 177066, floating-point math scores 119550, data compression scores 564207, data encryption scores 34644, extended instructions score 31084, find prime numbers scores 209, physics scores 2899, and random string sorting scores 63728.

The 24-core, 32-thread configuration with a 5.80 GHz boost clock provides exceptional parallel throughput for heavily threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The 92nd percentile ranking means this CPU outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database, and the single-core score of 5583 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong per-thread performance that benefits gaming and lightly threaded applications. The data encryption score of 34644 and extended instructions score of 31084 suggest solid performance in security and SIMD-heavy workloads, while the data compression score of 564207 indicates robust performance in archival and compression tasks.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who need substantial CPU compute power alongside a mid-tier GPU. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking and 24-core configuration make it ideal for content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, where multicore performance directly translates to reduced render times and faster compilation. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39551 and PassMark multithread score of 46532 confirm that heavily parallel workloads will execute efficiently, while the single-core score of 5583 in Cinebench R23 supports responsive application performance in less threaded tasks.

Gamers targeting 1440p or 4K resolutions will find the RX 7700 XT's 67th percentile ranking adequate for high-detail gaming, though the 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit the most demanding titles at 4K with maximum textures. The GPU's direct rivals — the RTX 2080 and RTX 4060 Mobile — perform within 1.5% of the RX 7700 XT, establishing this card as a solid mid-range option rather than a high-end solution. For 1080p gaming, the GPU's performance is likely to be more than sufficient, with the CPU's strong single-core performance ensuring high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, which accelerate parallel compilation and test execution, while the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds and server-like workloads. Students and small business workstations that run virtual machines, data analysis, or office productivity suites will find the CPU's multicore headroom valuable, though the GPU may be more than needed for purely office-oriented tasks. The build's combined 80th percentile ranking positions it as a high-performance desktop suitable for power users who require CPU-heavy workloads with capable but not flagship graphics.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the i9-14900F and RX 7700 XT is asymmetric, with the CPU at the 92nd percentile and the GPU at the 67th percentile — a 25-percentage-point gap that defines the bottleneck profile. In gaming workloads at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 5583) can drive high frame rates, but the GPU's 67th percentile ranking will limit maximum FPS in graphically intensive scenes. At higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as pixel throughput of 244.2 GPixel/s and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth constrain performance more than the CPU's processing capability.

In CPU-bound workloads such as 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation, the i9-14900F's 24 cores provide massive parallel throughput, and the GPU's 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 compute can assist in GPU-accelerated tasks, but the CPU will dominate overall execution time. The PassMark physics score of 2899 and floating-point math score of 119550 indicate strong CPU compute, meaning the GPU is unlikely to bottleneck in compute-heavy scenarios unless the workload is specifically GPU-optimized.

The nearest rival deltas reinforce this imbalance. The CPU's closest rival, the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T, scores 0.9% higher, while the GPU's closest rival, the RTX 2080, scores 1.5% higher — in both cases, the differences are minimal, so neither component represents a clear performance outlier relative to its peers. However, the absolute percentile gap between the components means that upgrading the GPU would provide the most significant performance gains in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, while the CPU would remain the strong foundation for compute-intensive tasks.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so the following gaming performance discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as projections rather than verified results. The RX 7700 XT's 67th percentile ranking among GPUs, with a PassMark G3D score of 22547 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316, suggests it performs similarly to the NVIDIA RTX 2080 and RTX 4060 Mobile, which are its nearest rivals with deltas of 1.5% and 0.8% respectively.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the GPU's 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 244.2 GPixel/s pixel rate should deliver high frame rates in most titles, though the DirectX 12 PassMark score of 79 indicates that DX12-optimized games may not scale as well as DX11 titles, where the score reaches 232. The 12 GB VRAM provides ample capacity for 1080p textures, and the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high detail levels without memory bottlenecks. The CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 5583) ensures that frame pacing and CPU-bound scenarios like open-world games or large battle scenes will not be limited by the processor.

At 1440p, the GPU's performance will be more constrained, with the 67th percentile ranking suggesting frame rates will be moderate to high depending on title optimization. The 192-bit memory bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1440p, but the RTX 2080's comparable performance (1.5% higher score) provides a reference point: this GPU generation's performance level is well-established for 1440p gaming at high settings. At 4K, the GPU will likely struggle with ultra settings in demanding titles, and the 12 GB VRAM may become a limiting factor with maximum texture quality. Users targeting 4K should expect to reduce settings or rely on upscaling technologies.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's benchmark profile is defined by its 92nd percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 60008. Cinebench R23 multicore scores 39551, which is the most commonly referenced rendering benchmark, and single-core scores 5583. Geekbench multicore reaches 20008 with single-core at 2570. PassMark multithread scores 46532, single-thread scores 4506, and the comprehensive PassMark suite shows strong performance across integer math (177066), floating-point math (119550), data compression (564207), and data encryption (34644). The CPU's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, scores 60099, just 0.2% higher, and the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T scores 60572, 0.9% higher — all four nearest rivals are within 0.9% of the i9-14900F's average score, highlighting an extremely competitive performance tier.

The GPU's benchmark profile shows a 67th percentile ranking with an average score of 22549. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 138383 indicate solid compute capabilities, while PassMark G3D scores 22547 with DirectX 11 at 232 and DirectX 12 at 79. The nearest rivals — RTX 5060 Mobile at 22435 (0.5% lower), RTX 4060 Mobile at 22729 (0.8% higher), RTX 2080 at 22895 (1.5% higher), and RX 5700 at 22170 (1.7% lower) — show that the RX 7700 XT sits in a tightly packed performance band where no single card has a decisive edge.

Combined, this build achieves the 80th percentile among all configurations, reflecting a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer and the GPU is a solid mid-range option. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking places it among the best processors available, while the GPU's 67th percentile is respectable but not flagship-class. The combined picture is a desktop that excels in CPU-heavy workloads like rendering, encoding, and compilation, while providing competent but not exceptional gaming performance, particularly at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The build achieves the 80th percentile among all benchmarked configurations, with the CPU at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 67th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: How does the Core i9-14900F compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The i9-14900F's average benchmark score is 60008, with the closest rival being the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX at 60099 (0.2% higher), followed by the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX at 60104 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D at 59641 (0.6% lower), and the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T at 60572 (0.9% higher). All rivals are within 0.9% of the i9-14900F's score.

Q: What is the RX 7700 XT's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with memory running at 2250 MHz for 18 Gbps effective throughput, providing 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does the Core i9-14900F include integrated graphics?

A: No, the i9-14900F has no integrated graphics (listed as N/A), so a discrete GPU is required for display output and any graphics processing.

Q: What are the Cinebench R23 scores for the i9-14900F?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 39551, and the single-core score is 5583, reflecting strong performance in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads.

Q: How does the RX 7700 XT compare to the NVIDIA RTX 2080?

A: The RX 7700 XT scores an average of 22549, while the RTX 2080 scores 22895, making the RTX 2080 1.5% higher. Both GPUs sit in a tight performance band with the RX 7700 XT's other rivals also within 1.7% of its score.

Q: What power supply is suggested for the RX 7700 XT?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 7700 XT is 550 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 245 W with a 65 W TDP for the CPU, providing significant headroom within the recommended power budget.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the RX 7700 XT's 67th percentile ranking and 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 compute, combined with the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5583, should support high frame rates in most titles, though the DirectX 12 PassMark score of 79 suggests DX12-optimized games may not reach the same performance as DX11 titles, where the score is 232.

Streaming: The i9-14900F's 24 cores and 32 threads, with a PassMark multithread score of 46532, provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming, ensuring that streaming workloads do not compete with game performance for CPU resources.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39551 and Geekbench multicore score of 20008 indicate strong performance in video encoding and rendering timelines, while the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth support GPU-accelerated effects and preview rendering.

3D rendering: The CPU's 24-core configuration with a PassMark floating-point math score of 119550 excels in CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 54 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and GPU rendering, though the 67th percentile ranking means it will not lead in extreme render workloads.

Software development: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads accelerate parallel compilation, with PassMark integer math scoring 177066 and extended instructions scoring 31084, while the ECC memory support adds reliability for long build processes and server-like workloads.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 5583) ensures responsive application usage, and the 24-core configuration future-proofs for multitasking, though the GPU is likely overkill for basic office tasks, making this build more suited to power users than standard student or office environments.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build that pairs Intel's Core i9-14900F with AMD's Radeon RX 7700 XT, creating a high-performance system with a strong emphasis on CPU compute. The combined percentile ranking of 80 places this configuration in the upper tier of all benchmarked systems, though the internal balance is notably skewed: the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking is exceptional, while the GPU's 67th percentile is solidly mid-range. This pairing is best described as a CPU-centric desktop for users who prioritize multicore performance in rendering, encoding, and development workloads, with gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks as secondary considerations. The i9-14900F's 24 cores, 32 threads, and 5.80 GHz boost clock, alongside the RX 7700 XT's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, create a platform capable of handling demanding professional workloads while maintaining competent gaming performance at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. The build's 80th percentile overall tier reflects a system that is above average in every category but does not reach the top echelon in graphics performance, making it a balanced choice for users who need substantial CPU power without the cost or power requirements of a flagship GPU.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900F

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

FAQ

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds