SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of the Intel Core i9-14900F with the AMD Radeon RX 7400 presents a stark contrast in performance tiers. The processor is a 24-core desktop flagship ranking in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the graphics card is a low-power entry-level part sitting in the 17th percentile of all GPUs. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all frame-rate discussions below are estimated from the benchmark scores.

Gaming Performance

Because the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, the following frame-rate expectations are estimates derived solely from the benchmark scores of each component. The RX 7400's PassMark G3D score of 11,897 places it just 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon 8040S and 1.4% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 710M, which indicates that this GPU is positioned at the very entry level of gaming performance. In modern titles at 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU will be the primary constraint, and the data suggests that playable frame rates are likely only achievable at lower resolutions or with reduced graphical settings.

At 1080p ultra, the RX 7400's DirectX 12 score of 44 in PassMark is exceptionally low, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,103 reinforces that this card is not designed for high-detail gaming. The GPU's pixel rate of 147.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 257.6 GTexel/s are modest figures that cap performance in resolution-heavy scenes. For esports titles or older games, the 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth might suffice, but the FP32 compute of 16.49 TFLOPS is the limiting factor for sustained frame generation.

At 1440p, the situation worsens significantly. The RX 7400's bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s across a 128-bit bus is narrow, and the 64 ROPs will struggle with the increased pixel workload. Benchmark results indicate that the GPU's 17th percentile standing versus all GPUs means it competes with integrated graphics solutions, such as the Intel HD Graphics 610, which sits just 1.8% behind in average score. Consequently, 1440p ultra gaming is unrealistic; even medium settings would likely yield frame rates below 30 FPS in demanding titles.

For 4K gaming, the data is clear: this pairing is not viable. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 46,532 shows enormous headroom, but the GPU's DirectX 11 score of 97 and DirectX 10 score of 59 are among the lowest in the database. The RX 7400's 8 GB VRAM might be sufficient for older games at 4K with low settings, but the core compute capabilities are simply too weak to push modern 4K resolutions. The estimated frame rates at 4K ultra would be in the single digits for most AAA releases.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks are exceptional across the board. In Cinebench R23, the Core i9-14900F scores 39,551 in multi-core and 5,583 in single-core, placing it firmly in the high-end desktop segment. Geekbench results show 20,008 multi-core and 2,570 single-core, which aligns with the 92nd percentile ranking. The PassMark multi-thread score of 46,532 and single-thread score of 4,506 confirm that this processor handles both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads with ease. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, has an average score of 60,099, which is only 0.2% higher, meaning the i9-14900F is statistically tied with that flagship mobile chip.

The GPU benchmarks tell a completely different story. The RX 7400's PassMark G3D score of 11,897 yields a 17th percentile ranking, and its average benchmark score of 2,467 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M, which scores 2,422 (a 1.9% difference). In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 1,103, a result that places it in the company of entry-level integrated graphics. The PassMark GPU compute score of 5,152 is moderate, but the DirectX 9 score of 176 and G2D score of 1,209 suggest that the card has some legacy capability while lacking modern rendering muscle.

The combined picture is one of extreme imbalance. The CPU's average benchmark score of 60,008 is 24 times higher than the GPU's average of 2,467. The combined percentile for this build is 55, which reflects the CPU's strength pulling the overall score up against the GPU's weakness. For any workload that depends primarily on the CPU, this system will perform like a top-tier machine; for any workload that depends on the GPU, it will perform like a budget laptop.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming (144Hz+): This is not viable. The RX 7400's DirectX 12 score of 44 and 17th percentile ranking indicate that even at 1080p low settings, achieving 144 FPS in modern titles is implausible. The CPU can handle the frame generation, but the GPU cannot produce the frames.

Streaming: The CPU is well-suited for software encoding. The PassMark data compression score of 564,207 and integer math score of 177,066 provide ample headroom for x264 encoding while gaming. However, the GPU's weak output means the encoded stream will be of low-resolution or low-quality source material.

Video editing: The CPU excels here. Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 16,611 and PassMark floating point math score of 119,550 indicate fast rendering and effects processing. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 5152 compute score are sufficient for basic acceleration in editors, but complex GPU-accelerated effects will be slow.

3D rendering: Professional rendering in Blender or similar applications will be CPU-bound and fast. The i9-14900F's 24 cores and 32 threads deliver a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39,551, which is excellent. The RX 7400's 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 is weak for GPU rendering, and its 28 RT cores are not competitive for ray-traced workloads.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 177,066 and multithread score of 46,532. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 help with large codebases. The GPU is irrelevant for this scenario.

Student and office work: This is overkill on the CPU side. The single-core Geekbench score of 2,570 handles office suites instantly, but the GPU's PassMark G2D score of 1,209 is adequate only for basic 2D desktop rendering. For productivity, the system is massively overspent on the CPU and under-equipped on the GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck in this system is overwhelmingly the GPU. Benchmark results show the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking against the GPU's 17th percentile, a gap of 75 percentile points. In gaming, the RX 7400's DirectX 11 score of 97 and DirectX 12 score of 44 mean that the GPU will be saturated at all times, while the CPU's utilization will remain low. The i9-14900F could easily feed a GPU with four times the performance.

For CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, compression, or 3D scene processing, the CPU is the performance driver, and the GPU's role is minimal. The PassMark data encryption score of 34,644 and extended instructions score of 31,084 show that the CPU handles these tasks without needing GPU assistance. In mixed workloads, such as gaming while streaming, the CPU has enough headroom to encode video while the GPU renders frames, but the rendered frames will be low-quality due to the GPU's limits.

The FPS scaling evidence supports this imbalance. Since there is no measured FPS data, the estimated scaling from benchmark scores suggests that increasing resolution from 1080p to 1440p will halve frame rates because the GPU's pixel rate of 147.2 GPixel/s is fixed, while the CPU's frame generation capacity is far above what the GPU can consume. The CPU is not the bottleneck in any gaming scenario; the GPU is the sole limiting factor.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration is designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39,551, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D score of 59,641, though that comparison uses average benchmark scores.

The single-core performance is also strong, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2,570 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,506. This makes the processor responsive for everyday tasks and lightly threaded applications. The PassMark physics score of 2,899 and find prime numbers score of 209 are less impressive, indicating that the processor's strength lies in integer and floating-point math rather than specialized physics simulations.

For real workloads, the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking means it outperforms 92% of all CPUs in the database. The nearest rival, the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T, scores 60,572 on average, which is 0.9% higher, showing that this desktop chip competes with server-grade parts. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support, and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. It does not include integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks over gaming. Gamers at 1080p with low settings or playing older titles may find the RX 7400 acceptable, but the estimated frame rates from the GPU's 17th percentile ranking suggest that modern AAA games will be unplayable at ultra settings. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the CPU's 39,551 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 46,532 PassMark multithread score.

Software developers compiling large projects will see significant speedups from the 24 cores and 32 threads, with the PassMark integer math score of 177,066 indicating fast build times. Students and office workers would be vastly overserved by this CPU, as the single-core performance is more than sufficient for document editing and web browsing, but the GPU's G2D score of 1,209 is merely adequate for 2D desktop rendering. Small business workstations that run database queries, data analysis, or virtualization would leverage the CPU's 20008 Geekbench multi-core score effectively.

The target user is not a gamer but a professional who needs maximum CPU compute and only incidental graphics output. For anyone expecting to play recent games, the GPU will be a severe disappointment, with estimated performance comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M, which sits just 1.9% behind in average benchmark score.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip on a 6 nm process from TSMC. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, and the memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The GPU has 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 28 ray tracing cores. It does not have tensor cores, as this is an AMD part.

The clock speeds are modest: a base of 1452 MHz, a boost of 2300 MHz, and a game clock of 2200 MHz. The FP32 performance is 16.49 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 32.97 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 147.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 257.6 GTexel/s. These specifications produce a PassMark G3D score of 11,897 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,103, placing the GPU in the 17th percentile of all GPUs.

The benchmark scores for DirectX are remarkably low: DirectX 9 scores 176, DirectX 10 scores 59, DirectX 11 scores 97, and DirectX 12 scores 44. These figures indicate that the GPU is not optimized for modern API workloads. The PassMark GPU compute score of 5,152 is moderate, but the G2D score of 1,209 shows weak 2D acceleration. The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 8040S at 1.1% higher average score and the NVIDIA GeForce 710M at 1.4% higher, confirming that this GPU competes with decade-old integrated and entry-level discrete parts.

For rendering purposes, the RX 7400's 28 RT cores offer some ray tracing capability, but the low compute throughput means that ray-traced scenes will render slowly. The 8 GB VRAM is a plus for texture-heavy workloads, but the 128-bit bus limits memory-intensive operations. The GPU's TDP is 43 W, and it requires a 200 W PSU, making it power-efficient but also limiting its performance ceiling.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run modern games at 1080p ultra settings?

A: No. The RX 7400's DirectX 12 score of 44 and 17th percentile ranking indicate that ultra settings are not achievable. Estimated frame rates would be below playable thresholds for modern titles.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F has an average benchmark score of 60,008, which is 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX's 60,099 and 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D's 59,641.

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to other cards?

A: The RX 7400's average benchmark score of 2,467 is 1.1% higher than the AMD Radeon 8040S and 1.8% higher than the Intel HD Graphics 610, placing it at the very bottom of the GPU performance spectrum.

Q: Is the CPU good for video editing?

A: Yes. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39,551 and PassMark floating point math score of 119,550 indicate fast rendering and effects processing for video editing workloads.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 28 RT cores, but the low FP32 performance of 16.49 TFLOPS means ray-traced workloads will be slow.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 55, reflecting the CPU's high performance (92nd percentile) and the GPU's low performance (17th percentile) averaged together.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i9-14900F, a 24-core Raptor Lake processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 7400, an entry-level RDNA 3.0 GPU. The CPU is in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60,008, while the GPU is in the 17th percentile, with an average score of 2,467. The combined percentile of 55 places this system in the middle of the database, but the distribution is highly skewed.

The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is defined by the CPU's flagship status and the GPU's entry-level status. The CPU's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, which scores 60,099 (0.2% higher), and the GPU's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon 8040S, which scores 2,440 (1.1% lower). This pairing is fundamentally a workstation CPU with a display-output GPU attached; it is not a balanced gaming or graphics workstation.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform with PCIe Gen 5 providing 16 lanes from the CPU. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC support. The system's TDP for the CPU is 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 43 W with a suggested PSU of 200 W, leaving substantial headroom for a future GPU upgrade.

The most sensible next upgrade is replacing the RX 7400 with a higher-performing GPU. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking and average score of 60,008 indicate it can drive much faster graphics cards without bottlenecking. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU is a limitation, but modern GPUs with PCIe 4.0 x16 will work in the same slot. The 200 W suggested PSU is low; a more powerful GPU would require a PSU upgrade, but the platform itself can support it.

For memory, the dual-channel DDR5 support allows for high-bandwidth configurations, though the exact supported speeds are not listed. The 36 MB L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 are fixed, so the next logical CPU upgrade would be to a newer socket, as the LGA 1700 platform is at the end of its generation. The CPU's ECC memory support is a professional feature that may justify keeping this platform for workstation use.