SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

27,425 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900F pairs a high-core-count desktop processor with a mid-range RDNA 2 graphics card, creating a system with a pronounced performance imbalance. This build is a desktop-class configuration, and its combined benchmark percentile of 82 places it in the upper tier of all systems. The core issue is that the CPU’s capabilities vastly outstrip the GPU’s, meaning the Radeon RX 6700 XT will almost always be the limiting factor in gaming and graphics-bound tasks. The data shows a clear hierarchy: for workloads like video encoding, software compilation, and 3D rendering that leverage all 24 cores and 32 threads, the i9-14900F is a powerhouse. However, for real-time graphics, the RX 6700 XT’s performance ceiling is far lower, capping the system’s potential at resolutions and settings that respect its 12 GB memory buffer and 13.21 TFLOPS of compute power. This pairing is logical for a creator who also games, but it is not a balanced gaming-first machine.

Balance and Bottleneck

The foundational data indicates that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all performance discussion must be framed as an estimation based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. In this configuration, the bottleneck profile is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 60008 places it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU’s average score of 27425 places it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. This 20-percentile gap is the most critical number for understanding system balance; the CPU is objectively a more powerful component relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its own peers.

In gaming workloads, the Radeon RX 6700 XT will be the primary constraint. The GPU’s 13.21 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 384.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth set a hard limit on frame generation. At 1080p and 1440p, where the CPU’s high single-thread score of 5583 in Cinebench R23 can feed frames quickly, the GPU will likely be saturated. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4506 ensures it can handle the draw calls and game logic of modern titles without bottlenecking the GPU. However, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 19786, while respectable, is the limiting factor. The data suggests that lowering resolution to 1080p will not yield proportionally higher frame rates because the GPU’s rendering pipeline, with its 2560 shading units and 64 ROPs, is the bottleneck.

For non-gaming tasks, the bottleneck shifts entirely to the CPU, but this is a positive trait. The i9-14900F’s multi-threaded might, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 20008, allows it to handle heavy parallel workloads like 3D rendering or data compression without any GPU assistance. In these scenarios, the GPU’s compute capability, with a PassMark GPU compute score of 9336, is secondary. The system is not balanced in a traditional sense; it is a CPU-centric build with a sufficient GPU. The data shows that any attempt to push high-refresh gaming at 1440p or 4K will be met with the GPU’s limitations, while productivity tasks will be met with exceptional CPU performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-14900F delivers exceptional CPU benchmark results. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 39551 in multi-core and 5583 in single-core. This multi-core score is a strong indicator of its capability in heavily threaded applications. The Geekbench results echo this, with a multi-core score of 20008 and a single-core score of 2570. These scores place the CPU in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, putting it in the top 8% of processors. Compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows it is essentially neck-and-neck with the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, which has an average score of 60099, representing a negligible delta of -0.2%. It also trades blows with the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, which has an average score of 59641, where the Intel chip leads by 0.6%. The PassMark multi-thread score of 46532 and integer math score of 177066 further confirm its dominance in parallel compute tasks.

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT provides solid, but not spectacular, graphics performance. Its average benchmark score of 27425 places it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. In synthetic tests, it achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2435. Geometry and compute tests show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 44152 and a Vulkan score of 93500. The PassMark G3D score of 19786 is the most direct indicator of its gaming performance. The GPU’s closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, which has an average score of 27435, a delta of 0%. It also sits near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, which scores 27565, with the AMD card trailing by -0.5%. This places the RX 6700 XT in a performance tier that is competitive with high-end mobile parts and previous-generation flagship desktop cards.

Combining these scores, the system’s overall average benchmark score is not a simple sum, but the combined percentile of 82 reflects the GPU dragging the CPU down from its 92nd percentile. The data paints a picture of a system with top-tier CPU performance and upper-mid-tier GPU performance. The CPU is capable of processing massive datasets and complex scenes, but the GPU will limit the final output resolution and frame rate in real-time graphics scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The build is based on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This is a significant advantage for a new build, as it allows users to choose between the two memory types based on their needs. The platform also supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation environments. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, ensuring high bandwidth for the fastest available storage and graphics cards. The i9-14900F has a 65-watt TDP, which is remarkably low for a 24-core processor, but the data shows the GPU has a 230-watt TDP and a suggested PSU rating of 550 watts. This means any system builder must account for the GPU’s power draw, not the CPU’s, when selecting a power supply.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system is the GPU. The CPU has significant headroom, as evidenced by its 92nd percentile ranking, and is unlikely to be the limiting factor in gaming for several years. Upgrading to a more powerful GPU would allow the system to leverage the CPU’s strength in high-resolution gaming and ray tracing, where the RX 6700 XT’s 40 RT cores and 13.21 TFLOPS will struggle. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that a next-generation GPU will not be bottlenecked by the bus interface. However, the CPU’s multiplier is locked, meaning it cannot be overclocked to squeeze out additional performance. The platform itself is likely a dead-end for future CPU upgrades, as it supports Raptor Lake and Raptor Lake Refresh, but the 14th Gen is the last for Socket 1700. Therefore, the CPU has a long life ahead, but the platform does not have a forward upgrade path. The 550-watt suggested PSU leaves headroom for a more power-hungry GPU, but a significant upgrade might require a new power supply.

Who Should Build It

This system is tailored for users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks over pure gaming frame rates. The target user is a content creator or software developer who needs immense multi-threaded performance but also wants a capable GPU for occasional gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering. The i9-14900F’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and PassMark data compression score of 564207 make it ideal for video editors working with high-resolution footage, 3D artists rendering scenes, and developers compiling large codebases. The RX 6700 XT, with its 12 GB of VRAM, is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, but it is not aimed at enthusiasts seeking 4K high-refresh experiences.

Students in engineering or computer science fields would benefit from the CPU’s performance for simulations and compilation, while the GPU can handle CAD workloads. Small business workstations that run heavy data analysis, such as PassMark integer math score of 177066, would see significant throughput gains. Gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p and prioritize high frame rates in esports titles will find the GPU adequate, but they are better served by a more balanced build with a stronger GPU and a cheaper CPU. The data clearly shows that this is a workstation-first build with gaming as a secondary capability. Users who primarily play AAA titles at 4K will be disappointed by the GPU bottleneck, while users who primarily render or encode will be delighted by the CPU’s speed.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the system is capable of driving high frame rates in less demanding titles, but the GPU’s 13.21 TFLOPS and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit performance in modern AAA games. The CPU’s single-core score of 5583 in Cinebench R23 ensures it will not hold the GPU back, but the RX 6700 XT’s 72nd percentile ranking means it is not a high-refresh champion at 1440p.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 46532 suggests that even with a game running, the CPU can handle x264 encoding without dropping frames. The GPU’s lack of dedicated encoding hardware is not an issue here, as the CPU is overqualified for the task.

Video Editing: This is a scenario where the system excels. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 indicates rapid export times in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM allows for smooth timeline scrubbing and real-time effects previews, but the CPU is the main engine for rendering and encoding.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s multi-threaded power is the star here. A score of 16611 in Cinebench R20 multi-core translates to fast final-frame rendering in Blender or Maya. The GPU can assist with viewport rendering, but its 13.21 TFLOPS is modest for GPU-based renderers like Cycles, where a higher-end card would be significantly faster.

Software Development: Compilation times will be extremely low. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20008 and PassMark integer math score of 177066 are indicators of strong performance in code compilation and data processing tasks. The high core count allows for parallel builds, significantly reducing iteration times for developers.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for typical office tasks. The CPU’s single-core score of 4506 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness in web browsers and office suites. The GPU is more than sufficient for multi-monitor productivity setups, and the ECC memory support adds a layer of stability for long-running academic computations.

FAQ

Q: Is this build better for gaming or productivity?

A: The data strongly indicates a productivity bias. The CPU sits in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 72nd percentile. This means the CPU is a top-tier performer for tasks like rendering and compilation, but the GPU is only upper-mid-tier for gaming.

Q: What is the most likely bottleneck in this system?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is the limiting factor. Its average benchmark score of 27425 is significantly lower than the CPU’s score of 60008, indicating that in graphics-bound workloads, the GPU will reach its limits first.

Q: Can I use this system for 4K gaming?

A: The GPU is not well-suited for 4K gaming. Its 12 GB of VRAM and 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p, but the 13.21 TFLOPS of compute power will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 4K in demanding titles.

Q: Does this CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the i9-14900F has a locked multiplier, as indicated by the multiplierUnlocked field being false. Users cannot overclock the CPU to increase performance beyond its stock boost clock of 5.80 GHz.

Q: What kind of memory does this platform support?

A: The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature often desired in workstation builds.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX?

A: The i9-14900F has an average benchmark score of 60008, which is nearly identical to the Ryzen 9 7945HX’s score of 60099. The delta is only -0.2%, meaning the Intel chip is effectively tied with the AMD chip in average performance.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 watts. The CPU has a 65-watt TDP, but the GPU has a 230-watt TDP, so the power supply must be chosen to handle the graphics card’s requirements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900F is a 14th Generation Core processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². This is a desktop-class processor with 24 cores and 32 threads, a configuration that includes a mix of performance and efficiency cores, though the specific core layout is not detailed in the pack. The base clock is 2.00 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.80 GHz, which is the highest frequency available. The TDP is rated at 65 watts, which is surprisingly low for such a high-core-count chip, making it efficient for its performance class. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores show a processor that is dominant in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 is exceptionally high, and the PassMark multi-thread score of 46532 confirms this. The PassMark integer math score of 177066 and floating-point math score of 119550 indicate strong ALU and FPU performance, respectively, making it ideal for scientific computing and financial modeling. The single-thread performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5583 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4506, ensuring responsiveness in everyday tasks. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 60008 places it in the 92nd percentile, making it a top-tier performer that rivals the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, which has an average score of 60099. This processor is a productivity powerhouse, but its locked multiplier means users cannot push it further than the 5.80 GHz boost clock.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that combines a flagship-level CPU with a mid-range GPU. The Intel Core i9-14900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks, sitting in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is a 12 GB graphics card based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, performing in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 82, which reflects the CPU’s high standing pulling the overall score up. The system is not balanced for pure gaming, as the GPU will bottleneck the CPU in most game titles. However, for mixed workloads that include content creation, software development, and 3D rendering, this is a formidable configuration. The CPU’s 65-watt TDP is a highlight, but the GPU’s 230-watt TDP and 550-watt suggested PSU are the real power considerations. The build is best described as a high-performance workstation with gaming capabilities, rather than a dedicated gaming rig.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and uses the Navi 22 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process node. The chip contains 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die. The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores, but it has no tensor cores, which are found in NVIDIA’s competing lineup. The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. The memory clock is rated at 2000 MHz, or 16 Gbps effective. The core clocks are set at a base of 2321 MHz, a game clock of 2424 MHz, and a boost clock of 2581 MHz.

In terms of raw compute, the GPU achieves 13.21 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 26.43 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. The pixel rate is 165.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 413.0 GTexel/s. The benchmark scores show a GPU that is solidly mid-range. Its PassMark G3D score of 19786 places it in the 72nd percentile. Its average benchmark score of 27425 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, with a delta of 0%, and it trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 by only 0.5%. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2435 is a measure of its modern API performance. The GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM is a key feature, allowing it to handle higher-resolution textures without running out of memory. However, its 40 RT cores are not sufficient for heavy ray-traced workloads, where it will lag behind more powerful competitors. The data indicates that this is a capable 1080p and 1440p gaming card, but it is not designed for 4K ultra settings or demanding ray tracing.