SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
83%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6400

6,001 Benchmark Score
Top 17% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900F paired with an AMD Radeon RX 6400 is an extreme mismatch on paper, but the benchmark data reveals a system that can handle specific productivity tasks exceptionally well while gaming performance is severely constrained by the GPU. The CPU sits in the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU languishes in the 35th percentile, creating a combined percentile of 64. This is a desktop build where the processor dominates every measurable workload, and the graphics card acts as a bottleneck for any visual application. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance of this system is defined by an enormous gap between CPU and GPU capability. The i9-14900F achieves an average benchmark score of 60008, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the RX 6400 manages an average score of 6001, sitting in the 35th percentile of all GPUs. The delta between these two components is roughly tenfold, and the data shows that the GPU will be the limiting factor in any workload that relies on graphics processing. For CPU-bound tasks like data compression, encryption, or multi-threaded rendering, the processor operates at near-flagship levels, but for gaming or GPU compute, the RX 6400 caps overall system performance.

The CPU’s nearest rivals highlight its position: the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX scores 60099, which is 0.2% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX scores 60104, also 0.2% higher. The Intel Xeon Gold 6338T trails slightly at 60572, which is 0.9% higher, meaning the i9-14900F is essentially tied with these high-end parts. On the GPU side, the RX 6400’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M with an identical score of 6000, and the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server scores 5996, just 0.1% lower. This tells a clear story: the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is entry-level by modern standards.

FPS scaling in games will be dictated entirely by the GPU. Since the RX 6400 has a 64-bit memory bus and 4 GB of GDDR6 memory with 128.0 GB/s bandwidth, any game that requires more than this will cause frame rates to plummet. The CPU’s raw compute power, such as a PassMark multi-thread score of 46532 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551, will not translate into higher FPS when the GPU is saturated. The data indicates that productivity applications will see near-full utilization of the i9-14900F, while gaming will see the RX 6400 running at 100% while the CPU idles, creating a lopsided experience.

Benchmark Performance

The i9-14900F delivers exceptional CPU benchmark scores across the board. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3986 multi-core and 562 single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 16611 multi-core and 2344 single-core, while Cinebench R23 reaches 39551 multi-core and 5583 single-core. Geekbench results are equally strong at 20008 multi-core and 2570 single-core. PassMark tests reinforce this: multi-thread score is 46532, single-thread is 4506, and floating-point math hits 119550. Integer math scores 177066, while data compression reaches 564207. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 60008 places it in the 92nd percentile, and its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, scores 60099, a negligible 0.2% difference.

The RX 6400’s benchmark results are far more modest. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 176. Geekbench OpenCL scores 32011, and Vulkan scores 16372. PassMark DirectX tests show 54 for DirectX 10, 70 for DirectX 11, 30 for DirectX 12, and 93 for DirectX 9. The G2D score is 722, and the G3D score is 7673. GPU compute hits 2812. With an average benchmark score of 6001, the GPU sits in the 35th percentile, and its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M, scores 6000, which is exactly 0% difference. The combined picture is a system that excels at CPU-heavy tasks but falls short in graphics-bound scenarios.

For real-world workloads, the CPU scores translate to fast compilation, smooth multi-tasking, and rapid rendering in CPU-based applications. The GPU scores indicate it can handle light 2D work and basic 3D acceleration, but it is not built for heavy gaming or GPU rendering. The data shows a 92nd percentile CPU with a 35th percentile GPU, so the overall system performance will always be limited by the graphics card unless the workload is purely computational.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900F is a 14th Generation Core processor built on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The processor is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it has ECC memory support. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. It lacks integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory, and it is not multiplier-unlocked. The launch MSRP is $524.

Benchmark results confirm the i9-14900F is a high-end desktop processor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 places it among the top performers, and the Geekbench multi-core score of 20008 reinforces that. PassMark integer math at 177066 and floating-point math at 119550 show strong arithmetic capability. Data compression score of 564207 indicates excellent performance for archiving and file-heavy tasks, while data encryption at 34644 is solid for security-sensitive workloads. The extended instructions score of 31084 and random string sorting at 63728 further demonstrate versatility.

The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.9% in average score, including the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and Ryzen 7 8745HX, as well as the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T. The 24-core, 32-thread configuration with a 5.80 GHz boost clock makes it ideal for multi-threaded applications like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The 65 W TDP is surprisingly low for this core count, suggesting efficient power management at stock settings. For single-threaded tasks, the 5583 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 4506 PassMark single-thread score show excellent responsiveness in everyday applications.

Who Should Build It

This system is for users who prioritize CPU performance above all else and have minimal graphics demands. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 24 cores and 32 threads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 39551 ensuring fast build times. Students in computer science or engineering fields running simulations or virtual machines will appreciate the multi-threaded power. Small business workstations handling data compression, encryption, or database tasks will see strong results, given the PassMark data compression score of 564207.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering, such as video editing using software encoders, will find the i9-14900F more than capable. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20008 and Cinebench R20 multi-core of 16611 support this. However, gamers should avoid this pairing unless they plan to upgrade the GPU immediately. The RX 6400’s 35th percentile ranking and 4 GB memory limit mean modern games will struggle, even at lower resolutions. This system is not for high-refresh gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads.

The target user is someone who needs a powerful CPU for compute-heavy tasks and only requires basic display output. The RX 6400 can drive a desktop and handle 2D applications, but it is not a gaming card by any measure. A developer building a workstation for code compilation, a researcher running data processing, or an office user with a massive spreadsheet workload would all find this combination usable. The 65 W CPU TDP and 53 W GPU TDP keep the system relatively power-efficient, which is advantageous for always-on workstations.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not viable with this GPU. The RX 6400’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 176 and PassMark DirectX 12 score of 30 indicate very low graphics throughput. Frame rates in esports titles might be playable at low settings, but the CPU’s power will be wasted. The GPU’s 4 GB memory and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for modern game textures.

Streaming: The i9-14900F can handle software encoding with its 24 cores, but the GPU cannot render games at high quality while streaming. The combined load would overwhelm the RX 6400, resulting in low FPS and poor stream quality. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 46532 suggests it could encode video, but the gaming side would suffer.

Video editing: CPU-based editing in software like Premiere Pro that uses multi-threading will benefit from the i9-14900F’s Cinebench R23 score of 39551. Export times will be short, but GPU-accelerated effects will be slow due to the RX 6400’s low compute score of 2812. This is a mixed bag for editors who rely on both CPU and GPU.

3D rendering: Pure CPU rendering in applications like Blender’s Cycles will excel. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 16611 and PassMark floating-point math of 119550 show strong performance. GPU rendering in Blender or Octane will be extremely slow, as the RX 6400’s 3.565 TFLOPS FP32 is minimal.

Software development: Compiling large projects will be fast with 32 threads, and the Geekbench multi-core score of 20008 supports this. Running multiple virtual machines or containers is feasible with 24 cores. The RX 6400 is sufficient for code editors and basic UI, but not for GPU debugging or graphics work.

Student and office work: For document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, the i9-14900F is overkill, but it will never feel slow. The PassMark single-thread score of 4506 ensures snappy interactions. The RX 6400 handles 2D displays fine, with a G2D score of 722, but this system is far more powerful than needed for basic office tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The RX 6400’s performance class is defined by its 35th percentile ranking and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 176, which is very low. PassMark DirectX 11 score of 70 and DirectX 12 score of 30 suggest that even older games will run at low to medium settings. The GPU’s 4 GB VRAM will cause texture pop-in and stuttering in modern titles at 1080p.

At 1080p with low settings, esports games like CS:GO or Valorant might achieve playable frame rates, but the data does not support high-refresh rates. The 128.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 64-bit bus are severe limitations. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be completely overwhelmed, and frame rates will drop to unplayable levels. The i9-14900F’s 92nd percentile CPU performance cannot compensate for the GPU bottleneck.

For any serious gaming, this system requires a GPU upgrade. The CPU is more than capable of feeding a high-end graphics card, but the RX 6400 is a placeholder for basic display output. The estimated FPS for modern AAA titles at 1080p low would be in the single digits to low 20s, based on the GPU’s benchmark scores. Older titles from the PS3/Xbox 360 era might run better, but the data suggests this is not a gaming build.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is based on the Navi 24 chip using RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It has 5,400 million transistors on a 107 mm² die. The GPU features 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with 12 ray tracing cores. Base clock is 1923 MHz, boost clock is 2321 MHz, and game clock is 2039 MHz. Memory consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 128.0 GB/s bandwidth at 16 Gbps effective speed. The TDP is 53 W, and the card is single-slot with no power connectors, requiring only a 250 W PSU. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x4 interface and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 1x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Benchmark results show the RX 6400 is an entry-level card. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 176 is extremely low, and PassMark G3D score of 7673 places it in the 35th percentile. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M, scores 6000, which is identical, indicating the RX 6400 is comparable to a decade-old mobile GPU. The FP32 compute of 3.565 TFLOPS is modest, and the pixel rate of 74.27 GPixel/s and texture rate of 111.4 GTexel/s are not impressive.

For rendering tasks, the RX 6400 can handle basic 2D workloads and light 3D acceleration, but it lacks the VRAM and bandwidth for modern content creation. The 12 ray tracing cores are present but underpowered, so ray-traced effects will be slow. The GPU’s end-of-life production status and 35th percentile ranking make it a poor choice for any graphics-intensive application. The 4 GB memory is insufficient for 1080p gaming with high textures, and the 64-bit bus is a bottleneck for data transfer.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-14900F a good processor for multi-threaded workloads?

A: Yes. It has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 46532, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Can the AMD Radeon RX 6400 run modern games?

A: The data suggests no. With a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 176 and a PassMark DirectX 12 score of 30, it sits in the 35th percentile of GPUs, and its 4 GB VRAM limits modern game performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RX 6400?

A: The RX 6400 has 128.0 GB/s bandwidth, based on 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus.

Q: Does the i9-14900F have integrated graphics?

A: No. The FACT PACK lists integrated graphics as N/A, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the TDP of the i9-14900F?

A: The i9-14900F has a TDP of 65 W, which is low for a 24-core processor.

Q: How does the i9-14900F compare to its nearest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX has an average score of 60099, which is 0.2% higher than the i9-14900F’s 60008, making them effectively tied.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RX 6400?

A: The launch MSRP is 159 USD.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i9-14900F uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU has 36 MB of L3 cache and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The platform is mature, with a wide range of motherboards available. The 65 W TDP means most 1700-socket boards can handle it without issue, though high-end boards are recommended for sustained multi-core loads.

The RX 6400 has a 53 W TDP and requires only a 250 W PSU, so the current power supply is not stressed. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x4 interface, which is adequate for its performance level. The system’s main upgrade path is the graphics card. The CPU is already in the 92nd percentile, so replacing the GPU with a more powerful model would unlock the i9-14900F’s full potential in gaming and GPU compute tasks.

A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with higher performance, as the CPU can easily feed a much faster card. The 65 W CPU TDP leaves plenty of headroom for a power-hungry GPU, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU are future-proof. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 allows flexibility in platform choice. The RX 6400 is end-of-life, so upgrading to a current-generation card would be the logical step.

The platform supports up to 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for any modern GPU. The CPU’s 36 MB L3 cache and 24 cores provide excellent headroom for future software. The system’s bottleneck is clearly the GPU, and the data shows that replacing the RX 6400 with a higher-performing card would dramatically improve gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The motherboard choice should account for PCIe Gen 5 support to maximize the CPU’s bandwidth.