SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900

58,115 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 pairing represents the pinnacle of the previous hardware generation, combining a 24-core Raptor Lake refresh processor with an Ada Lovelace flagship GPU. This analysis uses benchmark data to evaluate the platform's capabilities, focusing strictly on measured scores and architectural facts. The data indicates a system with exceptional compute throughput, though the benchmark results also reveal specific bottlenecks and trade-offs that define its character for different workloads.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is built on the AD102 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 76,300 million transistors into a 609 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2235 MHz with a boost clock of 2520 MHz. Its memory subsystem is substantial: 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus delivers 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth, with memory clocked at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). This configuration provides ample capacity and throughput for high-resolution textures and large datasets.

The RTX 4090's compute resources are massive. It features 16,384 shading units, 512 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output pipelines. For ray tracing and AI workloads, it has 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores. The raw throughput figures are impressive: FP32 performance is 82.58 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 82.58 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 443.5 GPixel/s, and texture rate reaches 1,290.2 GTexel/s.

Benchmark scores reflect this hardware's dominance in compute-heavy tasks. The GPU scores 9,223 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which indicates strong DirectX 12 performance for modern titles. In Geekbench compute tests, it scores 255,416 in OpenCL and 271,631 in Vulkan, showing robust cross-API performance. PassMark results show a G3D score of 38,194, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The GPU compute score is 26,613, which is notably lower than the G3D score relative to other GPUs, suggesting that while rasterization and graphics performance is elite, pure compute workloads might not scale as proportionally.

The nearest rivals in the database provide context. The Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 60,326 with a 0% delta, meaning the RTX 4090's average benchmark score of 60,347 is nearly identical. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 is 0.3% behind at 60,140, while the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M is 2.5% ahead at 61,896. Interestingly, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is 2.9% behind at 58,657. These comparisons suggest that in the aggregate benchmark suite, the RTX 4090's performance is comparable to professional workstation GPUs, despite its gaming-oriented design.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform centers on the Intel Core i9-14900, which uses the Intel Socket 1700. This socket supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output and can be useful for troubleshooting or office tasks without a discrete GPU.

The power delivery requirements are significant for this combination. The GPU has a TDP of 450 W and requires a single 16-pin power connector, with a suggested power supply of 850 W. The CPU has a modest TDP of 65 W, which is notably low for a 24-core processor, but this likely reflects base clock operation rather than sustained boost behavior. This 65 W TDP is unusual for a Core i9, suggesting that the thermal and power headroom is constrained at stock settings, potentially limiting all-core boost clocks under heavy loads.

For a sensible upgrade path, the data points to a few options. The CPU's socket 1700 is a mature platform, so users looking to stay current would need a new motherboard for a different socket. The GPU's production status is "End-of-life," with the GeForce 50 series listed as its successor, so upgrading the GPU would be the next logical step for increased performance. However, the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface on the GPU is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, so a newer GPU can be installed without changing the motherboard. The 850 W PSU suggestion provides headroom for the current components, but a future GPU with higher power draw might require a PSU upgrade.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-14900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The CPU is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². Cache is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark scores show a processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks. Cinebench R15 multi-core score is 4,793, with a single-core score of 315. In Cinebench R20, multi-core reaches 15,910 and single-core is 2,245. Cinebench R23 shows a multi-core score of 31,070 and single-core of 2,212. Geekbench results are 18,495 for multi-core and 2,488 for single-core.

PassMark results are extensive. Multi-thread score is 44,578, while single-thread is 4,323. Specific workloads show varied performance: data compression scores 550,271, data encryption 33,540, and extended instructions 30,624. Floating point math is 120,262, integer math is 175,010, and physics is 2,486. Random string sorting is 61,060, and finding prime numbers is 188.

The CPU's percentile versus all CPUs is 92, placing it in the top 8% of all processors. Its average benchmark score is 58,115. Nearest rivals show tight competition: the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M scores 58,323 (-0.4% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D scores 58,386 (-0.5%), and the Intel Xeon w5-2545 scores 58,504 (-0.7%). The AMD EPYC 9015 is 1% behind at 57,555. These deltas are minimal, indicating that the i9-14900 performs equivalently to these server and workstation chips in aggregate benchmarks, despite being a consumer desktop part.

The high boost clock of 5.80 GHz gives excellent single-threaded performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,212. The 32 threads handle heavily parallel workloads effectively, with the multi-core score of 31,070 in Cinebench R23 demonstrating strong scaling. The 65 W TDP is a caveat, as it may limit sustained multi-core performance compared to higher-TDP parts.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The combined percentile for this build is 90, indicating that as a system, it outperforms 90% of all desktop configurations. However, the individual percentiles reveal a slight imbalance: the CPU is at the 92nd percentile, while the GPU is at the 88th percentile. This suggests the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU in the benchmark suite.

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so frame-level analysis must be inferred from synthetic benchmarks. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 9,223 and PassMark G3D score of 38,194 indicate strong graphics capability. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,070 shows it can feed a fast GPU in most scenarios. However, the CPU's 65 W TDP may cause power throttling in sustained all-core workloads, potentially limiting performance in CPU-bound games or applications.

In gaming, the bottleneck depends on resolution and settings. At lower resolutions, the CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,212) is likely sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU. At higher resolutions, the GPU's raw throughput becomes the limiting factor. The GPU's 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth provide headroom for high-resolution textures, but the 450 W TDP means power delivery is a consideration.

For compute workloads, the CPU's 32 threads and the GPU's tensor cores handle different tasks. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 44,578 is strong for general parallelism, while the GPU's compute score of 26,613 in PassMark suggests it excels in specific parallel workloads like ray tracing and AI inference. The balance is such that neither component is a clear bottleneck for most mixed workloads, but the CPU's modest TDP could be a limiting factor in prolonged CPU-intensive tasks.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who need maximum multi-threaded CPU performance and top-tier GPU acceleration. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking makes it suitable for professionals who run CPU-bound applications, such as software compilation, data analysis, or 3D rendering in CPU-based engines. The GPU's 88th percentile and 24 GB VRAM support GPU-accelerated rendering, machine learning model training, and large-scale video editing.

Gamers at 4K resolution or with high refresh rate monitors will benefit from the GPU's 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which can drive demanding titles. The CPU's single-core score of 2,212 in Cinebench R23 ensures it won't hold back high-FPS gaming at lower resolutions. Content creators using Adobe Premiere or DaVinci Resolve will leverage the GPU's 512 tensor cores for AI-accelerated effects and the CPU's 32 threads for timeline rendering.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 175,010 and data compression score of 550,271. Students in engineering or data science fields can use the GPU's 24 GB VRAM for running large models, though the cost of the build may be prohibitive. Small business workstations handling video editing, 3D modeling, or database workloads will find the combination capable, with the CPU's data encryption score of 33,540 offering some security-related performance.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates based on benchmark scores, not measured values. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 9,223 and PassMark G3D score of 38,194 indicate that the RTX 4090 is among the fastest consumer GPUs available, placing it in the 88th percentile.

Based on these scores, the system is expected to deliver exceptionally high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p resolutions in most games, potentially exceeding 200 FPS in esports titles. At 4K resolution, the GPU's 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth should handle ultra settings in demanding AAA games, though frame rates will vary by title. The CPU's single-core score of 2,212 in Cinebench R23 suggests it can maintain high minimum frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios.

These are estimates only, as no direct FPS measurements exist for this pairing. The actual performance will depend on game optimization, driver quality, and system configuration. The GPU's 450 W TDP and the CPU's 65 W TDP mean thermal management is crucial to maintain boost clocks, which will affect sustained frame rates.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance and the CPU's single-core score of 2,212 in Cinebench R23 combine to deliver high frame rates at competitive settings. The GPU's 88th percentile ranking supports 144Hz or higher refresh rates at 1440p in most titles.

Streaming: The GPU's 512 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated encoding, while the CPU's 32 threads handle streaming software overhead. The PassMark multi-thread score of 44,578 ensures the CPU can manage encoding and game logic simultaneously without major frame drops.

Video editing: The GPU's 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth accelerate timeline rendering and effects. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,070 handles export tasks efficiently, reducing render times for 4K or 8K projects.

3D rendering: The GPU's FP16 performance of 82.58 TFLOPS benefits ray-traced renders, while the CPU's 32 threads handle geometry and physics calculations. The PassMark floating point math score of 120,262 indicates strong CPU-side number crunching for render engines.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 175,010 and data compression score of 550,271 accelerate code compilation and build processes. The 32 threads allow parallel compilation of large projects, reducing iteration times.

Student and office work: Overkill for typical tasks, but the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output for office productivity. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,323 in PassMark ensures responsive application performance for document editing and web browsing.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900 has 24 cores and 32 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4090 have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4090 has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 4090 is in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60,347.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900 supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop processor.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The RTX 4090 has a suggested PSU of 850 W, and it requires a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The i9-14900 scores 31,070 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, with a single-core score of 2,212.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance in TFLOPS?

A: The RTX 4090 delivers 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with FP16 also at 82.58 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 58,115, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Key scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 31,070 and single-core at 2,212, Geekbench multi-core at 18,495 and single-core at 2,488, and PassMark multi-thread at 44,578 with single-thread at 4,323. The GPU's average benchmark score is 60,347, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Notable scores include 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 9,223, Geekbench OpenCL at 255,416 and Vulkan at 271,631, and PassMark G3D at 38,194.

The combined percentile for this build is 90, indicating it outperforms 90% of all desktop configurations. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M, is only 0.4% ahead with a score of 58,323, while the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D is 0.5% ahead at 58,386. The GPU's nearest rival, the Intel Arc Pro A60, has a 0% delta with a score of 60,326, showing the RTX 4090's performance is directly comparable to that professional workstation card in aggregate benchmarks.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU in percentile terms, but both are elite performers. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide massive multi-threaded throughput, while the GPU's 16,384 shading units and 512 tensor cores deliver top-tier graphics and compute performance. The 65 W CPU TDP is a notable constraint for sustained multi-core workloads, potentially limiting the CPU's performance relative to its rivals. The lack of measured FPS data means gaming performance is estimated from synthetic scores, which suggest excellent but unquantified frame rates. This build is a high-end desktop workstation that excels in both CPU- and GPU-intensive tasks, with a balanced profile that suits a wide range of professional and enthusiast use cases.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds