SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900

58,115 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

41,187 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti form a high-end desktop pairing that targets demanding workloads and high-refresh-rate gaming. The CPU, a 24-core Raptor Lake Refresh part, sits at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU, an Ampere architecture part now in its end-of-life phase, holds the 83rd percentile among all GPUs. Together, this build achieves an 88th combined percentile, indicating a system that is significantly more powerful than the majority of configurations, though the performance gap between the two components has implications for workload-specific bottlenecks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. This configuration is designed to handle both high-thread-count productivity tasks and single-threaded responsiveness.

Benchmark results confirm its dual nature. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 31,070 points in multi-core and 2,212 points in single-core. The multi-core result is 30% higher than the single-core score when normalized, showing strong scaling across its 32 threads. Geekbench results show 18,495 multi-core and 2,488 single-core, reinforcing a profile where heavy parallel workloads benefit most. PassMark’s multithread score of 44,578 and integer math score of 175,010 indicate robust performance in compilation and data processing, while the floating-point math score of 120,262 supports scientific and engineering simulations.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 58,115, placing it at the 92nd percentile. Its nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M scores 58,323 (0.4% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D scores 58,386 (0.5% higher), and the Intel Xeon w5-2545 scores 58,504 (0.7% higher). The AMD EPYC 9015 trails by 1%. This indicates the i9-14900 is essentially performance-parity with these server and enthusiast parts, offering comparable throughput in a desktop socket. For real workloads, this means video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation will see near-top-tier results, with the CPU rarely being the limiting factor in a mixed-use system.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU in certain scenarios. The CPU’s 92nd percentile versus the GPU’s 83rd percentile suggests the graphics card is the more likely constraint in GPU-bound tasks. However, the gap is not extreme, and the nature of the bottleneck depends on the workload. For pure computational tasks like data encryption (PassMark score of 33,540) or extended instruction workloads (30,624), the CPU dominates, and the GPU is irrelevant. Conversely, in graphics-heavy applications, the RTX 3080 Ti’s lower percentile indicates it will cap frame rates before the CPU does.

The PassMark physics score of 2,486, while lower than the integer math score, still indicates strong game physics processing. In gaming, the balance favors the GPU for resolution scaling; at lower resolutions, the CPU’s high single-thread score of 4,323 (PassMark single thread) is sufficient to feed the GPU, but at 4K, the GPU’s 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 throughput becomes the primary bottleneck. The FPS scaling in this configuration is thus expected to show diminishing returns as resolution increases, with the CPU providing headroom that the GPU cannot fully exploit at higher settings. The combined 88th percentile suggests that for most users, the system will feel exceptionally responsive, but those seeking maximum frame rates at 4K will find the GPU is the limiting factor.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU’s 5.80 GHz boost clock and high single-thread performance (2,212 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensure high minimum frame rates, while the GPU’s 34.10 TFLOPS and 186.5 GPixel/s pixel rate can drive high frame rates. Expect the CPU to sustain frame pacing, with the GPU delivering the raw throughput. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, and frame rates will depend heavily on the game’s optimization.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding. PassMark’s data compression score of 550,271 is exceptionally high, indicating that simultaneous game capture and encoding will have minimal impact on gameplay performance. The GPU’s dedicated NVENC (implied by the 320 tensor cores) offloads encoding further, leaving the CPU free for game logic.

Video Editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,070 and PassMark multithread score of 44,578 make this CPU a strong candidate for timeline scrubbing and render exports. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with large media files, and the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support allows for high memory bandwidth to feed the 24 cores during effects processing.

3D Rendering: The 32 threads shine in CPU-based rendering, with Cinebench R23 and Geekbench multi-core scores (18,495) indicating render times that are 30% faster than many rival desktop chips. For GPU-accelerated renders, the RTX 3080 Ti’s 10,240 shading units and 80 RT cores provide substantial compute, though its 83rd percentile means it trails newer cards.

Software Development: PassMark’s integer math score of 175,010 and random string sorting score of 61,060 are directly relevant to code compilation and data manipulation. The 32 threads allow for parallel builds that will significantly reduce compile times, and the ECC memory support (true) adds stability for long-running test suites.

Student and Office Work: This is overkill for typical office tasks, but the CPU’s 65 W TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 770 provide a fallback if the GPU is idle. The single-core score of 2,212 ensures snappy application launches, and the high L2/L3 cache reduces latency in spreadsheet and database operations. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,323 confirms excellent responsiveness for everyday use.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14900 uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the final generation for this platform. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel bus, allowing builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is sufficient for a single high-end GPU and a Gen 5 NVMe drive. The 65 W TDP is modest for a 24-core part, meaning most boards will handle power delivery without issue, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 750 W.

The GPU, an RTX 3080 Ti, has a 350 W TDP and is already end-of-life, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a newer generation card, as the CPU’s 92nd percentile leaves headroom for a more powerful GPU. The PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface on the GPU is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slot, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck. The 12 GB GDDR6X memory with 912.4 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for current games, but future titles with higher VRAM demands may necessitate an upgrade. Given the CPU’s performance, the platform can support a GPU upgrade without changing the motherboard or CPU, as long as the PSU has the necessary connectors (1x 12-pin for the current GPU).

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 58,115, placing it at the 92nd percentile. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M, scores 58,323, a mere 0.4% difference, showing the i9-14900 is competitive with server-class parts. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D scores 58,386 (0.5% higher), and the Intel Xeon w5-2545 scores 58,504 (0.7% higher), all within a 1% band. The AMD EPYC 9015 trails by 1% with a score of 57,555.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 41,187, placing it at the 83rd percentile. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 with a score of 40,870 (0.8% higher) and the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB with 41,707 (1.2% lower). Notably, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 scores 40,377, which is 2% lower, indicating the 3080 Ti still outperforms a newer mainstream card in aggregate benchmarks. In specific tests, the GPU scores 26,896 in PassMark G3D and 15,282 in GPU compute, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,077. The combined picture is a CPU that is top-tier and a GPU that is upper-mid-tier, resulting in a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks but is slightly less dominant in pure graphics workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, and the data contains no measuredFps entries. All FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s high single-thread score (4,323 in PassMark) and the GPU’s 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggest strong performance in most titles. At 1080p, the CPU is likely to drive frame rates above 144 FPS in esports titles, with the GPU providing ample headroom. At 1440p, the GPU’s 12 GB GDDR6X memory and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth will sustain high settings, though frame rates will vary by title. At 4K, the GPU’s 83rd percentile indicates it will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in the most demanding AAA games at ultra settings, but with settings adjustments, playable frame rates are achievable. The CPU’s 36 MB L3 cache and 5.80 GHz boost clock reduce frame time spikes, resulting in smoother gameplay even when the GPU is the bottleneck.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900 has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is common for workstation-class tasks.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to bottleneck in gaming?

A: The GPU has a lower percentile (83rd) compared to the CPU (92nd), indicating the GPU is the more likely bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions like 4K.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The launch MSRP of the Intel Core i9-14900 is $549.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this build?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all FPS discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 3080 Ti is 750 W, which is sufficient for the 350 W TDP of the GPU.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-14900, a desktop-class CPU, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, also a desktop component. The CPU is an active production part from the Core 14th Gen series, while the GPU is end-of-life from the GeForce 30-series. The combined percentile is 88, placing this system in the top 12% of all configurations. The CPU’s 92nd percentile and the GPU’s 83rd percentile indicate a high-performance desktop that is well-suited for gaming and content creation, though the GPU is the weaker link. This is a desktop-class build, not a laptop, and it is designed for stationary use with high power draw components.

Who Should Build It

This system is ideal for gamers targeting 1440p high-refresh-rate monitors, as the CPU’s single-thread performance and the GPU’s 34.10 TFLOPS will drive high frame rates in most titles. It is also suited for 4K gaming at medium-to-high settings, where the GPU’s 12 GB memory and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth provide enough headroom, though not at maximum ultra settings in the most demanding games. Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 32 threads (31,070 in Cinebench R23 multi-core) and the GPU’s compute capabilities (15,282 in PassMark GPU compute). Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant time savings from the CPU’s integer math score of 175,010. Students in engineering or data science fields will find the ECC memory support and floating-point math score of 120,262 valuable for simulations. Small business workstations that run multi-threaded databases or virtual machines will leverage the 24 cores effectively. However, users who primarily play at 4K ultra settings or require the latest ray tracing features may find the GPU’s end-of-life status a limitation, and should consider a newer graphics card for future-proofing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds