SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900

58,115 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM pairing is a study in extremes. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, supported by a cache hierarchy that includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. This is a workstation-class compute engine that sits in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, yet it is paired with a GPU that ranks in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. The benchmark data reveals a profound imbalance, where the CPU's massive multithreaded throughput is consistently constrained by the GPU's mid-range capabilities. This analysis examines the measured scores, the resulting bottleneck dynamics, and the specific workloads where this configuration either excels or underperforms.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-14900 delivers benchmark scores that place it firmly in the high-end desktop segment. In Cinebench R23, the processor achieves a multicore score of 31070 and a single-core score of 2212. The multicore result indicates exceptional performance for heavily threaded workloads, while the single-core score demonstrates strong responsiveness for lightly threaded tasks. The Geekbench results reinforce this picture, with a multicore score of 18495 and a single-core score of 2488. The Passmark multithread score of 44578 and single-thread score of 4323 further confirm the processor's dual nature: it can handle both parallel and sequential workloads with equal competence. The data shows the CPU is 0.4% behind the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M, 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D, and 0.7% behind the Intel Xeon w5-2545, while being 1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9015. These deltas are negligible, placing the i9-14900 in a tightly contested performance tier among server and high-end desktop processors.

The architecture is Raptor Lake-R, a refresh of the Raptor Lake design, with a process node of 10 nm. The 24 cores and 32 threads provide substantial parallelism for rendering, compilation, and scientific computing. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache is significant, reducing memory latency for frequently accessed data. The Passmark physics score of 2486 suggests robust real-world simulation performance, while the floating point math score of 120262 indicates strong capability for numerical workloads. The extended instructions score of 30624 points to efficient handling of AVX and similar instruction sets. For real workloads, this CPU can handle 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation with considerable headroom. The single-core performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R15 single-core score of 315 and the Passmark single-thread score of 4323, ensures that everyday tasks like web browsing and office applications remain snappy. The CPU's 65 W TDP is surprisingly modest for the performance level, suggesting efficient power management under typical loads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly indicates that the RTX 3050 OEM is the limiting factor in this pairing. The CPU's average benchmark score is 58115, while the GPU's average benchmark score is 15199. This disparity is stark: the CPU is in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. In gaming and graphics-intensive tasks, the GPU will be saturated long before the CPU reaches its limits. The Passmark GPU compute score of 5779, combined with the G3D score of 11857, shows the GPU's compute throughput is an order of magnitude lower than the CPU's multithreaded output. The FPS scaling evidence, though not measured for this exact combination, can be inferred from the scores: at lower resolutions where the GPU is the bottleneck, frame rates will be consistent but limited by the GPU's pixel rate of 56.16 GPixel/s and texture rate of 126.4 GTexel/s. At higher resolutions, the CPU's headroom becomes irrelevant because the GPU cannot produce enough frames to saturate the CPU's processing capacity.

The bottleneck manifests differently across workload types. For CPU-bound tasks like data compression (Passmark score 550271) or encryption (Passmark score 33540), the GPU plays no role, and the system performs at the CPU's high level. For GPU-bound tasks like gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the CPU's power is wasted. The Passmark DirectX 12 score of 58 and DirectX 11 score of 86 for the GPU indicate modest DirectX performance, which will cap frame rates in modern titles. The combination of a high-end CPU with a mid-range GPU creates a system where the CPU is idle waiting for the GPU to finish rendering frames. This is a classic imbalance scenario, where the data suggests that the GPU is the bottleneck for any workload that uses graphics acceleration, while the CPU dominates in purely computational tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not a suitable configuration for high-refresh gaming. The RTX 3050 OEM's estimated frame rates, derived from its benchmark scores, will fall well short of what the CPU can drive. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 11857 and its 57th percentile ranking indicate it is a mid-range part, likely producing around 60 FPS at 1080p in esports titles but struggling to maintain high frame rates in AAA games. The CPU's single-core strength ensures it will never be the limiting factor, but the GPU will cap performance at levels far below the CPU's potential.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads are excellent for software encoding. The Passmark multithread score of 44578 suggests the CPU can handle x264 or x265 encoding while simultaneously running a game, provided the game is not GPU-limited. The GPU's NVENC capabilities, implied by the Ampere architecture and tensor cores, offer an alternative hardware encoding path, but the CPU's headroom makes it the preferred choice for quality. The system can handle streaming workloads effectively, though the GPU may limit in-game frame rates during simultaneous gaming and encoding.

Video editing: Video editing benefits from both CPU and GPU acceleration. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31070 indicates fast timeline rendering and export times for effects-heavy projects. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and some 1440p editing, but the 128-bit bus width and 2304 shading units will slow down complex GPU-accelerated effects. The data suggests a workable but not ideal video editing system, where the CPU handles the heavy lifting and the GPU provides basic acceleration.

3D rendering: This scenario heavily favors the CPU. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 15910 and R15 multicore score of 4793 indicate that CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender (Cycles) or V-Ray will be fast. The GPU's FP32 performance of 8.087 TFLOPS is modest for GPU rendering, and its 8 GB VRAM may be insufficient for large scenes. The data shows that CPU rendering will outperform GPU rendering in most cases, making this a viable if unconventional choice for 3D artists.

Software development: Compilation is a CPU-bound task, and the i9-14900 excels here. The Passmark integer math score of 175010 and data compression score of 550271 indicate rapid code compilation and file processing. The 32 threads allow for parallel builds, significantly reducing iteration times. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, so this configuration is excellent for developers working on large codebases.

Student and office work: For document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, the CPU's single-core performance (Geekbench single-core 2488) ensures smooth operation. The GPU's capabilities are overkill for office tasks, but the system is more than adequate. The 65 W CPU TDP suggests low idle power consumption, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle basic display output if the discrete GPU is not needed. This is a powerful but overqualified system for typical student workloads.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads and need only moderate graphics capabilities. Content creators working with video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the CPU's 92nd percentile performance. The data supports its use in small business workstations where database processing, financial modeling, or scientific simulations are common, as the Passmark multithread score of 44578 and floating point math score of 120262 demonstrate strong computational throughput. Gamers at 1080p who play less demanding titles may find the GPU sufficient, but the system is not aimed at high-refresh or high-resolution gaming. Students in engineering or computer science fields will appreciate the compilation speed, while office workers will never stress the hardware. The system is not well-suited for gamers seeking maximum frame rates or for professionals requiring heavy GPU compute, as the GPU's 57th percentile ranking limits its utility in those areas. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of 75 reflects the overall tier, pulling the CPU's high ranking down due to the GPU's lower position.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for the Core i9-14900 with the RTX 3050 OEM, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 11857 and its position relative to rivals, such as being 0.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 7600 and 0.6% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, indicate it performs in the mid-range tier. Based on these scores, the estimated frame rates at 1080p ultra settings would be around 60 FPS in older or less demanding titles, potentially dropping to 30-40 FPS in modern AAA games. At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will struggle, likely producing frame rates below 30 FPS in demanding titles. The CPU's performance is irrelevant in this context, as the GPU will be the limiting factor across all resolutions. The Passmark DirectX 12 score of 58 and DirectX 11 score of 86 suggest moderate API efficiency, but the low pixel rate of 56.16 GPixel/s caps fill-rate-limited scenarios. These figures are estimates and should be treated as such, given the absence of measured data.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is based on the GA106 chip using the Ampere architecture, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process with 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 1515 MHz and a boost clock of 1755 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz or 14 Gbps effective. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is modest for modern games. The GPU features 2304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. It includes 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, though the low core counts limit their effectiveness. The FP32 performance is 8.087 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). The pixel rate is 56.16 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 126.4 GTexel/s. The GPU's benchmark scores show a Passmark G3D score of 11857 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740, placing it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 7600, with the 3050 OEM being 0.2% ahead, and the AMD Radeon 680M, where it is 0.5% behind. For rendering workloads, the GPU can handle basic GPU-accelerated effects in video editing and light 3D rendering, but the 8 GB VRAM and limited bandwidth will cause slowdowns with larger textures or scenes. The tensor cores provide some AI acceleration, evidenced by the Passmark GPU compute score of 5779, but this is not a primary compute platform.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark performance is exceptional. It achieves an average benchmark score of 58115, with specific results including Cinebench R23 multicore at 31070, Geekbench multicore at 18495, and Passmark multithread at 44578. The single-core scores are equally strong, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 2212 and Geekbench single-core at 2488. The CPU's percentile vs all CPUs is 92, meaning it outperforms 92% of all processors. Its rivals include the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (0.4% behind), AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D (0.5% behind), and Intel Xeon w5-2545 (0.7% behind), while it is 1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9015. The GPU's benchmark performance is moderate. It achieves an average benchmark score of 15199, with a Passmark G3D score of 11857 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 57103. The GPU's percentile vs all GPUs is 57. Its rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (0.2% behind), AMD Radeon 680M (0.5% ahead), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (0.6% ahead). The combined picture is of a system with a top-tier CPU and a mid-tier GPU, resulting in a combined percentile of 75. This indicates the overall system outperforms 75% of all systems, but the GPU drags down the CPU's impressive standing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus. The memory support includes ECC, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the CPU only. This platform is mature, with the CPU released on 2024-01-07, and the production status is active. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though the GPU will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The GPU has a 130 W TDP and requires a 300 W suggested PSU, with a single 8-pin power connector. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, but a typical system with both components would need a PSU that exceeds the GPU's 300 W suggestion to account for the CPU and other components. A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The data shows the CPU can handle much faster graphics cards without bottlenecking, based on its high percentile ranking. The platform supports up to PCIe Gen 5, so a future GPU using that interface would be compatible. The memory support for DDR5 allows for high-bandwidth configurations, though the CPU's performance does not seem to be memory-bandwidth-limited based on the provided scores. The upgrade path is clear: replace the GPU with a higher-tier model to unlock the CPU's full potential.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900 has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900 supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The GPU is in the 57th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 75.

Q: What is the CPU's socket type?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: What is the GPU's suggested PSU wattage?

A: The GPU has a suggested PSU of 300 W.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i9-14900 CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM GPU. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread processor in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is an 8 GB card in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 75 indicates the system sits in the upper quartile of overall performance, but the pairing is fundamentally unbalanced. The CPU is a top-tier part that dominates in multithreaded workloads like rendering, compilation, and data processing, as shown by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31070 and Passmark multithread score of 44578. The GPU is a mid-range part that provides adequate 1080p gaming and basic GPU acceleration, but it cannot keep pace with the CPU in any graphics-intensive task. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier, based on the percentiles, is that of a workstation-class CPU paired with an entry-to-mid-level GPU, making it suitable for CPU-bound professional work but not for high-end gaming or GPU compute.