SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900

58,115 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070

23,877 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 is a desktop combination that ranks in the 81st combined percentile across all CPU+GPU pairings, placing it firmly in the upper tier of systems. The CPU delivers class-leading multi-threaded performance with a 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 69th percentile among all GPUs, creating a pairing where processor capability substantially outpaces graphics throughput. This analysis draws exclusively from the benchmark data provided, interpreting what these scores mean for real workloads, gaming expectations, and system balance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and is fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is supported. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides display output capability without a discrete GPU.

Benchmark results show a processor with exceptional multi-threaded strength. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i9-14900 scores 31,070 points, while single-core performance reaches 2,212 points. The Cinebench R20 results show 15,910 multi-core and 2,245 single-core, and Cinebench R15 shows 4,793 multi-core and 315 single-core. Geekbench scores are 18,495 multi-core and 2,488 single-core. PassMark multi-thread performance is 44,578, with single-thread at 4,323. The average benchmark score across all tests is 58,115, placing the CPU at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs.

The nearest rivals in the benchmark database show how tightly grouped this processor is with serious workstation and server parts. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M averages 58,323, which is 0.4% higher than the i9-14900’s average. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D scores 58,386, a 0.5% advantage. The Intel Xeon w5-2545 averages 58,504, 0.7% higher, while the AMD EPYC 9015 comes in at 57,555, which is 1% lower. This positioning means the i9-14900 delivers performance comparable to high-end Xeon and EPYC server processors in aggregate benchmarks, despite being a desktop part with a 65 W TDP.

For real workloads, these scores translate into exceptional multi-threaded capability for content creation, compilation, and rendering tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 550,271 indicates strong throughput for archival and database workloads, while data encryption at 33,540 and extended instructions at 30,624 show robust cryptographic and SIMD performance. The floating-point math score of 120,262 and integer math score of 175,010 demonstrate balanced compute across different instruction types. The find prime numbers score of 188 is comparatively low, suggesting that the processor’s strengths lie elsewhere, but the random string sorting score of 61,060 indicates good memory and cache efficiency for sorting algorithms. The physics score of 2,486 on PassMark is modest relative to the multi-thread score, which may reflect the test’s sensitivity to single-thread performance rather than core count.

The 5.80 GHz boost clock is a key differentiator for single-threaded responsiveness, evidenced by the 4,323 PassMark single-thread score and the 2,212 Cinebench R23 single-core score. This makes the i9-14900 well-suited for applications that rely on high-frequency single-core execution, such as legacy software, certain game engines, and lightly threaded productivity tools. The combination of 24 cores and high boost clocks gives it a dual personality: massive parallel throughput when needed and snappy single-thread response when workloads are lightly threaded.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 58,115 places it at the 92nd percentile, meaning it outperforms 92% of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M at 58,323 (0.4% higher), AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D at 58,386 (0.5% higher), Intel Xeon w5-2545 at 58,504 (0.7% higher), and AMD EPYC 9015 at 57,555 (1% lower). These deltas are all within one percentage point, indicating that the i9-14900 is statistically tied with these high-end server and workstation processors in aggregate performance.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 23,877, placing it at the 69th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z at 23,736 (0.6% lower than the RX 9070), AMD Radeon RX 6800S at 24,063 (0.8% higher), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile at 23,628 (1.1% lower), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER at 24,170 (1.2% higher). The RX 9070 outperforms the GTX TITAN Z and RTX 3080 Mobile but trails the RX 6800S and RTX 2080 SUPER by less than 1.2%, showing it sits in a tight competitive cluster around the 24,000 average score mark.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 6,290. Geekbench OpenCL yields 131,539, while Geekbench Vulkan shows 58,705. PassMark DirectX tests show 141 for DirectX 10, 281 for DirectX 11, 74 for DirectX 12, and 343 for DirectX 9. The PassMark G3D score is 25,381, with G2D at 1,280 and GPU compute at 14,737.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is the dominant performer relative to its peer group. The CPU’s 92nd percentile versus the GPU’s 69th percentile creates a 23-point gap in relative standing. The combined percentile of 81 reflects this imbalance, pulling the overall system ranking down from the CPU’s individual percentile. For applications that are heavily CPU-bound, this system will perform at a level comparable to enterprise-class hardware. For GPU-bound workloads, the RX 9070 will be the limiting factor, though it still delivers solid performance in the upper two-thirds of all GPUs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the GPU is the bottleneck in most graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile while the GPU sits at the 69th percentile, a substantial gap that means the processor has significant headroom to drive more powerful graphics cards. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics calculations, data compression, or compilation tasks, the i9-14900 will perform at near the top of the desktop market, with its nearest rivals being server-class Xeon and EPYC parts.

The GPU’s benchmark scores relative to its rivals show it performs competitively with cards like the RTX 2080 SUPER and RX 6800S, but the CPU could easily support a GPU in a much higher percentile without being constrained. For gaming at high resolutions, the GPU will typically be the limiting factor, as frame rates are often bound by graphics throughput rather than CPU performance. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,323 on PassMark and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2,212 indicate it will not bottleneck even demanding game engines in most scenarios.

The FPS scaling evidence from the benchmark scores suggests that increasing GPU capability would yield proportional gains in frame rates, while upgrading the CPU would show minimal improvement in graphics-bound workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6,290 on the GPU, combined with the CPU’s strong multi-thread performance, means that tasks like game streaming (which requires CPU encoding) or recording gameplay will not compete for resources with the game itself, as the CPU has ample headroom. The PassMark physics score of 2,486, while lower than the multi-thread score, is still sufficient for physics-heavy game simulations, but the GPU’s 69th percentile ranking will constrain overall gaming performance more than the CPU will.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14900 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M?

A: The i9-14900 has an average benchmark score of 58,115, while the Xeon Platinum 8260M scores 58,323. This puts the i9-14900 0.4% behind the Xeon in aggregate performance, a difference that is negligible in real-world usage.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking and what does it mean?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 sits at the 69th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it outperforms 69% of GPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 23,877, which is within 1.2% of its nearest rivals.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor for gaming performance?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor for graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU’s 92nd percentile vastly exceeds the GPU’s 69th percentile, so frame rates will be constrained by the RX 9070’s performance, not the i9-14900’s processing power.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and what does it mean for single-threaded tasks?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, which contributes to its PassMark single-thread score of 4,323 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,212. This high clock speed ensures fast response in lightly threaded applications.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The i9-14900 has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 80 KB of L1 cache per core. This cache hierarchy supports the CPU’s strong performance in data compression (550,271 PassMark score) and random string sorting (61,060).

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RX 9070 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 644.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2518 MHz, which translates to 20.1 Gbps effective.

Q: How does the GPU perform in DirectX 12 compared to other APIs?

A: The PassMark DirectX 12 score is 74, which is lower than DirectX 11 at 281 and DirectX 9 at 343. However, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,290 indicates strong modern API performance in a full 3D workload.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 9070’s 69th percentile ranking means it can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming well, but the CPU’s 92nd percentile provides far more headroom than the GPU can use. Frame rates will be GPU-bound in most titles, and the 16 GB VRAM ensures textures and assets load without memory constraints. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6,290 suggests solid DX12 performance, though the GPU’s PassMark DirectX 12 score of 74 indicates some inconsistency across different test methodologies.

Streaming: The i9-14900’s 24 cores and 32 threads, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 44,578, provide exceptional encoding headroom. Streaming software can run on dedicated cores without impacting game performance, as the CPU’s performance is far above what the GPU can deliver in gaming workloads. The CPU’s data encryption score of 33,540 also aids in secure stream transport.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,070 and Geekbench multi-core score of 18,495 indicate strong rendering and export performance. The CPU’s 92nd percentile places it among the top processors for video encoding and effects processing. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth assist with GPU-accelerated effects and preview rendering.

3D rendering: The PassMark floating-point math score of 120,262 and integer math score of 175,010 show balanced compute for 3D workloads. The i9-14900’s 36 MB of L3 cache and 5.80 GHz boost clock provide excellent single-threaded performance for viewport manipulation, while the multi-thread score handles final frame rendering. The GPU’s 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates supported render engines.

Software development: The PassMark data compression score of 550,271 and random string sorting score of 61,060 indicate strong performance for compilation and data processing tasks. The CPU’s 24 cores allow parallel builds to complete quickly, and the 5.80 GHz boost clock keeps interactive tools responsive. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support provides flexibility for different motherboard configurations.

Student and office work: The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output, eliminating the need for a discrete GPU in non-graphics tasks. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,323 on PassMark ensures snappy application launches and document processing. The 65 W TDP means this processor can be cooled effectively in standard desktop cases, though the 92nd percentile performance is overkill for typical office workloads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture, using the Navi 48 chip fabricated on TSMC’s 4 nm process node. The chip contains 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 151.0 million per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 1330 MHz, a boost clock of 2520 MHz, and a game clock of 2070 MHz. Memory runs at 2518 MHz, providing 20.1 Gbps effective bandwidth across a 256-bit bus for a total of 644.6 GB/s.

The memory configuration includes 16 GB of GDDR6, which is substantial for modern games and content creation. The GPU features 3,584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units. Ray tracing is handled by 56 dedicated RT cores. The pixel rate is 322.6 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 564.5 GTexel/s. Compute performance reaches 36.13 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (at 1:1 ratio). The card has a TDP of 220 W, requires a 550 W power supply, and uses dual 8-pin power connectors. It occupies a dual-slot form factor and connects via PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1a ports.

Benchmark scores show an average of 23,877 across all tests, placing the GPU at the 69th percentile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,290 is the most modern 3D benchmark result. Geekbench OpenCL shows 131,539, while Vulkan scores 58,705. PassMark G3D is 25,381, with G2D at 1,280. PassMark GPU compute reaches 14,737. The DirectX scores on PassMark are 141 for DX10, 281 for DX11, 74 for DX12, and 343 for DX9, showing the GPU performs better on legacy APIs in that specific test suite.

The nearest rivals show the RX 9070 is closely matched with older high-end cards. It outperforms the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z by 0.6% (23,736 vs 23,877) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile by 1.1% (23,628 vs 23,877). It trails the AMD Radeon RX 6800S by 0.8% (24,063 vs 23,877) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER by 1.2% (24,170 vs 23,877). This places the RX 9070 in a performance tier comparable to the RTX 2080 SUPER, a card several generations old.

For rendering workloads, the 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 performance is substantial for GPU compute tasks, and the 16 GB VRAM reduces memory swapping in large scenes. The 56 RT cores provide dedicated ray tracing acceleration, though the overall GPU percentile suggests it is not a top-tier performer. The 644.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and large datasets, and the PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures no bandwidth bottleneck from the system bus.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s 92nd percentile and the GPU’s 69th percentile indicate that gaming performance will be entirely GPU-bound in most scenarios. The RX 9070’s average benchmark score of 23,877, which is comparable to the RTX 2080 SUPER’s 24,170 (within 1.2%), suggests that frame rates will align with what a card of that performance tier delivers.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the GPU will be the primary determinant of frame rates. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,290 indicates competent modern API performance, but the GPU’s 69th percentile means it will not match the highest-end cards. The 16 GB VRAM ensures that even texture-heavy titles at 1080p will not exhaust memory, avoiding stutter from memory swapping. The CPU’s high boost clock of 5.80 GHz and single-thread score of 4,323 on PassMark mean it will not bottleneck the GPU at this resolution.

At 1440p, the GPU’s workload increases, and the RX 9070 will continue to be the limiting factor. The 644.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB capacity support the larger textures and higher resolution targets. Frame rates will be lower than at 1080p, but the system will remain playable in most titles. The CPU’s performance headroom means there is no risk of CPU-induced frame drops in most scenarios.

At 4K resolution, the GPU will be severely strained. The 69th percentile ranking means the RX 9070 will struggle to maintain high frame rates at ultra settings in demanding titles. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 74, while not a direct FPS indicator, suggests that the GPU’s modern API performance may be inconsistent. Users targeting 4K gaming should expect to lower settings or use upscaling technologies to achieve playable frame rates. The CPU will have no difficulty keeping up, as its performance far exceeds what any current game demands.

The combined picture is that this system excels in CPU-bound gaming scenarios, such as strategy games, simulation titles, and MMOs with large player counts, where the i9-14900’s multi-thread performance prevents frame drops. In GPU-bound titles, such as AAA shooters and open-world adventures, the RX 9070 will determine the experience, and its performance will be adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but not competitive with top-tier graphics cards.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i9-14900 with the AMD Radeon RX 9070. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread processor from the Raptor Lake refresh generation, with a 5.80 GHz boost clock and 65 W TDP. The GPU is a Radeon RX 9000 series card with 16 GB GDDR6 memory, 3,584 shading units, and 56 RT cores. The combined percentile ranking is 81, placing this system in the upper quintile of all CPU+GPU pairings.

The system sits in a tier where the processor is the standout component. The CPU’s 92nd percentile is exceptional, matching or exceeding server-class Xeon and EPYC processors within 1% aggregate benchmark scores. The GPU’s 69th percentile is solid but not elite, placing it alongside the RTX 2080 SUPER and RX 6800S. This creates an asymmetric build where the CPU has significant headroom for future GPU upgrades.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for stationary use in a tower or similar form factor. The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility in motherboard and memory selection. The GPU requires a 550 W power supply and uses dual 8-pin connectors, which are standard in most desktop power supplies. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 in the CPU provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p: The RX 9070’s 69th percentile provides solid frame rates at these resolutions, and the i9-14900 ensures no CPU bottleneck. The 16 GB VRAM future-proofs against larger texture packs. The CPU’s 92nd percentile means the system will remain balanced for GPU upgrades in future years.

Content creators: The i9-14900’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,070 and PassMark multi-thread score of 44,578 make this an excellent platform for video editing, 3D rendering, and batch processing. The GPU’s 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and compute tasks, while 16 GB VRAM handles large project files.

Software developers: The PassMark data compression score of 550,271 and integer math score of 175,010 support fast compilation and test execution. The 24 cores allow parallel builds, and the high boost clock keeps interactive editors responsive. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support allows developers to choose memory based on budget and platform preferences.

Streamers: The CPU’s multi-thread performance allows simultaneous game and encode workloads without competition. The 65 W TDP means the CPU produces manageable heat in a streaming rig, and the GPU’s performance is sufficient for gameplay while the CPU handles encoding.

Students and professionals needing a workstation: The integrated graphics provide a fallback, and the CPU’s 92nd percentile ensures longevity for multi-year use in academic or professional settings. The system can handle everything from office productivity to scientific computing, with the PassMark floating-point score of 120,262 supporting numerical workloads.

Users with CPU-intensive workloads: For tasks like data analysis, virtualization, or database management, the i9-14900’s 24 cores and 32 threads provide exceptional throughput. The nearest rivals being Xeon and EPYC processors confirms this is enterprise-class compute performance in a desktop package. The GPU, while not top-tier, is more than adequate for typical workstation display and compute acceleration needs.