SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900

58,115 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i9-14900's position among all CPUs?

A: The Core i9-14900 sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 58,115. It trails the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M by just 0.4%, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D by 0.5%, and the Intel Xeon w5-2545 by 0.7%, while leading the AMD EPYC 9015 by 1%.

Q: How does the Radeon RX 9060 compare to its closest GPU rivals?

A: The RX 9060 lands at the 59th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 16,014. It sits 0.7% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, but is 1% ahead of both the AMD Radeon R9 370X and the AMD Radeon RX 7700, and 2.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5500.

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the CPU in this pairing?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz.

Q: What memory technologies does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support. The processor offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Radeon RX 9060 features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective.

Q: What API features does the GPU support?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It includes 28 ray tracing cores, and its FP32 and FP16 compute performance are both rated at 21.43 TFLOPS.

Q: Does the build have measured FPS data for games?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All FPS discussion must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-14900 delivers a commanding multi-threaded performance profile. In Cinebench R23, it scores 31,070 in multi-core and 2,212 in single-core. The Cinebench R20 results show 15,910 multi-core and 2,245 single-core, while Cinebench R15 yields 4,793 multi-core and 315 single-core. Geekbench reports 18,495 multi-core and 2,488 single-core. These figures place the CPU at the 92nd percentile, indicating that it outperforms roughly 92% of all processors in the database. The nearest rival comparisons show a tight cluster: the Xeon Platinum 8260M scores 58,323 on average (0.4% higher), the Ryzen 7 9850X3D averages 58,386 (0.5% higher), and the Xeon w5-2545 hits 58,504 (0.7% higher). The EPYC 9015 trails slightly at 57,555 (1% lower). This suggests the i9-14900 is essentially performance-equivalent to a mid-range Xeon and a high-end Ryzen, making its 92nd percentile ranking a reflection of very strong but not absolute top-tier performance.

On the graphics side, the Radeon RX 9060 posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,322. In Geekbench, it achieves 88,183 in OpenCL and 39,476 in Vulkan. Passmark results show a G3D score of 17,631, a GPU compute score of 9,919, and DirectX scores of 104 (DX10), 182 (DX11), 44 (DX12), and 280 (DX9). The G2D score is 1,002. The GPU sits at the 59th percentile, meaning it outperforms 59% of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 16,014 places it just below the RTX 3060 Ti (16,129, 0.7% higher), but above the R9 370X (15,862, 1% lower), the RX 7700 (15,852, 1% lower), and the Pro W5500 (15,679, 2.1% lower). The combined picture is a CPU that is elite in its class paired with a GPU that is solidly mid-range. The 92nd percentile CPU heavily outpaces the 59th percentile GPU, which hints at a system where the graphics card is the primary constraint in many workloads.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 58,115 is roughly 3.6 times higher than the GPU's average of 16,014, but that comparison is misleading because they measure different things. What matters is the percentile gap: a 33-point difference between the two components' percentiles suggests significant imbalance. The combined percentile for this build is 76, which reflects the overall system tier when both components are considered together. This means the pairing as a whole sits above three-quarters of all recorded builds, even though the GPU alone is closer to the median.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data points toward a CPU-bound system in most scenarios, but not because the GPU is weak. The i9-14900's 92nd percentile ranking versus the RX 9060's 59th percentile creates a situation where the CPU can feed frames far faster than the GPU can render them. In CPU-intensive workloads such as physics calculations, the Passmark physics score of 2,486 and multithread score of 44,578 demonstrate that the processor has substantial headroom. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 17,631 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,322 indicate it will be the limiting factor in graphically demanding tasks.

For gaming, the bottleneck is clearly the GPU. The CPU's single-thread performance, measured by Passmark single-thread score of 4,323 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2,212, is more than adequate for high-refresh gaming. The GPU, however, with its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus, will constrain frame rates in modern titles, especially at higher resolutions. The FPS scaling would show diminishing returns when lowering resolution — the CPU would be capable of much higher frame rates, but the GPU's rendering throughput caps the output.

In compute or productivity scenarios, the balance shifts. The CPU's multithread scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 31,070, Geekbench multi-core of 18,495) suggest that the processor is the primary driver for rendering, encoding, and compilation tasks. The GPU's compute score of 9,919 in Passmark and 88,183 in OpenCL are respectable but not class-leading. For 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, the RX 9060 will hold back the system, while CPU-based rendering will leverage the i9-14900's full potential.

The PCIe Gen 5 interface on the CPU and PCIe 5.0 x16 on the GPU mean that bandwidth is not a bottleneck in either direction. The 288.0 GB/s GPU memory bandwidth is sufficient for its class but will limit performance in texture-heavy workloads. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and 132 W TDP of the GPU suggest that the system's power draw is modest relative to the performance on offer, and the suggested PSU of 300 W confirms that this is not a power-hungry pairing. The bottleneck profile is therefore workload-dependent: GPU-bound in gaming and graphics, CPU-bound in multithreaded productivity.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need exceptional CPU throughput but are willing to accept a mid-range GPU. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p will find that the RX 9060, at the 59th GPU percentile, delivers playable frame rates in most titles, while the i9-14900's 92nd CPU percentile ensures that frame pacing and physics calculations are never the limiting factor. Content creators who work with video editing or software development will benefit disproportionately from the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, as these workloads scale well with the 31,070 Cinebench R23 multi-core score.

Students and small business workstations that run virtual machines, compile code, or process large datasets will find the CPU's performance exceptional for the platform's power envelope. The 65 W TDP means that cooling requirements are modest, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation use. The GPU's capabilities, while not top-tier, are sufficient for general-purpose GUI acceleration and light GPU compute, as indicated by its Passmark G2D score of 1,002 and compute score of 9,919.

The build is less suitable for users who prioritize high-end gaming at 4K or ray tracing, where the GPU's 59th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM would be a significant constraint. Similarly, professional 3D artists using GPU-based renderers would find the RX 9060's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 performance limiting compared to higher-tier alternatives. The target user is someone who values CPU throughput as the primary metric and treats GPU performance as secondary or adequate for their specific needs.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,212) can drive high frame rates, but the GPU's 59th percentile ranking will likely cap performance in demanding titles. Estimated frame rates would be solidly playable, but not competitive with higher-tier GPUs. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, and frame rates would drop proportionally to the GPU's rendering capabilities.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The Passmark multithread score of 44,578 and Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 15,910 indicate that software encoding would have minimal impact on game performance. The GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores means hardware encoding would rely on its standard video encoders, which are not detailed in the benchmark data.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing and export times benefit from the CPU's 31,070 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and some 4K editing, though effects-heavy projects may see GPU-related slowdowns. The OpenCL score of 88,183 suggests reasonable acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering (such as Blender's Cycles) would leverage the i9-14900's multithread capabilities, with the Passmark integer math score of 175,010 and floating point math score of 120,262 indicating strong throughput. GPU-based rendering would be limited by the RX 9060's 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is mid-range at best.

Software development: Compilation times benefit from the CPU's 32 threads and high cache hierarchy (36 MB L3). The Passmark data compression score of 550,271 and encryption score of 33,540 indicate strong performance for build server-like workloads. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for typical office tasks, but the CPU's single-thread score of 4,323 in Passmark ensures snappy responsiveness. The GPU's G2D score of 1,002 handles desktop composition without issue. The low TDPs (65 W CPU, 132 W GPU) mean the system runs cool and quiet, suitable for shared workspaces.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14900 uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the final generation for that platform. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing builders to choose based on budget and availability, with dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, and the GPU supports PCIe 5.0 x16, ensuring that the interface is future-proof for the next several years.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, which is low for a 24-core processor and indicates that the platform has significant power headroom. The GPU has a TDP of 132 W, and the suggested PSU is 300 W, meaning that the total system draw is modest. This leaves ample room for upgrades. A sensible next step would be to replace the RX 9060 with a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking can support significantly more powerful graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck.

The socket's end-of-life status means that CPU upgrades would require a motherboard change, but the current processor's performance is high enough that such an upgrade would be unnecessary for several years. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that future GPUs and NVMe drives will be fully utilized. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for workstation use, and the dual-channel memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5, giving flexibility in memory choice.

The platform's power delivery is not a constraint: the 300 W suggested PSU is conservative, and the 65 W CPU TDP means that even a modest cooler would suffice. The GPU's 1x 8-pin power connector is standard, and the dual-slot design fits most cases. The upgrade path is clearly GPU-first, with the CPU being the long-lived component.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.00 GHz, boosting to 5.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. The CPU uses UHD Graphics 770 for integrated graphics, and it has a TDP of 65 W.

The benchmark results paint a picture of a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multithreaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,070 places it among the top CPUs, and the single-core score of 2,212 is competitive with the best consumer chips. The Geekbench scores of 18,495 multi-core and 2,488 single-core show consistent performance across different benchmark suites. The Passmark results break down performance by workload: integer math at 175,010, floating point at 120,262, and multithread at 44,578.

The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs is supported by its nearest rivals. It is 0.4% behind the Xeon Platinum 8260M, 0.5% behind the Ryzen 7 9850X3D, and 0.7% behind the Xeon w5-2545, while leading the EPYC 9015 by 1%. These tiny margins suggest that the i9-14900 is effectively at parity with these enterprise and high-end consumer chips, making it a versatile choice for both desktop and workstation use.

The Passmark data compression score of 550,271 and encryption score of 33,540 indicate strong performance for data-intensive tasks. The extended instructions score of 30,624 and find prime numbers score of 188 show that the CPU handles a wide range of workloads efficiently. The single-thread score of 4,323 is the same as the singlethread score, confirming consistency in measurement. The CPU's production status is Active, and it was released on 2024-01-07, with a launch MSRP of $549.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i9-14900 and the AMD Radeon RX 9060. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread processor at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is an 8 GB GDDR6 card at the 59th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for the build is 76, placing it above three-quarters of all recorded system configurations.

The pairing represents a high-end CPU with a mid-range GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score of 58,115 is within 1% of several enterprise Xeon and high-end Ryzen processors, indicating that it can handle workstation-class workloads. The GPU's average benchmark score of 16,014 is within 2.1% of the RTX 3060 Ti, RX 7700, and other mid-range cards, suggesting it is a capable 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming solution.

The build class is "desktop," and the overall tier, based on the 76th combined percentile, is upper-mid-range. The CPU is the star of the show, while the GPU is adequate but not exceptional. This is a system designed for users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks like rendering, compilation, and data processing, with gaming as a secondary consideration. The low TDPs (65 W CPU, 132 W GPU) and 300 W suggested PSU make it an efficient build that does not require exotic cooling or power delivery.

The architecture pairing is noteworthy: Intel's Raptor Lake CPU with AMD's RDNA 4.0 GPU. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support and the GPU's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensure that the data path is not a bottleneck. The GPU's 4 nm process from TSMC (with 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die) is more advanced than the CPU's 10 nm process, but the CPU's larger core count and cache compensate. This is a balanced system in terms of overall capability, even if the individual components are at different performance tiers.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is based on the Navi 44 chip, using the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the codename Strix Point. It is built on TSMC's 4 nm process with 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 149.2 million per mm². The GPU has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations units. It includes 28 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 1700 MHz, with a boost clock of 2990 MHz and a game clock of 2400 MHz. The memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), with 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The pixel rate is 191.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 334.9 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 performance are both 21.43 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The GPU has a TDP of 132 W, uses a dual-slot design with a single 8-pin power connector, and requires a suggested PSU of 300 W. It supports PCIe 5.0 x16 and has display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a.

In benchmarks, the GPU scores 3,322 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 88,183 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 39,476 in Geekbench Vulkan. Passmark results include a G3D score of 17,631, GPU compute of 9,919, and DirectX scores ranging from 44 (DX12) to 280 (DX9), with a G2D score of 1,002. The GPU's 59th percentile ranking places it just below the RTX 3060 Ti (0.7% higher) and above the R9 370X and RX 7700 (both 1% lower) and the Pro W5500 (2.1% lower).

For rendering, the 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 performance is mid-range, suitable for 1080p gaming and light GPU-accelerated workloads. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for current titles at 1080p, but may be limiting for 1440p with high-resolution textures. The 128-bit memory bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest, potentially constraining performance in bandwidth-intensive scenarios. The ray tracing cores (28) provide hardware acceleration, but the GPU's overall RT performance is not expected to be competitive with higher-tier cards. The GPU's production status is Active, released on 2025-08-04, with no launch MSRP listed in the data.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not measured results. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking and the GPU's 59th percentile ranking provide the basis for these estimates.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the RX 9060's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,322 and Passmark G3D score of 17,631 suggest that frame rates would be playable in most titles, likely ranging from 60 to 90 FPS depending on the game's optimization. The CPU's single-thread performance (4,323 in Passmark single-thread) ensures that frame pacing is consistent, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus would cause stuttering in texture-heavy titles.

At 1440p, the GPU's bandwidth and VRAM limitations become more pronounced. Estimated frame rates would drop to 40 to 60 FPS in demanding titles, with the GPU being the clear bottleneck. The CPU would have significant headroom, as indicated by its 31,070 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, but the GPU's rendering throughput would cap performance. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p but marginal for 1440p in modern titles.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the CPU's high single-thread performance would allow for very high frame rates, but the GPU's 59th percentile ranking would still limit the absolute maximum FPS. Estimated frame rates could reach 144 FPS or higher in these lighter titles at 1080p. For AAA games, the estimates are more conservative, with the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 44 in Passmark (which is a relative measure, not absolute) suggesting that DX12 titles may not be fully optimized for this GPU.

The lack of measured FPS data means that these estimates carry uncertainty. The GPU's performance relative to the RTX 3060 Ti (0.7% lower average score) suggests that the RX 9060 would perform similarly to that card in gaming, which is a known 1080p performer. The CPU's performance relative to the Ryzen 7 9850X3D (0.5% lower average score) indicates that it would not bottleneck even high-end GPUs, but in this pairing, the GPU is the limiting factor. Overall, gaming performance is expected to be solid at 1080p, adequate at 1440p, and not suitable for 4K ultra settings.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900

AMD Radeon RX 9060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds