SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900

58,115 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-14900 + AMD Radeon RX 7600: A Desktop Pairing Analysis

This build pairs Intel's 24-core Raptor Lake flagship-class processor with AMD's entry-level RDNA 3 graphics card, creating a desktop system where CPU capability dramatically outpaces GPU headroom. The Core i9-14900 sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the RX 7600 lands at the 57th percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 75. This imbalance defines the character of the system: it is a compute monster paired with a 1080p-oriented graphics solution, and the benchmark data consistently reflects that division of labor.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The GPU packs 13,300 million transistors across a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². Memory configuration consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. Clock speeds are specified at a base of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2250 MHz, and a boost clock of 2655 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective.

The shader array comprises 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations pipelines. Ray tracing hardware is present in the form of 32 RT cores, though the card lacks dedicated tensor cores. Pixel rate is listed at 169.9 GPixel/s, texture rate at 339.8 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute at 21.75 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1). The GPU supports PCIe 4.0 x8, has a TDP of 165 W, and requires a suggested PSU of 450 W with a single 8-pin power connector.

Benchmark results for the RX 7600 show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310, which is a modest result for modern DirectX 12 workloads. Geekbench scores include 88051 in OpenCL and 34401 in Vulkan, indicating compute performance that is respectable but not exceptional. PassMark scores break down as 16634 in G3D, 8790 in GPU compute, and older API results of 226 in DirectX 9, 172 in DirectX 11, 84 in DirectX 10, and 58 in DirectX 12. The G2D score is 984. The average benchmark score across all tests is 15171, placing the GPU at the 57th percentile.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the RX 7600 sits within a tight cluster. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 15199, a delta of -0.2% relative to the RX 7600, meaning the two are effectively tied. The AMD Radeon Pro 560X scores 15082, which is 0.6% lower, while the AMD Radeon 680M integrated graphics scores 15270, 0.7% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 15063, 0.7% lower. This grouping indicates that the RX 7600's raw benchmark performance is comparable to a range of older and lower-tier cards, despite its modern architecture.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 throughput of 21.75 TFLOPS provides a baseline for compute-heavy tasks, though the absence of tensor cores means AI-accelerated rendering features are unavailable. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for 1080p textures but may constrain higher-resolution or texture-heavy scenes. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the card's compute level, but the 128-bit bus limits memory throughput compared to wider-memory designs. Overall, the GPU benchmark scores suggest a card suited to entry-level rendering, where the 32 RT cores can assist with ray-traced effects but the overall throughput will be the limiting factor.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i9-14900 delivers CPU benchmark scores that place it firmly in high-end territory. In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 4793 multi-core and 315 single-core. Cinebench R20 results show 15910 multi-core and 2245 single-core. Cinebench R23, a more demanding test, yields 31070 multi-core and 2212 single-core. Geekbench scores are 18495 multi-core and 2488 single-core. PassMark tests show a multithread score of 44578, single-thread of 4323, physics of 2486, floating-point math of 120262, integer math of 175010, extended instructions of 30624, data compression of 550271, data encryption of 33540, random string sorting of 61060, and find prime numbers of 188. The average benchmark score is 58115, placing the CPU at the 92nd percentile.

The nearest CPU rivals illustrate the i9-14900's position. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M scores 58323, a delta of -0.4% relative to the i9-14900, meaning the Xeon is essentially equal. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D scores 58386, which is 0.5% higher. The Intel Xeon w5-2545 scores 58504, 0.7% higher. The AMD EPYC 9015 scores 57555, which is 1.0% lower. These deltas of less than one percent across all four rivals place the i9-14900 in a tightly competitive band where no single processor holds a meaningful advantage.

The GPU benchmarks, as detailed above, give an average score of 15171 at the 57th percentile. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 75, reflecting the dominance of the CPU in overall system performance metrics. The gap between the CPU's 92nd percentile and the GPU's 57th percentile is the defining characteristic of this build.

The combined picture is one of severe asymmetry. The CPU is capable of handling the most demanding multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31070 and PassMark multithread score of 44578. The GPU, however, is positioned to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p, with benchmark scores that place it near the midpoint of all GPUs. This means the system will excel at CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and productivity, while GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming will be limited by the RX 7600's capabilities.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 75, based on the CPU's 92nd percentile and the GPU's 57th percentile.

Q: How does the Core i9-14900 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D?

A: The Ryzen 7 9850X3D has an average benchmark score of 58386, which is 0.5% higher than the i9-14900's score of 58115, indicating near-identical performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Radeon RX 7600?

A: The RX 7600 has a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s, achieved with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Does the RX 7600 have tensor cores for AI acceleration?

A: No, the RX 7600 does not have tensor cores; it has 32 RT cores for ray tracing but no tensor hardware.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the RX 7600?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 7600 is 450 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 165 W.

Q: How does the RX 7600's benchmark score compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM scores 15199, which is 0.2% lower than the RX 7600's score of 15171, making them nearly identical in performance.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core i9-14900?

A: The launch MSRP of the Core i9-14900 is $549.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i9-14900 and AMD Radeon RX 7600. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussion must be framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 57th percentile and average benchmark score of 15171, alongside its 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, suggest a card targeting 1080p gaming. The CPU's 92nd percentile ensures that frame rates will not be CPU-limited in most scenarios, allowing the GPU to operate at its full potential.

For 1080p gaming, the RX 7600's performance level, as indicated by its proximity to the RTX 3050 OEM and other mid-range cards, should deliver playable frame rates in most titles at high or ultra settings. The 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 169.9 GPixel/s pixel rate support this expectation. However, the 8 GB VRAM may become a constraint in newer titles with high-resolution textures, potentially requiring reduced settings. At 1440p, the GPU's bandwidth and memory capacity will likely limit performance, with frame rates dropping below the smooth threshold in demanding games. At 4K, the RX 7600 is expected to struggle, as the 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB capacity are insufficient for the memory bandwidth demands of high-resolution rendering.

The CPU's performance ensures that even in CPU-intensive games, the i9-14900 will provide consistent frame pacing. The 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, deliver single-thread performance that is competitive with the best available, as shown by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2212. This means that any frame rate limitations in gaming will come from the GPU, not the CPU. The overall gaming experience is estimated to be solid at 1080p, adequate at 1440p with settings adjustments, and poor at 4K, based on the benchmark scores and hardware specifications.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the RX 7600's 57th percentile and average score of 15171 should support frame rates in the range suitable for 144 Hz monitors in less demanding titles, but the 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are likely to cap performance in AAA games. The CPU's single-core performance, evidenced by a 4323 PassMark single-thread score, will not bottleneck frame generation, but the GPU will determine the ceiling.

Streaming: The i9-14900's 24 cores and 32 threads, with a PassMark multithread score of 44578, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU's lack of tensor cores means no dedicated AI-based encoding, but the CPU can handle x264 encoding at high presets without significant frame drops, given its 92nd percentile performance.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31070 and Geekbench multi-core of 18495 indicate strong performance in timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 compute can accelerate effects processing, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit the use of GPU-accelerated effects in large 4K projects.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will excel, with the i9-14900's 36 MB of L3 cache and high multi-core scores reducing render times. GPU rendering is possible but constrained by the RX 7600's 57th percentile and 8 GB memory, making it suitable for smaller scenes or preview renders rather than final-frame production at high resolutions.

Software development: Compilation and parallel build tasks will benefit from the CPU's 32 threads and 175010 PassMark integer math score. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, but its support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 allows for API testing and graphics debugging at 1080p.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance is overkill for document editing and web browsing, but the 4323 PassMark single-thread score ensures snappy responsiveness. The GPU's 984 PassMark G2D score supports 2D acceleration for multiple monitors, and the 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption moderate for sustained office workloads.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who prioritize CPU compute over GPU graphics. Gamers at 1080p who play esports or less demanding titles will find the RX 7600 sufficient, with the i9-14900 ensuring no CPU bottleneck. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's 92nd percentile performance, as evidenced by Cinebench R23 multi-core of 31070, while accepting the GPU's limitations for GPU-accelerated effects. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 32 threads and PassMark data compression score of 550271, which indicates strong throughput in parallel tasks.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will have more CPU power than needed for coursework, but the 65 W TDP keeps the system efficient for long study sessions. Small business workstations running virtualization or database workloads will leverage the CPU's 44578 PassMark multithread score, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for basic CAD or 2D design. The system is not suited for 4K gaming or high-end GPU rendering, as the RX 7600's 57th percentile and 8 GB memory capacity are clear limitations. Users who need ray tracing performance will find the 32 RT cores helpful at 1080p but insufficient for demanding ray-traced titles at higher resolutions.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance of this system is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The i9-14900's 92nd percentile versus the RX 7600's 57th percentile creates a 35-percentile gap, meaning the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-bound workloads. In gaming, the CPU's single-thread performance, indicated by a 2212 Cinebench R23 single-core score, is sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p, but the GPU's benchmark scores suggest it will reach its limits before the CPU does. FPS scaling, though not measured, would show that increasing resolution from 1080p to 1440p or 4K would cause frame rates to drop due to the GPU's 288.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM, while the CPU would remain underutilized.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, compilation, or 3D scene processing, the GPU is not a factor, and the CPU operates at its full potential. The bottleneck shifts entirely to the CPU, which is a high-performance part, so these workloads will run efficiently. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks like rendering with ray tracing or high-resolution texture work, the RX 7600's 32 RT cores and 8 GB memory will be the constraint, and the CPU's power will go unused. The 165 W GPU TDP and 65 W CPU TDP indicate that power delivery is not a bottleneck, with the 450 W suggested PSU providing ample headroom for both components.

The combined percentile of 75 reflects this imbalance, as the system's overall performance is dragged down by the GPU. For a balanced build, the GPU would need to be upgraded to a higher percentile to match the CPU, but as configured, the data clearly shows that the RX 7600 is the primary limiter in any workload that relies on graphics or GPU compute.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This build is a desktop-class system, as indicated by the buildClass field. It pairs the Intel Core i9-14900, a 24-core, 32-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, with the AMD Radeon RX 7600, an 8 GB GDDR6 GPU from the Radeon RX 7000 series. The CPU is built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, using a 10 nm process, while the GPU uses RDNA 3.0 on a 6 nm process.

The overall tier of this system, as measured by the combined percentile of 75, places it in the upper-middle range of all desktop configurations. The CPU's 92nd percentile means it is among the top 8% of all CPUs, rivaling server-grade Xeon and EPYC processors in average benchmark score. The GPU's 57th percentile places it slightly above the median, meaning it is a mid-range graphics card. The combination results in a system that outperforms most desktops in CPU-intensive tasks but is average in graphics performance. This is a workstation-class CPU paired with an entry-level gaming GPU, making the build suitable for productivity-focused users who occasionally game at 1080p.

The launch MSRP of the CPU is $549, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 269 USD, but these are the only pricing details available and should not be interpreted as a value assessment. The system's production status is active for both components, with the CPU released on 2024-01-07 and the GPU on 2023-05-24.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-14900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. The die size is 257 mm², and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, and the TDP is 65 W. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU only, and integrated graphics are present in the form of UHD Graphics 770. The multiplier is not unlocked, meaning overclocking is limited.

Benchmark scores indicate exceptional multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31070 is a strong result that places the CPU in the top percentile for rendering and compute tasks. PassMark multithread score of 44578 and integer math of 175010 further confirm its capability in parallel workloads. The Geekbench multi-core score of 18495 is competitive with workstation processors. Single-thread performance is also strong, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4323 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2212, ensuring responsiveness in everyday tasks.

For real workloads, the 24 cores and 32 threads handle heavily threaded applications like video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing with ease. The 36 MB of L3 cache reduces memory latency in data-intensive tasks, while the 5.80 GHz boost clock provides fast single-thread execution for legacy or lightly threaded software. The 65 W TDP is notably low for a 24-core processor, suggesting efficient power delivery, and the support for ECC memory makes it suitable for workstation environments where data integrity is critical. The lack of an unlocked multiplier limits manual overclocking, but the high boost clock already provides substantial performance out of the box.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, giving users flexibility in choosing memory technology. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, enabling high-bandwidth connections for next-generation GPUs or NVMe storage. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it operates at the lower PCIe 4.0 bandwidth. The RX 7600 has a TDP of 165 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 65 W, resulting in a combined TDP of 230 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450 W, which provides significant headroom for the entire system, including other components like drives and fans. This headroom means that a more powerful GPU could be installed without upgrading the power supply, as long as the total system power remains within the PSU's capacity.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RX 7600 with a higher-performance GPU to balance the system. The CPU's 92nd percentile and PCIe Gen 5 support mean it can drive a much faster graphics card without bottlenecking. The 450 W PSU headroom suggests that a GPU with a TDP up to approximately 300 W could be accommodated, though this would depend on the rest of the system's power draw. Alternatively, users could add more memory, as the dual-channel support and ECC capability allow for expansion. The platform also supports PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives, so storage upgrades are possible. The CPU's socket, Socket 1700, is shared with other 14th Gen and 13th Gen processors, meaning a CPU upgrade would not be necessary for most users, as the i9-14900 is already near the top of its generation.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900

AMD Radeon RX 7600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds