SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900

58,115 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of an Intel Core i9-14900 with an AMD Radeon RX 7400 presents one of the most pronounced asymmetrical configurations in the database. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU languishes at the 17th percentile among all graphics cards. This 75-point gap in percentile ranking is not merely a statistical curiosity — it defines the entire character of this build.

In workload terms, the bottleneck is unequivocally the GPU. The Core i9-14900's multi-threaded might, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,070, is effectively untapped when paired with a GPU whose Passmark G3D score of 11,897 places it in the bottom fifth of the graphics hierarchy. For gaming, this means the RX 7400 will be the limiting factor in virtually every scenario, regardless of resolution or graphical settings.

However, the data suggests this imbalance is not necessarily a design flaw but rather a deliberate architectural choice. The CPU's TDP of 65 watts, combined with the GPU's TDP of just 43 watts, creates a system with a remarkably low total power envelope. The suggested PSU of 200 watts confirms this: the entire platform can run on a power supply that many standalone high-end GPUs would find inadequate. This is a system designed for efficiency, not brute-force gaming performance.

The FPS scaling implications are stark. At 1080p, the GPU's pixel rate of 147.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 257.6 GTexel/s will be the primary determinants of frame rates. The CPU's single-thread performance — a Passmark single-thread score of 4,323 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,488 — is more than sufficient to feed even the most demanding game engines, meaning the GPU will saturate well before the CPU breaks a sweat. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU bottleneck becomes even more pronounced, as the RX 7400's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will struggle to maintain playable frame rates in modern titles.

The compute side tells a similar story. The CPU's Passmark multi-thread score of 44,578 and floating-point math score of 120,262 indicate a processor capable of handling heavy productivity workloads. The GPU's Passmark compute score of 5,152, while respectable for its class, is not in the same league as the CPU's computational throughput. For tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the CPU will be doing the heavy lifting, with the GPU providing only modest acceleration.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-14900 delivers exceptional benchmark results across the board, befitting its position at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 58,115 places it within striking distance of significantly more expensive workstation processors. The nearest rival, the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M, scores 58,323, a delta of just -0.4 percent — essentially a statistical tie. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D at 58,386 is only 0.5 percent ahead, while the Intel Xeon w5-2545 at 58,504 is 0.7 percent ahead. The only rival the i9-14900 clearly beats is the AMD EPYC 9015 at 57,555, which trails by 1 percent.

Single-thread performance is where the i9-14900 truly shines. A Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,212 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4,323 demonstrate excellent per-core efficiency, critical for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The Geekbench single-core score of 2,488 reinforces this picture. Multi-threaded workloads benefit from the 24 cores and 32 threads, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 18,495 and a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 15,910.

The GPU's benchmark results tell a very different story. With an average benchmark score of just 2,467, the RX 7400 sits at the 17th percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,103 is modest, and its Passmark scores reflect its entry-level positioning: 11,897 in G3D, 5,152 in GPU compute, and notably low DirectX scores — 44 in DirectX 12, 97 in DirectX 11, 59 in DirectX 10, and 176 in DirectX 9. The nearest rivals are all in the same performance strata: the AMD Radeon 8040S at 2,440 (1.1 percent ahead of the RX 7400), the NVIDIA GeForce 710M at 2,433 (1.4 percent ahead), the Intel HD Graphics 610 at 2,425 (1.8 percent ahead), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M at 2,422 (1.9 percent ahead).

The combined percentile of 55 for this pairing reflects a system that is neither a high-end gaming rig nor a budget compromise — it is a middle-tier configuration with a glaring internal performance disparity. The CPU is overkill for the GPU, yet the overall system lands squarely in the middle of the performance distribution.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900 is a desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. It uses a 10 nm process node from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The chip features 24 cores and 32 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores to balance throughput with power consumption. The base clock of 2.00 GHz and boost clock of 5.80 GHz provide a wide dynamic range, allowing the processor to scale from idle efficiency to maximum performance on demand.

The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large pool of fast memory helps keep the cores fed with data, particularly beneficial for multi-threaded workloads that can leverage the shared L3. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support — a feature typically found in workstation-class platforms.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that excels at both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R15 single-core score of 315 and multi-core score of 4,793 demonstrate strong scaling across cores. The Passmark results show particular strengths in integer math (175,010), floating-point math (120,262), and data compression (550,271). Encryption performance is also solid at 33,540. The extended instructions score of 30,624 indicates good SIMD performance, beneficial for multimedia and scientific applications.

For real-world workloads, these numbers translate to snappy application launches, responsive multitasking, and fast compilation times for developers. The 32 threads provide ample parallelism for video encoding, 3D rendering, and other heavily threaded productivity tasks. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output and hardware acceleration fallback, though the discrete RX 7400 will handle most graphics duties.

The processor's 65 W TDP is remarkably low for a 24-core chip, suggesting Intel has tuned this SKU for power efficiency rather than maximum performance. This makes it suitable for compact builds and systems where thermal management is a concern. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for modern storage and expansion cards.

# Who Should Build It

This configuration targets a specific niche: users who require serious CPU horsepower but have modest graphics demands. The target audience is not the hardcore gamer — the GPU's 17th percentile ranking would frustrate anyone seeking high-refresh gaming — but rather professionals and enthusiasts whose primary workloads are CPU-bound.

Software developers and engineers would benefit enormously from this pairing. The i9-14900's 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with its Passmark multi-thread score of 44,578, make it an excellent choice for compiling large codebases, running virtual machines, or executing CI/CD pipelines. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes. The modest GPU is sufficient for desktop compositing and 2D acceleration, with a Passmark G2D score of 1,209.

Students and researchers working with computational workloads — simulations, data analysis, or machine learning preprocessing — would find the CPU's floating-point math score of 120,262 and integer math score of 175,010 invaluable. The low 65 W TDP means the system can run quietly and efficiently in shared spaces or small apartments without excessive heat output.

Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and office productivity would be well-served by the CPU's strong single-thread performance — a Passmark single-thread score of 4,323 ensures responsive application performance. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth can drive multiple high-resolution displays for productivity workflows, though demanding 3D CAD or video editing would strain the GPU's capabilities.

Content creators are a more nuanced case. For video editing, the CPU's multi-threaded power handles codec-heavy workloads well, but the GPU's compute score of 5,152 limits GPU-accelerated effects and rendering. For 3D rendering, the CPU can handle ray tracing and complex scenes, but the GPU will not accelerate these tasks meaningfully. Photographers working with large RAW files would benefit from the CPU's data compression score of 550,271, but the GPU's modest DirectX scores suggest limited GPU-accelerated editing support.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is an entry-level graphics card built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed "Hotpink Bonefish." It uses a 6 nm process from TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die — a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The chip, Navi 33, is the smallest in the RX 7000 series lineup.

The GPU features 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations units. Clock speeds are modest: a base clock of 1,452 MHz, a game clock of 2,200 MHz, and a boost clock of 2,300 MHz. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at 2,250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), yielding a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The pixel rate of 147.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 257.6 GTexel/s are adequate for 1080p gaming at medium settings but will struggle at higher resolutions.

The ray tracing hardware includes 28 RT cores, though the absence of dedicated tensor cores means AI-accelerated features are limited. The FP32 performance of 16.49 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 32.97 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) are modest figures that place the card firmly in the entry-level segment. The API support is comprehensive — DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 — ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications.

The benchmark scores reflect the card's positioning. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,103 is low even for entry-level cards. The Passmark DirectX scores are inconsistent: 176 in DirectX 9, 97 in DirectX 11, 59 in DirectX 10, and 44 in DirectX 12. These numbers suggest the card performs best with older APIs and legacy titles, while modern DirectX 12 games will be more demanding. The G3D score of 11,897 and compute score of 5,152 confirm the card's place near the bottom of the performance hierarchy, just ahead of integrated graphics solutions.

The card's power characteristics are its saving grace. A TDP of just 43 W, with a single 6-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 200 W, makes it remarkably energy-efficient. The dual-slot cooler and PCIe 4.0 x8 interface are standard for this class. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, supporting modern high-refresh monitors.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Socket 1700 platform offers a defined but limited upgrade path. As the final generation to use this socket, the Core i9-14900 represents the pinnacle of what the platform can offer — there is no faster CPU available for Socket 1700. This means buyers are at the end of the line for processor upgrades, though the existing CPU is already near the top of the performance charts.

Memory support is flexible, with dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 compatibility. This allows builders to choose between older, more affordable DDR4 modules or newer, faster DDR5 kits. The ECC memory support is a bonus for workstation users, though it requires compatible motherboard and memory combinations. The memory bandwidth is unspecified in the data, but dual-channel operation with either memory type provides adequate throughput for the CPU's 24 cores.

PCIe connectivity comes from the CPU's Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes. This provides ample bandwidth for the RX 7400's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface — the GPU will not be bottlenecked by the bus — and leaves room for Gen 5 NVMe storage or other expansion cards. The platform supports the full PCIe Gen 5 specification, ensuring forward compatibility with next-generation peripherals.

The power delivery requirements are modest. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 43 W TDP combine for a total draw that a 200 W PSU can comfortably handle, as suggested by the power supply recommendation. This leaves headroom for additional drives, fans, and other components without requiring a PSU upgrade. The 1x 6-pin power connector for the GPU is standard and compatible with virtually all power supplies.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU. The CPU has enormous headroom — its 92nd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 17th percentile means there is significant untapped gaming and compute potential. Swapping the RX 7400 for a mid-range or high-end GPU would transform this system from a productivity-focused workstation into a capable gaming rig, leveraging the CPU's strong single-thread performance (4,323 Passmark single-thread) and multi-thread capabilities (44,578 Passmark multi-thread).

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 55, placing this build in the middle of the performance distribution for all desktop configurations.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14900 compare to its nearest CPU rival?

A: The i9-14900 has an average benchmark score of 58,115, which is 0.4 percent behind the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (58,323), 0.5 percent behind the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D (58,386), and 0.7 percent behind the Intel Xeon w5-2545 (58,504). It is 1 percent ahead of the AMD EPYC 9015 (57,555).

Q: How much VRAM does the AMD Radeon RX 7400 have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The RX 7400 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the Core i9-14900 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the processor supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation and server applications requiring error correction.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, the GPU has a TDP of 43 W, and the suggested PSU is 200 W.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The RX 7400 is at the 17th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2,467.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination. All gaming performance figures discussed must be treated as estimates based on the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i9-14900, a 24-core, 32-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, with the AMD Radeon RX 7400, an entry-level GPU from the RX 7000 series based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The configuration represents a study in contrasts: a top-tier CPU at the 92nd percentile paired with a bottom-tier GPU at the 17th percentile, resulting in an overall combined percentile of 55.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 58,115 places it among the top processors in the database, rivaling workstation-class Xeon and Threadripper chips. The GPU's average benchmark score of 2,467 places it in the company of integrated graphics and decade-old mobile GPUs. This disparity defines the system's character: it is a computing powerhouse with graphics capabilities that are merely adequate.

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1700, with support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, and a 65 W TDP for the CPU. The GPU uses a 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors and operates at a modest 43 W TDP. The entire system can run on a 200 W power supply, making it one of the most power-efficient high-CPU-performance configurations available.

This build is not for gamers seeking high frame rates — the GPU's 17th percentile ranking precludes that. Instead, it is for users who need exceptional CPU performance for productivity, development, or computational workloads, and who require only basic graphics capability for display output and light acceleration. The upgrade path is clear: replacing the GPU with a more powerful model would unlock the CPU's full potential in gaming and graphics-accelerated workloads.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The database contains no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core i9-14900 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7400, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the two components.

Based on the GPU's performance metrics — a Passmark G3D score of 11,897, a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,103, and a pixel rate of 147.2 GPixel/s — the RX 7400 is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium to low settings in modern titles. The DirectX 12 score of 44 suggests poor performance in current-generation games that rely heavily on DX12 features. Older titles using DirectX 9 (score of 176) or DirectX 11 (score of 97) will fare better, but still below what gamers expect from a discrete GPU.

The CPU's gaming-relevant performance is excellent. A Passmark single-thread score of 4,323 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,488 indicate the i9-14900 can easily feed frames to any GPU, including far more powerful ones than the RX 7400. The CPU will not be a bottleneck at any resolution; the GPU will saturate at approximately the same frame rate regardless of whether the CPU is running at stock or overclocked.

At 1080p, the RX 7400's 8 GB of VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for esports titles and older games, which should run at playable frame rates. Modern AAA games will require significant settings reductions to maintain 30-60 FPS. At 1440p, the GPU's bandwidth and pixel rate become serious limitations, with most modern games running at below 30 FPS even at low settings. At 4K, the GPU is largely unusable for gaming, with even the lightest titles struggling to maintain playable frame rates.

The takeaway is that this build is not a gaming system. Its value lies elsewhere, and gamers should look to different GPU options to pair with the capable i9-14900.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not viable with the RX 7400. The GPU's 17th percentile ranking and low DirectX 12 score of 44 mean that even 1080p high-refresh gaming is out of reach for modern titles. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (4,323 Passmark) is wasted in this configuration, as the GPU cannot produce enough frames to benefit from the CPU's capabilities.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,070, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. Streamers using x264 encoding at medium or slower presets would find the i9-14900 more than capable. However, the GPU's modest performance limits the games that can be streamed, as the RX 7400 will struggle to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles.

Video editing: The CPU excels in this workload, with a Passmark multi-thread score of 44,578 and floating-point math score of 120,262. Timeline scrubbing, preview rendering, and export encoding will be fast, especially with software codecs. The GPU's compute score of 5,152 provides limited acceleration for effects and transitions, but most processing will fall on the CPU. This is a viable scenario for editors who prioritize CPU performance.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering engines will perform exceptionally well, with the i9-14900's 32 threads providing fast ray tracing and path tracing performance. The GPU's FP32 performance of 16.49 TFLOPS is modest, so GPU-accelerated rendering will be slower than dedicated workstation GPUs. However, for users who primarily rely on CPU rendering, this is a solid configuration.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 175,010 and data compression score of 550,271 indicate fast compilation times and efficient handling of large codebases. The 32 threads handle parallel builds with ease, and the 36 MB of L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data. The GPU is sufficient for multiple monitors and basic 2D acceleration, making this an excellent developer machine.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance (4,323 Passmark) ensures responsive applications, while the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption and heat output low. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and multi-display support (1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1) allow for productive multi-monitor setups. For document editing, spreadsheets, web browsing, and light multimedia, this system is vastly over-powered, but its efficiency makes it a reasonable choice for a quiet, low-maintenance workstation.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900

AMD Radeon RX 7400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds