SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + AMD Radeon RX 6800

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900

58,115 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800

30,095 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-14900 + AMD Radeon RX 6800: A High-Core Desktop Build with a 75th-Percentile GPU

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 24-core Raptor Lake refresh flagship with AMD's RDNA 2-based RX 6800, resulting in a system that sits at the 84th percentile overall. The CPU is a top-8% performer (92nd percentile) with an average benchmark score of 58115, while the GPU lands at the 75th percentile with an average score of 30095. The data shows a significant performance gap between the two components, making the CPU the clear primary driver of this build's capabilities, with the GPU serving as a capable but secondary element. This analysis relies exclusively on the benchmark scores and specifications provided; no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussions are estimates derived from the component benchmark performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14900 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which anchors this build to the Raptor Lake generation. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older, more widely available DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits. ECC memory support is present, which adds a layer of reliability relevant for workstation-class usage. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, offering modern bandwidth for the fastest SSDs and future expansion cards; the GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which remains fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, a notably modest figure for a 24-core processor, which suggests the platform does not demand extreme power delivery hardware. The GPU, however, has a TDP of 250 watts and a suggested PSU of 600 watts, making the power supply a more critical consideration. A 600-watt unit is the minimum recommendation for the graphics card alone, and the combined system draw — with the CPU's 65-watt TDP and the GPU's 250-watt TDP — fits comfortably within that envelope, provided the rest of the system does not add excessive load. The power connectors are two 8-pin, and the GPU is a dual-slot design measuring 267 mm in length, so case and PSU cable compatibility should be verified before assembly.

A sensible next upgrade path would focus on the GPU, as the CPU's 92nd-percentile standing leaves substantial headroom for a faster graphics card. The RX 6800's 75th percentile is the clear bottleneck in this pairing, and replacing it with a higher-tier GPU would better utilize the i9-14900's multi-threaded power. The PCIe 4.0 x16 bus on the GPU and the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes mean newer graphics cards will not be interface-limited. Memory expansion follows the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 routes, and the 16 GB of GDDR6 on the GPU is already substantial for current titles. The platform itself is at the end of its socket generation, so future CPU upgrades would require a new motherboard, but the current processor's performance ceiling leaves little reason to upgrade the CPU in the near term.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 58115 places it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, a top-tier position that is reinforced by its nearest-rival comparisons. The i9-14900 trails the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M by just 0.4%, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D by 0.5%, and the Intel Xeon w5-2545 by 0.7%, while leading the AMD EPYC 9015 by 1%. These are razor-thin margins — all four rivals fall within a 1.7% band — meaning the i9-14900 sits squarely in a performance dead heat with high-end server and workstation processors. In multi-core workloads, the Cinebench R23 score of 31070 and Geekbench multicore score of 18495 show the CPU's strength in parallel tasks; the PassMark multithread score of 44578 corroborates this. Single-core performance is equally strong, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 2212 and Geekbench single-core at 2488, placing it among the fastest desktop chips for lightly-threaded tasks.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 30095 places it in the 75th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6700, which leads by 1.1%, while the RX 6800 edges out the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti by 0.5%, the RTX 5070 Mobile by 0.6%, and the RTX 2080 Ti by 1%. The GPU is competitive with these mid-to-high-range cards but is not in the top tier. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3188 provides a modern DirectX 12 measurement, while legacy PassMark tests show DirectX 11 at 214, DirectX 12 at 89, and DirectX 9 at 257. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 115107 and OpenCL score of 24508 indicate solid compute capability, and the PassMark G3D score of 22067 with GPU compute at 10864 round out the picture.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that dominates its performance class and a GPU that is merely above average. The 84th overall percentile for the build reflects this imbalance — the CPU's elite standing is dragged down by the GPU's more modest showing. For workloads that are CPU-bound, this system performs like a top-10% machine; for GPU-bound tasks, it performs like a 75th-percentile machine. The delta between the CPU's 92nd percentile and the GPU's 75th percentile is the defining characteristic of this build.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It uses a 10 nm process node (as listed) from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, a wide frequency range that allows the chip to idle efficiently and still reach high single-thread speeds. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which aids in both latency-sensitive and data-heavy workloads.

The benchmark data shows a processor that excels in multi-threaded environments. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31070 and the R20 multicore score of 15910 reflect strong scaling across the 24 cores. PassMark tests reveal specific strengths: integer math at 175010, floating-point math at 120262, and extended instructions at 30624. Data compression scores 550271, and random string sorting hits 61060, both indicating robust throughput for data manipulation tasks. The 32 threads enable heavy parallel workloads — video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation all benefit from this core count, and the CPU's 92nd percentile position confirms it outperforms the vast majority of processors in these arenas.

Single-thread performance is equally noteworthy. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2212 and Geekbench single-core of 2488 show that the 5.80 GHz boost clock delivers excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications. PassMark single-thread at 4323 and find prime numbers at 188 indicate the CPU handles single-threaded workloads without compromising on speed. In real-world terms, this means the i9-14900 does not sacrifice per-core speed for its high core count — it is both a multi-threaded monster and a snappy single-thread performer. The CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though the discrete RX 6800 will handle graphics duties in this build.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core strength (Cinebench R23 single-core 2212, Geekbench single-core 2488) ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU's 75th percentile limits overall FPS. Estimated performance at 1080p and 1440p would be strong, but 4K high-refresh is unlikely to be sustained given the RX 6800's position relative to faster GPUs.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 44578 and integer math of 175010 indicate the CPU can handle simultaneous game and stream encoding workloads, though the GPU's frame rate ceiling will still cap overall quality.

Video editing: Multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multicore 31070, Geekbench multicore 18495) make this a strong editing platform. Timeline scrubbing and export tasks benefit from the CPU's parallel power, while the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM (from the RX 6800's memory spec) assists with effects and previews.

3D rendering: The CPU is exceptional here — its 92nd percentile and Cinebench scores place it near workstation-class Xeon and EPYC chips. Render times in CPU-based engines will be competitive with much more expensive systems, though GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the RX 6800's 75th percentile.

Software development: Compilation and build tasks leverage the 32 threads effectively. The data compression score of 550271 and random string sorting of 61060 suggest strong performance in code processing and build toolchains, making this a productive developer workstation.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for typical productivity, but the single-core speed (PassMark single-thread 4323) ensures snappy application response. Office suites, web browsing, and multitasking will run flawlessly, though the system's power and cost are far beyond student needs.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the data pack contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all frame-rate figures below are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3188 and its 75th percentile position, the RX 6800 is a capable 1440p-class graphics card. In esports and lightly-demanding titles, the CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 2212) would push frame rates high, likely exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p in many competitive games. For AAA titles, the GPU's performance relative to rivals — slightly ahead of the RTX 3070 Ti and RTX 2080 Ti — suggests solid 1440p gameplay at high settings, with 1080p being comfortable and 4K requiring reduced settings or upscaling.

The GPU's memory configuration of 16 GB GDDR6 with a 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample capacity for modern textures, which helps at higher resolutions. The 60 ray-tracing cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the RDNA 2 architecture's ray-tracing performance is generally weaker than NVIDIA's Ampere counterparts, so RT effects would come at a notable frame rate cost. The FP32 throughput of 16.17 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 202.1 GPixel/s support high-resolution rendering, but the GPU's 75th percentile means it will not match top-tier cards in raw frame generation. Overall, this build is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K being possible but not optimal.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the Intel Core i9-14900 use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for the Raptor Lake generation.

Q: How much memory does the RX 6800 have and what type is it?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The i9-14900 scores 31070 in Cinebench R23 multicore, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900 supports ECC memory, which is useful for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the recommended power supply for the GPU?

A: The RX 6800 has a suggested PSU of 600 W, with a GPU TDP of 250 W and two 8-pin power connectors.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The RX 6800 has an average benchmark score of 30095, which is 0.5% higher than the RTX 3070 Ti's score of 29945.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900 has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over raw gaming frame rates. Content creators — specifically video editors and 3D renderers — will benefit most from the i9-14900's multi-threaded power, as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31070 and 92nd percentile standing rival workstation-class processors. Software developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the 32 threads, and the PassMark integer math score of 175010 supports heavy computation. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions will find the RX 6800 adequate for high settings, with the CPU ensuring no frame rate bottlenecks in CPU-bound titles, but those seeking 4K high-refresh gaming should look elsewhere. Students and office workers are poorly served by this build — the performance far exceeds their needs, and the system's power draw (250 W GPU TDP) and cost are unjustified for such tasks. Small business workstations handling data processing, simulation, or rendering workloads would benefit from the CPU's ECC memory support and high throughput, provided the GPU's 75th percentile is acceptable for their graphics needs.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: desktop) pairing the Intel Core i9-14900 with the AMD Radeon RX 6800. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake refresh part on Intel Socket 1700, released in January 2024 with a launch MSRP of $549. The GPU is an RDNA 2.0 architecture card from the Radeon RX 6000 series, released in October 2020 with a launch MSRP of 579 USD, and is now end-of-life. The combined percentile is 84, placing this build in the upper tier of desktop systems, but the internal imbalance is significant. The CPU's 92nd percentile makes it a top-8% processor, while the GPU's 75th percentile is merely above average. This is a build where the CPU dictates the system's class — it is a high-end workstation-grade processor paired with a mid-range-to-high-end graphics card, resulting in a hybrid that excels at compute and productivity but is only solid, not exceptional, at gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is unambiguous: the GPU is the limiting component in nearly all gaming and graphics-accelerated workloads. The CPU's 92nd percentile versus the GPU's 75th percentile creates a 17-percentage-point gap that manifests in GPU-bound scenarios. In games, the RX 6800 will be the constraint — its average benchmark score of 30095 and 75th percentile mean frame rates are capped by the GPU's capabilities, regardless of the CPU's headroom. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3188 and PassMark G3D of 22067 are the relevant metrics, and they reveal a card that is competitive with the RTX 3070 Ti (0.5% ahead) but not a top-tier performer.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads — rendering, compiling, data processing — the GPU is not the limiting factor. The i9-14900's multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multicore 31070, PassMark multithread 44578) ensure the CPU delivers near-elite performance, and the GPU's compute capabilities (PassMark GPU compute 10864) are sufficient to avoid bottlenecking most productivity tasks. The imbalance is most pronounced in gaming, where FPS scaling is dictated by the GPU's 75th percentile; upgrading the GPU would yield significant frame rate gains, while upgrading the CPU would show little to no benefit in games. For compute-heavy workloads, the system is well-balanced, with the CPU doing the heavy lifting and the GPU providing adequate acceleration. The data suggests this build is a CPU-first platform where the GPU is a secondary consideration, and users should calibrate expectations accordingly: top-tier productivity, mid-to-high-tier gaming.