SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

83%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900

58,115 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6400

6,001 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6400 is a study in extreme asymmetry. The data indicates a desktop system where a top-tier 92nd-percentile CPU is coupled with a 35th-percentile GPU, creating a configuration whose benchmark results are dominated by the processor’s immense compute capacity while its graphical output remains firmly in entry-level territory. This analysis will quantify that disparity using the provided benchmark scores and percentiles.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900 is the centerpiece of this build, and its specifications confirm a high-end, multi-threaded powerhouse. It features 24 cores and 32 threads, operating on a base clock of 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. This is a Raptor Lake architecture part, specifically the Raptor Lake-R generation, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy is substantial, including 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache, which contributes to its strong performance in both latency-sensitive and throughput-heavy applications.

Benchmark scores place this CPU in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. The average benchmark score of 58115 is the aggregate measure of this strength. When compared to its nearest rivals, the performance is tightly clustered. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (58323) is a mere 0.4% ahead, while the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D (58386) leads by 0.5%. The Intel Xeon w5-2545 is 0.7% ahead, and the AMD EPYC 9015 (57555) trails the i9-14900 by 1%. This indicates that the i9-14900 sits in a performance tier with professional server and workstation processors, making it an exceptional choice for compute-intensive tasks.

In multi-threaded workloads, the data is decisive. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31070 and the Geekbench multicore score of 18495 demonstrate massive parallel processing capability. The Passmark multithread score of 44578 reinforces this, suggesting the CPU can handle heavy rendering, video encoding, and software compilation without breaking a sweat. The single-thread performance is equally robust, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2212 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4323, ensuring that everyday applications and games that rely on fewer cores will still run responsively.

The specialized Passmark workloads reveal specific strengths. The data compression score of 550271 is exceptionally high, indicating excellent performance in file archiving and database operations. Similarly, floating-point math (120262) and integer math (175010) scores are strong, which is beneficial for scientific simulations and financial modeling. The CPU also supports ECC memory and features integrated UHD Graphics 770, adding versatility for professional workstations where data integrity is critical. With a TDP of 65 W, it manages to deliver this performance within a modest power envelope, making it a highly efficient compute engine.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data presents a clear picture: this is a CPU-bound system with a significant GPU bottleneck. The combined percentile for the build is 64, but this figure is an average that masks the extreme divergence between the two components. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 58115 positions it in the top 8% of all processors, while the GPU’s average score of 6001 places it in the bottom 35% of all graphics cards.

The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multicore score of 15910 and single-core score of 2245 are indicative of a processor that excels in both professional rendering and general application responsiveness. The Geekbench scores of 18495 (multi) and 2488 (single) corroborate this, showing that the i9-14900 is a top-tier performer across a variety of workloads. Its Passmark data encryption score of 33540 and extended instructions score of 30624 further highlight its capacity for security and complex computational tasks.

In stark contrast, the GPU’s benchmark scores are modest. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is only 176, and its Passmark G3D score is 7673. These figures are consistent with a graphics card designed for basic display output and light gaming, not high-end 3D rendering. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 70 and DirectX 12 score of 30 underscore its limitations in modern graphics APIs. The GPU’s percentile rank of 35 confirms that, in the database of all GPUs, it falls below the median, making it the limiting factor in any graphics-intensive scenario.

The combined picture is one of an unbalanced system. The CPU is capable of feeding a much more powerful GPU, but the RX 6400 cannot utilize the full potential of the i9-14900’s processing power in gaming. For non-graphical workloads like CPU rendering, data analysis, and compilation, the system will perform at the level of the 92nd percentile CPU. For gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering, performance will be constrained to the 35th percentile GPU level.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance class of the Intel Core i9-14900?

A: The i9-14900 sits in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 58115. This places it on par with server-class processors like the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M and the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D, which are within 0.5% of its score.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 6400 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 6400 has an average benchmark score of 6001, placing it in the 35th percentile of all GPUs. It is statistically tied with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M (0% delta), and performs within 0.3% of the AMD FirePro W4100 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M.

Q: Does the CPU support the latest memory and expansion standards?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes from the CPU, ensuring high bandwidth for modern SSDs and expansion cards.

Q: What is the power draw and cooling requirement for this GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6400 has a TDP of 53 W and is a single-slot card that requires no power connectors. The system’s suggested PSU is 250 W, indicating that it can run in a compact or entry-level desktop chassis with minimal power supply requirements.

Q: Is the i9-14900 a good choice for multi-threaded workloads?

A: The benchmark data strongly supports this. It scores 31070 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 18495 in Geekbench multicore. Its Passmark multithread score of 44578 and data compression score of 550271 confirm it is an excellent processor for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation.

Q: What are the key limitations of the RX 6400 regarding software support?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. However, its low benchmark scores in DirectX 12 (30) and DirectX 11 (70) indicate that it will struggle with modern game titles that rely heavily on these APIs for advanced effects.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed in this section are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions, not empirical test results.

Based on the GPU’s 35th-percentile ranking and its low 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176, the RX 6400 is positioned for entry-level 1080p gaming. The Passmark G3D score of 7673 provides a baseline for its overall graphical compute, but its performance in specific APIs is telling. The DirectX 11 score of 70 and DirectX 12 score of 30 are exceptionally low, suggesting that the card will be severely challenged by modern titles that use these APIs at high settings.

For esports and older or less demanding games, the RX 6400 may deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with lower graphical presets. The CPU’s high single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2212) ensures that game logic and physics calculations will not bottleneck the system, but the GPU will be the limiting factor in frame rendering. For newer AAA titles, the 4 GB of VRAM and 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth will likely be insufficient for high-resolution textures and complex scenes at 1080p with high settings. The pixel rate of 74.27 GPixel/s and texture rate of 111.4 GTexel/s further indicate that the card’s fill rate is modest.

Users should expect to significantly lower graphical settings and resolution scaling to achieve consistent frame rates in modern games. The performance gap between the CPU and GPU means that gaming performance will be wholly dictated by the RX 6400, and the i9-14900 will be largely idle in this scenario. The data suggests this is not a gaming-focused build, but rather a workstation configuration where 3D acceleration is a secondary function.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a profound imbalance, with the CPU being the dominant component. The i9-14900 operates at the 92nd percentile, while the RX 6400 languishes at the 35th percentile. This 57-point gap creates a definitive bottleneck where the GPU limits all graphics-related tasks. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 58115 is nearly ten times that of the GPU’s 6001, indicating that the processor is capable of far more work than the graphics card can process.

In gaming, the bottleneck is the GPU. The CPU can easily calculate game state, physics, and AI at high frame rates, but the RX 6400 cannot render the frames fast enough to keep up. This is evidenced by the GPU’s low DirectX 11 and 12 scores, which suggest that even at lower resolutions, the graphics card is the primary constraint. The FPS scaling, if measured, would show a plateau that is independent of CPU clock speed or core count.

In non-graphical workloads, the bottleneck is eliminated. For tasks like data compression (score 550271), integer math (175010), and multithreaded rendering (Cinebench R23 multi: 31070), the GPU is irrelevant, and the system performs at the level of the i9-14900. This makes the build highly effective for CPU-bound tasks such as software development, 3D modeling, and virtual machines, but ineffective for GPU-accelerated tasks like video editing with effects or machine learning training.

The system’s combined percentile of 64 accurately reflects this dichotomy. It is neither a top-tier gaming machine nor a bottom-tier workstation; it is a hybrid with exceptional CPU performance and nominal GPU performance. The only way to balance this system would be to upgrade the GPU to a model that can match the CPU’s throughput, but as configured, the RX 6400 is the clear bottleneck in any graphics-related scenario.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users with intense CPU workloads and minimal GPU requirements. The primary audience is content creators working in CPU-rendered environments, such as 3D artists using software that relies on the processor for final frame rendering, or video editors working with codecs that favor CPU encoding over GPU acceleration. The i9-14900’s 92nd percentile performance in multi-threaded tasks makes it ideal for these professionals.

Software developers and engineers will find this build compelling. The CPU’s high Passmark integer math score (175010), data compression score (550271), and multithread score (44578) indicate excellent performance in code compilation, unit testing, and running multiple virtual machines. Students in computer science or engineering fields who need to compile large codebases or run simulations will benefit from the CPU’s power without needing a high-end GPU.

Small business workstations that handle large datasets, financial modeling, or database management would also suit this build. The ECC memory support and high floating-point math score (120262) make it robust for data integrity and complex calculations. However, users requiring gaming at 1440p or higher, 3D rendering in real-time, or GPU compute tasks like machine learning should avoid this combination, as the RX 6400 will severely hamper these workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14900 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This provides flexibility for builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, ensuring compatibility with the fastest available NVMe SSDs and future expansion cards.

The current GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 6400, has a TDP of 53 W and requires no power connectors, with a system PSU suggestion of 250 W. This leaves significant headroom for a GPU upgrade. The motherboard’s PCIe Gen 5 slot will accommodate a more powerful graphics card, and the 250 W PSU suggestion indicates that the system is currently operating at a very low power draw. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RX 6400 with a mid-range or high-end GPU to balance the system. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is low, meaning the PSU budget is almost entirely available for a new graphics card.

The platform’s production status is active, and the CPU’s launch MSRP is $549. The upgrade path is straightforward: swap the GPU to leverage the CPU’s full potential. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 also serves as a fallback if the discrete GPU is removed or fails, ensuring the system remains operational for basic tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) that pairs an Intel Core i9-14900 with an AMD Radeon RX 6400. The overall tier, as indicated by the combined percentile of 64, is mid-range, but this is a misleading statistic. The system is a high-end CPU workstation with an entry-level GPU, making it a specialized tool rather than a balanced general-purpose machine.

The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake part with a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, sitting in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is a RDNA 2.0 part with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, sitting in the 35th percentile. The combination is akin to pairing a race car engine with a compact car chassis; the engine’s power cannot be fully utilized until the chassis is upgraded.

This build is best described as a compute-focused workstation. It excels in CPU-bound tasks like software compilation, data analysis, and 3D scene rendering, where the RX 6400 is irrelevant. It fails as a gaming machine, where the RX 6400’s low benchmark scores and limited VRAM will result in poor performance in modern titles. For users who need massive CPU power and only require basic display output, this is a coherent, if unconventional, configuration.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is a discrete graphics card built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, using the Navi 24 chip manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation pipelines, along with 12 ray accelerators. The card has a base clock of 1923 MHz and a boost clock of 2321 MHz, with a game clock of 2039 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Benchmark results place this GPU in the 35th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 6001. This puts it in direct competition with older or low-power parts like the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M, which matches its score with a 0% delta. The performance is also within 0.3% of the AMD FirePro W4100 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M. The GPU’s strongest showing is in the Passmark G3D test with a score of 7673, but its API-specific scores are weak. The DirectX 12 score of 30 and DirectX 11 score of 70 indicate poor performance in modern gaming APIs. The Vulkan score is not listed, but the Geekbench Vulkan score of 16372 suggests moderate performance in that API.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176 is exceptionally low, confirming that the card is not designed for high-end 3D rendering. The pixel rate of 74.27 GPixel/s and texture rate of 111.4 GTexel/s are modest, and the FP32 performance of 3.565 TFLOPS is limited. This GPU is best suited for basic display output, office applications, and light 2D workloads. Its 12 ray accelerators provide entry-level ray tracing support, but the low compute power will make ray-traced effects a heavy burden. The card has a 53 W TDP, requires no power connectors, and is a single-slot design, making it ideal for small form factor systems or as a display adapter for a powerful CPU.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900

AMD Radeon RX 6400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds