SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13980HX + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13980HX

50,398 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a mobile workstation-class pairing built around the Intel Core i9-13980HX and the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation. The data indicates a system designed for heavy multi-threaded productivity, with a CPU that ranks in the 90th percentile among all processors. The GPU, while positioned at the 50th percentile, brings dedicated ray tracing and tensor hardware to the table. This combination is not primarily aimed at pure gaming, but rather at users who need to render, compile, and encode on the go.

The benchmark results place this CPU in elite company, trading blows with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 and the Intel Core i7-13850HX. The CPU's multi-core performance is its defining trait, while the GPU offers a solid, balanced foundation for professional graphics work. The following analysis breaks down these components and their combined capabilities, drawing exclusively from the provided benchmark and specification data.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The data does not support this as a primary high-refresh gaming machine. The RTX 3000 Mobile Ada GPU sits at the 50th percentile, indicating mid-range performance relative to other GPUs. While the CPU's strong single-thread score of 1145 in 3DMark and Passmark score of 4252 will not bottleneck most titles, the GPU is the limiting factor. Users seeking 240Hz or even 144Hz at maximum settings in demanding titles should temper expectations based on this GPU's mid-pack standing.

Streaming: This is a strong scenario for this hardware. The GPU includes 144 dedicated tensor cores and the Ada Lovelace architecture, which supports the AI-accelerated encoding features that reduce the performance hit during live broadcasts. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, evidenced by a 3DMark max-threads score of 12601, provide more than enough headroom to handle both game encoding and the streaming software simultaneously without significant frame drops.

Video Editing: The combination of a high-core-count CPU and a CUDA-capable GPU makes this an excellent choice for video editing. The CPU's multi-core might is evident in its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30273, which will accelerate timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export times. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth can hold moderately complex timelines and GPU-accelerated effects, though the 50th percentile GPU score suggests it is not a top-tier renderer on its own.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the star here. With a Passmark multi-thread score of 46409 and a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 16187, CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender (Cycles) or V-Ray will be exceptionally fast. The GPU can assist with viewport interactivity and final frame rendering, but its 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 50th percentile ranking mean it will not outpace the CPU's contribution in most GPU-accelerated renderers.

Software Development: This is a prime use case. The 24-core, 32-thread configuration is ideal for parallel compilation tasks, and the Passmark data encryption score of 35332 and data compression score of 588306 indicate strong performance in archiving and cryptographic workloads. The 90th percentile CPU ranking ensures that large codebases will compile quickly, while the generous memory bandwidth and dual-channel DDR5 support will keep build processes fed.

Student and Office Work: This hardware is massively overqualified for this scenario. The single-core performance is excellent, as seen in the 3DMark single-thread score of 1145, which ensures a responsive system for everyday tasks. However, the 55W TDP of the CPU and the discrete GPU mean this is a power-hungry solution for tasks that a far less capable and more efficient chip could handle. For a student, the battery life would be a concern, but the performance is undeniable.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's performance is the headline of this data set. Its average benchmark score is 50398, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. In the nearest rival comparison, it is virtually tied with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, which scores 50448, a mere 0.1% difference. It also sits within 0.7% of the Intel Core i7-13850HX, which scores 50761. This indicates that the i9-13980HX is at the absolute top of its class, with no single rival holding a significant advantage.

Looking at synthetic benchmarks, the CPU's scaling is impressive. It goes from a 3DMark 2-thread score of 2207 to a 4-thread score of 4177, nearly doubling. This scaling continues to 7290 with 8 threads and peaks at 12601 with max threads, demonstrating excellent multi-core efficiency. In Cinebench, the R23 multi-core score of 30273 is particularly strong, nearly doubling the R20 multi-core score of 16187, which reflects the high sustained power delivery and thermal headroom of the platform.

The GPU, in contrast, has no benchmark scores in the data. Its percentile rank of 50 is the only performance indicator, placing it in the middle of the pack for all GPUs. The combined percentile for this system is 70, suggesting that the CPU is the primary driver of the system's overall high performance. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy: the CPU is a top-tier part, while the GPU is a competent but not exceptional performer.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 22,900 million transistors on a 188 mm² die. The GPU is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is adequate for 1080p and 1440p rendering but may feel constrained in 4K content creation with high-resolution textures.

The GPU's compute capabilities are defined by 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. It also includes 36 dedicated ray tracing cores and 144 tensor cores. The clock speeds are listed as a base of 1395 MHz and a boost of 1695 MHz. This hardware translates to 15.62 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 15.62 TFLOPS of FP16 performance with a 1:1 ratio, indicating that the GPU does not have dedicated FP16 acceleration that doubles the rate.

The presence of the tensor cores and RT cores is significant. The tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI-based features, which can substantially boost frame rates in supported games and accelerate certain compute workloads. The RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is present but will be limited by the GPU's overall 50th percentile performance. The pixel rate of 81.36 GPixel/s and texture rate of 244.1 GTexel/s are solid mid-range figures. For rendering, this GPU is a capable entry-level to mid-range professional card, but the data suggests it will not compete with the highest-end mobile workstation GPUs in raw compute.

Who Should Build It

This system is for the professional mobile workstation user who prioritizes CPU performance above all else. The target audience includes content creators who edit high-bitrate video and work in After Effects, where the 32 threads of the i9-13980HX will drastically reduce render times. Software developers compiling large C++ or Rust projects will benefit from the 90th percentile CPU, as will data analysts running complex simulations or processing large datasets.

3D artists and architects who use CPU-based renderers will find this system ideal. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30273 ensures fast final-frame renders, while the GPU allows for a smooth viewport experience with its 8 GB of VRAM. It is also suitable for engineers running CAD and CAE software that is often single-threaded, where the CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1145 ensures quick response times.

For gamers, this is not the primary target. While it can play games, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it is better suited for 1080p gaming at high settings rather than 4K or high-refresh competitive play. Students in demanding STEM fields would benefit from the performance, but the power requirements make it a less practical choice than a lower-power ultrabook. Small business workstations that need to handle video conferencing, office suites, and occasional heavy batch processing would find this system more than capable, though potentially more expensive to run than necessary.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13980HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX variant. It uses a hybrid design, though the data does not specify the P-core/E-core split. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process and has a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.20 GHz, and it boosts up to 5.60 GHz, which is a significant frequency range that allows for both power efficiency and high single-thread performance.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache helps keep frequently used data close to the cores, reducing latency. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, and it supports ECC memory, which is a critical feature for professional workstations where data integrity is paramount. It also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast connectivity to next-generation SSDs and GPUs.

The benchmark data shows a processor that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9440 is 4.3 times higher than the 2-thread score, demonstrating excellent multi-threading efficiency. The Passmark integer math score of 166455 and floating-point math score of 118645 indicate strong general-purpose compute. The data encryption score of 35332 and compression score of 588306 also show that it handles security and archiving tasks with ease. The 90th percentile ranking is well-earned, and the CPU's performance in the nearest rivals list confirms it is a top-tier mobile part.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores and component specifications. The CPU's high single-thread score of 1145 in 3DMark ensures it will not be the limiting factor in most games. The GPU, however, is the bottleneck.

Given the GPU's 50th percentile rank and 15.62 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, users can expect playable performance at 1080p with high settings in most modern titles. For example, fast-paced shooters like Call of Duty or Overwatch 2 should easily hit 60-100+ FPS at 1080p. More demanding AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Alan Wake 2 will likely need settings reduced to medium or the use of DLSS to maintain a smooth 60 FPS.

At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth will become more of a constraint. Users can expect 40-60 FPS in demanding titles with high settings, and DLSS will be necessary for higher frame rates. 4K gaming is not recommended; the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute power are insufficient for consistently smooth frame rates above 30 FPS in modern titles. The data suggests this is a 1080p gaming machine first, and a 1440p machine with compromises, but its primary purpose is clearly professional work.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance of this system is heavily skewed toward the CPU. With the CPU in the 90th percentile and the GPU in the 50th, the CPU is clearly the dominant component. In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the bottleneck, as it cannot keep up with the CPU's ability to feed it frames. This is not necessarily a bad thing, as it means the system will excel in CPU-heavy tasks.

In content creation, the bottleneck shifts depending on the task. In CPU-based rendering, the GPU is irrelevant, and the CPU will be the sole determinant of speed. In GPU-accelerated effects rendering, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2207 suggests the CPU has excellent single-core performance, so games that are poorly multi-threaded will still run well, but the GPU will cap the maximum frame rate.

The combined percentile of 70 reflects this imbalance. The system is not a balanced 50/50 split; it is a high-performance CPU with a mid-range GPU. For workloads like 3D modeling, the CPU will handle physics and simulation, while the GPU handles viewport rendering. The CPU's high multi-thread score of 12601 in 3DMark ensures that complex scenes with many objects will remain responsive, while the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM may limit texture quality in the viewport.

FAQ

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more powerful in this pairing?

A: The CPU is significantly more powerful. It ranks in the 90th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 50398, while the GPU ranks in the 50th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: What is the CPU's performance relative to the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370?

A: The data shows they are effectively tied. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 has an average score of 50448, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i9-13980HX's score of 50398.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 36 dedicated ray tracing cores, which provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing support as part of the Ada Lovelace architecture.

Q: What kind of memory does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i9-13980HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, and it supports ECC memory.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Is this a good system for 4K gaming?

A: Based on the GPU's 50th percentile performance and 8 GB of VRAM, 4K gaming is not recommended. The system is better suited for 1080p gaming at high settings or 1440p with compromises.

Q: What is the manufacturing process for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is manufactured using Intel's 10 nm process, while the GPU is manufactured using TSMC's 5 nm process.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13980HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded in the traditional sense. Users are limited to the CPU that comes with the laptop. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, but the specific type is determined by the laptop's motherboard design.

The GPU is also integrated into the laptop chassis and is not upgradeable. The system uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface for the GPU, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes for other devices. The CPU has a TDP of 55W, while the GPU has a TDP of 115W. The power delivery system must be capable of handling this combined thermal load.

The most sensible upgrade path for this system is to maximize the memory and storage. Users should ensure they install the fastest supported memory (likely DDR5) in dual-channel mode to maximize the CPU's performance. Adding NVMe SSDs using the available PCIe Gen 5 lanes would provide the fastest possible storage speeds. Since the CPU and GPU are not upgradeable, the only meaningful hardware improvements are memory capacity and speed, and storage capacity. The platform is designed to be a complete, high-end package at the time of purchase, with the 90th percentile CPU serving as the long-term performance anchor until the entire system is replaced.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13980HX + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13980HX

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds