SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13980HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13980HX

50,398 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13980HX paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh represents a high-end mobile workstation configuration, occupying the 70th combined percentile among all builds. This pairing combines a flagship 13th-generation Intel processor with a professional-grade Turing architecture GPU, targeting users who require substantial multi-threaded compute power alongside certified graphics capability. The data indicates a system designed for demanding professional workloads, though the GPU's age relative to the CPU architecture introduces a notable performance asymmetry that the benchmark scores quantify clearly.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13980HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support enabled, and provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results place this processor in the 90th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 50,398. The nearest rival data shows a tight competitive cluster: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 scores 50,448 (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 50,718 (0.6% higher), and the Intel Core i7-13850HX scores 50,761 (0.7% higher). The Intel Core 9 273PE trails at 49,845 (1.1% lower). This indicates the i9-13980HX sits within a 1.1% performance band of its closest competitors, making the architectural differences more significant than raw aggregate scores.

The multi-threaded performance metrics reveal the processor's capability. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score reaches 30,273, while the single-core score is 2,110. The R20 results show 16,187 multicore and 2,285 single-core, and the R15 results show 4,717 multicore and 304.5 single-core. These numbers demonstrate strong scaling from single-thread to multi-thread workloads, with the R23 multicore score being approximately 14.3 times the single-core score. The 3DMark thread scaling tests reinforce this pattern: scores progress from 1,145 for single-thread, through 2,207 for 2 threads, 4,177 for 4 threads, 7,290 for 8 threads, 9,440 for 16 threads, to 12,601 for max threads.

PassMark results provide additional workload-specific insight. The multithread score of 46,409 and single-thread score of 4,252 indicate robust general-purpose performance. Integer math scores 166,455, while floating-point math scores 118,645, showing a 40% advantage for integer operations. Data encryption scores 35,332, data compression scores 588,306, and extended instructions score 33,868. Physics processing scores 2,575, and random string sorting scores 66,125. The prime number finding score of 191 suggests relatively weaker performance in this specific algorithmic pattern, which may influence certain scientific or cryptographic workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is based on the TU104B chip, utilizing the Turing architecture fabricated on TSMC's 12 nm process. The GPU contains 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, with a transistor density of 25.0 million per mm². It operates with a base clock of 1035 MHz and a boost clock of 1530 MHz. The memory subsystem comprises 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

The compute resources include 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. For specialized workloads, the GPU provides 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 97.92 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 293.8 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance reaches 9.400 TFLOPS for FP32 operations and 18.80 TFLOPS for FP16 operations via the 2:1 ratio. The GPU has a TDP of 110 W, uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, and features an IGP slot width with no power connectors, indicating a soldered mobile design.

The GPU's benchmark data is notably sparse, with no benchmark scores recorded and an average benchmark score of 0. Its percentile ranking against all GPUs is 50th, placing it at the median of the distribution. This lack of measured performance data, combined with the production status marked as end-of-life (released June 2020), positions this GPU as an older professional solution. The absence of nearest rivals in the data further complicates direct performance comparisons.

The RT and tensor core counts (48 and 384, respectively) enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based operations, though the Turing architecture represents an earlier generation of these technologies. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support and OpenGL 4.6 compatibility ensure modern API coverage, while Vulkan 1.4 support provides cross-platform rendering capability. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for 16 GB of VRAM, though the PCIe 3.0 interface may limit data transfer speeds compared to newer PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 implementations.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-specific package that precludes traditional CPU upgrades. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel configuration, providing flexibility in memory selection. ECC memory support is present, which is critical for workstation stability in professional environments. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 lanes from the CPU offers substantial bandwidth for modern storage and expansion devices, though the GPU's PCIe 3.0 x16 interface creates a generation mismatch.

The CPU TDP of 55 W and GPU TDP of 110 W combine for a total thermal envelope of 165 W, ignoring other system components. This configuration requires robust cooling and a substantial power supply, though the fact pack does not provide a suggested PSU wattage. The GPU's design with no power connectors and IGP slot width suggests a fixed, non-upgradeable implementation typical of mobile workstations.

A sensible next upgrade path for this platform is constrained by the mobile form factor. The CPU's unlocked multiplier (indicated by multiplierUnlocked: true) may allow some tuning within thermal limits, but the BGA socket prevents processor replacement. Memory upgrades are feasible via the DDR4/DDR5 slots, and storage can be expanded through PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The GPU, being soldered with no connectors, is not user-serviceable. For users seeking improved graphics performance, the data suggests the CPU has headroom to support a more capable GPU, as the 90th percentile CPU ranking significantly exceeds the GPU's 50th percentile ranking.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU is stark. The CPU ranks in the 90th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. This creates a CPU-bound system in most workloads, where the processor's capabilities outpace the graphics subsystem's ability to keep up. The CPU's nearest rivals all score within 1.1% of its average benchmark score, indicating it operates at the competitive frontier, while the GPU has no recorded benchmark scores to establish its relative position.

In CPU-intensive tasks such as compilation, data processing, or physics simulation, the i9-13980HX demonstrates exceptional capability. The PassMark multithread score of 46,409 and integer math score of 166,455 indicate strong performance in these domains. However, in GPU-accelerated workloads like 3D rendering or machine learning inference, the Quadro RTX 5000's 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth become the limiting factor. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests it delivers median performance, which may not fully utilize the CPU's 90th percentile capability.

The FPS scaling pattern further illustrates this imbalance. While no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, the benchmark scores imply that gaming performance would be constrained by the GPU in most scenarios. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,252 in PassMark and 2,110 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can handle the physics and game logic computations efficiently, but the GPU's median ranking would cap frame rates in graphically intensive titles. This makes the system better suited for compute-heavy professional workloads than for high-refresh gaming.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 50th percentile ranking and lack of measured FPS data suggest this system would struggle to achieve high frame rates at demanding settings. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (4,252 PassMark, 2,110 Cinebench R23) would not compensate for the GPU's median-level graphics throughput. Gamers seeking 144 Hz or higher refresh rates would likely need to reduce resolution and detail settings significantly.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming workloads. The 3DMark max-thread score of 12,601 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30,273 indicate the processor can handle x264 or x265 encoding alongside game execution. The GPU's tensor cores (384) could accelerate AI-based encoding features, though the Turing architecture's capabilities are earlier-generation.

Video editing: The combination of strong CPU multi-threading and 16 GB of GPU VRAM supports 4K video editing workflows. The PassMark data compression score of 588,306 and random string sorting score of 66,125 indicate efficient handling of codec operations. The GPU's 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance provide adequate acceleration for effects and color grading, though the 50th percentile ranking suggests it is not top-tier.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30,273 positions it well for CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 3,072 shading units and 48 RT cores support GPU-accelerated rendering with ray tracing. The 16 GB VRAM allows handling of moderately complex scenes. However, the GPU's median performance ranking means render times would be longer than with higher-tier graphics solutions.

Software development: The CPU excels in compilation workloads, with the PassMark integer math score of 166,455 indicating strong performance in code compilation and build processes. The 32 threads enable parallel compilation, and the 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency in large codebases. ECC memory support adds stability for long-running build processes.

Student and office work: This configuration is substantially overprovisioned for typical student or office tasks. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM far exceed the requirements of document processing, web browsing, or spreadsheet applications. The power consumption (55 W CPU + 110 W GPU) and mobile form factor make it a less practical choice for these use cases compared to lower-tier systems.

Who Should Build It

This system targets professionals who require the CPU's exceptional multi-threaded performance for compute-intensive workloads. The 90th percentile CPU ranking and 30,273 Cinebench R23 multicore score make it suitable for engineers running simulations, data scientists processing large datasets, and developers compiling substantial codebases. The 32 threads and ECC memory support align with workstation-class requirements.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the 16 GB GPU memory, though the GPU's 50th percentile ranking may limit performance in GPU-accelerated tasks. The system suits users who prioritize CPU throughput over graphics capability, such as researchers running numerical computations or financial analysts performing quantitative analysis. The 70th combined percentile indicates the pairing is above average but not top-tier.

Students in engineering or computer science programs requiring substantial compute power for coursework would find the CPU capabilities sufficient, though the GPU's age suggests limited future-proofing. Small business workstations handling data processing, virtualization, or moderate CAD workloads could leverage the ECC memory support and professional GPU driver certification. However, the end-of-life GPU status and lack of upgrade options in the mobile form factor recommend this system for users who expect to replace it rather than extend its lifespan.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 70th among all builds, indicating above-average overall performance.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-13980HX compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU scores 50,398 on average, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (50,448) and 0.6% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT (50,718), while being 1.1% higher than the Intel Core 9 273PE (49,845).

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and what does it indicate?

A: The GPU ranks in the 50th percentile among all GPUs, placing it at the median of the performance distribution.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation stability in professional environments.

Q: What memory types and bus configuration does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with no specified memory bandwidth in the data.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for gaming performance?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-13980HX, a 24-core, 32-thread mobile processor from the Raptor Lake-HX architecture, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh, a Turing-architecture professional GPU with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The system is classified as a laptop (buildClass: laptop) and achieves a combined percentile of 70th among all builds. The CPU ranks in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 50th percentile among all GPUs, creating a significant performance imbalance favoring the processor.

The CPU was released in January 2023 and remains in active production, while the GPU was released in June 2020 and is marked as end-of-life. This generational gap contributes to the performance asymmetry. The CPU's launch MSRP was $668. The GPU has no recorded launch MSRP. The platform uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, supports DDR4/DDR5 memory with ECC capability, and provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity from the CPU, while the GPU uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 50,398, placing it in the 90th percentile. Its nearest rivals demonstrate a tight competitive field: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 scores 50,448 (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 50,718 (0.6% higher), the Intel Core i7-13850HX scores 50,761 (0.7% higher), and the Intel Core 9 273PE scores 49,845 (1.1% lower). In Cinebench R23, the CPU achieves 30,273 multicore and 2,110 single-core. PassMark results show 46,409 multithread and 4,252 single-thread scores.

The GPU has no recorded benchmark scores, with an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest rivals listed. Its 50th percentile ranking is based on the aggregate database distribution. The combined picture shows a system where the CPU operates at the 90th percentile frontier while the GPU operates at the median, resulting in a 70th combined percentile. This configuration excels in CPU-bound tasks but delivers only average GPU-accelerated performance, making it a specialized tool for compute-heavy professional workloads rather than a balanced general-purpose system.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. All gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified measurements.

Based on the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance, gaming frame rates would likely fall below those of higher-tier graphics solutions. The 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provide sufficient capacity for modern game textures at 1080p and 1440p resolutions, but the median performance ranking suggests playable frame rates at medium to high settings rather than ultra settings at high refresh rates. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (4,252 PassMark, 2,110 Cinebench R23) ensures game logic and physics run smoothly, but the GPU would become the bottleneck in graphically demanding scenes.

At 4K resolution, the GPU's FP32 throughput and memory bandwidth would likely limit performance to lower detail settings for playable frame rates. The Turing architecture's ray tracing capabilities, supported by 48 RT cores, would enable ray-traced effects but with significant performance impact given the GPU's median ranking. Esports titles with low graphical demands could potentially achieve high frame rates, but the system is not optimized for competitive gaming. Users seeking high-refresh gaming should consider this configuration inadequate, as the CPU's capabilities far exceed what the GPU can deliver in gaming scenarios.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13980HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13980HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds