SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13980HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13980HX

50,398 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a Turing-architecture professional mobile GPU built on TSMC's 12 nm process, with a die size of 545 mm² and 13,600 million transistors. Its memory configuration is substantial for a laptop part: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a workstation-class memory pool, sized for large datasets, multi-layer compositing, and GPU-accelerated rendering workloads that would exhaust 8 GB or even 12 GB alternatives. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, with 14 Gbps effective data rate, and the bus width of 256 bits is the conduit that delivers that 448.0 GB/s figure — a number that matters for texture streaming and in-viewport responsiveness in 3D applications.

The compute configuration is equally telling. The GPU packs 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. Its base clock is 1035 MHz, boosting to 1530 MHz. Pixel rate is 97.92 GPixel/s and texture rate is 293.8 GTexel/s, which are the raw throughput metrics that govern fill-rate-bound scenes. FP32 performance sits at 9.400 TFLOPS, while FP16 reaches 18.80 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio — the latter being relevant for workloads that leverage half-precision inference or certain rendering paths. The RT cores number 48 and tensor cores number 384, meaning this GPU predates the dedicated RT hardware found in later generations but still offers hardware-accelerated ray tracing and tensor operations. DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 round out the API profile, making it compatible with modern rendering pipelines.

The GPU's percentile rank against all GPUs is 50, placing it squarely at the median of the database's GPU distribution. That is a notable position for a professional card: it is not a top-tier performer by raw rasterization, but its memory capacity and driver certification for ISV applications give it a different kind of value. The benchmark scores for this GPU are empty in the FACT PACK, so quantitative GPU-specific scores are unavailable; the analysis must lean on the architectural specs and the combined system percentile of 70. What the data implies is that this is a balanced professional laptop GPU — not a halo gaming part, but one whose 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are oriented toward sustained, memory-hungry workloads rather than peak frame rates.

# Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks are extensive and paint a clear picture of the Intel Core i9-13980HX's capabilities. In 3DMark tests, the processor scores 1145 in single-thread, 2207 in 2-thread, 4177 in 4-thread, 7290 in 8-thread, 9440 in 16-thread, and 12601 in max-thread runs. The scaling from 8 to 16 to max threads shows strong multicore headroom: 7290 to 9440 is a 29.5% gain, and 9440 to 12601 is another 33.5% gain. Cinebench results reinforce this: R15 multicore is 4717 with a single-core of 304.5; R20 multicore is 16187 with single-core 2285; R23 multicore is 30273 with single-core 2110. The R23 multicore score of 30273 is a strong indicator for rendering and compilation workloads, while the single-core 2110 confirms solid per-thread performance for legacy or lightly threaded tasks.

PassMark results add another dimension. Multithread score is 46409, single-thread is 4252. Integer math hits 166455, floating-point math 118645, and extended instructions 33868. Data compression scores 588306, encryption 35332, and random string sorting 66125. Physics is 2575 and find prime numbers is 191. These numbers suggest a CPU that excels at parallel integer and floating-point operations, with very high throughput for compression and sorting tasks — all typical of content creation and scientific computing.

The CPU's percentile vs. all CPUs is 90, meaning it outperforms 90% of all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 50398. Nearest rivals show how tight the competition is at the top: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 scores 50448 with a delta of -0.1%, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 50718 with -0.6%, the Intel Core i7-13850HX scores 50761 with -0.7%, and the Intel Core 9 273PE scores 49845 with +1.1%. These deltas are all within roughly one percentage point, indicating that the i9-13980HX is in a dead heat with its closest competitors — the data shows a cluster of high-end mobile and desktop parts separated by margins that are practically noise.

The combined percentile for the CPU+GPU pairing is 70, which is lower than the CPU's individual 90th percentile. This gap is explained by the GPU's 50th percentile ranking, dragging the system average down. The data suggests a laptop that is CPU-dominant in benchmark terms, with the GPU serving as a competent but not exceptional performer relative to the broader GPU landscape.

# Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i9-13980HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform — there is no CPU upgrade path in the traditional sense. The processor is part of the Raptor Lake-HX family, built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is supported, which is notable for workstation use. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is the interface for high-speed storage and potentially external GPU enclosures, though the laptop form factor limits expansion.

The GPU is a mobile part with a TDP of 110 W and no power connectors — it is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) in the sense of being soldered onto the motherboard, not a replaceable MXM module. Its production status is end-of-life, so any upgrade would require a new laptop rather than a component swap. The suggested PSU field is null, which means no specific power supply recommendation is provided; the 110 W GPU TDP and 55 W CPU TDP suggest a combined thermal envelope that a typical high-end laptop power brick can handle, but exact wattage figures are not in the FACT PACK.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points to the GPU as the limiting factor. The CPU's 90th percentile rank and strong multicore scores suggest it has headroom for more demanding graphics hardware, but the laptop form factor and BGA socket preclude component-level upgrades. A user looking to improve performance would need to consider a new machine with a higher-percentile GPU, as the CPU is unlikely to be the bottleneck in most workloads. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives some flexibility for a system builder, but in a soldered mobile platform, even memory upgrades may be limited by the manufacturer's design.

# Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the CPU and GPU is asymmetric. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile, while the GPU is at the 50th. In CPU-bound workloads — compilation, data processing, physics simulation — the i9-13980HX will deliver top-tier performance. The 3DMark max-thread score of 12601 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 30273 are evidence of a processor that can sustain heavy parallel loads. The nearest rival data, with deltas under 1%, shows that the CPU is competitive with the best available options.

In GPU-bound workloads — gaming at high resolutions, 3D rendering with ray tracing, video encoding — the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile's 50th percentile becomes the limiting factor. The 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are respectable but not class-leading. For a laptop with a 90th percentile CPU, the GPU will bottleneck in graphically intensive tasks. The data shows no measured FPS for this exact combination, so FPS scaling cannot be quantified, but the percentile gap is a strong qualitative indicator: a 40-percentage-point difference between CPU and GPU ranks means the GPU will hold the CPU back in most graphical workloads.

Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks, the GPU's lower rank is irrelevant. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for large textures and datasets, so memory capacity is not a bottleneck even if raw compute is. The system's combined percentile of 70, between the CPU's 90 and GPU's 50, reflects this imbalance — the whole is weaker than its strongest part. For a balanced system, a GPU in the 70th-80th percentile would be a better match, but the data shows this pairing is CPU-forward by design.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile rank and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Core i9-13980HX has a percentile rank of 90 against all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 90% of CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 50398, and it is within 1% of its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (-0.1%) and Intel Core i7-13850HX (-0.7%).

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate.

Q: Is the GPU good for gaming?

A: The GPU has a 50th percentile rank against all GPUs, placing it at the median. With 3072 shading units and 9.400 TFLOPS FP32, it can handle gaming, but it is not a top-tier performer. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so gaming performance is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The CPU uses Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-HX codename), built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, along with DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. This is a feature typically valued in workstation environments where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for the CPU+GPU pairing is 70, which reflects the CPU's strong 90th percentile and the GPU's median 50th percentile. The system is CPU-dominant in benchmark terms.

Q: Can the CPU be upgraded?

A: No, the CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. The GPU is also soldered (IGP slot width, no power connectors), so component-level upgrades are not possible in this laptop form factor.

# Who Should Build It

The Intel Core i9-13980HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile pairing is a laptop-class system with a CPU-forward performance profile. The CPU's 90th percentile rank and strong multicore scores — Cinebench R23 multicore of 30273, PassMark multithread of 46409 — make it suitable for users whose primary workloads are processor-intensive. Software developers compiling large codebases, data scientists running batch processing, and researchers executing simulations would benefit from the 24 cores and 32 threads. The 3DMark max-thread score of 12601 and integer math score of 166455 indicate strong parallel compute for these tasks.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering or video encoding would also find value. The PassMark data compression score of 588306 and floating-point math of 118645 suggest efficient handling of media processing. The 16 GB VRAM on the GPU is a boon for GPU-accelerated rendering or machine learning inference, even if the GPU's raw compute is mid-tier. Students in engineering or computer science programs, and small business workstations running multi-threaded productivity suites, would see the CPU's 90th percentile shine.

Gamers, however, should note the GPU's 50th percentile. For high-refresh gaming at high resolutions, the GPU is the limiting factor. Users who prioritize gaming over compute should look elsewhere, but for those who need a professional workstation that can also game at moderate settings, this pairing is viable. The 16 GB VRAM ensures modern game textures fit, but the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 caps peak performance.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 50th percentile rank suggests it can handle competitive titles at lower settings or resolutions, but the CPU's 90th percentile will be underutilized. No measured FPS data exists; the 3072 shading units and 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 point to moderate frame rates. At 1080p with optimized settings, expect playable but not elite performance; at 1440p or 4K, the GPU will bottleneck.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads can handle encoding and streaming overhead without breaking a sweat. The 3DMark max-thread score of 12601 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 30273 suggest plenty of headroom for simultaneous game capture and encode. The GPU's hardware encoder, part of the Turing architecture, can offload some work, but the CPU alone is sufficient.

Video editing: CPU-based timeline editing and export will be fast, given the PassMark integer math of 166455 and multithread score of 46409. The 16 GB VRAM accelerates GPU effects and color grading, and the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth handles 4K and 8K footage. The 50th percentile GPU may slow GPU-only renders, but hybrid workflows benefit from the CPU's strength.

3D rendering: CPU rendering in software like Blender or 3ds Max will excel, with Cinebench R23 multicore of 30273 indicating strong performance. GPU rendering with CUDA or OptiX will be limited by the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 and 48 RT cores, which are mid-tier. The 16 GB VRAM allows large scenes, but render times will be slower than with a higher-percentile GPU.

Software development: Compilation and test execution are CPU-bound, and the 90th percentile rank shows top-tier performance. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9440 and PassMark multithread of 46409 support parallel builds. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds or server-like workloads.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic productivity, but the 90th percentile CPU ensures responsiveness in any office suite. The PassMark single-thread score of 4252 handles spreadsheet and document tasks instantly. The 16 GB VRAM is unused, but the system's thermal and power profile — 55 W CPU TDP and 110 W GPU TDP — is manageable for a laptop.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class system (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the Intel Core i9-13980HX with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-HX part with a 90th percentile rank, while the GPU is a Turing architecture professional card with a 50th percentile rank. The combined percentile is 70, placing the system in the upper-mid tier of the database's overall distribution. The CPU's average benchmark score of 50398 and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM make this a workstation-oriented configuration, but the GPU's median rank prevents it from being a top-tier gaming or rendering machine. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $668, stated once here as a reference point.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13980HX is the centerpiece of this system. It has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The architecture is Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX codename, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. This cache configuration supports the high multicore scores seen in benchmarks.

The CPU's TDP is 55 W, which is modest for a 24-core part, suggesting efficient power management. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC capability — a professional feature. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 lanes provides high-speed connectivity for storage and peripherals. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 offers a fallback display output. The multiplier is unlocked, indicating overclocking potential if the laptop BIOS allows it.

Benchmark scores are uniformly strong. In 3DMark, the max-thread score of 12601 and single-thread score of 1145 show both parallel and single-core strength. Cinebench R23 multicore of 30273 and single-core of 2110 are competitive. PassMark multithread of 46409 and single-thread of 4252 confirm the pattern. The nearest rivals — AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT, Intel Core i7-13850HX, and Intel Core 9 273PE — are all within 1.1% of this CPU's average score, indicating a tightly contested high-end segment. The 90th percentile rank is justified by this data.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows. All gaming performance discussed here is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as qualitative expectations rather than exact figures. The GPU's 50th percentile rank, 3072 shading units, and 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 suggest it can run most games at 1080p with medium-to-high settings, but it will struggle at higher resolutions or with ray tracing enabled. The 48 RT cores are present but from the first-generation Turing implementation, which is less efficient than later RT hardware.

The CPU's 90th percentile rank means it will not be a bottleneck in gaming. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1145 and PassMark single-thread of 4252 indicate strong per-core performance for game logic and physics. The 16 GB VRAM ensures that even large texture packs will fit without stuttering. However, the GPU's median rank caps the frame rate ceiling. For competitive esports titles at 1080p with low settings, the system should deliver high frame rates, but for AAA titles at 1440p or 4K, expect 30-60 FPS at best, depending on the title and settings. The data suggests a system that games competently but is not a gaming-first machine.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13980HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13980HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds