SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13980HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

76%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13980HX

50,398 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

1,285 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13980HX paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a laptop configuration defined by a stark performance dichotomy. The processor is a 24-core Raptor Lake-HX flagship that posts top-tier multi-threaded scores, placing it in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics solution is a Turing-based professional card that sits at the 7th percentile, a level of performance comparable to entry-level desktop GPUs from over a decade ago. This pairing creates a system that excels in CPU-bound productivity and development tasks but is severely constrained in graphical workloads, making it a specialized tool for specific professional niches rather than a balanced performer.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core i9-13980HX?

A: The CPU features 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU performance compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370?

A: The i9-13980HX has an average benchmark score of 50398, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 scores 50448. This makes the Intel part 0.1% slower than its rival, a negligible difference.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile?

A: The GPU is equipped with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is based on the Turing architecture and includes 30 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What is the performance percentile of the GPU compared to all other GPUs?

A: The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile sits in the 7th percentile, indicating that 93% of all GPUs in the database benchmark higher than it.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core i9-13980HX?

A: The launch MSRP is $668.

Q: What is the combined percentile rank for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 49, placing it near the median of all benchmarked system configurations.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data illustrates a profound imbalance where the CPU is the dominant component and the GPU is the definitive limiting factor in almost all graphics-related workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 50398 places it in the 90th percentile, a figure that dwarfs the GPU's average score of 1285, which sits in the 7th percentile. This represents a massive performance gulf; the processor is capable of feeding data far faster than the graphics card can render it.

In gaming or 3D rendering scenarios, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile will be the bottleneck, capping frame rates and extending render times regardless of the CPU's capabilities. The CPU's high thread count and clock speeds are largely irrelevant when the GPU is saturated. Conversely, in CPU-intensive tasks like code compilation, data compression, or physics simulations, the i9-13980HX will operate at full capacity, while the GPU remains underutilized. The system is effectively a high-performance workstation CPU paired with a legacy entry-level GPU, making the latter the hard ceiling for any graphics-dependent application. This is not a balanced configuration; it is a CPU-centric platform where the GPU serves as a basic display adapter and modest accelerator for professional workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13980HX is a 24-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture and a 10 nm process node. Its 5.60 GHz boost clock is among the highest in the mobile segment, and the 36 MB of shared L3 cache helps drive strong single-threaded performance. The benchmark results confirm this: the CPU achieves a 3DMark single-thread score of 1145 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2110, demonstrating excellent responsiveness for lightly-threaded applications.

The multi-threaded results are where this chip truly shines. The 3DMark max-threads score of 12601 and the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30273 indicate exceptional parallel processing power. The Passmark multithread score of 46409 further reinforces this, with strong integer math performance (166455) and floating-point math (118645) that are suited for complex simulations and data analysis. The processor also shows high efficiency in data compression (588306) and encryption (35332), making it a formidable tool for archiving, database work, and security-related tasks. Its average benchmark score of 50398 places it in the 90th percentile, with a performance delta of only -0.1% compared to the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 and -0.6% compared to the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT. This places it at the very top of the mobile performance hierarchy, rivaling desktop-class processors.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is tailored for professionals who prioritize raw CPU computation over graphics fidelity. The primary audience is software developers and data scientists who require immense parallel processing power for compiling large codebases, running test suites, or executing complex data transforms. The high Passmark integer and floating-point scores directly translate to faster build times and quicker data analysis.

Content creators working with video encoding or 3D scene simulation that relies heavily on CPU physics could benefit, although the GPU would severely hamper any GPU-accelerated rendering. Students in engineering or computer science fields who need to run heavy simulations or compile code would find the CPU performance exceptional, but they would be limited to non-graphical or CPU-rendered tasks. For small business workstations, this system could serve as a powerful server or calculation node, but it is not suited for design work. The 24 cores and high memory bandwidth make it a compelling choice for virtualization, but the GPU's low 7th percentile ranking means it is not a viable option for any workflow involving modern 3D graphics or GPU compute.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a clear narrative of CPU dominance and GPU limitation. The Intel Core i9-13980HX achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30273, a figure that underscores its capability in heavily threaded workloads. Its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2110 is also strong, ensuring snappy performance in everyday tasks. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9440 shows a significant scaling from the 8-thread score of 7290, confirming the efficiency of its core layout and cache hierarchy.

In contrast, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile's only benchmark result is a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1285. This places the GPU in the 7th percentile, with a performance delta of -0.6% compared to the AMD Radeon R9 380 and +0.3% compared to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610. The combined percentile for the system is 49, which is dragged down entirely by the GPU's poor showing. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking is the only reason the system does not fall into the bottom quartile. This pairing presents a picture of a workstation CPU shackled to a GPU that is a generation behind and several tiers below its intended class.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the FACT PACK; all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. Given the GPU's 7th percentile ranking and its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1285, which is on par with the GeForce GT 610, gaming performance is expected to be minimal. The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, despite having 1920 shading units and 30 RT cores, is severely limited by its 6 GB memory buffer and low raw compute power (5.299 TFLOPS FP32).

For modern titles at 1080p, the data suggests that this system would only be capable of running games at the lowest settings and likely at low frame rates. The GPU is the bottleneck, and the CPU's performance is irrelevant in this context. Esports titles might be playable at low resolutions, but the experience would be poor. The estimates indicate that this is not a gaming laptop; it is a professional workstation where gaming is a secondary, barely supported function. Users should expect frame rates well below 60 FPS in most contemporary games, even at 720p.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a professional mobile GPU based on the Turing architecture and built on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It features 1920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 30 RT cores and 240 Tensor Cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 945 MHz with a boost clock of 1380 MHz. While the presence of RT and Tensor cores suggests some modern capabilities, the performance is anchored by its memory subsystem: 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus yields 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The benchmark data is unambiguous: its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1285 places it in the 7th percentile, with nearest rivals including the GeForce GT 610 and AMD Radeon R9 380. This indicates that the GPU's rendering performance is comparable to entry-level graphics cards from the early 2010s. The FP32 performance of 5.299 TFLOPS and texture rate of 165.6 GTexel/s are far below what modern professional or consumer GPUs offer. While it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, the raw compute power is insufficient for any demanding rendering task. It is an end-of-life product, and the data confirms it is only suitable for basic display output, not for GPU-accelerated rendering or modern gaming.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs a flagship 13th Gen Intel Core processor with an end-of-life professional mobile GPU. The Intel Core i9-13980HX is a 24-core Raptor Lake-HX part that represents the pinnacle of mobile CPU performance, achieving a 90th percentile ranking. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, however, is a Turing-generation part from 2019 that has fallen to the 7th percentile, making it one of the weakest GPUs in the database.

The result is a system with a combined percentile of 49, a position that reflects the severe imbalance between components. This is not a high-performance multimedia or gaming machine; it is a CPU-compute powerhouse with a legacy graphics adapter. The build's overall tier is defined by its CPU, which is a top-tier mobile processor. The GPU, however, downgrades the entire system to a mid-range tier in terms of combined capability, making it a niche product for specific professional workloads where CPU power is paramount and graphics are an afterthought.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is built for the Intel BGA 1964 socket and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, offering high bandwidth for next-generation storage devices. The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 80 W. The system's memory controller supports ECC memory, a feature critical for professional workstations that require data integrity.

As a laptop build, the upgrade path is largely restricted to memory and storage. The primary limitation for any upgrade is the GPU, which is a soldered or MXM module (as per slot width) that is likely not user-replaceable in most chassis. Given the CPU's performance, the most sensible next upgrade would be to replace the entire platform with a newer laptop that features a modern GPU, as the current GPU is the bottleneck that prevents the system from achieving its full potential. The CPU's performance would remain relevant for years, but the GPU's 7th percentile ranking makes it obsolete for any graphical task.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: Not recommended. The GPU's estimated performance, based on its 1285 3DMark score, is far too low to drive high refresh rates at any modern resolution. The CPU is capable, but the GPU is the bottleneck.
Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and high Passmark multithread score (46409) can handle software encoding for streaming. However, the GPU's low performance limits the gaming side of the stream, making this a poor choice for a streaming setup.
Video Editing: The CPU will handle 4K timeline scrubbing and effect processing with ease, given its high multi-core scores. However, the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and low compute power will severely hamper GPU-accelerated effects and final render times, making this a mixed experience.
3D Rendering: This is the weakest scenario. The GPU's 7th percentile ranking means any GPU-based renderer (like Octane or Redshift) will perform terribly. CPU-based rendering will be fast, but the system is a poor fit for modern 3D workflows.
Software Development: Excellent. The i9-13980HX's high integer math score (166455) and 32 threads make code compilation and test execution very fast. The GPU is irrelevant for this workload, making this the ideal use case.
Student and Office Work: The CPU ensures a highly responsive system for multitasking, spreadsheets, and document editing. The GPU is sufficient for basic display output, so this scenario works well, though the system is overkill for such tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13980HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13980HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds