SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13980HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13980HX

50,398 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13980HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a flagship-class laptop combination: a 24-core Raptor Lake-HX mobile CPU sitting in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, matched to an Ada Lovelace mobile GPU in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, for a combined build percentile of 86. This is a desktop-replacement configuration in the truest sense, with the CPU carrying a 55 W TDP and the GPU a 110 W TDP — figures that belong in thick-chassis machines rather than thin-and-lights. One important caveat frames everything below: this exact pairing has no measured FPS rows in the database, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores rather than directly measured gameplay.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-13980HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 257 mm² die fabricated in-house by Intel. It belongs to the Raptor Lake-HX family, the top tier of Intel's 13th Gen mobile lineup, and it carries an unlocked multiplier — a rarity in the mobile segment. Base clock sits at 2.20 GHz with a boost ceiling of 5.60 GHz, and the cache hierarchy is deep: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. That L3 pool is large enough to keep heavily threaded workloads fed without constant trips to main memory, which the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 bus serves.

The benchmark profile tells a clear story about hybrid throughput. In Cinebench R23, the chip posts 30273 points multi-core against 2110 points single-core — a threading scaling ratio of roughly 14:1 across 32 threads, which is exactly what you want to see from a 24-core part with P-cores that can reach 5.60 GHz. Single-thread strength is confirmed across the suite: 304.5 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 2285 in R20 single-core, and 4252 in PassMark single-thread. That last figure matters most for everyday responsiveness, because most desktop applications and many game engines still lean on a few fast threads.

Thread scaling is visible in the 3DMark CPU profile: 1145 single-thread, 2207 at two threads, 4177 at four, 7290 at eight, 9440 at sixteen, and 12601 at maximum threads. Two things stand out. First, the jump from one to eight threads is nearly linear, which benefits game engines with modern threading models. Second, the curve flattens noticeably from sixteen to maximum threads — 9440 to 12601 — reflecting the hybrid design where efficiency cores extend total throughput rather than per-thread speed. For developers and creators running compile jobs or renders, that max-thread headroom is where the chip earns its keep; PassMark multithread confirms it at 46409.

Against its field, the i9-13980HX ranks in the 90th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 50398. Its nearest rivals are remarkably tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 averages 50448 (a deltaPct of -0.1, effectively a tie), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT sits at 50718 (-0.6), and Intel's own Core i7-13850HX averages 50761 (-0.7). Only the Intel Core 9 273PE falls behind the 13980HX, at 49845 (1.1). In practical terms, this CPU trades blows within one percent of the chips immediately around it — including a desktop Ryzen 9 — while being a mobile part.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture is anchored by a combined percentile of 86, meaning this pairing outperforms the overwhelming majority of systems in the database. The CPU's average benchmark score of 50398 and the GPU's 38135 come from different test suites, so the meaningful comparison is percentile placement: 90th percentile for the CPU versus 81st for the GPU. The CPU is the relatively stronger of the two components.

On the CPU side, the headline results are the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30273, the PassMark multithread score of 46409, and the max-thread 3DMark CPU score of 12601. Supporting results round out the picture: 4717 multi-core and 304.5 single-core in Cinebench R15, 16187 multi-core and 2285 single-core in R20, plus PassMark subtests including integer math at 166455, floating point at 118645, data compression at 588306, encryption at 35332, extended instructions at 33868, physics at 2575, prime finding at 191, and string sorting at 66125.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4080 Mobile posts a PassMark G3D score of 24926, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 159575, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 145807. The PassMark GPU compute result of 11191 and the older DirectX subtests (286 for DX9, 244 for DX11, 157 for DX10, 96 for DX12) provide legacy context. Its rivals by average score are an odd but instructive list: the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 at 38299 (deltaPct -0.4), the RTX 5080 Mobile at 38349 (-0.6), the desktop RTX 4070 at 37648 (1.3), and the Tesla P4 at 37628 (1.3). The data shows the RTX 4080 Mobile scoring within a fraction of a percent of a next-generation mobile flagship and slightly ahead of a desktop RTX 4070 by average score — a strong statement for a 110 W mobile part.

Taken together, the data indicates a system where both components clear the 80th percentile simultaneously, which is the hallmark of a balanced flagship laptop rather than a lopsided one.

Gaming Performance

To restate clearly: no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the database. Everything in this section is an estimate derived from benchmark scores, not measured gameplay.

Working from the RTX 4080 Mobile's PassMark G3D score of 24926 and its 81st-percentile standing, frame-rate expectations can be framed qualitatively. At 1080p with ultra settings, the raw compute on tap — 24.72 TFLOPS FP32, 7424 shading units, 432 GB/s of memory bandwidth — points toward high frame rates in esports titles and comfortably playable ultra-settings frame rates in modern AAA releases. At 1440p, the 192-bit bus and 12 GB of GDDR6 provide enough headroom that estimated frame rates should remain in high-refresh territory for most titles, with the heaviest ray-traced workloads relying on the 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores to keep DLSR-class reconstruction viable.

The CPU side supports high-refresh play: a 3DMark max-thread score of 12601 and a single-thread score of 1145, backed by a 5.60 GHz boost clock, mean the processor should not be the limiting factor in CPU-heavy game engines at mainstream resolutions. Where estimated FPS would dip — 4K ultra with ray tracing enabled in the most demanding engines — the bottleneck shifts entirely to the GPU, which is the expected behavior for this class of pairing. These are estimates from synthetic positioning; actual in-game results will vary by title, driver, and the laptop's power delivery.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentile data identifies the CPU as the relatively stronger component: 90th percentile versus the GPU's 81st. In a laptop this is actually the preferable imbalance, because the GPU is far more often the limiting factor in games, and giving the GPU the headroom advantage protects frame rates in GPU-bound scenarios.

Evidence from the benchmark scores supports this division of labor. The 3DMark CPU thread scaling (1145 single-thread up to 12601 max-thread) shows the i9-13980HX has threading capacity to spare for any game engine — even the sixteen-thread score of 9440 exceeds what most titles can saturate. Meanwhile, the RTX 4080 Mobile's G3D score of 24926 and its 192-bit bus place a hard ceiling on rasterization throughput at high resolutions and settings. In productivity, the imbalance reverses: the 30273 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is the dominant resource, and the GPU's 159575 Geekbench OpenCL result becomes the ceiling for GPU-accelerated rendering and compute.

For streaming, the picture is well balanced. NVENC-style encoding load falls on the GPU's fixed-function hardware while the CPU's 32 threads absorb game, encoder-control, and chat overhead simultaneously — the 46409 PassMark multithread score indicates substantial spare capacity for concurrent workloads. The one genuine constraint is thermal, not computational: a 55 W CPU TDP plus a 110 W GPU TDP in a single chassis means sustained all-core loads will depend on the laptop's cooling capacity, which the database does not measure.

FAQ

Q: How does the i9-13980HX compare to its closest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 50398 is within a tenth of a percent of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (50448, deltaPct -0.1), about half a percent behind the Ryzen 9 5900XT (50718, -0.6) and Core i7-13850HX (50761, -0.7), and about one percent ahead of the Intel Core 9 273PE (49845, 1.1). Effectively, it performs on par with its immediate peer group.

Q: Is this CPU good for multitasking and heavy workloads?

A: Yes. With 24 cores and 32 threads, a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30273, and a PassMark multithread score of 46409, the data shows desktop-class throughput in a mobile package.

Q: Can this pairing handle 1440p gaming?

A: By estimate, yes. No measured FPS data exists for this combination, but the RTX 4080 Mobile's 24926 G3D score, 12 GB of GDDR6, and 81st-percentile ranking indicate strong 1440p capability.

Q: Is the RTX 4080 Mobile ray-tracing capable?

A: It has 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores on the Ada Lovelace architecture, with DirectX 12 Ultimate support — the hardware profile indicates yes, though estimated frame rates under heavy path tracing will depend on upscaling.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: The multiplier is unlocked, which is uncommon for mobile parts, giving system integrators and enthusiasts tuning headroom within thermal limits.

Q: What memory does the platform support?

A: The i9-13980HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and supports ECC memory.

Q: Are measured frame rates available for this build?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU+GPU pairing; all frame-rate discussion is estimated from synthetic benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of a 1145-point 3DMark single-thread score, 5.60 GHz boost clocks, and the RTX 4080 Mobile's 24926 G3D score points to a system that can drive high-refresh displays at 1080p and 1440p. Estimated frame rates in competitive titles should comfortably exceed standard 60 Hz monitors given the GPU's 81st-percentile standing.

Streaming: The 46409 PassMark multithread score and 32 threads mean game, encoding, and broadcast overhead can coexist without contention, while the GPU's fixed-function video hardware offloads the encode. This is one of the workloads where the CPU's 90th-percentile ranking translates directly into a smoother broadcast.

Video editing: GPU acceleration benefits from the 159575 Geekbench OpenCL score and 12 GB of GDDR6, while timeline scrubbing, proxies, and exports lean on the 30273 Cinebench R23 multi-core result and 36 MB of shared L3. The PassMark data compression score of 588306 also helps with codec-heavy pipelines.

3D rendering: The max-thread 3DMark CPU score of 12601 and Cinebench throughput make CPU renders fast, and the 145807 Geekbench Vulkan result indicates a capable GPU render path. Ada's 232 tensor cores add an inference-acceleration option for AI-assisted denoising workflows.

Software development: Compiling is one of the best-threaded real-world workloads, and the PassMark integer math score of 166455 plus near-linear 3DMark scaling from one to eight threads (1145 to 7290) indicate fast builds. Container workloads and local test environments benefit from the 32-thread capacity.

Student and office work: For document work, browsing, and web apps, the 4252 PassMark single-thread score and 5.60 GHz boost deliver snappy everyday responsiveness — though this hardware is far more than typical office tasks require. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 also allows low-power operation when the discrete GPU is idle.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets buyers who need desktop-class compute in a portable chassis. Content creators running video editing, 3D rendering, or GPU-compute workloads are the clearest fit: a 90th-percentile CPU and an 81st-percentile GPU in one system cover both sides of an accelerated pipeline. Gamers who want 1440p-class performance — or high-refresh 1080p — in a laptop will find the estimated capability sufficient, though measured FPS data is absent and buyers should verify per-title benchmarks. Developers who compile large codebases benefit from the 24-core layout, and students in engineering, rendering, or machine-learning programs get workstation-grade throughput (58 RT cores, 232 tensor cores) for coursework. Small businesses needing a mobile workstation with ECC memory support for data-integrity-sensitive work also fall within the target audience, since the i9-13980HX supports ECC. The launch MSRP of the CPU alone was $668, which signals the flagship tier of the entire configuration. Casual users and office-only buyers would be paying for capacity they cannot use.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop) pairing Intel's top-bin 13th Gen Raptor Lake-HX mobile flagship with NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace RTX 4080 Mobile. The tier is unambiguous: 90th percentile CPU, 81st percentile GPU, 86th combined percentile. In database terms, this system outranks roughly six of every seven systems on record, placing it in flagship desktop-replacement territory. The CPU is socketed on Intel BGA 1964 — ball-grid array, meaning soldered and non-replaceable — which is standard for HX-class chips and reinforces that the upgrade path runs through the whole machine, not the socket. The GPU connects over PCIe 4.0 x16, runs at a 110 W TDP, requires no external power connectors (IGP-style integration into the laptop platform), and the platform's total sustained power budget is defined by the chassis, not a desktop PSU spec.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4080 Mobile is built on the AD104 chip, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The die measures 294 mm² and packs 35800 million transistors, for a density of 121.8 million transistors per square millimetre. The architecture is Ada Lovelace, the generation is GeForce 40 Mobile, and the card sits between the GeForce 30 Mobile and GeForce 50 Mobile generations in NVIDIA's lineage.

The hardware allocation is generous for a mobile part: 7424 shading units, 232 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 58 RT cores, and 232 tensor cores. Clocks run from a 1290 MHz base to a 1665 MHz boost, with memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). That memory is 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Throughput figures follow: 24.72 TFLOPS FP32, FP16 at a 1:1 ratio for the same 24.72 TFLOPS, a pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 386.3 GTexel/s. API support covers DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

For rendering workloads, the benchmark scores map directly onto capability. The 159575 Geekbench OpenCL score indicates strong general GPU compute for OpenCL-based renderers, and the 145807 Vulkan score covers modern engine pipelines. The 11191 PassMark GPU compute result and the 24926 G3D score position the GPU for high-detail real-time work. In ray-traced rendering, the 58 RT cores handle BVH traversal while the 232 tensor cores accelerate denoising and AI upscaling; the 432 GB/s of bandwidth keeps texture-heavy scenes resident, and 12 GB of VRAM is sufficient for most current 1440p workloads without texture compromise.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform constraints are strict because this is a BGA laptop. The CPU is soldered to Intel BGA 1964, so there is no socket-level CPU upgrade. The GPU is integrated into the laptop platform with no external power connectors, so it is likewise fixed. What remains upgradable is memory and storage: the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus with ECC support, so a configuration shipping with DDR4 can be validated for DDR5 by the manufacturer, and the 20 lanes of PCIe Gen 5 from the CPU (CPU only, per the spec) provide fast storage lanes where the chassis exposes them.

Power headroom is defined by the laptop's design: a 55 W CPU TDP and a 110 W GPU TDP sum to a sustained platform draw that the chassis cooling must handle, and no suggested PSU figure applies because there is no desktop PSU — the comparison point is the laptop's own AC adapter and thermal design. Buyers evaluating this pairing should treat the machine as a sealed unit: check the vendor's cooling validation and warranty rather than planning component upgrades.

A sensible next upgrade is therefore generational, not incremental. The RTX 4080 Mobile's successor generation is GeForce 50 Mobile, and the database shows the RTX 5080 Mobile averaging 38349 — only a deltaPct of -0.6 from this GPU's 38135 — indicating that a same-tier next-generation jump yields marginal gains by average score. On the CPU side, the data shows the Core 9 273PE at 49845, 1.1 percent behind the 13980HX's 50398. The practical conclusion: owners of this pairing are already at the plateau of the performance curve by these metrics, and a meaningful step up requires moving to a higher tier of hardware rather than an adjacent generation.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13980HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13980HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds