SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13980HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13980HX

50,398 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile pairs an AD107 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1545 MHz and boosts to 1890 MHz, while the 8 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed across a 128-bit bus, yielding 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is modest by modern standards, but the 128-bit interface keeps power efficiency high — the GPU's TDP is 115 W, and it uses no power connectors, indicating it draws power entirely through the motherboard slot.

The RTX 4060 Mobile contains 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. For ray tracing and AI workloads, it packs 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores. Pixel rate reaches 90.72 GPixel/s, texture rate hits 181.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is rated at 11.61 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). These specs place it as a mainstream mobile GPU — not a flagship, but far from entry-level. The API support is comprehensive: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which means it can handle modern rendering features like mesh shaders and variable rate shading.

Benchmark scores tell a nuanced story. The GPU scores 17,469 in Passmark G3D, which is the overall graphics benchmark, but 6,816 in Passmark GPU Compute, indicating compute performance lags behind rasterization. In Geekbench, it scores 89,420 in OpenCL and 89,569 in Vulkan, showing strong cross-API consistency. The Passmark DirectX scores are revealing: DirectX 9 scores 216, DirectX 11 scores 157, DirectX 12 scores 73, and DirectX 10 scores 107. The low DirectX 12 score relative to DirectX 11 suggests that the GPU's performance under modern graphics APIs may be more constrained than legacy API performance would indicate, possibly due to driver overhead or architectural trade-offs. The Passmark G2D score of 730 reflects 2D desktop performance, which is adequate for office tasks.

The GPU's percentile versus all GPUs is 67, meaning it outperforms two-thirds of the database. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, with the RTX 4060 Mobile trailing by only 0.7% in average score. This is notable because the RTX 2080 is a desktop card from a previous generation, highlighting how far mobile GPUs have advanced. The RTX 4060 Mobile also edges out the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT by 0.8% and trails the Intel Arc B580 by 1.3%, while leading the RTX 5060 Mobile by 1.3%. These tight margins suggest the RTX 4060 Mobile sits in a competitive sweet spot for 1080p and 1440p rendering, though its 8 GB VRAM and 256 GB/s bandwidth may limit 4K texture-heavy workloads.

For rendering workloads, the 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 and 11.61 TFLOPS FP16 compute are sufficient for real-time graphics but not for heavy offline rendering. The 24 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is essential for games with ray-traced lighting, but the modest RT core count means ray tracing at high resolutions will likely require DLSS upscaling to maintain playable frame rates. The 96 tensor cores support DLSS and other AI-accelerated features, which can significantly boost effective performance in supported titles.

# Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i9-13980HX delivers exceptional CPU performance across all benchmark suites. In 3DMark, it scores 1,145 in single-thread, 2,207 in 2-thread, 4,177 in 4-thread, 7,290 in 8-thread, 9,440 in 16-thread, and 12,601 in max-thread tests. These scores show strong scaling from 1 to 24 cores, with the max-thread score being 11 times the single-thread score, indicating excellent multi-threading efficiency. In Cinebench, the CPU scores 304.5 in R15 single-core and 4,717 in R15 multi-core; 2,285 in R20 single-core and 16,187 in R20 multi-core; and 2,110 in R23 single-core and a massive 30,273 in R23 multi-core. The R23 multi-core score is particularly impressive, as it demonstrates sustained performance across all 24 cores.

Passmark results further confirm the CPU's strength: 4,252 in single-thread, 46,409 in multi-thread, 118,645 in floating-point math, 166,455 in integer math, 588,306 in data compression, 35,332 in data encryption, 33,868 in extended instructions, 191 in find prime numbers, 66,125 in random string sorting, and 2,575 in physics. The data compression and floating-point scores are standout numbers, indicating strong performance in content creation and scientific workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score is 50,398, placing it in the 90th percentile versus all CPUs — meaning it outperforms 90% of all CPUs in the database.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 22,729, placing it in the 67th percentile versus all GPUs. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 79, which reflects the CPU's dominance pulling up the overall position. The CPU's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370, which scores 50,448 — just 0.1% higher. The Intel Core i7-13850HX scores 50,761 (0.7% higher), while the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 50,718 (0.6% higher). The Intel Core 9 273PE lags by 1.1% at 49,845. These rivals are all close, confirming the i9-13980HX is at the top tier of mobile CPU performance.

The combined picture is a laptop with flagship-level CPU performance and mid-range GPU performance. The CPU is in the top 10% of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the top 33% of all GPUs. This asymmetry is common in mobile workstation and gaming laptops, where the CPU often takes precedence for multi-threaded productivity tasks, while the GPU handles gaming and graphics acceleration. The CPU's 90th percentile versus the GPU's 67th percentile suggests that in CPU-bound workloads, this system will outperform most others, but in GPU-bound tasks, it will be more average.

# Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and relative performance comparisons, not measured results. The data is explicitly marked as not measured.

For 1080p gaming, the RTX 4060 Mobile's 67th percentile GPU score and its near-parity with the RTX 2080 (0.7% slower) suggest it should handle most modern titles at high settings. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 256 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p textures, and the 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 compute is sufficient for rasterized rendering. At 1440p, the GPU will start to feel the strain, especially in VRAM-heavy titles, but DLSS via the 96 tensor cores can help bridge the gap. At 4K, the 256 GB/s bandwidth becomes a bottleneck, and the GPU's 48 ROPs limit pixel throughput, so 4K gaming would require significant upscaling and reduced settings.

The CPU's gaming potential is excellent. The i9-13980HX's 90th percentile score and its 12,601 max-thread 3DMark score indicate it can feed even the most demanding GPUs without bottlenecking. Single-thread performance of 1,145 in 3DMark and 2,110 in Cinebench R23 single-core is strong for game logic and physics, while the 32 threads ensure background tasks don't interfere with gameplay. For esports titles that are CPU-bound, this CPU could push very high frame rates, but the GPU will cap performance in GPU-bound scenarios.

# Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload

The data reveals a clear imbalance: the CPU is in the 90th percentile, while the GPU is in the 67th percentile. In gaming, this means the GPU will be the limiting factor in most graphically intensive titles, especially at higher resolutions where the 256 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM become constraints. The GPU's 67th percentile score and its proximity to the RTX 2080 (0.7% slower) suggest it is a capable mid-range part, but the CPU could easily drive a more powerful GPU if one were available.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, software compilation, and 3D rendering, the CPU will be the star. The 30,273 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 46,409 Passmark multi-thread score indicate the CPU can handle heavy multi-threaded tasks with ease. The GPU will still contribute in GPU-accelerated tasks, but the CPU will not bottleneck these workloads — the GPU might, in some compute tasks, given its 6,816 Passmark GPU Compute score is relatively modest.

The FPS scaling evidence supports this: at lower resolutions like 1080p, the GPU is more likely to be the bottleneck as CPU headroom remains; at higher resolutions, the GPU's memory bandwidth and ROP count become increasingly limiting. Conversely, in productivity tasks that are CPU-bound, the GPU's slower compute (relative to the CPU's dominance) may limit certain GPU-accelerated workflows, but the CPU will excel in pure CPU tasks.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 90th percentile and strong single-thread scores (1,145 in 3DMark single-thread, 4,252 in Passmark single-thread) ensure high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU's 67th percentile caps performance in GPU-bound games. At 1080p with DLSS, this system could achieve high refresh rates in many titles, but at 1440p, expect mid-range performance.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads handle encoding workloads without breaking a sweat — the 588,306 Passmark data compression score and 35,332 data encryption score indicate strong real-time processing. The GPU's NVENC (implied by the 40-series architecture) would offload encoding, but the CPU alone can manage streaming at high bitrates.

Video editing: The CPU's 46,409 Passmark multi-thread score and 118,645 floating-point math score make short work of video rendering, while the GPU's 89,420 Geekbench OpenCL score accelerates effects and exports. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p timelines, but 4K multi-layer edits may hit VRAM limits.

3D rendering: The CPU's 30,273 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is excellent for CPU-based rendering, and the GPU's 6,816 Passmark GPU Compute score supports GPU rendering, but the GPU's compute is not top-tier. For hybrid rendering workflows, the CPU will dominate.

Software development: The CPU's 166,455 integer math score and 33,868 extended instructions score accelerate compilation, and the 32 threads handle parallel builds. The GPU is less relevant here, but its 67th percentile ensures it won't bottleneck most development workloads.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance (4,252 Passmark single-thread) handles office applications instantly, and the GPU's 730 Passmark G2D score ensures smooth desktop rendering. The iGPU (UHD Graphics 770) is also available for basic tasks, potentially saving power.

# Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU combination targets users who need extreme CPU horsepower in a laptop form factor but are satisfied with mid-range GPU performance. Gamers at 1080p who play CPU-intensive titles like esports or simulation games will benefit most from the CPU's 90th percentile performance. Content creators who edit video, render 3D scenes, or work with large datasets will find the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads invaluable — the 30,273 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is a strong indicator of productivity performance.

Software developers who compile large codebases will appreciate the CPU's 166,455 integer math score and 32 threads, which accelerate build times. Students in engineering or data science programs will benefit from the CPU's compute power for simulations and analysis. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or heavy Excel models will see excellent performance, though the GPU is overkill for most office tasks.

The laptop class (buildClass is "laptop") means this is a mobile solution, not a desktop. The i9-13980HX's BGA 1964 socket confirms it is soldered to the motherboard. This pairing is ideal for users who want a single machine that can handle both demanding productivity work and moderate gaming, without sacrificing portability.

# CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-13980HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX codename. It belongs to the Core 13th Gen series and was released on 2023-01-03 with a launch MSRP of $668. The base clock is 2.20 GHz, boosting to 5.60 GHz, and it has a TDP of 55 W. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory supported. The CPU has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only) and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. It is socketed in Intel BGA 1964, has an unlocked multiplier, and is marked as Active in production.

The 24 cores are divided into performance and efficiency cores, which is typical of Raptor Lake. The 32 threads indicate hyperthreading is enabled. The 5.60 GHz boost clock is among the highest in mobile CPUs, explaining the strong single-thread scores. The 36 MB L3 cache is substantial, helping with cache-sensitive workloads like gaming and database operations.

Benchmark scores translate to real-world performance: the 30,273 Cinebench R23 multi-core score means this CPU can render complex 3D scenes faster than nearly all other CPUs — it is in the 90th percentile. The 118,645 Passmark floating-point math score indicates excellent scientific computing performance. The 588,306 data compression score means file archiving and compression tasks complete quickly. The 35,332 data encryption score supports secure communications and VPN throughput. The 33,868 extended instructions score shows strong SIMD performance for multimedia codecs and signal processing.

The nearest rival comparison is telling: the i9-13980HX is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (0.1% slower), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT (0.6% slower), and the Intel Core i7-13850HX (0.7% slower), while beating the Intel Core 9 273PE by 1.1%. This means the i9-13980HX is at the top of the mobile CPU food chain, with only a few rivals matching its overall performance.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-13980HX has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 Gbps effective speed.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The GPU is in the 67th percentile versus all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 22,729, and it is 0.7% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080.

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile?

A: The CPU is in the 90th percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 50,398, and it is 0.1% slower than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13980HX supports ECC memory, along with DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 79, reflecting the CPU's dominance over the GPU in overall system performance.

Q: What is the GPU's thermal design power?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 115 W, uses no power connectors, and is classified as an IGP slot width, meaning it is designed for laptop integration.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which means it is soldered to the laptop motherboard and cannot be upgraded independently. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The GPU is also soldered or integrated (slot width is "IGP"), so GPU upgrades are not possible in this laptop class.

Given the 55 W CPU TDP and 115 W GPU TDP, the total system power draw is manageable for a laptop. The suggested PSU is not listed, but the absence of power connectors on the GPU indicates it draws power from the motherboard. A sensible next upgrade would be increasing memory capacity or speed, as the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5. For storage, the PCIe Gen 5 lanes allow for ultra-fast NVMe SSDs, which would improve load times and data-intensive workloads. The CPU's 36 MB L3 cache and 32 threads ensure the platform remains relevant for years, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM may become a limiting factor for future games at higher resolutions.

The platform is a laptop (buildClass is "laptop"), so upgrades are limited to memory, storage, and potentially the display or battery. The CPU's unlocked multiplier suggests overclocking is possible, but laptop thermals and power delivery constrain this. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU fails or for power-saving tasks.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop build combining the Intel Core i9-13980HX CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile GPU. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-HX processor with a 5.60 GHz boost clock and 36 MB L3 cache, scoring 30,273 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and placing in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace-based RTX 4060 Mobile with 8 GB GDDR6, 256 GB/s bandwidth, 24 RT cores, and 96 tensor cores, scoring 17,469 in Passmark G3D and placing in the 67th percentile of all GPUs.

The combined percentile is 79, indicating this system outperforms 79% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database. The CPU is the dominant component, with a 90th percentile versus the GPU's 67th percentile. This makes the system ideal for CPU-intensive workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, software compilation, and scientific computing, while gaming performance is solid but not top-tier, especially at higher resolutions. The pair's nearest CPU rival is the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (0.1% faster), and the nearest GPU rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (0.7% faster), showing both components sit at competitive performance levels for their respective tiers. This is a high-end mobile workstation-class laptop with gaming capabilities, not a pure gaming machine.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13980HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13980HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds